Meta kills diversity programs, claiming DEI has become “too charged”

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,922
Subscriptor++
Of course the problem with justifying ANY decision as "too political" is that anything can be turned political if some people decide to turn it political - existing as black or lgbtq or Jewish or Muslim human beings has often been "too political". Existing as a woman and living your life by doing things like wearing pants or walking in public without a male escort or trying to get a job or share an opinion has for much of history been "too political". It's a terrible excuse for decisions.
 
Upvote
159 (162 / -3)

Skwerl

Ars Centurion
352
Subscriptor
It's not easy, but I'm doing my best. FB is a medium for keeping in touch with friends and family, and there's really no easy replacement. I've tried in the past. maybe private Bluesky profiles or groups might work.
Perhaps you don't really need to keep in touch with as many people as you're now accustomed to. I don't use Facebook because I don't care what my classmates from twenty years ago are doing, what my friends cooked for dinner last night, or see photos of their kids doing this and that. I stay up to date with people who are currently an important part of my life. For the others, I find it really pleasant to sit down and catch up if I haven't seen them in a long time.
 
Upvote
60 (68 / -8)

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,059
Subscriptor++
Well there's also the slightly inconvenient fact that it's illegal. Just because you're discriminating against white people and men doesn't make it not discrimination.

Once again for those in the cheap seats: If you think DEI is discrimination you don't know what DEI actually is. And you certainly don't know what discrimination is.
 
Upvote
136 (166 / -30)

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,350
Subscriptor++
Weirdly, when companies say they just focus on qualifications and are race/gender/etc blind, what tends to happen is that the people doing the hiring hire mostly people who are like themselves.
Also, I want to point out that I deliberately didn't specify a particular demographic they are most like or attribute it to malice. This is just how people are. We seek out familiarity and comfort and a lot of the time that means faces that look like ours. Names that sound like ours. People who went the same school as us. Diversity initiatives serve to help us be aware of unconscious biases so that we actually consider the candidates on their merits.

And diversity is on its own a merit to the company because diverse viewpoints and experiences mean diverse means of solving problems and seeing opportunities for new products and markets.
 
Upvote
78 (83 / -5)

Edgar Allan Esquire

Ars Praefectus
3,093
Subscriptor
I get the focus on FB/Meta due to the tech angle, but they're also not alone in DEI rollbacks. Over the past month I've seen several other companies in the news taking similar action, Walmart and McDonald's being the most recent in my feed that I remember. The excuse given is fear of "reverse racism" suits (not actually the term used, but pretty much what the press releases boiled down to). Is it the real reason? IDK, they may also just be trying to cozy up to the administration expecting preferential treatment.
 
Upvote
43 (44 / -1)
Let me be blunt: You don't know what DEI initiative do. Period. Not a single clue.

Because the entire goal of DEI is to make sure that biases against color/gender/religion/nationality are recognized and removed as factors in the hiring decision. In other words, DEI makes sure that you are hiring the people with the best skills for the job. The most qualified candidates.
Yes, it appears that they have never been part of a DEI hiring process. I'm in a liberal company in a very blue state. DEI means our HR take the time to strip name, age and other person info off any resumes so we just get a list of numbered applicants resumes with their education and history to judge them by. We typically have no clue to age or race until after we have already ranked them all and are having interviews with our top rated candidates.
 
Upvote
181 (187 / -6)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

papito10

Ars Scholae Palatinae
837
I was expecting the billionaire class to fall in line, but it's honestly kind of scary just how quickly they're doing it.
That's what I have been saying. Putin took YEARS to intimidate and kill oligarchs, journalists, and anyone who crossed him, but Trump is not even in power yet. America is rolling over to a dictatorship at the speed of light, compared to Russia. I guess we peaked as a democracy, everyone is kind of tired of it.
 
Upvote
80 (89 / -9)

s73v3r

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,618
Since color/gender/religion/nationality are generally not relevant to one's job duties
Then we should be reaching out to people of other skin colors and backgrounds besides just rich white people. Cause that's all DEI is: Reaching out to those traditionally underrepresented groups, broadening your talent pool.

Anyone who claims that companies were hiring purely based on skin color is a racist fuckhead.
 
Upvote
56 (78 / -22)

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,059
Subscriptor++
If that was the way most DEI policies were implemented nobody would have an issue with them. It's not. Most DEI programs I've encountered, including the one at my own company rely on illegal quotas based on race or other identity features. This guarantees you will hire less qualified people because by definition you are hiring for something OTHER than merit.
Then your company is run by morons and you should quit. Every DEI program I've run into is run the right way, it's a combination of scrubbing out indicators on the applications and training people to recognize their own biases. And it works.

