Then it to me suggest that the ring is bigger than we think, and the reach is far greater than we know. One diplomat over here in Norway lost her job and is being investigated. Jaglands reputation is done for also, and there is a broad investigation that has started, although as you say, when our intelligence was warned many years ago - no investigation started - until now, but there will be some big political consequences here, our media is blasting everything on the front page.
US DOJ: We investigated this thoroughly and came to the conclusion that Epstein did all this just for his own needs and didn't traffic girls and women to other people. Nothing to see here, move along.
As wide and extensive Epstein's network was, this is a big planet and I'm sure you can find some qualified prosecutor .
I think the statute of limitations has passed for many potential crimes. However, we can certainly make pariahs out of the perpetrators. That the DoJ is covering for the rapists is gross beyond belief.
NO.
The memo is probably just a typo. If you're killing the world's most infamous man you don't leak it to the paralegal who drafts memos.
That's 100% what you'd assume in every administration not run by Trump. These people have proven to be beyond incompetent. Just look at how incredibly terrible Kash Patel has been as Director of the FBI, based on very thorough reporting on him. Like "hey what if instead of meeting in a secure facility we just went jet skiing" in planning for a Five Eyes meeting level dipshittery.
Honestly, with regard to the wrongly typed date, I'm doubtful that it indicates anything. I mean, the way that you actually keep shit like this secret is to minimize the number of people in the know. And having the office on the Southern District on New York in the know is to many people in the know. So, it's most likely that this was a clerical error. And that's true even when we assume that Epstein was assassinated. Whoever wrote that memo probably wouldn't have been in the know beforehand so it's still a red herring.
Also a reasonable guess.
And probably for other things. Note what's brought down UK's Peter Mandelson (and is threatening Starmer's job) is not the girls thing per se, but the breaking of financial disclosure laws. Without even looking at the procurement of girls and young women, I bet there's more fire where that smoke came from. Unlikely in the extreme that only one UK figure or only UK figures were involved in such illegality. Where you find someone has engaged in one kind of immorality and lawbreaking, assume they are not above and looked for opportunities to participate in other forms of immorality and lawbreaking.
He seems to be doing a good job at the job he was hired to do.
and as usual he told us exactly what he planned to do by accusing Democrats of doing it first.
One can hope. But we may be at the juncture that as these names become exposed they just become more defiant. The americans are likely not to go after them so it will end up falling onto the hands of others to execute arrests. But they would be potentially lacking all the evidence that the US has, and also face an adversarial US. Even to the point where the US offers protection to these predators in exchange to enrich Trump more.
Something tells me they are waiting for a rainy day on that. Wouldn't surprise me if some of that crew is on it too or implicated in other ways. So that becomes really the nuclear option.
Apparently you haven't had to work with 20 year old DVR systems. Nothing there seems unlikely.
The real problems don't stem from the memo you're responding to. Epstein supposedly had a prior suicide attempt as well. Instead of preserving the video as requested, the prison staff deleted it. It was reported to be a technical error or unintentional. During the actual death, there was some video, but what was released was discovered to be multiple videos spliced together. There is a 1 minute missing segment and a 2:53 missing segment.
I’ve been in IT for 30 years. I’ve also worked for the FBI, DOJ, and a few other agencies. And yes at my current job I work with security systems while I support an import/export company and its assets.
They weren't going to go from decrepit old shit to shiny new shit just because they suddenly had a high profile prisoner. But sure, it deserved a little scrutiny and I think it received much more than that.
The "burn notes" were nothing but personal attacks and retorts. Not to actually bone her up on possible answers to give. Which she didn't give a single one in her testimony.
There are a few issues: The executive doesn't get to monitor Congress. Congress gets the monitor the executive, while the executive is specifically forbidden from taking some actions against Congress. Its a violation of separation of powers,
If these materials are unreleased and must be viewed in a SCIF, isn't all of that logged and recorded? Isn't that mandatory?
The government assertion disconnecting old hard drives from an unpowered DVR would somehow wipe them without user intervention is idiotic.
The thought process appears to be Bondi took a bribe to not investigate the Epstein conspiracy years ago and she knows if certain files get out she's cooked.
