More to come, but for now, we talk about new battling system, disappointing plot.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32366621#p32366621:14j16zix said:Tofystedeth[/url]":14j16zix]Nah, they're doing fine. FFXI and now FFXIV basically print money for them.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32366461#p32366461:14j16zix said:billyok[/url]":14j16zix]This looks so bloated to me.
I assume Square is all out of money after finally pushing this expensive monster across the finish line after 10 years of development....
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364255#p32364255:1a6xunj4 said:BasP[/url]":1a6xunj4]Remember when Final Fantasy was about hunting down elemental orbs in a straight-up fantasy world?
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364847#p32364847:2fa3bktv said:Zer0.exe[/url]":2fa3bktv][
Edit: FFIX is my favorite one by a longshot, but even I can admit that the zooming panning camera for like 15 seconds at the beginning of every battle just slows everything down. Not hating, I love the game, but it wasn't without its faults.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32366621#p32366621:1llbwb2f said:Tofystedeth[/url]":1llbwb2f]Nah, they're doing fine. FFXI and now FFXIV basically print money for them.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32366461#p32366461:1llbwb2f said:billyok[/url]":1llbwb2f]This looks so bloated to me.
I assume Square is all out of money after finally pushing this expensive monster across the finish line after 10 years of development....
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32366923#p32366923:2ra597cw said:Resolute[/url]":2ra597cw]And don't get me started on Cindy. They took a character with great potential - a female Cid - and tropified it into a Daisy Duke wannabe so badly that even SE was too ashamed to properly call her Cid.
Paper-cut from reading an internet comment? You sound like a complete moron.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364499#p32364499:383yid5z said:alanmies[/url]":383yid5z]You're being so edgy I think I just got a paper cut by reading your three (basically the same, but hey, you have a ever-so-important-and-completely-original point to make) comments.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364453#p32364453:383yid5z said:Radcliff[/url]":383yid5z]Maybe they'll slit their writs and I won't have to read about another Final Fantasy.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368157#p32368157:12dyi9l3 said:Crazy Diamond[/url]":12dyi9l3]FF1*, FF4*, FF6*, FF7, FF12 are the only good Final Fantasy Games. Thank you. (I played first ones on NES and SNES, so they were known as 1, 2 and 3).
And you sound like a person completely unable to grasp the concept of sarcasm, but it takes all kinds.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368633#p32368633:1mng7lj2 said:BoJolly[/url]":1mng7lj2]Paper-cut from reading an internet comment? You sound like a complete moron.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364499#p32364499:1mng7lj2 said:alanmies[/url]":1mng7lj2]You're being so edgy I think I just got a paper cut by reading your three (basically the same, but hey, you have a ever-so-important-and-completely-original point to make) comments.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364453#p32364453:1mng7lj2 said:Radcliff[/url]":1mng7lj2]Maybe they'll slit their writs and I won't have to read about another Final Fantasy.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369015#p32369015:15bpy517 said:raitox[/url]":15bpy517]So main characters who drive around in cars all the time, stare at their cell phones, and avoid talking about anything meaningful for the duration? They really are targeting an American audience!
The only thing that's off is they seem to be carpooling.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364639#p32364639:3c1kw05k said:puppies[/url]":3c1kw05k]
It's always been a bit nebulous to me what "makes" a Final Fantasy game. The game mechanics change, and there's no world or plot continuity save for some recurring elements. Do people really like Cid and Bahamut that much?
[i:3c1kw05k said:article[/i]":3c1kw05k]They battle together. They drive together (via an auto-driving Maserati). They camp together. And they talk to each other all of the time, especially as they tour a giant overworld either on foot or in a car. This could have resulted in a great organic way to let players dive into a bunch of meandering plot between missions and dungeons. I would have loved to see a "press X to recap" button while spending 60 to 90 seconds driving from place to place.
