There’s a lot of hype about Chinese EVs—is any of it true?

They key EV advantage China has is not in price. As the writeup explains those price advantages largely dispear when the vehicles are designed to western standards.

They China EV advantage that we are missing out on is in the actual EV technology. It is the CATL's 3rd-generation Qilin (Shenxing) battery, unveiled in April 2026 that completes a full charge in under 7 minutes (10% to 98% in 6 minutes and 27 seconds). It is the the BYD flash charging that charges an EV from 10% to 97% in just 9 minutes and adds 400km of range in 5 minutes. It fully charges a cold soaked battery at -30°C in 12 minutes. It is the 2nd Generation Blade Battery that provides electric range exceeding 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) and the WeLion Semi-Solid-State Battery from Nio which was live streamed providing a real world range of 1,044 km from a 150 kWh battery.


Here is Kyle from Out of Spec recently reviewing BYD flash charging to show the next level of EV technology being deployed that we do not have access to


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajim7KF30jE

Everything about this article reeks of "American exceptionalism"

The entire planet has been caught with their pants down as China seems to have been the only country who didn't half-arse electrification.

(Global) People are now buying Chinese cars not because they're cheaper, but because they're straight up better. It's the 90s Japanese auto takeover, but it's China's turn now.
 
Upvote
2 (10 / -8)
As do European automakers. Never in living in North America have I come across a Renault.
Now tell me you've never seen a Beemer, a Merc, or an Audi.
The cheap Chinese cars don't meet US or European crash safety standards, which is part of why they are cheap.
If they didn't meet EU safety standards they wouldn't be available for sale there at all... much like the Cybertruck.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
50,713
Subscriptor
FWIW, that's like 1 shipping container, so you might if you don't use your living room much.

Not real useful, and I suspect the amusement value of a room full of lids with some tunnels to get around would wear off pretty quickly...but possible.

(And maybe you'd come out of it with the much more useful container.)
A 20' container, or a 40' container? The former is basically the same size as a car, so I could fit that. The latter, not so much.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Underpaid Chinese workers and robots without human rights, subsidized by an underdeveloped country that is stealing all your know-how, are producing substandard, lousy vehicles... yet you slap on 100%+ tariffs because they might ruin your 'magnificent' auto industry. Very confident, are you?

Btw, @DrGitlin: Tesla and other startups? Tesla market cap: $1.4T > Ford + GM: $110B.
 
Upvote
-13 (2 / -15)

THT

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,208
Subscriptor
I mean, startup companies are generally, in any field, death marches. You expect maybe 10% to survive 5 years.

In manufacturing the gulf between usable prototype and volume production is pretty vast. You can hire a company to produce widgets; not so much with cars.
Yeah, but we should do something about that, no?

There really needs to be huge subsidies for merchant car manufacturing to allow startups to ship, to try to drive down the cost of mass manufacturing of cars. It’s not a real market if startups fail before having a product.

A lot of interesting car concepts, but the capital needed to get to market, for incumbents too, means only milquetoast little-risk vehicles make it.

And even if they do make it, there are crazy conditions that must be worked around, like only being able sell cars through dealers, further increasing capital costs.

It’s an embarrassment.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
But there is next to the driveway of most of the rental houses I’ve seen. Or lived in.

(Were those goal posts heavy?)

I own an EV and plan on buying a second. But I own a house.

I have never rented at a place that had external power outlets anywhere near the parking.

Of course, rental houses essentially don't exist in my market. They cost more than buying a house so only people who don't plan to stay or who have enough cash to afford a house but not enough credit to get a loan rent stand-alone houses.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

c-gull

Seniorius Lurkius
35
Subscriptor++
Perhaps, but I spend all day here and online being told y’all want small cars with no AI and no connection and no screens and lots of buttons and then an irresponsible website publishes a “you’re being denied this $10,000 EV” and the car is packed full of AI and screens and spyware and all of a sudden none of those complaints seem to matter anymore.
"y'all" coming from an expat is delicious sarcasm...

