As a United Methodist pastor with a more historical/metaphorical perspective on scripture, I appreciate Nate and Eric's analysis on the Mark of the Beast from Revelation. I, personally, am in agreement with their conclusion. I believe and work on a daily basis within the framework that the Bible was written in a specific time and place with a cultural context that requires some work on our part to understand and fully appreciate in our modern day and age. Yes, I believe the Bible to be true, with many stories we can learn from both good and bad, but I don't believe it to be literal. A literal reading causes lawsuits like this, which in the end is not the point of Revelation or other apocalyptic literature.
I run into individuals who frequently have questions on apocalyptic literature worried that the end times are upon us and specific events like this are a sign of that coming. What this does in the end is cause a great deal of anxiety and fear. It frustrates me a great deal that so many fundamentalist and premillenialists have distorted a text that is suppose to be a message of hope and instead induced that fear and anxiety. Oy, I think I'll have another cup of coffee before going outside today.