Instead, during long car drives and cross-country runs, Noctis' companions tend to gloss over major plot details and instead obsess over complaints and one-liners.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364847#p32364847:9e0z7dac said:Zer0.exe[/url]":9e0z7dac][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364819#p32364819:9e0z7dac said:J.King[/url]":9e0z7dac]I'd suggest that combat was a unifying mechanic. With minor tweaks the way combat works is the same in the first ten games, the greatest change being the pseudo-real-timedness in, er... IV, was it? The back row also survived a surprisingly long time (I'm not sure of VIII or X had it), and spells and their effects have been pretty constant. You were also guaranteed a globe-spanning conflict, an airship, and a party of some size. There are certainly some commonalities. That all ended with XI, and then XII. I've not played any since X in any great amount, though.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364639#p32364639:9e0z7dac said:puppies[/url]":9e0z7dac]There's a real tension with the fact that these games developed in a 2d/barely 3d graphics world and long time fans (20 years for me, people!) enjoyed the gameplay that were a result of the very limited computers of the time.
1. I liked the cartoony style, esp in IX.
2. I liked the turn based battles - just downloaded FFT to my phone, actually.
3. I liked the 'reasonably closed' open worlds of the old RPG maps.
4. I loved the minigames
If they want to go all modern, they need to go all the way. Skyrim makes sense, GTA makes sense, CoD makes sense, this pastiche of old tropes doesn't. Just look at the driving menu! In an 'open world' game, shouldn't you just drive? Or give them a self-driving car like the old airships, where you just pick a destination?
I haven't played the series in years, maybe I shouldn't get a say at this point. But I don't see the point in a JRPG without the turn-based combat. Yes, FF always reinvented itself, but ALSO it takes more than spikey hair to be Final Fantasy.
It's always been a bit nebulous to me what "makes" a Final Fantasy game. The game mechanics change, and there's no world or plot continuity save for some recurring elements. Do people really like Cid and Bahamut that much?
Anyway, the tone of this review is pretty relevant to me. I stopped playing after VIII and the last one I truly loved was III/VI. I do hear that IX was delightful so maybe I'll pick that up someday.
You'll want to pick up XII when it's remake comes out then. It had a more "steampunk" look to the airships, but it was still your standard fantasy fare (power hungry villain "muh crystals"). The Steam port of FFIX is excellent as well, they sped up the crazy long battle sequence intro and made some other mechanical improvements. A game that wouldn't normally age well with time got a shot in the arm on Steam.
Edit: FFIX is my favorite one by a longshot, but even I can admit that the zooming panning camera for like 15 seconds at the beginning of every battle just slows everything down. Not hating, I love the game, but it wasn't without its faults.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369919#p32369919:25n88yr2 said:Jurrasic[/url]":25n88yr2][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364847#p32364847:25n88yr2 said:Zer0.exe[/url]":25n88yr2][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364819#p32364819:25n88yr2 said:J.King[/url]":25n88yr2]I'd suggest that combat was a unifying mechanic. With minor tweaks the way combat works is the same in the first ten games, the greatest change being the pseudo-real-timedness in, er... IV, was it? The back row also survived a surprisingly long time (I'm not sure of VIII or X had it), and spells and their effects have been pretty constant. You were also guaranteed a globe-spanning conflict, an airship, and a party of some size. There are certainly some commonalities. That all ended with XI, and then XII. I've not played any since X in any great amount, though.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364639#p32364639:25n88yr2 said:puppies[/url]":25n88yr2]There's a real tension with the fact that these games developed in a 2d/barely 3d graphics world and long time fans (20 years for me, people!) enjoyed the gameplay that were a result of the very limited computers of the time.
1. I liked the cartoony style, esp in IX.
2. I liked the turn based battles - just downloaded FFT to my phone, actually.
3. I liked the 'reasonably closed' open worlds of the old RPG maps.
4. I loved the minigames
If they want to go all modern, they need to go all the way. Skyrim makes sense, GTA makes sense, CoD makes sense, this pastiche of old tropes doesn't. Just look at the driving menu! In an 'open world' game, shouldn't you just drive? Or give them a self-driving car like the old airships, where you just pick a destination?
I haven't played the series in years, maybe I shouldn't get a say at this point. But I don't see the point in a JRPG without the turn-based combat. Yes, FF always reinvented itself, but ALSO it takes more than spikey hair to be Final Fantasy.