I have a Subaru BRZ, which somewhat meets your description and happens to be a lot of fun going around corners. (I am sure the GPS track recorded off its shark fin is of interest and available to some interested parties though.)

But if I was less interested in going around corners, I might accept all the other things. I could see that happening.

I am not simple about my desires for "car" (fun/transport/?) I expect much of the commentariat here to be conflicted.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

SomeoneElseFromSomewhere

Smack-Fu Master, in training
52
Subscriptor
Seems like a bit of a weird article. I have a Chinese car (xpeng g6), and it's great. What's more, the 2025 model brought back manual control for air vents after following Tesla's crap lead on touchscreen only controls for the prior model.

Disappointingly one sided, but at least honest that it's based on forum chat, not actual experience.
 
Upvote
1 (3 / -2)
Any nation with a minimum wage should enact a tariff on imports at a level specific to eliminate wage arbitrage.
We all know of heat death, the ultimate end of energy in the universe. May I posit the wage death: when every Nation will have wages slightly higher than China's wages in 2000
 
Upvote
-2 (1 / -3)
And if the car can’t handle 100% if the trips that are made, they are worthless for the many single car families. That’s like saying a parachute is okay for most people if it works 98% of the fall to the ground.

This got downvoted, but I loathe rental car companies.

  • I've been accused of not returning the car ("hands free" drop off at airport) and only avoided that becoming a thing because I had photos of it in their lot, trapped by other cars.
  • I have received a vehicle half the size I requested and had to drive 700 miles with luggage on peoples' laps
  • have had to go to a different rental company because I there were no cars even though I had a 6-month older reservation
  • Have had to go to a different rental company because the car I was given was defective and wouldn't turn left.
  • I have spent far, far, far too long waiting at rental car desks.

I'm not even adding the predatory fuel charges and assortment of add-ons.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
It's sort of fascinating to hear all the "oh no trust me the cars are crap not worth it" in this thread when in the last thread on the topic we had some of the same people (including the OP) breathlessly explaining why it was so important to take a protectionist stance and hedge the Chinese out of the US market entirely.

The positions feel somewhat at odds with each other. Are Chinese EVs irrelevant garbage or is it our patriotic duty to protect Ford as suggested in a previous article?
 
Last edited:
Upvote
3 (8 / -5)
I'll admit I want a car that sits higher, only because my knees don't bend very well anymore.

But my tastes are for a small car, (not a LOW car, just small is fine), no AI, no screens, and brush-it-to-turn-on bullshit. I have zero shits to give about EV's, because AFAIK, they're all about touch screens, spyware and AI out the ass. ESPECIALLY if you're talking Chinese models. Other factors are included that are inherent to the design.

I'd be fine with some of the modern safety things like blind spot alerts and stuff like that, but I think my tastes in automotive interiors and features stopped evolving a bit over 10 years ago and have only gotten more bitter and foul at what's been produced since then. If it has an Infotainment system in it, I have a Ka-Bar for that.

In the meantime, my car is well over the US drinking age, no touch screens, all levers and physical buttons and physical sliders, and it's old enough to be entering a doctorate program after already having cleared both Bachelor's and Master's degrees.

It'll probably find a job soon, probably better paying than anything I ever had, hook up with a cute Japanese model three quarters its age and start producing go-carts in the near future. Assuming I can fix the driver door before then...

So not EVERYONE bitches about what we're NOT getting from China. I'm rather glad we don't generally have them running around here. Those SUV's and pickups would run them over and never realize it was more than speed a bump.*

*Some exaggeration included.

Overall, I remember when driving was fun. Today, it just seems stressful, distracting and dangerous. And that's literally with no difference in traffic density. Kinda says something, but I don't think most folks are listening to that. They're often too busy FOMO YOLOing through life.
Add a stick to it and window cranks, and I'm with you! Now pardon me while I shake out the dashboard carpet...
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

AntiStrangeQuark

Seniorius Lurkius
7
Subscriptor++
They exist. I just don't think they're sold in North America, including Canada. There are plenty of good small hatchback, compact SUVs now that are not Chinese.

