X apparently added 5-second delay for links to sites Musk doesn’t like

DeschutesCore

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,079
Some day, when Yaccety Sax writes her memoir complaining about she was always having to rein in Musk's leash; I will have zero sympathy and I will not buy a copy of that memoir.
Excellent! I needed a companion piece for my copy of On The Firing Line: My 500 Days At Apple by Gil Amelio, it was getting lonely.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)
The eventual autopsy/biography of this debacle should be titled How to abuse your userbase and destroy a platform in 10 easy steps
I haven't kept count but it feels like we've gone beyond 10 steps a long time ago. Perhaps there's enough material for a sequel: "How to ensure the damage is permanent in 10 easier steps".
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)
So Musk equates "free speech absolutist" with being "against censorship that goes far beyond the law." He is saying that he is not against censorship unless it is far beyond the laws. This means that he will censor to the absolute limit beyond which effective legal restraints will be triggered, if there are any legal restraints.
Musk: "I'm a gun rights absolutist, and don't believe in restrictions on guns that go far beyond the law. Therefore, I'm totally ok with the very strict gun controls in the UK, NZ, and other similar jurisdictions because they don't go far beyond the law."

What an absolutely moronic argument. It's the exemplar of the term "weasel words". In other words, he's basically saying, "I'm for free speech, until I have to actually stand up for them and face a truly authoritarian government that actually does have laws to enforce censorship like Russia, Saudi Arabia, or China". What a comfortable ethical position to hold.
Musk is at least explicitly stating where he stands on his increasing censorship of other people's speech, and making it clear what people can expect when they use something he controls.
Yes, that's his stated view. That is NOT how we have actually seen him clamp down on speech he disagrees with, however. In other words, he's a lying hypocrite, which is WORSE than being intentionally vague about where you stand.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
11 (18 / -7)

astack

Ars Praetorian
416
Subscriptor
Before the Musk simps come racing in (and they'll do this anyway), let's all agree that yes, Musk has every right to actually do this with his own company. That does not mean that it's not an asshole move made by a petulant child in a flabby man's body.

Now expect people to still come into this thread with "HE'S GOT A RIGHT TO DO THIS!" complaints every 4th page.

Yeah, various news agencies are flailing at what to actually call it. No one will ever just say X. It's entirely too non-descript. I've also seen "X social media company". Which is funny, as it's over twice as long as "Twitter". But yeah, Musk's master plan of just naming something X has run face first into the stop trying to make fetch happen conundrum.
My favorite is that people have started leaving the name of the brand off all together now. I've heard multiple times that so-and-so posted on social media. What social media it is isn't said, but it's twitter where it is posted. This trend is the worst possible one for a company brand, but X is now reaping what they have sown.
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)

Green RT

Ars Scholae Palatinae
947
Subscriptor
I have never, nor thought I ever would, see someone with so much money and power act like such an imbecile day in and day out in a massively public spectacle.

Interesting.

One of the major benefits of having money is paying people to make you look good. This is Wealth 101.
He has a rival although his rival only pretends to have money.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)
NYU Professor Locked Out of Twitter After Reportedly Declining to Meet With Elon Musk
New York University professor and Kara Swisher’s podcasting buddy Scott Galloway voiced his outrage at being banned from posting on Twitter in a Threads post on Tuesday. Galloway claims he’s been locked out of Twitter (aka X) two days after allegedly declining an invitation to meet with the chief Twit himself.

Galloway posted on Threads that, as of Tuesday, he had been locked out of his account for 17 days, following it up with a post saying: “A mutual friend reached out and said Elon feels ‘unfairly attacked,’ by me, and wants to meet. I declined. 2 days later I was locked out of ‘X.’” ...
 
Upvote
57 (57 / 0)

fenris_uy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,088
Links from X to the NYT and Reuters loaded almost instantly for us today. But we still found delays of three to five seconds in links to Substack, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, and Threads today in our tests.

Given that both Substack and Threads are competitors, and are smaller than Twitter, at what point can those companies sue Twitter for abusing their position? Especially, given that Twitter forces the links to go through t.co.
 
Upvote
6 (7 / -1)

fenris_uy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,088
Would love to have been a fly on the wall for the conversation that convinced/coerced Mush to agree to that (unless Yaccarino was allowed to make that decision /s).

Yaccarino probably order the change without consulting Elon, and Elon didn't know that they made the change.
 
Upvote
-5 (2 / -7)
This gets brought up all the time. The H1B programme is not meant to be a path to citizenship or permanent residency. It's a temporary work visa. Regardless of the fact that you ended up working for a human-shaped shitstain, people working under an H1B need to have a plan for when their visa will expire anyway, which it WILL do eventually. If you planned to stay in the US permanently, you should have applied for a different kind of visa.

