theJonTech":190eb7wj said:These are Samsung chips no doubt....
licensed under FRAND?
I prefer a more recent 666 numerology candidate:Throughout the ages, different candidates for the identity of the Antichrist, or the first beast, have been offered up. They have ranged from various Popes (and the Papacy itself) to historical figures like Peter the Great, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin—even John F. Kennedy.
cdclndc":1vy2qd09 said:For article relevance: Awesome Iron Maiden reference. Had the song in my head before I hit the second page. Nice surprise!
cdclndc":2dyt9r3c said:For article relevance: Awesome Iron Maiden reference. Had the song in my head before I hit the second page. Nice surprise!
Mujokan":rnloaes3 said:Good article. There's another interpretation that besides Nero and the Roman Empire, Revelation also is discussing the split in early Christianity over accepting gentiles and not requiring them to fully follow Mosaic law. Though the New Testament in general is on the pro side of that argument, Revelation is on the anti side.
sonolumi":321x7bbs said:theJonTech":321x7bbs said:These are Samsung chips no doubt....
licensed under FRAND?
The terms seem fair and reasonable at first glance, until you read the small print about eternal soul and your first born etc.
desinerd":2vbqhqyo said:"My religion prohibits me from paying taxes"
Can I use this one?
warmachine":3aonagd7 said:I'm still confused about how an RFID badge is a mark or coin on the right hand or forehead.
Sorry, I can't just up arrow this. Being rather non-religious I honestly can't say I've seen this angle from your particular viewpoint personally. Thanks. I appreciate and sincerely thank you for this well reasoned and insightful post.MacTravdog":yznpx60y said:As a United Methodist pastor with a more historical/metaphorical perspective on scripture, I appreciate Nate and Eric's analysis on the Mark of the Beast from Revelation. I, personally, am in agreement with their conclusion. I believe and work on a daily basis within the framework that the Bible was written in a specific time and place with a cultural context that requires some work on our part to understand and fully appreciate in our modern day and age. Yes, I believe the Bible to be true, with many stories we can learn from both good and bad, but I don't believe it to be literal. A literal reading causes lawsuits like this, which in the end is not the point of Revelation or other apocalyptic literature.
I run into individuals who frequently have questions on apocalyptic literature worried that the end times are upon us and specific events like this are a sign of that coming. What this does in the end is cause a great deal of anxiety and fear. It frustrates me a great deal that so many fundamentalist and premillenialists have distorted a text that is suppose to be a message of hope and instead induced that fear and anxiety. Oy, I think I'll have another cup of coffee before going outside today.
brodie":2rn0hg7e said:I don't know why they had to bring religious freedom into something which seems to me to be a civil liberties issue.
AJester":jdtlibmh said:After reading this story, I have only one comment....
WTF America... How on earth did the US become a technological powerhouse with folks who believe such nonsense.
I am generally opposed to such things normally, but I wonder if some people should not be allowed to procreate.
Dilbert":31921wva said:Why a Texas student thinks her school ID is the "Mark of the Beast"
Read one book many times, instead of many books once?
Revelation 13:15-18 (New Revised Standard Version)
It’s this section that has caused no small part of consternation for some fundamentalist and evangelical Christians over the past few decades.
(emphasis added)9 A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, 10 they, too, will drink the wine of God’s fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. 11 And the smoke of their torment will rise for ever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name.” 12 This calls for patient endurance on the part of the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus.
HeyWaitASecond":29peph59 said:If the religious liberty argument were to work, couldn't it also be used to combat voter ID laws, as photo IDs are coded?
This. If kids are used to being tracked at school, how much will they complain as adults when their movements are tracked and stored via license plate readers and cell phone location?Ostracus":3oyg5v87 said:I think some are missing the larger point that programs like this make our citizenry more comfortable with a surveillance society. Start 'em young.
According to these Scriptures, an individual's acceptance of a certain code, identified with his or her person, as a pass conferring certain privileges from a secular ruling authority, is a form of idolatry or submission to a false god.
Swing and a miss. I don't have the answers to everything, nor did I say or even infer as much. But thanks forRaging Canuck":3avkt6u8 said:Fixed that for ya!brodie":3avkt6u8 said:I don't know why I need to roll my eyes at someone who doesn't share in my belief that I have the answers to everything.
Turd.
Nah, it's just the slippery slope argument. Once the technology is accepted it's a short step to implants.Hagen":16hby15q said:warmachine":16hby15q said:I'm still confused about how an RFID badge is a mark or coin on the right hand or forehead.
They're probably some of the people who will demand you acccept a literal interpretation of the Bbible on issues they feel strongly about, but when you point that out they will say how those were only listed as examples or something and that we should be more flexible in our interpretation![]()
MacTravdog":3kb08rm8 said:As a United Methodist pastor with a more historical/metaphorical perspective on scripture, I appreciate Nate and Eric's analysis on the Mark of the Beast from Revelation. I, personally, am in agreement with their conclusion. I believe and work on a daily basis within the framework that the Bible was written in a specific time and place with a cultural context that requires some work on our part to understand and fully appreciate in our modern day and age. Yes, I believe the Bible to be true, with many stories we can learn from both good and bad, but I don't believe it to be literal. A literal reading causes lawsuits like this, which in the end is not the point of Revelation or other apocalyptic literature.