F.eg the new ID Polo:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25OfJS-gb0U&t=50s

I should have been clearer - I know they exist, but aren't sold here. No ID3, and probably won't get the ID Polo, considering we don't get the gas Polo (or even the base model Golf any more). It is really frustrating because the incumbents don't seem interested. If it is because nobody here wants small cars, we'll find out when the Chinese brands can export 49,000 cars to us. Unless they do the same thing and only send their high end models.
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)
I own an EV and plan on buying a second. But I own a house.

I have never rented at a place that had external power outlets anywhere near the parking.

Of course, rental houses essentially don't exist in my market. They cost more than buying a house so only people who don't plan to stay or who have enough cash to afford a house but not enough credit to get a loan rent stand-alone houses.
I only ever rented one place that didn't have a place where I could have charged, and that was the first apartment I ever rented. All but one of the rest had a garage but even that one had a private driveway.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
50,713
Subscriptor
Yeah, but we should do something about that, no?

There really needs to be huge subsidies for merchant car manufacturing to allow startups to ship, to try to drive down the cost of mass manufacturing of cars. It’s not a real market if startups fail before having a product.

A lot of interesting car concepts, but the capital needed to get to market, for incumbents too, means only milquetoast little-risk vehicles make it.

And even if they do make it, there are crazy conditions that must be worked around, like only being able sell cars through dealers, further increasing capital costs.

It’s an embarrassment.
It's not a real market if every stupid idea gets artificially carried to production either.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
Cherry‑picking Chinese‑market‑only models like Zeekr (?) for their ridiculous passenger infotainment screens and no buttons seems a bit disingenuous to me, though. All your other concerns from your article are fine otherwise!

Compare the ridiculous Zeekr with what the cheapest EU‑market Byd Dolphin actually looks like here in Europpe:
View attachment 134178
Physical buttons for climate control, volume and drive regime? Check.
No ridiculous screens? Check
et cetera…

I mean, you'd be hard pressed to tell it's a Chinese car, right? It looks pretty normal to me. €23,000 incl. VAT for the basic version.
So it's a more expensive version of the Kia Rio...
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)
Did you think of them as American when Ford owned the company?
Sadly yes, same as with Saab when GM owned the company and then started using their crappy parts bib to build the cars to their utter detriment.

Volvo being part of the Geely group isn't a bad thing though. Geely are building a reputation for solid reliability, excellent tech and great design. The new Zeekrs in particular are getting a lot of positive reviews in markets outside China as well as performing well intehir home market.

I think they're finding their way with Volvo products, the new ones on show at Beijing a week or so ago seem very solid and more traditional Volvo. And they share tech with the Chinese house brands in a good way which will help them compete in a way that many solely European brands are failing at.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

Boskone

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,089
Subscriptor
Most EVs are going to have at least one good sized screen to help with finding a charger while driving.

Now, the trend for the whole dash to be a screen is just right up fugly.
I can't speak for everyone, but I don't necessarily mind one large screen...depending on the definition of "large".

I wouldn't mind something a bit larger than my current double-DIN head unit.

But the 12"+ screens in some cars always look sorta wedged-in to me, like the designers got a last-minute directive to fit one in.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
Sadly yes, same as with Saab when GM owned the company and then started using their crappy parts bib to build the cars to their utter detriment.

Volvo being part of the Geely group isn't a bad thing though. Geely are building a reputation for solid reliability, excellent tech and great design. The new Zeekrs in particular are getting a lot of positive reviews in markets outside China as well as performing well intehir home market.

