Microsoft gaming chief Phil Spencer steps down after 38 years with company

lukipedia

Ars Centurion
227
Subscriptor
It does not bode well that the new head of the gaming division

A) has less than two years at Microsoft
B) Was the head of Core AI at Microsoft
And has no gaming experience in her CV at all.

Which wouldn’t in and of itself be disqualifying, except that based on her memo to employees, I’m not even sure she’s ever played a Xbox game. Just soulless corporate speak.
 
Upvote
345 (348 / -3)

Urist

Ars Praefectus
4,345
Subscriptor
And has no gaming experience in her CV at all.

Which wouldn’t in and of itself be disqualifying, except that based on her memo to employees, I’m not even sure she’s ever played a Xbox game. Just soulless corporate speak.
No need for experience when you can just use Copilot!!
 
Upvote
215 (218 / -3)
From now on, Asha Sharma, who currently serves as the company chief for the CoreAI product, will be taking on the new role as the CEO of Microsoft Gaming
God damn it.

M$ is trying to quadruple (fucktuple?) up on their AI effort?

From: https://www.techpowerup.com/345803/microsoft-seeks-to-rebuild-community-trust-in-windows-11 (Microsoft Seeks to Rebuild Community Trust in Windows 11)

to: https://www.techpowerup.com/345893/...where-in-windows-11-to-focus-on-core-features (Microsoft Steps Back from "AI Everywhere" in Windows 11 to Focus on Core Features)

to: https://www.techpowerup.com/346546/...dows-11-running-in-task-bar-and-file-explorer (Microsoft Shows AI Integration in Windows 11 Running in Task Bar and File Explorer)

WTF is going on over at M$
 
Last edited:
Upvote
53 (78 / -25)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Elrabin

Ars Scholae Palatinae
786
Well, we'll see. Leaders with different perspectives are fine, as long as they listen to the folks near the work. Xbox revenue has doubled over the last decade, granted part of that is due to acquisition contribution. The overall gaming market only grew by about 88% in the same time period. So for all the teeth grinding and (alleged) xbox player revolts over decisions the business looks healthy to me. And doing the same old crap of buying out games to offer as an exclusive on a console seems like it's time is over. So we'll see if they can offer something compelling.
Focus less on the last decade and more on the last year or two.

They're significantly down in that time frame
 
Upvote
56 (62 / -6)

IceStorm

Ars Legatus Legionis
26,177
Moderator
Not hopeful after reading her corpo-speak letter.

If Phil has his bag, then by all means he should retire, I have no qualms with that. Sarah Bond not taking over, however, shows something is rotten inside Microsoft. My guess is that it's pro-Slop vs anti-Slop factions, and it's clear which side Nadella's on.
 
Upvote
199 (202 / -3)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

freakout87

Ars Centurion
388
Subscriptor
Oh god, an AI exec? 🤦‍♂️

This sucks. Probably not for Spencer, who I think was likely not pleased to have to eat shit sandwiches like jacking up the price of Game Pass and console hardware, or executing mass layoffs these last couple of years. But for the rest of us, he championed consumer-friendly initiatives that I found really valuable. Play Anywhere, Game Pass, Smart Delivery, and backwards compatibility all happened under his watch. He pushed hard on improving the PC experience. He also played games himself and understood where a lot of the pain points were.

Fanboys invested in brand wars hated it, but Spencer's pushing Microsoft towards becoming a multi-platform publisher also gives us all more choice in the long run. People say it's going to kill Xbox, ignoring the elephant in the room that that already happened when previous management fucked up the Xbox One launch and sent a generation of gamers to build digital libraries on other platforms. They were never coming back, and the Xbox Series trailing the PS5 so drastically in sales is the proof. Xbox is going to become a bespoke gaming PC brand in the future, which TBH I'm totally cool with, since it'll let me buy games from whatever store offers the best deal as opposed to having to decide based on which games are locked to the hardware.

