Critics note a lack of factual support lawsuit filed by US Senate candidate.
Just need a check made out to the Trump Ballroom, and all those inconveniences go away.Has any explanation been offered as to why the BIS would have CLOSED the investigation, if they had a finding of false advertising and insecure message handling?
That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. You would normally (I know, nothing is normal now wrt the Federal Govt) expect a closure of the investigation to happen because they didn't find any wrongdoing?
I was going to come here to say this "because of the children"Wait, I'm a little confused. . . I thought Republicans were generally against E2EE encryption "because law enforcement"?
Don’t worry, as soon as the election is over he’ll be back to demanding back doors in everything to spy on women who dare to seek healthcare.Aw, look at Paxton pretending to care about honesty and and integrity. How cute.
Well, ever since their guy's new administration keeps getting caught with incriminating chat groups...Wait, I'm a little confused. . . I thought Republicans were generally against E2EE encryption "because law enforcement"?
You mean you don't understand how this investigation could be closed? C'mon man, just think of the extortion.Has any explanation been offered as to why the BIS would have CLOSED the investigation, if they had a finding of false advertising and insecure message handling?
That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. You would normally (I know, nothing is normal now wrt the Federal Govt) expect a closure of the investigation to happen because they didn't find any wrongdoing?
Because Zuck is already giving money to Demented Don. This investigation might interrupt that, at least temporarily, which would not benefit Paxton. Closing the investigation doesn't need to have anything at all to do with the facts of this particular charge.Has any explanation been offered as to why the BIS would have CLOSED the investigation, if they had a finding of false advertising and insecure message handling?
That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. You would normally (I know, nothing is normal now wrt the Federal Govt) expect a closure of the investigation to happen because they didn't find any wrongdoing?
Dowling, however, stressed that the analysis applied only to the WhatsApp client as available in May 2023. Their findings wouldn’t necessarily apply to versions updated since then.
They are more than likely upset that Facebook isn't sharing the access with them.Wait, I'm a little confused. . . I thought Republicans were generally against E2EE encryption "because law enforcement"?
Ron DeSantis says "Hold my beer"...proving the only entity more reprehensible than Meta is a Texas Republican A.G.