It's always been a bit nebulous to me what "makes" a Final Fantasy game. The game mechanics change, and there's no world or plot continuity save for some recurring elements. Do people really like Cid and Bahamut that much?
Anyway, the tone of this review is pretty relevant to me. I stopped playing after VIII and the last one I truly loved was III/VI. I do hear that IX was delightful so maybe I'll pick that up someday.
You'll want to pick up XII when it's remake comes out then. It had a more "steampunk" look to the airships, but it was still your standard fantasy fare (power hungry villain "muh crystals"). The Steam port of FFIX is excellent as well, they sped up the crazy long battle sequence intro and made some other mechanical improvements. A game that wouldn't normally age well with time got a shot in the arm on Steam.
Edit: FFIX is my favorite one by a longshot, but even I can admit that the zooming panning camera for like 15 seconds at the beginning of every battle just slows everything down. Not hating, I love the game, but it wasn't without its faults.
XII was criminally underrated.
In my opinion, it's the 2nd best in the series overall after VI, and the best with a bullet it it's game world mechanics. It is for it's time an almost perfect fusion of western CRPG and Japanese JRPG mechanics with a huge and sprawling world that wonderfully filled out the already existing world of Ivalice from the FF: Tactics series and Revenant Wings.
I really hope the refresh gets the attention and sales that it deserves. One of the PS2 era's greatest games of all time.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369983#p32369983:uw6swhz5 said:Akemi[/url]":uw6swhz5][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369919#p32369919:uw6swhz5 said:Jurrasic[/url]":uw6swhz5][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364847#p32364847:uw6swhz5 said:Zer0.exe[/url]":uw6swhz5][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364819#p32364819:uw6swhz5 said:J.King[/url]":uw6swhz5]I'd suggest that combat was a unifying mechanic. With minor tweaks the way combat works is the same in the first ten games, the greatest change being the pseudo-real-timedness in, er... IV, was it? The back row also survived a surprisingly long time (I'm not sure of VIII or X had it), and spells and their effects have been pretty constant. You were also guaranteed a globe-spanning conflict, an airship, and a party of some size. There are certainly some commonalities. That all ended with XI, and then XII. I've not played any since X in any great amount, though.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364639#p32364639:uw6swhz5 said:puppies[/url]":uw6swhz5]There's a real tension with the fact that these games developed in a 2d/barely 3d graphics world and long time fans (20 years for me, people!) enjoyed the gameplay that were a result of the very limited computers of the time.
1. I liked the cartoony style, esp in IX.
2. I liked the turn based battles - just downloaded FFT to my phone, actually.
3. I liked the 'reasonably closed' open worlds of the old RPG maps.
4. I loved the minigames
If they want to go all modern, they need to go all the way. Skyrim makes sense, GTA makes sense, CoD makes sense, this pastiche of old tropes doesn't. Just look at the driving menu! In an 'open world' game, shouldn't you just drive? Or give them a self-driving car like the old airships, where you just pick a destination?
I haven't played the series in years, maybe I shouldn't get a say at this point. But I don't see the point in a JRPG without the turn-based combat. Yes, FF always reinvented itself, but ALSO it takes more than spikey hair to be Final Fantasy.
It's always been a bit nebulous to me what "makes" a Final Fantasy game. The game mechanics change, and there's no world or plot continuity save for some recurring elements. Do people really like Cid and Bahamut that much?
Anyway, the tone of this review is pretty relevant to me. I stopped playing after VIII and the last one I truly loved was III/VI. I do hear that IX was delightful so maybe I'll pick that up someday.
You'll want to pick up XII when it's remake comes out then. It had a more "steampunk" look to the airships, but it was still your standard fantasy fare (power hungry villain "muh crystals"). The Steam port of FFIX is excellent as well, they sped up the crazy long battle sequence intro and made some other mechanical improvements. A game that wouldn't normally age well with time got a shot in the arm on Steam.
Edit: FFIX is my favorite one by a longshot, but even I can admit that the zooming panning camera for like 15 seconds at the beginning of every battle just slows everything down. Not hating, I love the game, but it wasn't without its faults.