Armchair CEOs in comments sections across the Internet have given him a hard time for awhile now for various reasons. But I'll remember him fondly as someone who drove hard to break down the walls of platform exclusivity and made my gaming dollar go further.
 
Upvote
203 (205 / -2)

NWade

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
150
Subscriptor++
So MS makes massive cuts to XBox over the last year, in order to prioritize its spend and ambitions on AI. Then it puts an AI executive in charge of gaming. Saying they won't push slop is a pretty big "Trust me, bro" statement to make.

And for those who don't speak Corporate, Sharma saying "...created with the most innovative technology..." is a reference to AI tools & AI-generated content.
 
Upvote
132 (134 / -2)

HoorayForEverything

Ars Scholae Palatinae
915
Subscriptor
Does anyone else feel that Sharma leaving the AI division is the lede here? I mean we knew Spencer was going at some point and we knew XBox would get a shakeup. This is just the other shoe dropping.

And we knew MS were making some major changes of direction with "AI" too but CoreAI has only been there a year and is supposed to be their agentic strategy... On YouTube you can watch hours of Sharma pitching this, just six months ago.
 
Upvote
105 (105 / 0)

freakout87

Ars Centurion
388
Subscriptor
I think it's too late for xbox.

Too late for... what? To succeed as an exclusive console hardware platform, certainly. But that writing has been on the wall for years now. Spencer and Bond made no secret of it. But if the aim is to just sell games, accessories and subscriptions to as many people as possible, it looks to me like they have more opportunity than ever. Xbox Game Studios titles regularly top the PlayStation and Steam charts, and more of them will be appearing on the Switch 2 as time goes by.

While 34 million Xbox Series consoles sold doesn't come close to PS5's 90 mil, that's still a lot of existing customers who probably have digital purchases and Game Pass subscriptions who might want to hang onto all that when it's time for the next generation. The real danger is that the next "Xbox" (really just a bespoke gaming PC like the Steam Machine) is too damn expensive for those people to upgrade to or tempt new PC buyers thanks to the component supply crunch, IMO.
 
Upvote
21 (36 / -15)
Spencer and Bond oversaw the implosion of an incredibly promising brand, but that Microsoft is putting someone with no experience in games and a background in AI and Meta hardware in charge means it's probably going to get even worse.

I finally bought a PS5 two months back, after owning and mostly focusing on every Xbox since the OG. There's just not future to the platform and spending money continuing to build a digital library seemed absurd (and I refuse to rent my games for $30 a month).
 
Upvote
18 (29 / -11)

IrishMonkee

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,383
We will empower our studios, invest in iconic franchises, and back bold new ideas. We will take risks. We will enter new categories and markets where we can add real value, grounded in what players care about most.
The only part of this statement from her that I find believable is that they'll invest in iconic franchises... or they'll go and buy another gaming company out. But they're on the clock and need to complete it before this admin changes. Microsoft didn't pay Trump part of the money needed for the WH East Wing demolition and planned ballroom for nothing.
 
Upvote
19 (22 / -3)

cfenton

Ars Scholae Palatinae
884
Subscriptor
Very sad news for one such as myself who bought into the Xbox ecosystem more than two decades ago. I'm very concerned about the Xbox brand although I accepted that console gaming has been on its death bed for years.
How is console gaming on it's deathbed? The PS5 has sold a lot, and the Switch 2 has been doing very well so far. Even the Xbox Series has done reasonably well, historically speaking, if not up to Microsoft's expectations.
 
Upvote
65 (67 / -2)

sarusa

Ars Praefectus
3,274
Subscriptor++
Making this about race, with a word some feel is a slur, feels unnecessary
Ejected from thread for 3 days – (Feb 23, 2026 at 4:45 PM)
what the heck is going on over there?
WTF is going on over at M$
Satya Nadella is on the email list of Desi CEOs and they all got the email that they all need to go 100% into AI and this is what he has been doing (of course they're not the only ones). He does not care if their entire product line completely goes to shit (as it has been doing, almost without exception, since 2021) as long as he can cram 'AI' sideways up the ass of everything and MS is 'in the lead' when Copilot suddenly achieves AGI deep inside everything's ass (which it can't possibly do).

