I love long races like this. I can put it on, do other things, and still enjoy it. Turn it off, come back hours later and still enjoy it.
I still want to know what exactly went on with those two Mazdas. They failed at nearly the same time!
Is Rolex's sponsorship of the race a little counterproductive? The only Daytona I want is the one I'd get for winning the race, and I don't think that's ever going to happen...
From the caption
Is Rolex's sponsorship of the race a little counterproductive? The only Daytona I want is the one I'd get for winning the race, and I don't think that's ever going to happen...
I assume that Daytona is suppose to be Rolex. Not that I blame you I would have Daytona on the brain too.
From the caption
Is Rolex's sponsorship of the race a little counterproductive? The only Daytona I want is the one I'd get for winning the race, and I don't think that's ever going to happen...
I assume that Daytona is suppose to be Rolex. Not that I blame you I would have Daytona on the brain too.
No, I meant the only Rolex Daytona I want is the one you get for winning this race or Le Mans. I’d be OK paying for a Submariner, but paying for a Daytona feels like failure
I’ll edit the caption in a bit to make it clearer.
Sports car racing fan my whole life, pro to local vintage. Sports car racing is a facsimile of production cars in both the technical and daily aspect, but going at it at 100%. It rains on the street, you slow down. It rains on the track, put on the rains and adjust your driving accordingly. After the first one or two non-visibility mishaps the rest of the field would have gotten the message. They should have let them race. Also, Ferrari got hosed out of the victory. They had better numbers than the BMW. They just happened to be 'officially ' out front by 1.56 seconds when they called the race.
Sports car racing fan my whole life, pro to local vintage. Sports car racing is a facsimile of production cars in both the technical and daily aspect, but going at it at 100%. It rains on the street, you slow down. It rains on the track, put on the rains and adjust your driving accordingly. After the first one or two non-visibility mishaps the rest of the field would have gotten the message. They should have let them race. Also, Ferrari got hosed out of the victory. They had better numbers than the BMW. They just happened to be 'officially ' out front by 1.56 seconds when they called the race.
The water was deep enough where the cars would have hydroplaned on their belly pans. Slowing down won’t help if your tires can’t even touch the track.
Hell, I read that the pit crews were having wheels/tires floating away.
I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
I once got to drive a kart in the rain on slicks. The day started wet and cleared up by the afternoon. Being able to go from full wet to a dry line forming to a full dry track in one day, on the same tires, was incredible fun. I can only imagine what it's like to race one of these fantastic machines.
I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
Alonso is a truly gifted driver. He's had a shit car the last few years, but look at his first lap performance when all of the backmarkers are hampered by traffic, and you can see just how good he is.
Alonso's problem has always been that he cannot tolerate having an equally strong teammate. He insists on being the #1 driver, so when Hamilton arrived as a rookie in 2007, and was at least matching Alonso on performance, he really couldn't cope and left the team. If you're going to drive for a top 3 team in F1, you're going to have 2 strong drivers. McLaren had years with 2 world champions, Ferrrari did the last few years, Mercedes would prefer to. Alonso got cycled back to weaker teams where he could be the star, but where he had worse equipment. It was a bad tradeoff, IMO.
Nice to see him winning again. I always enjoy watching him race.
I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
I once got to drive a kart in the rain on slicks. The day started wet and cleared up by the afternoon. Being able to go from full wet to a dry line forming to a full dry track in one day, on the same tires, was incredible fun. I can only imagine what it's like to race one of these fantastic machines.
Alonso is a truly gifted driver. He's had a shit car the last few years, but look at his first lap performance when all of the backmarkers are hampered by traffic, and you can see just how good he is.
Alonso's problem has always been that he cannot tolerate having an equally strong teammate. He insists on being the #1 driver, so when Hamilton arrived as a rookie in 2007, and was at least matching Alonso on performance, he really couldn't cope and left the team. If you're going to drive for a top 3 team in F1, you're going to have 2 strong drivers. McLaren had years with 2 world champions, Ferrrari did the last few years, Mercedes would prefer to. Alonso got cycled back to weaker teams where he could be the star, but where he had worse equipment. It was a bad tradeoff, IMO.
Nice to see him winning again. I always enjoy watching him race.
