Every living thing on the planet plays host to viruses, and bacteria are no exception. Bacteriophages—or just “phages” to those in the know—are the viruses that attack bacteria. And we are in dire need of things that attack bacteria, since many pathogenic bacterial species have developed resistance to the antibiotics we’ve thrown at them for decades.
Phage therapy is attractive not only because antibiotic use yields antibiotic resistance but also because the treatment can be targeted specifically to the bacteria causing an infection. Most antibiotics in use are rather broad-spectrum, so they obliterate many of the bacteria they encounter, including the ones that are happily residing in our guts, minding their own business and not causing anyone any problems. Phages can be more precise.
But is phage therapy effective? A new study suggests it may end up being undercut by our own immune systems, which treat the therapies like a hostile invader.
Case studies
One promising case study that makes phage therapy look promising is provided by a 15-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis. He had a nasty bacterial infection, which was successfully treated with a cocktail of three different phages. But he was on immunosuppressants because he had just had a lung transplant. Phage therapy in immunocompetent people has not yet been as thoroughly examined, so we don’t really know how our immune system would deal with it.
The researchers who treated the boy learned of an 81-year-old man with lung disease who was infected with a closely related strain of bacteria. He had been treated with different antibiotic regimens for five years to no avail. The researchers took bacteria he coughed up and exposed it to the same three phages they had successfully used to treat the other patient, and they found that the phages killed most, but not all, of the bacteria. The bacteria the phages didn’t kill evolved some resistance to the phages, but none of the bacteria that survived were resistant to all three phages.
Loading comments...