Apart from using similar technology, how are these things in any way alike? Inventory control of goods isn't the same as inventory control of students.Greho":2rhpf4wg said:When you are standing in line at your favorite store this holiday season, waiting for the cashier to optically scan every item, and wondering, "gee, there must be a better way..."
There is. Paranoid chumps like these will keep RFID at retail from ever happening, and hamstring progress.
The same underlying technology. For years, the argument against RFID in retail ranged from "they will know what I'm buying," (even though big data means they already do), to "they will scan my house and see my mayonnaise" (which, given current technological limits, is improbable.)NickN":5wvmofk0 said:Apart from using similar technology, how are these things in any way alike? Inventory control of goods isn't the same as inventory control of students.Greho":5wvmofk0 said:When you are standing in line at your favorite store this holiday season, waiting for the cashier to optically scan every item, and wondering, "gee, there must be a better way..."
There is. Paranoid chumps like these will keep RFID at retail from ever happening, and hamstring progress.
She is Professor of Religion at Princeton, she is not some kind of crank.Eric":1pqcmpu2 said:Mujokan, I can't think of many biblical scholars who agree with her take on it.
taswyn":22kpmec8 said:While in many ways I'm in favor of schools keeping better track of their students (sorry, but if I'm sending my kid to a public school I do want them to know where she is... they're still children, and given that many parents don't have other schooling options within reach and are therefor legally required to send their children to public school, there is in my opinion a definite mandate for the school to provide adequate monitoring for the parents, short of emancipation), an RFID badge seems questionable if they have their students' welfare primarily in mind. It's too easy to just pass one to a friend to take in to cover for truancy.
Wayzom":19kwxsa7 said:HeyWaitASecond":19kwxsa7 said:If the religious liberty argument were to work, couldn't it also be used to combat voter ID laws, as photo IDs are coded?
Voter ID laws have been pretty well wiped out. The courts looked to freedom rather than wacky fairy tales for guidance.
Yeah, but that Song of Solomon is some pretty hot stuff!MalachiteATF":2y9gks76 said:Dilbert":2y9gks76 said:Why a Texas student thinks her school ID is the "Mark of the Beast"
Read one book many times, instead of many books once?
In my experience, it is the smallest of minorities of Christians who have actually read the bible in its entirety.
Would it be tasteless to say "Amen" to that?pyster":10crm242 said:Ars knowing about 616 and writing about it is an example of why I fucken love ars. They are well informed and the writing is good. I may not always agree, but one can never claim they dont do their home work.
desinerd":redj45eu said:"My religion prohibits me from paying taxes"
Can I use this one?
sonolumi":3ap65cvw said:Someone should warn apocalyptic whackjobs about the 555 chip. It's EVERYWHERE! There's probably one in a device near you right now. SCARY!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/555_timer_IC
Should be the key line in those scriptures. For a Christian or similar denomination, the fact that a child thinks she has the wisdom to "calculate the number of the beast", should just throw this little argument to tatters. Even John couldn't fathom all he saw without an angel to guide him.This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast.
Reasonable enough, I too appreciate a good historical analysis and condemn literal readings of so-called holy books. But...MacTravdog":no8ob8ij said:As a United Methodist pastor... I believe and work on a daily basis within the framework that the Bible was written in a specific time and place with a cultural context that requires some work on our part to understand and fully appreciate in our modern day and age. Yes, I believe the Bible to be true, with many stories we can learn from both good and bad, but I don't believe it to be literal. A literal reading causes lawsuits like this, which in the end is not the point of Revelation or other apocalyptic literature.
It's pretty disingenuous to accuse others of distorting an evidence-free fairy tale while promoting your own factless interpretation. Right up there with accusing a licensed Star Wars novelist of distorting that universe, because you consider the movies to be canon.It frustrates me a great deal that so many fundamentalist and premillenialists have distorted a text that is suppose to be a message of hope and instead induced that fear and anxiety.
MalachiteATF":1hopqhu8 said:In my experience, it is the smallest of minorities of Christians who have actually read the bible in its entirety. The vast, vast majority receive their scripture in short segments, hand-in-hand with their pastor's interpretation every Sunday. Most Christians have read a few chapters on their own (The Pentateuch, 4 Canonical Gospels, rarely much else, often less). By and large the problem is that people like this *aren't* reading their own holy book; they're having someone with an agenda tell them what their holy book says. If more Christians read the bible on their own, I'd like to believe that we'd have more Christians living Christ-like. Conversely, some think it'd make more Atheists:
Many Ars readers, encountering the story for the first time, might well have shared some of the privacy concerns expressed by Hernandez, but come up short in understanding the reason for her objection.