Also, he is intensely political within a team, and burned bridges at Ferrari. Neither Mercedes nor Red Bull were interested in hiring him for that reason. Which is a shame because he ought to have way more than 2 WDCs.
I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
I once got to drive a kart in the rain on slicks. The day started wet and cleared up by the afternoon. Being able to go from full wet to a dry line forming to a full dry track in one day, on the same tires, was incredible fun. I can only imagine what it's like to race one of these fantastic machines.
Rain and red flags wreck the racing at the Rolex 24 at Daytona
I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
I once got to drive a kart in the rain on slicks. The day started wet and cleared up by the afternoon. Being able to go from full wet to a dry line forming to a full dry track in one day, on the same tires, was incredible fun. I can only imagine what it's like to race one of these fantastic machines.
Dunno. When it gets as wet as it did, I think the rain becomes more of a randomizer than an equalizer.
I have to agree, Sebring is a far better race and test for car and driver. Honestly, for all its importance, I never found Daytona all that interesting of a race.“probably IMSA's highest-profile event“
From an old ALMS fan...
SEBRING!!! (While shaking fist in the air)
You are probably right, but I think the 12 hours of Sebring is a harder race on both the drivers and cars.
Plus more people show up (though Daytona was pretty full this year)
Sebring has character. It’s a “Happening” as my old deceased uncle used to say
From the caption
Is Rolex's sponsorship of the race a little counterproductive? The only Daytona I want is the one I'd get for winning the race, and I don't think that's ever going to happen...
I assume that Daytona is suppose to be Rolex. Not that I blame you I would have Daytona on the brain too.
“probably IMSA's highest-profile event“
From an old ALMS fan...
SEBRING!!! (While shaking fist in the air)
You are probably right, but I think the 12 hours of Sebring is a harder race on both the drivers and cars.
Plus more people show up (though Daytona was pretty full this year)
Sebring has character. It’s a “Happening” as my old deceased uncle used to say
as someone who understands a car has 4 tires and an engine and can go really fast intentionally and be regularly interesting to watch in passing, i was initially puzzled and asked 'why on ars?'.
i read it in full with interest, but got lost in small sections that required context i missed. then i read the comments (all more interesting than expected) and the same thing happened (a little help on acronyms please, aficionados!). a nice diversion.
it's definitely worthy of ars. And techy detail is certainly a good angle to bridge the gap of empathy and interest. just help a guy out with the oodles of TLAs and assumed history, please!
I have to agree, Sebring is a far better race and test for car and driver. Honestly, for all its importance, I never found Daytona all that interesting of a race.“probably IMSA's highest-profile event“
From an old ALMS fan...
SEBRING!!! (While shaking fist in the air)
You are probably right, but I think the 12 hours of Sebring is a harder race on both the drivers and cars.
Plus more people show up (though Daytona was pretty full this year)
Sebring has character. It’s a “Happening” as my old deceased uncle used to say
A wet track is a great equalizer. Enough standing water that you're effectively trying to race in a very shallow pond. otoh, is just a mess.I think racing in the rain really highlights driver skill. It's "easier" when things are dry and perfect an those glue balls they call tires can do their magic. But in the wet it's all about finesse.
I once got to drive a kart in the rain on slicks. The day started wet and cleared up by the afternoon. Being able to go from full wet to a dry line forming to a full dry track in one day, on the same tires, was incredible fun. I can only imagine what it's like to race one of these fantastic machines.
Dunno. When it gets as wet as it did, I think the rain becomes more of a randomizer than an equalizer.
Just a minor correction to one of the image captions: As much as I wish it'd happened, Kobayashi didn't win Le Mans in 2018; you might have mixed him up with Kazuki Nakajima, who did win at Le Mans last year, but has never driven in the Daytona 24.
I’ve been following F1 and other series since mid 1990s and what I cannot understand is adoration of Fernando Alonso.
Sure, he is a 2-time world champion and won Le Mans, had a good run at Indy 500.
But let’s compare him with Jacques Villeneuve, who has an equally difficult personality.
The Canadian won 1 WC, finished runner up his first season. He won Indy 500 (came from 2 laps down), Indy championship, and finished runner up at Le Mans (behind all conquering Audis). He put a Nascar car on qualifying p6 on his first attempt in Taladega.
They are in the same league.