XII was criminally underrated.
In my opinion, it's the 2nd best in the series overall after VI, and the best with a bullet it it's game world mechanics. It is for it's time an almost perfect fusion of western CRPG and Japanese JRPG mechanics with a huge and sprawling world that wonderfully filled out the already existing world of Ivalice from the FF: Tactics series and Revenant Wings.
I really hope the refresh gets the attention and sales that it deserves. One of the PS2 era's greatest games of all time.
What do you mean? The X/XII HD remaster has been out for some time now on Steam and consoles. Since May of this year on PC. They're quite well done on the PC, so I'm assuming the console releases are in the same boat.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/359870/
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369983#p32369983:1yn5y4kh said:Akemi[/url]":1yn5y4kh][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32369919#p32369919:1yn5y4kh said:Jurrasic[/url]":1yn5y4kh][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364847#p32364847:1yn5y4kh said:Zer0.exe[/url]":1yn5y4kh][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364819#p32364819:1yn5y4kh said:J.King[/url]":1yn5y4kh]I'd suggest that combat was a unifying mechanic. With minor tweaks the way combat works is the same in the first ten games, the greatest change being the pseudo-real-timedness in, er... IV, was it? The back row also survived a surprisingly long time (I'm not sure of VIII or X had it), and spells and their effects have been pretty constant. You were also guaranteed a globe-spanning conflict, an airship, and a party of some size. There are certainly some commonalities. That all ended with XI, and then XII. I've not played any since X in any great amount, though.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364639#p32364639:1yn5y4kh said:puppies[/url]":1yn5y4kh]There's a real tension with the fact that these games developed in a 2d/barely 3d graphics world and long time fans (20 years for me, people!) enjoyed the gameplay that were a result of the very limited computers of the time.
1. I liked the cartoony style, esp in IX.
2. I liked the turn based battles - just downloaded FFT to my phone, actually.
3. I liked the 'reasonably closed' open worlds of the old RPG maps.
4. I loved the minigames
If they want to go all modern, they need to go all the way. Skyrim makes sense, GTA makes sense, CoD makes sense, this pastiche of old tropes doesn't. Just look at the driving menu! In an 'open world' game, shouldn't you just drive? Or give them a self-driving car like the old airships, where you just pick a destination?
I haven't played the series in years, maybe I shouldn't get a say at this point. But I don't see the point in a JRPG without the turn-based combat. Yes, FF always reinvented itself, but ALSO it takes more than spikey hair to be Final Fantasy.
It's always been a bit nebulous to me what "makes" a Final Fantasy game. The game mechanics change, and there's no world or plot continuity save for some recurring elements. Do people really like Cid and Bahamut that much?
Anyway, the tone of this review is pretty relevant to me. I stopped playing after VIII and the last one I truly loved was III/VI. I do hear that IX was delightful so maybe I'll pick that up someday.
You'll want to pick up XII when it's remake comes out then. It had a more "steampunk" look to the airships, but it was still your standard fantasy fare (power hungry villain "muh crystals"). The Steam port of FFIX is excellent as well, they sped up the crazy long battle sequence intro and made some other mechanical improvements. A game that wouldn't normally age well with time got a shot in the arm on Steam.
Edit: FFIX is my favorite one by a longshot, but even I can admit that the zooming panning camera for like 15 seconds at the beginning of every battle just slows everything down. Not hating, I love the game, but it wasn't without its faults.
XII was criminally underrated.
In my opinion, it's the 2nd best in the series overall after VI, and the best with a bullet it it's game world mechanics. It is for it's time an almost perfect fusion of western CRPG and Japanese JRPG mechanics with a huge and sprawling world that wonderfully filled out the already existing world of Ivalice from the FF: Tactics series and Revenant Wings.
I really hope the refresh gets the attention and sales that it deserves. One of the PS2 era's greatest games of all time.
What do you mean? The X/XII HD remaster has been out for some time now on Steam and consoles. Since May of this year on PC. They're quite well done on the PC, so I'm assuming the console releases are in the same boat.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/359870/
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370043#p32370043:1xez43el said:mikehild[/url]":1xez43el]
Not X-2, XII as in 12. Square is currently working on that remaster, with the name Final Fantasy XII: The Zodiac Age.
