[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=27084333#p27084333:sdwsg7d9 said:
BasP[/url]":sdwsg7d9]I don't get why none of the reviews mention that nothing about the 630 improves on the 620: in most cases, it's a regression. The 620 has hardware buttons, flash, a dedicated camera button, NFC, and runs WP8.1. The 620 can be picked up dirt-cheap by now too: if you buy it, you have a much better phone at a far lower price.
What am I missing? Why does nobody touch upon this in the reviews?
Or the 625 for that matter. 625 is very similar to the 630, similar size screen (4.5 vs 4.7, rather than the 3.8 of the 620). That said, the 625 also had a light sensor, flash, 1080p video, more camera controls, a larger batter.
There's also a [urll=http://www.nokia.com/global/products/phone/lumia635/]635 with a light sensor[/url] too, which just makes it downright confusing. But my bet is someone decided that 5xx can be cheap with a small screen, 6xx cheap with a large, rather than the 6xx being good with a small screen.
Personally though, I bought a 920 used for $200 with the wireless charger, the used market makes the new market a difficult one to bother with.