NickN":1a2ayf69 said:This. If kids are used to being tracked at school, how much will they complain as adults when their movements are tracked and stored via license plate readers and cell phone location?Ostracus":1a2ayf69 said:I think some are missing the larger point that programs like this make our citizenry more comfortable with a surveillance society. Start 'em young.
Conservative evangelicals and privacy advocates may make strange bedfellows but I'm okay with that.
Mujokan":3swpjbwp said:In my opinion, Jesus definitely comes from an Essene background in some way. Of course, thinking yourself the Messiah was not a normal thing for Essenes though. Nor was accepting everyone into the fold.Mydrrin":3swpjbwp said:The rise of apocalypse in the religion like the isolation and strict Jewish Essenes.
Read through this and see if it reminds you of anything! http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5867-essenes
NERDZAR":y75t3bb3 said:The author of Revelations messed up by being too specific. Even if people loosen the interpretation of the Greek word so that a mark can be a card or a chip, the prophecy says it will be on the right hand or the forehead. So all we have to do is make a law that says any identifying mark that is stamped on (or attached to) a person's body should be installed somewhere other than the right hand or forehead. Let's see, left hand or legs are bad choices because of all the amputees we're going to have after WWIII. Nose or neck would be resisted because people would think that the former would be aesthetically unpleasing and the latter might be painful. So . . . let's go with the left buttcheek. Everybody's got one and we'd only need to make minor clothing modifications (openable flap) if it's a mark and no clothing modification at all if it's RFID. And once we get a large enough installed base of left buttcheek-marked citizens it becomes economically infeasible to change the location and retrain the mark installers. And if anybody ever suggests changing the location, he's the Antichrist and you shoot him on the spot. Prophecy defeated. Christianity obsolete. Next?
NERDZAR":22gh202w said:So . . . let's go with the left buttcheek. Everybody's got one and we'd only need to make minor clothing modifications (openable flap) if it's a mark and no clothing modification at all if it's RFID. And once we get a large enough installed base of left buttcheek-marked citizens it becomes economically infeasible to change the location and retrain the mark installers. And if anybody ever suggests changing the location, he's the Antichrist and you shoot him on the spot. Prophecy defeated. Christianity obsolete. Next?
crhilton":19wc4m1a said:What irritates me about this story is that the school district is spending $260,000 to prove more students show up then regular roll call shows so they can get $1,700,000 in extra funds.
It's absurd that a public institution is "spending money to make money." All districts should play by the same, preferably cheap, roll call rules and the money should then be split based on attendance (if that's how people want it). Don't let them all define what attendance means and spend large chunks of the money you're giving them to prove they need the money you're giving them!
What a waste.
GhostRed":2cy5lpnm said:....
I think it's wrong to overlook the very valid argument that this could violate rights, could have a nefarious use that could easily be exploited and hasn't gone through the necessary legal review to assess whether or not it actually does violate constitutional rights.
This article, and many of the comments as well, seem to mock this idea as though this person is over-reacting and/or suggest that this family is a bunch of demon-fearing bible thumpers with no reasonable stance on rights.
.....
Ars":2cy5lpnm said:.....
The hundreds of news stories on the controversy have focused largely on the privacy element, though some have repeated the Mark of the Beast claims without much in the way of explanation.
.......
While I don't believe the Bible contains encoded narratives that reveal the future, elements of the dystopian society they fear have some universal elements of truth. I'm of the opinion that if they are going to help be watchdogs for civil liberties, it's a net win for everyone.brodie":hqt2x8ad said:I don't know why they had to bring religious freedom into something which seems to me to be a civil liberties issue.
When I first heard of the story, I cheered, but when I heard the whole "mark of the beast" garbage, I rolled my eyes a bit.
I agree, to an extent... it just seems like there are valid non-religious gripes with this practice that we don't need to invoke "the number of the beast" to fight it.fantasticrice":1olrexy6 said:While I don't believe the Bible contains encoded narratives that reveal the future, elements of the dystopian society they fear have some universal elements of truth. I'm of the opinion that if they are going to help be watchdogs for civil liberties, it's a net win for everyone.brodie":1olrexy6 said:I don't know why they had to bring religious freedom into something which seems to me to be a civil liberties issue.
When I first heard of the story, I cheered, but when I heard the whole "mark of the beast" garbage, I rolled my eyes a bit.