To be fair, I think both Trails of Cold Steel and Trails in the Sky FC are just long world building and tutorials for the sequels (ToCS 2, TiTS SC) that end with ultimate cliffhangers and require almost 100 hours to complete list.One of my favorite JRPGs in recent years is Trails of Cold Steel, and after 10 hours, you're still basically in tutorial mode.
There's 3 demos for this game. Episode Duscae which was included on Final Fantasy Type-0, Platinum Demo which is available on the PlayStation Store and Judgment Disc which is a Japanese Exclusive.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370201#p32370201:tq0wx5z7 said:hel1kx[/url]":tq0wx5z7]I wish demos were still a thing. I'd like to try FFXV, but it looks like it will be like any other JRPG I've tried lately, where the story is a snooze-fest and the characters are one-dimentional and fit anime tropes to a T (and are annoying), and I'll be bored of it after a few hours. Maybe the combat would keep me engaged, but that's not a $60 risk I want to take.
I loved FFX, so maybe I'm just getting crotchety as I get older, but I don't have the patience to sit through crappy stories with crappy characters anymore. But it's hard to find a JRPG these days without those traits :-( (suggestions welcome).
EDIT: How bad is the story, really? The Metacritic reviews seem to be split on the quality of the story and dialogue.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370809#p32370809:14rbzc1l said:freedfromdeath[/url]":14rbzc1l]There's 3 demos for this game. Episode Duscae which was included on Final Fantasy Type-0, Platinum Demo which is available on the PlayStation Store and Judgment Disc which is a Japanese Exclusive.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370201#p32370201:14rbzc1l said:hel1kx[/url]":14rbzc1l]I wish demos were still a thing. I'd like to try FFXV, but it looks like it will be like any other JRPG I've tried lately, where the story is a snooze-fest and the characters are one-dimentional and fit anime tropes to a T (and are annoying), and I'll be bored of it after a few hours. Maybe the combat would keep me engaged, but that's not a $60 risk I want to take.
I loved FFX, so maybe I'm just getting crotchety as I get older, but I don't have the patience to sit through crappy stories with crappy characters anymore. But it's hard to find a JRPG these days without those traits :-( (suggestions welcome).
EDIT: How bad is the story, really? The Metacritic reviews seem to be split on the quality of the story and dialogue.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368683#p32368683:87xy5tt3 said:Saikaici[/url]":87xy5tt3][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368157#p32368157:87xy5tt3 said:Crazy Diamond[/url]":87xy5tt3]FF1*, FF4*, FF6*, FF7, FF12 are the only good Final Fantasy Games. Thank you. (I played first ones on NES and SNES, so they were known as 1, 2 and 3).
I understand if you like the older games, and not all of them. Everyone has their own cup of tea.
But FFXII? Seriously? The one with super boring characters that hate each other, aren't a cohesive group, and has a cliche evil empire plot? The one with a programming-like battle system that is painfully inefficient? And you dislike so many of the others?
[url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32371835#p32371835:usmet1dq said:Falsadoom[/url]":usmet1dq]snip
Oh yeah, I member..........[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32364255#p32364255:1iyduex2 said:BasP[/url]":1iyduex2]Remember when Final Fantasy was about hunting down elemental orbs in a straight-up fantasy world?
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32365473#p32365473:2ulsie18 said:BasP[/url]":2ulsie18][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32365295#p32365295:2ulsie18 said:Mawich[/url]":2ulsie18]Is it just me whose first thought when reading about the game's party is "why is it all guys?"? Sounds like the only female character of significance at least at the start of the game is a damsel in distress with lots of cleavage. Do Square still think all gamers are straight men?
With protagonists like these guys? Hardly.
