Meta claims it will find other ways to hire employees from different backgrounds.
See full article...
See full article...
Like child labour, forced labour, or outright slavery, I guess...Meta claims it will find other ways to hire employees from different backgrounds.
Also don't work there.If you consider yourself to be a decent human being, please stop using Meta products. Because their owner isn’t.
Like child labour, forced labour, or outright slavery, I guess...
Also, they'll likely redefine "different backgrounds" as something that enables them to hire only racists, fascists, and neo-nazis.
The most qualified candidate is someone like him, a golf playing, sexist, racist, white dude.Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties, choosing to hire people based on those attributes strikes me as no more logical than declining to hire someone based on those attributes.
If I were a shareholder, I'd want them to focus on hiring the most qualified candidates, even if they're striped aliens from a species with three genders.
He'd be violating a twitter trademark.Why not just replace the logo with a swastika and be done with it, Zuck?
Give yourself some credit. It's not incoherent.I'm increasingly feeling like this image is my daily news brief. I know its a trap, and yet the stupidity of TFGWINTG threatening to invade Canada, Greenland, and Panama, Meta becoming a Twitter clone for Nazis, and...View attachment 99667
We're talking about the same billionaires that literally bankrolled the fall, after all.I was expecting the billionaire class to fall in line, but it's honestly kind of scary just how quickly they're doing it.
You know this is code for “hiring exclusively white men,” right?Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties, choosing to hire people based on those attributes strikes me as no more logical than declining to hire someone based on those attributes.
If I were a shareholder, I'd want them to focus on hiring the most qualified candidates, even if they're striped aliens from a species with three genders.
You know who benfits from this? White, westernized culture. CIS White men, who, despite decades of saying "we only hire the best people" really mean:Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties, choosing to hire people based on those attributes strikes me as no more logical than declining to hire someone based on those attributes.
If I were a shareholder, I'd want them to focus on hiring the most qualified candidates, even if they're striped aliens from a species with three genders.
Weirdly, when companies say they just focus on qualifications and are race/gender/etc blind, what tends to happen is that the people doing the hiring hire mostly people who are like themselves.Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties, choosing to hire people based on those attributes strikes me as no more logical than declining to hire someone based on those attributes.
If I were a shareholder, I'd want them to focus on hiring the most qualified candidates, even if they're striped aliens from a species with three genders.
So, diversity and inclusion. Got it.build an industry-leading workforce and leverage teams made up of world-class people from all types of backgrounds
By some wackity-smackity coincidence, our society of pure meritocracy and quality is all white and all male!You know this is code for “hiring exclusively white men,” right?
This comment makes you seem expendable.The only thing that the DEI group at my company does is send out "_____ History Month!" emails.
They're the most expendable part of a company.
Nobody should be surprised.I was expecting the billionaire class to fall in line, but it's honestly kind of scary just how quickly they're doing it.
Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties, choosing to hire people based on those attributes strikes me as no more logical than declining to hire someone based on those attributes.
If I were a shareholder, I'd want them to focus on hiring the most qualified candidates, even if they're striped aliens from a species with three genders.
This is all missing the most important thing happening, which is that Zuck has ditched the Data look for a Zoomer haircut. And let's be honest, it just does not work. Zuck needs to look weird and own it.
Also don't work there.
If you consider yourself to be a decent human being, please stop using Meta products. Because their owner isn’t.
Nah man, Meta is gonna get them H1Bs for a steal and pay them in Meta scrip. They'll have housing, food, and accommodations too. Arbeit macht frei!You know this is code for “hiring exclusively white men,” right?