Microsoft CoreAI exec Asha Sharma will take over in surprise executive shake-up.
See full article...
See full article...
Asha Sharma, an executive currently in charge of Microsoft’s CoreAI division, will take his place.
A recent ars article pointed out that Xbox brings in comparable revenue to Windows these days.Fun fact, I was really curious about how big "Xbox" as a brand really is. It's really easy to underestimate it because it's just a division under Microsoft, but their revenue for 2025 was around 23 Billion.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/963263/microsoft-annual-gaming-revenue/
If they were their own company, they would rank just inside of the top 200 out of Fortune 500 companies, right next to companies like Adobe, Colgate-Palmolive, General Mills, Discover, Black Rock, etc. I'd guess some of those companies have more assets than Xbox has, but it's an interesting thing thinking about how big that division really is.
https://us500.com/fortune-500-companies
EDIT: The list has Microsoft at $245B in revenue, meaning the gaming division is still only around 10% of the companies revenue.
Also, by spearheading the Activision acquisition, he gave a huge amount of undeserved money to Bobby “I’m in the files” Kotick, got thousands of people fired, and killed Halo.Spencer was a net negative in my book. Many years of bad calls. Had a load of quotes from his tenure that did not age well. Didn't know the territory.
No clue about the new boss: Maybe she's good at organization, and will listen to folks who know the terrain. Of course, it is Microsoft...
Sharma also promised the company would “invent new business models and new ways to play,” including treating its core gaming properties “as static IP to milk and monetize.” And given Sharma’s history of managing AI products at Microsoft, she was extremely enthusiastic about certain types of machine-generated content.
“As monetization and AI evolve and influence this future, we will definitely chase short-term efficiency and flood our ecosystem with soulless AI slop,” Sharma promised. “Games are and always will be monetizable products, crafted by reverse centaurs, and created with the most innovative technology provided by us.”
As monetization and AI evolve and influence this future, we will not chase short-term efficiency or flood our ecosystem with soulless AI slop.
I think it's probably best to focus on the "slop" part of her quote. That's very different than the AI person they hired saying they are not going to use AI.Phil lost his shit or went with the flow and messed up xbox.
The new head, despite previously being deep into "AI", recently said they'd not add "AI" slop on games.
So that's a massive upgrade.
It is also worth noting that although an AI exec does not bode well, Spencer himself had no gaming experience when he originally became head of Microsoft Game Studios. Nor did Nintendo's Reggie Fils-Aime, who worked at places like Proctor & Gamble and Pizza Hut.
13 years. He became head of Microsoft Game Studios EMEA back 2001.He had 11 years of experience.
Let me re-think my decision to walk away from console gaming very carefully in light of this bit of news...
Nope. I'm good.
T, FTFYwhat the heck is going on overthereeverywhere?
No can do, all my xboxen controllers only have ABXY.Press F to pay respect for Xbox.
Wow, that’s wildly racist, with a dollup of sexism to boot.I've been told that in cases of people of Indian origins promoting others of Indian origins, we should be doing a caste analysis, looking for "nepotism", same a s we do for western people with the same last name or familial ties. Has anyone done that in this case ?
I'm asking because I see no reason why that lady would be ending up at the job ?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=indian+caste+system+in+silicon+valleyWow, that’s wildly racist, with a dollup of sexism to boot.
Press F to pay respect for Xbox.
Reggie fought the Nintendo execs to make Wii Sports a bundled in game, which is probably the number one reason the Wii was a massive hit. Nintendo wanted it to be a separate purchase like the Switch 2 tech demo.WhileI think public opinion of Reggie is/was very positive; I personally don't think he did very much other than put on a really good public face. To me it seemed like mostly the lawyers and Nintendo Japan ran Nintendo US.
And while Spencer might have had a positive start to his tenure (in terms of public opinion); I think he's been in the negatives for at least the last 5-8 years. And personally I don't think he's done very well over the entirety of his tenure as CEO.
So not quite the example I think you are probably trying to go for.
Yeah the way people talk about Spencer is weird to me. Like the dude did more to make gaming more accessible than any executive in decades. Just because that may have hurt some nebulous console brand nonsense is irrelevant imo. I want to play games where I want and with who I want and Spencer did a massive amount on that front.Oh god, an AI exec?