I think they're finding their way with Volvo products, the new ones on show at Beijing a week or so ago seem very solid and more traditional Volvo. And they share tech with the Chinese house brands in a good way which will help them compete in a way that many solely European brands are failing at.
I agree with you about Saab, which died the typical GM death but Volvo really didn't lose its identity under Ford like that. Sure there was some cross-make development like the C1 platform that was shared by the V40, Ford Focus (European), Mazda3 but Volvo had been partnering with other companies before the Ford acquisition (looking sideways at the miserable PRV V6). The move from their traditional rear wheel drive models to front wheel drive predated Ford and I'm not sure anything else could be pointed at as "Ford did that!"
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
I agree with you about Saab, which died the typical GM death but Volvo really didn't lose its identity under Ford like that. Sure there was some cross-make development like the C1 platform that was shared by the V40, Ford Focus (European), Mazda3 but Volvo had been partnering with other companies before the Ford acquisition (looking sideways at the miserable PRV V6). The move from their traditional rear wheel drive models to front wheel drive predated Ford and I'm not sure anything else could be pointed at as "Ford did that!"
All fair points.
But I'd counter that they were starved of development money by Ford for a long time and that had a big effect. It feels like Geely are happy to invest more for the cachet of owning a Euro marque (two with Polestar) and seem to utilised that for their home market bands like Zeekr and Lynx & Co which definitely have more Euro influence and designers than other Chinese cars.
Ford's influence was felt in the restrictions imposed rather than direct intervention.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Something to think about for those who view Chinese cars a copy/paste of other designs.
The Chinese car industry is massively invested in R&D and this doesn't appear to be slowing down.
As an example here's a quote about BYD's hiring in recent years and what they're hiring for:

At the same time, it is worth pointing out that in the past two to three years, BYD has recruited more than 50,000 fresh college graduates, of which nearly 70% this year have Masters and Doctoral degrees, and nearly 80% are R&D personnel.

That's from this article:
https://carnewschina.com/2024/12/30...tomaker-and-nearly-110000-engineers-ceo-says/
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

kai_h

Smack-Fu Master, in training
74
This article is a pretty low effort post for Ars. Please do better.

All of the fear mongering around Chinese data collection now can equally be applied by the rest of the world to American vehicles. Do I want to drive a Tesla if I think that Musk can gather whatever data he wants, or shut my car down remotely if he has another ketamine-fuelled tantrum? How about the long-promised, paid for and never delivered FSD that so many people are hanging out for? Orders that are paid in full that have never been fulfilled even years later, and now he says "Oh, sorry, that hardware I promised could do FSD, well, nah, it actually can't – if you want FSD I'll give you a discount on a new Tesla though". Like seriously?

Here in Australia, we get a lot of the new Chinese brands. There is the BYD Atto 1, that has a driveaway price of $25,000 AUD, including GST, which is roughly $15,500 USD once you take off 10% for GST and then factor in the exchange rate. There's all of the Geely brands – including Zeekr, Polestar and Lotus. MG, GWM, Chery. BYD and Denza. Take your pick. It's a brave new world out there and the USA is no longer the king of the hill.

I recently purchased a Polestar 2, having driven various versions of the Audi S3 for the past 10+ years, and the Polestar is an excellent vehicle – a true driver's EV.

It combines some of the best minimal and classy European design with cutting-edge Chinese technology, and the whole package is very compelling.

The Long Range, Dual Motor variant has an 82kW/h battery that delivers 590km range, and with over 300kW to the wheels, it can get all 2,100kgs of vehicle and batteries to do the 0-100 sprint in around 4.5 seconds. The Bowers and Wilkins stereo possibly sounds better than my hifi system at home, the leather seats are comfy and the panoramic sunroof is just the icing on the cake.
 
Upvote
7 (11 / -4)
I think there are a number of underlying problems with the US industry that China addresses:
  • The industry predicted that EVs would be cheaper than ICE around 2020. 6 years later they're still charging us more for EVs presumably because EV buyers will pay more and they like the money.
  • If the vehicle interface is going to just be an iPad, it might as well be inexpensive. It's not like Cadillac is returning the savings to us.
  • Many of us dislike that the formula for US safety is to wrap more steel around us to counter the extra steel everyone has wrapped around them, and would like a return to more modest vehicles.
Those of us who are old enough to remember the invasion of Japanese vehicles starting in the 1970s saw a movement that was ultimately beneficial to the US auto industry by getting them out of their outdated ideas, and getting them to adopt better manufacturing practices. One of those joint efforts was NUMMI, a GM/Toyota joint plant that is now Tesla's CA plant.

