Q1DM6":fcjsvqj5 said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
smokedart":2hy6j7vg said:stepinto":2hy6j7vg said:Raging Canuck":2hy6j7vg said:Fixed that for ya!brodie":2hy6j7vg said:I don't know why I need to roll my eyes at someone who doesn't share in my belief that I have the answers to everything.
Turd.
I'm a Canadian who's getting a bit tired of apologizing for the behaviour of other Canadians lately. Turd? Sheesh. You really added to the conversation with that one.
Then don't apologize for other Canadians.
Turd.
I think part of it is that actually understanding where Jesus was coming from is quite dangerous to the social status quo. There is a massive industry built on misrepresenting Jesus.lazarus0000":1dc2vcx2 said:Here in the South, education is frowned upon by your more evangelical Christians because it'll "educate the faith right out of you..." In practice, what that more often means is that you have a bunch of really devout morons who haven't a clue as to what they believe - they've been told by their preachers what to believe and they must be right, having heard "the call."
Q1DM6":1z3kq0zw said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
Mujokan":28mkz6jt said:I think part of it is that actually understanding where Jesus was coming from is quite dangerous to the social status quo. There is a massive industry built on misrepresenting Jesus.lazarus0000":28mkz6jt said:Here in the South, education is frowned upon by your more evangelical Christians because it'll "educate the faith right out of you..." In practice, what that more often means is that you have a bunch of really devout morons who haven't a clue as to what they believe - they've been told by their preachers what to believe and they must be right, having heard "the call."
SuinusLatinus":136qlhlm said:I have nothing to add except to say religious thinking is an oxymoron...
Jon Ghast":u8g32xrb said:Q1DM6":u8g32xrb said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
Typical Christian tolerance.
/s
Jakelshark":3d24r803 said:Q1DM6":3d24r803 said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
I should ignore this, buuuut. I'm liberal and renounced my Christianity, I'm not an atheist though (I'm deist). As far as the death penalty goes, if you don't believe in hell (or an afterlife at all for the matter) then a life sentence in prison is the one of the worst ways you can punish someone. I understand the logic of "let's send him to hell" but I think I have a perfectly valid point since I don't believe such a place exists. So why not keep him alive and locked up? Don't say we can't afford it (it's a fraction of the cost to execute). If hell is real, the person still gets to go. We both win. The person suffered for their misdeeds, and we can be positive of that.
Q1DM6":1mndllnp said:Jon Ghast":1mndllnp said:Q1DM6":1mndllnp said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
Typical Christian tolerance.
/s
I'm not Christian. I'm not anything, actually. The constant stream of religion bashing from the left is horribly annoying, however. And let me add in, incredibly egotistical. The 'I'm better than you' vibe I get from many of those posts is too strong to ignore.
lazarus0000":iou7x62v said:Being a Christian (preferably a follower of Christ as "Christian" was originally and often still is, meant as a pejorative), I take a great deal of interest in these articles. It shames me in no small way to see that my "brethren" are often ill informed, uneducated, ignorant fools not far above savages.
Q1DM6":21ou14ct said:Jakelshark":21ou14ct said:Q1DM6":21ou14ct said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
I should ignore this, buuuut. I'm liberal and renounced my Christianity, I'm not an atheist though (I'm deist). As far as the death penalty goes, if you don't believe in hell (or an afterlife at all for the matter) then a life sentence in prison is the one of the worst ways you can punish someone. I understand the logic of "let's send him to hell" but I think I have a perfectly valid point since I don't believe such a place exists. So why not keep him alive and locked up? Don't say we can't afford it (it's a fraction of the cost to execute). If hell is real, the person still gets to go. We both win. The person suffered for their misdeeds, and we can be positive of that.
There was never a mention of Hell in my post. That idea originated with you. As for executions, I'm quite sure a bullet and a hole would be pretty cheap if we really got serious about removing the trash from society.
devsfan1830":1spbuf4r said:brodie":1spbuf4r said:I don't know why they had to bring religious freedom into something which seems to me to be a civil liberties issue.
When I first heard of the story, I cheered, but when I heard the whole "mark of the beast" garbage, I rolled my eyes a bit.
Agreed, but religious freedom was probably used partly because there is no civil liberties case here. RFID is short range and only readable by close contact with a reader to energize the chip. It basically just lets the school make an attendance count automatically and do basic tracking of where on the premises a student is. If its isolated to the school premises, they have the right to do what they want. Don't like it, tough nuts. The religous angle is nothing more than a tool to scare the school into abandoning RFID or allowing opt outs. These paranoid idiots who oppose RFID generally don't understand the technology and think Big Brother can pinpoint you anywhere on the globe. RFID is NOT GPS. Guess what folks, NOBODY cares about you or what you do. If they do, its either to make money by selling you crap, or you're probably on the run from the law. Its not like there's thousands of government agents sitting at computers and on a whim wanting to see what Sally is up to. Hell, you can pretty much already do that yourself. It's called Twitter and Facebook.
Jakelshark":3p6vt51u said:You can remove "trash" from society by putting them in prison. Killing a person solves nothing and is a woefully inadequate punishment.
Gisboth":1ayt7ltv said:I prefer a more recent 666 numerology candidate:Throughout the ages, different candidates for the identity of the Antichrist, or the first beast, have been offered up. They have ranged from various Popes (and the Papacy itself) to historical figures like Peter the Great, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin—even John F. Kennedy.
Ronald Wilson Reagan
Q1DM6":3jrog4ez said:Jakelshark":3jrog4ez said:You can remove "trash" from society by putting them in prison. Killing a person solves nothing and is a woefully inadequate punishment.
Then you end up punishing society by paying for them forever. Better to remove them and be done with it. You lack the courage to simply choose the more logical course of action.