There's a reason for all that. XII had a very troubled development. Late in the process the director/writer was replaced. Basch was originally the main character, but Vaan (and presumably Penelo)was added because they felt Basch didn't appeal to teenage girls enough.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32371661#p32371661:17a80efi said:mogbert[/url]":17a80efi]
I really couldn't get into the plot of FF XII. This was a first for me. I've gotten used to playing these games for the plot, and usually find them very enjoyable. FF XII plot was forgettable, and in fact, they seem to have forgotten a few of their characters when writing it. Instead of following Vaan and... I can't recall the princess's name, they SHOULD have made the main characters Bal-something or other and Fran (as he often insisted he already was). They were actually interesting characters. The game also seemed to forget that Penelope was even in the game.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32373861#p32373861:1lx4xa5l said:Tofystedeth[/url]":1lx4xa5l]There's a reason for all that. XII had a very troubled development. Late in the process the director/writer was replaced. Basch was originally the main character, but Vaan (and presumably Penelo)was added because they felt Basch didn't appeal to teenage girls enough.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32371661#p32371661:1lx4xa5l said:mogbert[/url]":1lx4xa5l]
I really couldn't get into the plot of FF XII. This was a first for me. I've gotten used to playing these games for the plot, and usually find them very enjoyable. FF XII plot was forgettable, and in fact, they seem to have forgotten a few of their characters when writing it. Instead of following Vaan and... I can't recall the princess's name, they SHOULD have made the main characters Bal-something or other and Fran (as he often insisted he already was). They were actually interesting characters. The game also seemed to forget that Penelope was even in the game.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32371775#p32371775:3hbh6gu1 said:kalzekdor[/url]":3hbh6gu1][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368683#p32368683:3hbh6gu1 said:Saikaici[/url]":3hbh6gu1][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32368157#p32368157:3hbh6gu1 said:Crazy Diamond[/url]":3hbh6gu1]FF1*, FF4*, FF6*, FF7, FF12 are the only good Final Fantasy Games. Thank you. (I played first ones on NES and SNES, so they were known as 1, 2 and 3).
I understand if you like the older games, and not all of them. Everyone has their own cup of tea.
But FFXII? Seriously? The one with super boring characters that hate each other, aren't a cohesive group, and has a cliche evil empire plot? The one with a programming-like battle system that is painfully inefficient? And you dislike so many of the others?
I actually really liked the combat system in 12. Being able to plan out complex battle strategies was a lot of fun. But, then, I'm a programmer, so I'm probably biased there.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370809#p32370809:6yxhrx19 said:freedfromdeath[/url]":6yxhrx19]There's 3 demos for this game. Episode Duscae which was included on Final Fantasy Type-0, Platinum Demo which is available on the PlayStation Store and Judgment Disc which is a Japanese Exclusive.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370201#p32370201:6yxhrx19 said:hel1kx[/url]":6yxhrx19]I wish demos were still a thing. I'd like to try FFXV, but it looks like it will be like any other JRPG I've tried lately, where the story is a snooze-fest and the characters are one-dimentional and fit anime tropes to a T (and are annoying), and I'll be bored of it after a few hours. Maybe the combat would keep me engaged, but that's not a $60 risk I want to take.
I loved FFX, so maybe I'm just getting crotchety as I get older, but I don't have the patience to sit through crappy stories with crappy characters anymore. But it's hard to find a JRPG these days without those traits :-( (suggestions welcome).
EDIT: How bad is the story, really? The Metacritic reviews seem to be split on the quality of the story and dialogue.
You're so Vaan, you probably think this game is about you.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32373901#p32373901:9vve6ci9 said:Asvarduil[/url]":9vve6ci9][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32373861#p32373861:9vve6ci9 said:Tofystedeth[/url]":9vve6ci9]There's a reason for all that. XII had a very troubled development. Late in the process the director/writer was replaced. Basch was originally the main character, but Vaan (and presumably Penelo)was added because they felt Basch didn't appeal to teenage girls enough.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32371661#p32371661:9vve6ci9 said:mogbert[/url]":9vve6ci9]
I really couldn't get into the plot of FF XII. This was a first for me. I've gotten used to playing these games for the plot, and usually find them very enjoyable. FF XII plot was forgettable, and in fact, they seem to have forgotten a few of their characters when writing it. Instead of following Vaan and... I can't recall the princess's name, they SHOULD have made the main characters Bal-something or other and Fran (as he often insisted he already was). They were actually interesting characters. The game also seemed to forget that Penelope was even in the game.