US cars got a LOT better as a result of that pressure. But that's not how we're responding to this. Instead, we have a bipartisan effort in the Senate to seal the US off from China, banning any joint effort like NUMMI as if there's nothing there to learn. US automakers will just get weaker. Electrification is the obvious outcome. Electrification benefits from size reduction and simplification. US automakers can't afford a revenue drop, and the government will protect them from one, and they're going to milk us for that revenue rather than deliver what the country needs and customers increasingly will want.

I'll add BYD has a factory in the US. It's in Lancaster, CA. They make electric buses and have been for over a decade. They're fantastic.
 
Upvote
4 (7 / -3)
You need to be a home-owner to do this.
Nope. You need to live within commuting distance of an L2 charger. Here in Atlanta, MARTA has L2 chargers at many of their Park-N-Ride sites. Plug the car in, hop on a bus or train, and go about your business. I have done that many, may times in the 2+ years that I have lived here. And I have never lived anywhere that I could charge at home or at work.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

sd70mac

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,630
Subscriptor
When I opened the article I was really hoping that Ars sent Dr. Gitlin to the Chinese auto show for hands-on reporting. That needs to happen. Surely Condé Nast has a private jet they could send him on.
Well, considering that Mainland Chinese cars are coming to Canada, it might only be necessary to take a trip up there to drive them soon (the Chinese-built Tesla Model 3 is already available up there, but that mostly has improved fit and finish compared to the California ones).
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Here's a review of the tiny Wu-ling EV pictured at the top of the story by an American plying his trade as a YouTube (and Chinese social media) based automotive journalist, it sells for US$6,500 and they've sold like hotcakes for years to people looking to upgrade from a bicycle or scooter who don't have funds for anything grander, very much not an export option:

http://www.wheelsboy.net/sys-nd/146.html
 
Last edited:
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

sd70mac

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,630
Subscriptor
If Chinese EVs are so great, how is it that China has remained one of Tesla’s largest markets? China accounted for 38.24% of Tesla's global deliveries of 1.64 million vehicles in 2025. This basic fact makes me skeptical about much of the hype about Chinese EVs.

The super fast charging that BYD is demonstrating has real potential for the future. However, it requires electrical infrastructure which does not exist in the USA. The town in Iowa that I grew up in, doesn't even have a single DC fast charger within 30 miles of it. The closest one peaks out at less than 100 kW. There are huge areas in the west and mid-west, outside the "big" cities in which an EV is as rare a sight as BigFoot.

Part of the reason that Americans want an EV with an EPA range of at least 300 miles is that at interstate highway speeds of 70+ mph, the real range drops to 250 or less. Even then, most EVs, my Model Y especially, charge fastest between 10% and 60%. As such, on a long road trip, the best strategy is to never actually charge much past 60%, otherwise the time spent charging is excessive. As it is, it is typical to charge for 8 to 10 minutes every 2 hours of driving. Nevertheless, last month I drove 2400 miles round trip to Iowa from Florida for a visit without any difficulty in my EV.

I'm in my late 70s. I rather like not having a whole bunch of buttons. Voice commands are not that hard to learn.
The demonstration BYD ‘flash’ charging station didn’t use a grid connection, relying entirely on on-site storage and power imports from vehicles. However, normally most fast charging sites would still have a grid connection, even if they rely primarily on solar and/or wind along with storage (like the Tesla ‘Oasis’ station: https://electrek.co/2025/07/03/tesla-launches-oasis-supercharger-with-solar-farm-off-grid-batteries/ ).
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