And honestly, India is not a bad country to make a living as a software engineer, especially if you have Twitter on your resume. You're gonna live like a king because the cost of living is so low compared to the US, and all the FAANG companies have large presences there. People in the socioeconomic class of software engineers in that part of the world often have a chauffeur, live-in maid service, and housing expenses are often subsidized by your employer, so I'm not gonna really cry for someone who is forced to move back earlier than expected because Elon Musk decided to be an asshole.

And if you are an Indian national with American work experience, somewhere like Dubai is always an option, where the standard of living is really high, they pay boatloads of money for Western experience/training in IT, and has a personal income tax rate of 0%.

As an aside, it's funny that none of these hard hitting investigative journalism articles about the poor H1B workers stranded at Twitter never interview an actual H1B visa-holder. The article you linked interviewed a PhD student whose doing his thesis on the H1B programme, but no actual direct quotation from a visa holder. The PhD student Vice interviewed claims that some of these workers have mortgages to pay, but buying a house on credit with a typically 25-30 year amortization period isn't the wisest decision when an H1B only lasts 3 years, and can only be extended to a maximum of 6 years. The first 3 years of a mortgage, well over 50% of what you are paying is interest.


Your article doesn't pass the sniff test.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-2 (23 / -25)
Honestly, next he's gonna replace any user pictures for accounts he hates with a dunce cap, or some childish thing like the peach emoji.
Or use his groundbreaking AI system to train individual models on specific users' post histories, then shoot off the occasional generated xeet looking like those users wrote them, for some damage and lolz. (I actually wouldn't put it past the X "management".)
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Thad Boyd

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,155
X? What's that?
verywrong.gif
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)

dacjames

Ars Scholae Palatinae
652
I have never, nor thought I ever would, see someone with so much money and power act like such an imbecile day in and day out in a massively public spectacle.

Interesting.

One of the major benefits of having money is paying people to make you look good. This is Wealth 101.
It was before Trump upended everything in 2016. He proved that the more effective strategy is to simply continue to generate new, more outrageous controversies over and over.

The goal is not to look good, it's to retain attention and drive engagement. As evidenced by this very article, the strategy works. The only solution I can think of would be for news media to simply ignore Musk's actions, but the media benefits from the engagement just as much as he does, so I don't see that happening any time soon.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,438
Subscriptor
Or use his groundbreaking AI system to train individual models on specific users' post histories, then shoot off the occasional generated xeet looking like those users wrote them, for some damage and lolz. (I actually wouldn't put it past the X "management".)
Is that pronounced skeet?

xeet xeet xeet lol
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
People keep using X. The problem lies there. They forgot how to vote with their feet.
Except that they now effectively lock out anyone who does not have a login and severely limit nonpaid users. Even for those who habitually use X/Twtter Elon now excludes those who don't register. Elon thought that blocking users and limitng the number of posts viewed for nonpaid uses would get them to register or pay for a blue check. But, I just don't bother and barely use the site now.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

thekaj

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,270
Subscriptor++
"Brand X" is literally the term for something generic that many of us old people grew up with. And by old people I mean people who are a few years younger than Musk like me.

It can't just be X and be meaningful. It needs to have a noun or something attached to it - like X-Windows or DrainX or the X-games. "X" by itself is just so meaningless as to kind of make you try to fill in the gaps yourself.

(Calling it X-social is actually my preferred one. Because it actually also serves as a description of how I use Twitter - I used to, but now I don't. And I'm honestly surprised he hasn't grabbed the domain name for x.social.)
Oh yeah, I'm old enough to remember. And yeah, that's the thing. You have to say "Brand X". Say something like "We tested this against X", and our brains are conditioned to think of that as a placeholder (blame algebra). Any time I see that someone has written about X without qualifying what they're talking about, I default to thinking that someone forgot to update their article before they published.
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)

msawzall

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,357
Musk is like Alex Jones or Rush Limbaugh; they are incredibly obnoxious and disgusting on the surface, just obviously utterly terrible, but millions (hundreds of thousands?) of people love them. Takes all kinds to make a world etc. but damn.
Bullies always have toadies.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

WXW

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,156
Truth be told, with Model X it actually made sense, because of the wing doors resembling an X. Then again it's safe to assume that this was the only instance in which it wasn't Musk who actually decided about the naming, but actual professionals. If Musk would have really the say at Tesla even just about names, the company would have tanked ages ago.
It's pretty safe to assume it was either Musk or another child who came up with the names:

Model S
Model 3
Model X
Model Y

"S3XY"
 
Upvote
26 (26 / 0)

SvnLyrBrto

Ars Scholae Palatinae
616
I actually read that exact same book and thought it was insightful for all the Be/Gassee and Next/Return of Steve drama

Wasn't that the one in which Amelio delusionally claimed that he, not Steve Jobs or Tim Cook, was the true architect of Apple's current success? It's been a while and maybe I'm recalling an article and not the book; but I seem to recall claims that Jobs and Cook had only charisma and the "cool factor" to offer, but didn't actually know what they were doing or how to run the company; and that all they ever did was merely build upon his own actions and initiatives.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)