AJester":h4pqdf2b said:After reading this story, I have only one comment....
WTF America... How on earth did the US become a technological powerhouse with folks who believe such nonsense.
I am generally opposed to such things normally, but I wonder if some people should not be allowed to procreate.
MalachiteATF":27w3f3ck said:Dilbert":27w3f3ck said:Why a Texas student thinks her school ID is the "Mark of the Beast"
Read one book many times, instead of many books once?
In my experience, it is the smallest of minorities of Christians who have actually read the bible in its entirety. The vast, vast majority receive their scripture in short segments, hand-in-hand with their pastor's interpretation every Sunday. Most Christians have read a few chapters on their own (The Pentateuch, 4 Canonical Gospels, rarely much else, often less). By and large the problem is that people like this *aren't* reading their own holy book; they're having someone with an agenda tell them what their holy book says. If more Christians read the bible on their own, I'd like to believe that we'd have more Christians living Christ-like. Conversely, some think it'd make more Atheists:
"Take some time and put the Bible on your summer reading list. Try and stick with it cover to cover. Not because it teaches history; we've shown you it doesn't. Read it because you'll see for yourself what the Bible is all about. It sure isn't great literature. If it were published as fiction, no reviewer would give it a passing grade. There are some vivid scenes and some quotable phrases, but there's no plot, no structure, there's a tremendous amount of filler, and the characters are painfully one-dimensional. Whatever you do, don't read the Bible for a moral code: it advocates prejudice, cruelty, superstition, and murder. Read it because: we need more atheists — and nothin' will get you there faster than readin' the damn Bible." - Penn Jillette
RIght, because if people's morals don't seem consistent to us we should force them to adjust their morality to meet our standards.tehashi":2qd0hqlr said:If they are going to use this kind of justification, they should be forced to abide by it in all facets of their life.
This is the theory of Elaine Pagels.Eric":u9et018f said:Mujokan":u9et018f said:Good article. There's another interpretation that besides Nero and the Roman Empire, Revelation also is discussing the split in early Christianity over accepting gentiles and not requiring them to fully follow Mosaic law. Though the New Testament in general is on the pro side of that argument, Revelation is on the anti side.
I'm not going to say that issue was completely settled by the time Revelation was written, but a lot of that stuff was hashed out in the Pauline epistles a good 4 decades previous. if the relationship between the law and gentiles is a concern, it's a pretty minor one. The biggest theme, especially in the first three chapters (which consists of seven letters written to seven churches in Asia Minor), is the relation of Christians (be they of Jewish or gentile origin) to the culture. For instance, the church at Pergamum was warned about eating food sacrificed to idols or other gods. So it's more a Christians vs. culture mindset than a Jews vs. gentiles issue.
SourceWhat’s more original to Pagels’s book is the view that Revelation is essentially an anti-Christian polemic. That is, it was written by an expatriate follower of Jesus who wanted the movement to remain within an entirely Jewish context, as opposed to the “Christianity” just then being invented by St. Paul, who welcomed uncircumcised and trayf-eating Gentiles into the sect. At a time when no one quite called himself “Christian,” in the modern sense, John is prophesying what would happen if people did. That’s the forward-looking worry in the book. “In retrospect, we can see that John stood on the cusp of an enormous change—one that eventually would transform the entire movement from a Jewish messianic sect into ‘Christianity,’ a new religion flooded with Gentiles,” Pagels writes. “But since this had not yet happened—not, at least, among the groups John addressed in Asia Minor—he took his stand as a Jewish prophet charged to keep God’s people holy, unpolluted by Roman culture. So, John says, Jesus twice warns his followers in Asia Minor to beware of ‘blasphemers’ among them, ‘who say they are Jews, and are not.’ They are, he says, a ‘synagogue of Satan.’ ” Balaam and Jezebel, named as satanic prophets in Revelation, are, in this view, caricatures of “Pauline” Christians, who blithely violated Jewish food and sexual laws while still claiming to be followers of the good rabbi Yeshua. Jezebel, in particular—the name that John assigns her is that of an infamous Canaanite queen, but she’s seen preaching in the nearby town of Thyatira—suggests the women evangelists who were central to Paul’s version of the movement and anathema to a pious Jew like John. She is the original shiksa goddess. (“When John accuses ‘Balaam’ and ‘Jezebel’ of inducing people to ‘eat food sacrificed to idols and practice fornication,’ he might have in mind anything from tolerating people who engage in incest to Jews who become sexually involved with Gentiles or, worse, who marry them,” Pagels notes.) The scarlet whores and mad beasts in Revelation are the Gentile followers of Paul—and so, in a neat irony, the spiritual ancestors of today’s Protestant evangelicals.
In my opinion, Jesus definitely comes from an Essene background in some way. Of course, thinking yourself the Messiah was not a normal thing for Essenes though. Nor was accepting everyone into the fold.Mydrrin":u9et018f said:The rise of apocalypse in the religion like the isolation and strict Jewish Essenes.