Some of the very few Microslop products that hadn't completely gone to shit were a few of the game studios like Obsidian that had managed to avoid ensloppification. This looks like the end of that.
 
Upvote
40 (67 / -27)

solomonrex

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,543
Subscriptor++
It is also worth noting that although an AI exec does not bode well, Spencer himself had no gaming experience when he originally became head of Microsoft Game Studios. Nor did Nintendo's Reggie Fils-Aime, who worked at places like Proctor & Gamble and Pizza Hut.
Ok but thirty years ago, it was very common not to have that experience, that was a billion gamers ago. I don’t know what their plans are, and Spencer was there for the recent nonsense, but it doesn’t look good.

They have the entire Activision company and Xbox div and they didn’t hire from within?
 
Upvote
86 (86 / 0)
It is also worth noting that although an AI exec does not bode well, Spencer himself had no gaming experience when he originally became head of Microsoft Game Studios. Nor did Nintendo's Reggie Fils-Aime, who worked at places like Proctor & Gamble and Pizza Hut.
WhileI think public opinion of Reggie is/was very positive; I personally don't think he did very much other than put on a really good public face. To me it seemed like mostly the lawyers and Nintendo Japan ran Nintendo US.

And while Spencer might have had a positive start to his tenure (in terms of public opinion); I think he's been in the negatives for at least the last 5-8 years. And personally I don't think he's done very well over the entirety of his tenure as CEO.

So not quite the example I think you are probably trying to go for.
 
Upvote
2 (13 / -11)

Safranin O

Smack-Fu Master, in training
38
Subscriptor
I've been patiently waiting for Phil to leave or take a backseat because I didn't think Xbox was living up to their potential, especially after all of the acquisitions. I still think he should've stepped down sooner. But somehow, his replacement fills me with even less confidence?

Modern Microsoft really is the lead author in the paper on how to squander goodwill. Windows 10 to 11, and Xbox One to the (terribly named) Xbox Series. Even Surface went from "shining beacon of Windows" to "all but dead" :/
 
Upvote
67 (70 / -3)
It is also worth noting that although an AI exec does not bode well, Spencer himself had no gaming experience when he originally became head of Microsoft Game Studios

He had 11 years of experience.

Spencer, who got his start at Microsoft as an intern in 1988, served as a manager and executive at Microsoft Game Studios in 2003. In 2014, he took over as Head of Xbox,
 
Upvote
88 (92 / -4)

dragonzord

Ars Scholae Palatinae
778
Spencer was a likeable dude but he seems very incapable of delivering big things from Xbox, certainly not enough to win back the crowd after Matrick. Microsoft as a whole has no really consumer driven leaders. It's all about buzzwords and shareholders since Satya took over, but they can only milk old goodwill so long, gaming for far less time than Windows.
 
Upvote
9 (15 / -6)
Fun fact, I was really curious about how big "Xbox" as a brand really is. It's really easy to underestimate it because it's just a division under Microsoft, but their revenue for 2025 was around 23 Billion.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/963263/microsoft-annual-gaming-revenue/

If they were their own company, they would rank just inside of the top 200 out of Fortune 500 companies, right next to companies like Adobe, Colgate-Palmolive, General Mills, Discover, Black Rock, etc. I'd guess some of those companies have more assets than Xbox has, but it's an interesting thing thinking about how big that division really is.

https://us500.com/fortune-500-companies


EDIT: The list has Microsoft at $245B in revenue, meaning the gaming division is still only around 10% of the companies revenue.
 
Upvote
73 (75 / -2)