That doesn't mean every DEI hire will be unqualified but it does guarantee that you will on average have less qualified people than if you did not have any DEI quotas. If you hire the best qualified people, sometimes you might get nothing but men, other times you might get only women, or only 1 race. If merit is what you're after, that's fine. Instead you automatically hire the 1 or 2 candidates who meet your identity quota regardless whether they have any relevant skills.

AGAIN for those in the cheap seats, DEI != Quotas. Never. That's not what it's about and anyone claiming it is either needs to cough up hard evidence or admit that they don't know what DEI is.

This also certainly does not imply that just because you're white or male that you're more qualified. Your race and any other identity characteristics are irrelevant to the job. If I'm hiring for an engineering role I will probably get mostly male and mostly white and asian applicants because that's demographic that tends to go into that field. If I'm hiring nurses I'll get mostly women. So it stands to reason that if I want the best candidates for the engineering job I'll be hiring mostly white and asian men. If I want the best qualified nurses I'll be hiring mostly women. To do otherwise pretty much guarantees less qualified people.
Except that the anti-DEI folks are outright claiming that to be qualified you have to be white and male. Start listening to them and and pretending you know what's going on.
 
Upvote
149 (182 / -33)

s73v3r

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,618
Well there's also the slightly inconvenient fact that it's illegal. Just because you're discriminating against white people and men doesn't make it not discrimination.
Nobody has ever, in any form, "discriminated against white people." Finding that you can't compete because minorities, when given a chance, are actually more talented than mediocre white guys, is not discrimination.
 
Upvote
56 (106 / -50)

s73v3r

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,618
This comment being downvoted so heavily highlights the reason we need society to purge DEI and media censorship.
Nope. That comment was a flat out lie, which had literally no understanding whatsoever of what DEI is. It's nothing but pure right wing propaganda, just like your post is. We need less of it in the world.
 
Upvote
87 (108 / -21)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Topaz3in6

Smack-Fu Master, in training
81
Subscriptor
Zuck is a wet noodle bending to whoever is in power precisely like Mitch McConnell. For a billionaire to posture so much they are the trail-blazer why is he following rather than leading? The rhetoric that fact-checkers are "politically biased" just made me snap. I WANT HIM TAKEN OUT LIKE BRIAN THOMPSON. How's that for free speech?
 
Upvote
50 (54 / -4)

Fabermetrics

Ars Praefectus
5,768
Subscriptor
I fail to see how including a diverse set of viewpoints is anything but a positive for any company, much less one focused on engineering, but I’m also not an MBA or a RWNJ, so what do I know?
Any view beyond "I will accept the lowest salary you offer" is heresy to the Job Creators.
 
Upvote
49 (49 / 0)
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
glad all the racist idiots are revealing themselves in these comments.
Yeah, it's pretty easy to tell who in this thread realizes - most likely only at a subconscious level - that they would have a much harder time competing in a world that didn't disadvantage 70+% of society for their benefit.
 
Upvote
42 (55 / -13)

Sajuuk

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,855
Subscriptor++
It's sad to see so many negative comments. Folks, I don't know how so many can possibly believe this move is bad. It isn't. It's a move toward meritocracy. It's the opposite of racist. and it most definitely isn't fascist, Nazi, or so the other comments I've read. Do you guys even know a conservative? As in real life? Or am I commenting to bots?
Do you guys even know a conservative?

How can we not? Trump hasn't shut the fuck up for 10 years.
 
Upvote
131 (140 / -9)

Frodo Douchebaggins

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,995
Subscriptor
Interesting that no one has made the suggestion here that he's bending the knee and pleasing Trump to get Trump to not save TikTok. He benefits massively from TikTok being kicked out of the US.
He's a fucking invertebrate, no matter what the reason.
 
Upvote
16 (20 / -4)

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,059
Subscriptor++
It's sad to see so many negative comments. Folks, I don't know how so many can possibly believe this move is bad. It isn't. It's a move toward meritocracy. It's the opposite of racist. and it most definitely isn't fascist, Nazi, or so the other comments I've read. Do you guys even know a conservative? As in real life? Or am I commenting to bots?

Here's the thing. I'm a hiring manager. My company, not being run by a bag of shitstains, implemented DEI and made sure all the hiring managers got training in what it was and what it wasn't. And repeated that until people got a clue.

So I can state with great confidence that you've got a warped and twisted view of what DEI is.
 
Upvote
140 (155 / -15)
It's sad to see so many negative comments. Folks, I don't know how so many can possibly believe this move is bad. It isn't. It's a move toward meritocracy. It's the opposite of racist. and it most definitely isn't fascist, Nazi, or so the other comments I've read. Do you guys even know a conservative? As in real life? Or am I commenting to bots?
Because unlike you, we aren't terrified of women or minorities taking our jobs or place in society if given equal opportunity.
 
Upvote
95 (112 / -17)