Doesn't your religion say thou shall not killQ1DM6":20z2iy2s said:Jakelshark":20z2iy2s said:You can remove "trash" from society by putting them in prison. Killing a person solves nothing and is a woefully inadequate punishment.
Then you end up punishing society by paying for them forever. Better to remove them and be done with it. You lack the courage to simply choose the more logical course of action.
realwarder":m55p3pgb said:If the chip was going to be more reliable than a teacher looking around and taking role, perhaps there would be a reason to support it in this use, however when I can give you my chip and still be 'at school', we're just wasting money on technology that is offering no advantage.
gerbintosh":317h48k9 said:But it does offer an advantage. In the current system if a child skips a majority of his classes at school and is on campus he is treated as absent. The school would then lose money because they get money proportionate to the number of kids attending class. Now with the RFID, if a kid skips class but the RFID shows him on campus then he could be counted as present and the school does not lose money. Even if the kid leaves the badge in his locker and is not on campus the school could still count him as present and get paid. Why should the whole school have to suffer because kids don't want to go.
On a side note, I don't think it should have to come to RFID. Maybe we should be harder on kids who don't want to go to school. Kick them out and start them on their way to low education jobs.
We're pretty serious, now, seems to me.Q1DM6":2kpeexw9 said:... if we really got serious about removing the trash from society.
Bondi Surfer":2vkywh4c said:When anyone talks religion to me, I mentally replace their fictional characters with my own. So God becomes Santa, Jesus becomes the Tooth-Fairy, etc
It makes tedium fun. You should try it for Santa's sake
There is actually a hypothesis -- or theory, there's not much difference in this field -- that the second part of the Revelation (the first part is the epistles to various churches in Asia Minor) is a pre-christian Jewish apocalypse, which was later adopted to a Christian context in anticipation of the persecutions of Emperor Domitian. According to a well known folk legend from first century C.E. Domitian was the resurrected Emperor Nero, i.e. "Neron Kaisar" (666 by number subsitution from original Greek) as translittered from Greek.Mujokan":3fctazm3 said:Good article. There's another interpretation that besides Nero and the Roman Empire, Revelation also is discussing the split in early Christianity over accepting gentiles and not requiring them to fully follow Mosaic law. Though the New Testament in general is on the pro side of that argument, Revelation is on the anti side.
SaaSaFRaaS":3g8iiofv said:As someone who likes peanut butter on toast, it shames me in no small way to see that my brethren toast-lovers who prefer jelly are ill-informed, uneducated, ignorant fools not far above savages.
lazarus0000":21zqamm8 said:Being a Christian (preferably a follower of Christ as "Christian" was originally and often still is, meant as a pejorative), I take a great deal of interest in these articles. It shames me in no small way to see that my "brethren" are often ill informed, uneducated, ignorant fools not far above savages.
I do wish they would take a deep breath, read their Bibles a little more often and get an education as to what it actually means.
It also does not respect the dignity of the human person and ignores the possibility of redemption.Jakelshark":1dgg8snd said:Q1DM6":1dgg8snd said:Jakelshark":1dgg8snd said:Q1DM6":1dgg8snd said:Page after page filled with hate over a topic you liberal naysayers don't even believe in. Amazingly, you'll hate the typical Christian, but fight tooth and nail to keep the serial killer out of the electric chair, then you chant words like 'progress' and 'forward'.
You people are venomous an vile in the very ways you time and again denounce in others.
I should ignore this, buuuut. I'm liberal and renounced my Christianity, I'm not an atheist though (I'm deist). As far as the death penalty goes, if you don't believe in hell (or an afterlife at all for the matter) then a life sentence in prison is the one of the worst ways you can punish someone. I understand the logic of "let's send him to hell" but I think I have a perfectly valid point since I don't believe such a place exists. So why not keep him alive and locked up? Don't say we can't afford it (it's a fraction of the cost to execute). If hell is real, the person still gets to go. We both win. The person suffered for their misdeeds, and we can be positive of that.
There was never a mention of Hell in my post. That idea originated with you. As for executions, I'm quite sure a bullet and a hole would be pretty cheap if we really got serious about removing the trash from society.
You can remove "trash" from society by putting them in prison. Killing a person solves nothing and is a woefully inadequate punishment.
SpecTP":2h01vn4p said:desinerd":2h01vn4p said:"My religion prohibits me from paying taxes"
Can I use this one?
But your god still has to answer to a higher power.. the IRS.
Quiet Desperation":1mlg40pq said:SaaSaFRaaS":1mlg40pq said:As someone who likes peanut butter on toast, it shames me in no small way to see that my brethren toast-lovers who prefer jelly are ill-informed, uneducated, ignorant fools not far above savages.
I put peanut butter AND jelly on toast.
*Rye* toast.
Yeah. Yeah. Blew your mind there, I did.
crhilton":25xwo2hm said:bsharp":25xwo2hm said:I'm sure there are probably ways to track students that just leave their badge at school so that they are always "present". Schools could have the system take attendance at midnight when no one should be there. Take attendance several times throughout the day and see which badges always get read by the same reader. With a system like this in place, it makes it easier for a truancy officer/attendance clerk to follow up on the list of suspects.
But they have financial incentive not to. So why would they do it? They might do it internally to help students, then not bother to change their totals reported to the state.
SaaSaFRaaS":1kiifgtk said:Quiet Desperation":1kiifgtk said:SaaSaFRaaS":1kiifgtk said:As someone who likes peanut butter on toast, it shames me in no small way to see that my brethren toast-lovers who prefer jelly are ill-informed, uneducated, ignorant fools not far above savages.
I put peanut butter AND jelly on toast.
*Rye* toast.
Yeah. Yeah. Blew your mind there, I did.
Damned polytheist.
![]()