That explains why Vaan/Penelo felt tacked on... they were indeed tacked on.
What could've been, if only they hadn't been...oh well.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32375223#p32375223:e7ivezdk said:Resolute[/url]":e7ivezdk][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370809#p32370809:e7ivezdk said:freedfromdeath[/url]":e7ivezdk]There's 3 demos for this game. Episode Duscae which was included on Final Fantasy Type-0, Platinum Demo which is available on the PlayStation Store and Judgment Disc which is a Japanese Exclusive.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370201#p32370201:e7ivezdk said:hel1kx[/url]":e7ivezdk]I wish demos were still a thing. I'd like to try FFXV, but it looks like it will be like any other JRPG I've tried lately, where the story is a snooze-fest and the characters are one-dimentional and fit anime tropes to a T (and are annoying), and I'll be bored of it after a few hours. Maybe the combat would keep me engaged, but that's not a $60 risk I want to take.
I loved FFX, so maybe I'm just getting crotchety as I get older, but I don't have the patience to sit through crappy stories with crappy characters anymore. But it's hard to find a JRPG these days without those traits :-( (suggestions welcome).
EDIT: How bad is the story, really? The Metacritic reviews seem to be split on the quality of the story and dialogue.
The Platinum demo does not sell the real game at all, however. I'd stay away from that one entirely if you want a sense of what the real game is.
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32376633#p32376633:3mepzuni said:hel1kx[/url]":3mepzuni][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32375223#p32375223:3mepzuni said:Resolute[/url]":3mepzuni][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370809#p32370809:3mepzuni said:freedfromdeath[/url]":3mepzuni]There's 3 demos for this game. Episode Duscae which was included on Final Fantasy Type-0, Platinum Demo which is available on the PlayStation Store and Judgment Disc which is a Japanese Exclusive.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370201#p32370201:3mepzuni said:hel1kx[/url]":3mepzuni]I wish demos were still a thing. I'd like to try FFXV, but it looks like it will be like any other JRPG I've tried lately, where the story is a snooze-fest and the characters are one-dimentional and fit anime tropes to a T (and are annoying), and I'll be bored of it after a few hours. Maybe the combat would keep me engaged, but that's not a $60 risk I want to take.
I loved FFX, so maybe I'm just getting crotchety as I get older, but I don't have the patience to sit through crappy stories with crappy characters anymore. But it's hard to find a JRPG these days without those traits :-( (suggestions welcome).
EDIT: How bad is the story, really? The Metacritic reviews seem to be split on the quality of the story and dialogue.
The Platinum demo does not sell the real game at all, however. I'd stay away from that one entirely if you want a sense of what the real game is.
I rented FFXV from Redbox last night and played a couple hours. So far I'm enjoying it. The battles are fun, albeit a little clunky, but I think they'll get smoother the more I get used to the mechanics.
I think the story's interesting enough (what I was able to get in 2 hours, anyway). It's a little slow, but at least there aren't a ton of apostrophe-riddled names for things like in XIII, and so far not a lot of emo angst, and the characters are interesting enough. It has a light-hearted but mature feel.
The weirdest thing about the game to me so far is the setting of the first portion. It's some weird mix of fantasy, mid/southwest USA, and sci-fi. It's not bad, but doesn't feel very "Final Fantasy" to me so far.
So, in short, it's the first FF game since FFX that I'm looking forward to playing more of, enough that I'm planning on buying it later today.
Worse, if it was released today:[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370119#p32370119:jz7r97op said:Akemi[/url]":jz7r97op][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32370043#p32370043:jz7r97op said:mikehild[/url]":jz7r97op]
Not X-2, XII as in 12. Square is currently working on that remaster, with the name Final Fantasy XII: The Zodiac Age.
Okay, the one upcoming in 2017. The naming system for the FF games gets under my skin. With X-2 and XII, then the sometimes different numbers for the same game between Japan and US releases. Like FF II (initial US title) being released in Japan as FF IV with all subsequent releases also falling under the IV heading. Just weirdness.