sd70mac

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,630
Subscriptor
Could be partly a generational thing. Being in my 50's I don't mind touch screen buttons but I do want buttons or physical controls for ventilation controls, volume, wipers, turn signals, etc. However, I could see one in their early 20's who crew up with iPads and smartphones be more comfortable with touch controls.
I’m in my early 30’s and also favor physical buttons and switches for important or commonly used controls, although I don’t mind a vehicle also including a touchscreen, as long as it works well.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
The demonstration BYD ‘flash’ charging station didn’t use a grid connection, relying entirely on on-site storage and power imports from vehicles. However, normally most fast charging sites would still have a grid connection, even if they rely primarily on solar and/or wind along with storage (like the Tesla ‘Oasis’ station: https://electrek.co/2025/07/03/tesla-launches-oasis-supercharger-with-solar-farm-off-grid-batteries/ ).
For the demonstration sure - but BYD have already installed 5,000 of these and are continuing on with deployment:

https://insideevs.com/news/791930/byd-charging-network-5000-flash/
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Algenonq

Smack-Fu Master, in training
3
This reminds me of the wailing and gnashing of teeth about Japanese cars in the 1970s. There was a lot of woe is me back then too. Australia has lost its domestic manufacturing capability thanks to GM, Ford, Toyota and Mitsubishi pulling out when the government refused to keep subsidizing them. We now have an unbelievable array of imports. Those complaining about screens and interior design should look to home. Tesla started this nonsense. As for style, we anre inundated with ugly huge and very conservative looking trucks and suvs from the US, the usual quirky Japanese and European imports and shiploads of Chinese Evs. Yes the Chinese cars seem a little gaudy, but fuck, they’re just cars. Here, in March BYD was third highest selling car in the market overall, not just for evs. They are great vehicles, and everyone I know that has one loves them. That market share is sure to grow as Evs make a hell of a lot of sense while the theocracies (US, Iran, and Isreal) are beefing it up in west Asia and screwing up the rest of the world’s energy supplies. Energy security is real, and electricity doesn’t need ships.
 
Upvote
5 (7 / -2)

dagar9

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,881
Subscriptor
No you do not. Level 1 charging only requires a regular electrical outlet. Plug it in overnight and unplug in the morning. Works for me! :cool:
That's right! Drop an extension cord from your 4th floor apartment across the sidewalk and just plug in overnight!
 
Upvote
-2 (1 / -3)

android_alpaca

Ars Praefectus
5,344
Subscriptor
justin150 said:
It is absurd because they never understand that EVs can be charged overnight
You need to be a home-owner to do this.
93% of people buying new cars are homeowners and only about 3% of Americans own an EV right now.
Ok, I'll move the goalpost: not everyone can rent a house either.
According to US Census, in 2023 73% of households in the US live in an single family home (63%) or a townhouse (10%). Now that isn't everyone (and some of those homes aren't immediately EV-ready) but that's a lot more people than the 3% of households that own an EV. This is a "glass 2/3 full, 1/3 empty" type of deal since US Census says that out of all households in the US, 35% rent (versus 65% the own their own home)... and about 15% rent an apartment.

In the long term we will need to build EV charging infrastructure for people without access to ovenight charging, we still have over a decade (probably or more if you do the math on production build up) before total EV adoption is high enough for this to become an issue for continued adoption growth. Otherwise, people who aren't homeowners are unlikely to be buying new vehicles anyway (and there are still enough homeowners to leftover to buy used EVs).
 
Last edited:
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
We have to give the Chinese some credit that are actually looking at banning some of the nonsense.

Retractable door handles
https://carnewschina.com/2025/09/24...handles-released-for-public-comment-in-china/

Physical controls
https://carnewschina.com/2026/02/16...-reducing-reliance-on-central-control-screen/
That's well behind the times, China banned retractable door handles and already all the new models no longer have them, there's a legal requirement to have mechanical door lock mechanisms. Watch something like this and its follow-ups for details (and a full run-down of the Beijing show, it's far more insightful than this article:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs_ihHX_uOY


They move fast.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

matty-o2

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
117
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)