At the rate he's going, it's not going to be a very useful tool for that, either.You're assuming he wants it to make money, and doesn't just want it as a tool for manipulating discourse and settling political scores. No one asks how much money their screwdriver made them last week.
Exactly. Some of the talking points are actually not bad. E.g., I think every large social media platform should have some kind of formalized appeals process when it comes to dealing with bans and the like.I will believe Musk when he says things will happen, when they actually happen.
It should be completely effective, because no one is smart enough to circumvent the childishly simple filters by using simple code words, like Hilter88.You know... Key words like "Jew", "Replacement", and "Nationalist". Maybe a few other ones that Elon wants to keep.
Do you remember a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, when Musk bought Tw#tter so he could get rid of bots, not promote them to content moderation?"She also confirmed that Twitter would be relying more on automated content removal."
Not every Twitter user was convinced that they could trust this messaging from Irwin, though. Tech reporter Tom McKay thanked Irwin for her transparency, but then Irwin stopped responding when he asked her what one “Twitter Files” journalist, Abigail Shrier, meant when she tweeted, “Our team was given extensive, unfiltered access to Twitter’s internal communications and systems.”
Musk only cares about advertisers and government to the extent that he is forced to do so by their economic and regulatory leverage.Musk brings back Twitter Blue with new features to prevent impersonation
I don't see anything in the Reuters article to suggest they are stopping impersonation of individuals. The colored marks make it harder to impersonate businesses or government agencies, but blue is still blue. Is there a new process for vetting those purchased blue checkmarks? Is there any staff left to check them? Seems like we will just have a repeat.
There's a clip I've seen bandied about a lot where Elon literally says he doesn't care about the economics of it. That was before he owned the platform though. It's very obvious he very much does care, and even more obvious he has no idea that he's the root cause of all of Twitter's financial woes.This idea that Elon Musk, the billionaire, doesn't care about making money is honestly so fucking comical to me.
He realizes the whole point of shadowbanning is to not give a tell that bots and trolls need to create new accounts right?“Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if you’ve been shadowbanned, the reason why and how to appeal,” Musk tweeted.
How could you not? If you work for a Musk company, every day is a Monday.I can't believe they pushed a change on Friday.
https://shortcut.com/blog/dont-deploy-on-frida-3-other-unwritten-rules-of-software-engineering
Why not just use all the colors?
"We got the information from Twitter! The user was sea foam green verified!"
"Well, we also got the information from Twitter, and our source is forest green verified!"
Later, I'll build a deck of black and blue verified twitter checkmarks to see how it plays against my buddy's black and red verified twitter checkmarks. He's low on mountains to tap so I'm hoping I can hit him with a few Vesuvan Doppelgangers early on before he can put together a big enough fireball.
Too bad it wasn't 9 dollars or 11 dollars for apple. Then it could be 9-11 chan for all the conspiracy nuts.
Kurt Vonnegut used the asterisk for that in some of his novels.Can we give Elon Musk an asshole checkmark?
HoNoRaRy DeGrEeS aRe BeTtEr, hE eArNeD tHeM WiThOuT BeInG TaUgHtFuck. Now you've done it.
Pretty sure posts like this cause some sort of bat signal to go up somewhere.
It won't be long now before we're flooded with people telling us that Elon is, in fact, a software engineer, a mechanical engineer, a controls engineer, an industrial engineer, an engineer engineer, a rocket surgeon, a rocket scientist, and an astrophysicist.
Uh sure. In a world where heavily armed, poorly-informed in-duh-viduals show up to investigate the basements of single-story pizzerias, we should trust people to have the 'common sense' to figure everything out for themselves. Not in this timeline.“If the goal is transparency to build trust, why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves?” Dorsey tweeted.
I still think he bought Twitter mostly so he could read Grimes DMs.On the one hand, Shrier is a lying shrew. So, at first, I kind of dismissed this as being more braggartly crap....
But??? After a think-thunk it dawned on me that Musk has that level of access and that became a rather frightful thought, so I thought it worthy of mentioning that it would be a very wise safety precaution for each of my fellow Arsians to remember it, and not share anything important in Twitler DM's. Don't even share work related things, but especially not anything personal.
Who knows what Musk is scouring for at this point with bulk Admin-level searches of DM's and things normally considered private??? Be safe gang, a'ight?
But if they don't know they are shadowbanned how will they spend another $7 or $11 on a new verified account.He realizes the whole point of shadowbanning is to not give a tell that bots and trolls need to create new accounts right?
You'll be able to buy a position on the safety team. How much do you think people will pay?How long until Twitter's safety team is made up of the likes of the Westburo Baptist church, KKK, neo-nazis, and proud boys?
I was thinking more like $8Stan or $11Stan depending on where you signed up for itIt's $8kun now. You better apologize to the Watkins.
Apparently not.He realizes the whole point of shadowbanning is to not give a tell that bots and trolls need to create new accounts right?
Can we give Elon Musk an asshole checkmark?
I think he's closer to Mr. Burns. He has that "...Release the Hounds" mentality.I think this need reposting.View attachment 48463
On the one hand, Shrier is a lying shrew. So, at first, I kind of dismissed this as being more braggartly crap....
But??? After a think-thunk it dawned on me that Musk has that level of access and that became a rather frightful thought, so I thought it worthy of mentioning that it would be a very wise safety precaution for each of my fellow Arsians to remember it, and not share anything important in Twitler DM's. Don't even share work related things, but especially not anything personal.
Who knows what Musk is scouring for at this point with bulk Admin-level searches of DM's and things normally considered private??? Be safe gang, a'ight?
Yes. That looks pretty good to me.Something like this:?
Pro tip: Like Trump, when Elon's lips are moving (Tweets), he's lying.I will believe Musk when he says things will happen, when they actually happen.
Did Twitter/Musk explain how the new check system will prevent impersonation? Is there going to be more verification on Twitter's end besides "you gave us money?"
Yes, if people can it's best to delete the account. If it's so bad we have to start to worry about Musk collecting our data like that.Even better yet delete your account. We're here for you and I promise it will be alright.
They should use shape + colour to denote information to aid those who are colourblind or have other vision issues.Why not just use all the colors?
"We got the information from Twitter! The user was sea foam green verified!"
"Well, we also got the information from Twitter, and our source is forest green verified!"
Later, I'll build a deck of black and blue verified twitter checkmarks to see how it plays against my buddy's black and red verified twitter checkmarks. He's low on mountains to tap so I'm hoping I can hit him with a few Vesuvan Doppelgangers early on before he can put together a big enough fireball.
Elon Musk cares about making people disabled.They should use shape + colour to denote information to aid those who are colourblind or have other vision issues.
But when has Musk ever cared about people with disabilities (or anyone other than himself).