This sucks. Probably not for Spencer, who I think was likely not pleased to have to eat shit sandwiches like jacking up the price of Game Pass and console hardware, or executing mass layoffs these last couple of years. But for the rest of us, he championed consumer-friendly initiatives that I found really valuable. Play Anywhere, Game Pass, Smart Delivery, and backwards compatibility all happened under his watch. He pushed hard on improving the PC experience. He also played games himself and understood where a lot of the pain points were.
Fanboys invested in brand wars hated it, but Spencer's pushing Microsoft towards becoming a multi-platform publisher also gives us all more choice in the long run. People say it's going to kill Xbox, ignoring the elephant in the room that that already happened when previous management fucked up the Xbox One launch and sent a generation of gamers to build digital libraries on other platforms. They were never coming back, and the Xbox Series trailing the PS5 so drastically in sales is the proof. Xbox is going to become a bespoke gaming PC brand in the future, which TBH I'm totally cool with, since it'll let me buy games from whatever store offers the best deal as opposed to having to decide based on which games are locked to the hardware.
Armchair CEOs in comments sections across the Internet have given him a hard time for awhile now for various reasons. But I'll remember him fondly as someone who drove hard to break down the walls of platform exclusivity and made my gaming dollar go further.
The problem of Xbox (and sony, and partially of the switch) is that they no longer use specifically-designed chips; nowadays they use (little-)customised computer chips, and unix-like OSses.I think it's too late for xbox.
yep and sony holding group(the parent company of everything shell corp by sony)Fun fact, I was really curious about how big "Xbox" as a brand really is. It's really easy to underestimate it because it's just a division under Microsoft, but their revenue for 2025 was around 23 Billion.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/963263/microsoft-annual-gaming-revenue/
If they were their own company, they would rank just inside of the top 200 out of Fortune 500 companies, right next to companies like Adobe, Colgate-Palmolive, General Mills, Discover, Black Rock, etc. I'd guess some of those companies have more assets than Xbox has, but it's an interesting thing thinking about how big that division really is.
https://us500.com/fortune-500-companies
EDIT: The list has Microsoft at $245B in revenue, meaning the gaming division is still only around 10% of the companies revenue.
While no longer true today, there was a time when it was possible to build a basic but decent gaming PC for not too much more than the price of a PS4 or Xbox One.How is console gaming on it's deathbed? The PS5 has sold a lot, and the Switch 2 has been doing very well so far. Even the Xbox Series has done reasonably well, historically speaking, if not up to Microsoft's expectations.
Also note that Fils-Aimé was not in a comparable position He was head of Nintendo of America, which handles sales, marketing, distribution and translation for North America. It does not do any game development. Sharma will lead everything games-related at Microsoft.Can you please explain why you would come in here lying about Spencer’s gaming history of all things? I’m really scratching my head here.
I’ve been gaming on Linux (using Fedora) the last 3 or 4 months with no major issues. It’s not perfect but it’s good enough that I’ll never go back to windows.Oh wow, so Xbox is actually officially dead.
Dear Nadella: go to therapy or go fuck yourself.
I've been on the Xbox train since the OG Xbox launched when I was in middle school. Phil Spencer was the best thing to happen to Xbox since Seamus left, but now Microsoft as a whole is officially dead to me.
Fuck Sony too, I hope Valve and Linux steps up to fill the gap, but I will finally go PlayStation now that you're putting a non-gamer, marketing / AI exec in charge of your gaming division.
Honestly what the honest fuck.
Steve Jobs called it decades ago - Microsoft, institutionally, has no taste. They understand best practice, they understand process, they understand, technically, how to achieve great things. But they have no taste, so in the consumer space (where it matters) they never use that behemoth-scale expertise to build and sustain anything great. At best they build imitative mediocrity with small flashes of brilliance.I've been patiently waiting for Phil to leave or take a backseat because I didn't think Xbox was living up to their potential, especially after all of the acquisitions. I still think he should've stepped down sooner. But somehow, his replacement fills me with even less confidence?
Modern Microsoft really is the lead author in the paper on how to squander goodwill. Windows 10 to 11, and Xbox One to the (terribly named) Xbox Series. Even Surface went from "shining beacon of Windows" to "all but dead" :/