Ajit Pai says there’s no net neutrality problem—but keeps complaints under wraps.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
And when people are shouting about all the problems the lack of NN is causing he'll just shrug and go "Well none of you bothered to speak up about it, so I figured you'd all be fine about this outcome."Well, no surprises here that Pai's mind is made up. If NN goes away, it won't be due to lack of trying from the opposition that's for sure.
-d
Pretty sure with the bribes from the industry he could hire a competent programmer to make that a non-issue.it will only provide the text for a fraction of the complaints, because providing them all would be too burdensome.
I recall submitting a comment in the previous round. The system displays author information in separate fields from the text of the comment, which suggests that they are each stored as different data elements.
In that case, redacting that information would essentially be trivial. Granted, there might be a need to do some keyword searches in the comments for specific patterns (email addresses, phone #s) just in case somebody screwed up during entry, but that's nothing that a few dozen regular expressions can't handle...
In short, this sounds like complete and utter bullshit to me.
It seems two different things are being discussed here: comments and complaints. The former are opinions on the proposed rolling back of net neutrality regulations, which Pai is happy to dump online with full contact details. The latter are actual examples of alleged infractions of existing net neutrality rules, which Pai et al are withholding presumably because they prove the problems they contend doesn't exist actually do exist. But the conclusion is the same though: the swamp is being filled to overflowing with industrial effluent.So let's see if I understand this.....
It's perfectly OK for the Trump Administration to publish the contact info of people commenting about elections, but when it comes to Net Neutrality, it is perfectly OK to keep the actual comments under wraps.
Our government has the largest budget of anything, anywhere, ever.
Yet somehow they manage to charge 10¢ a page for information out of every agency. The most technologically advanced nation on the planet can put people on the moon, but when it comes to making basic public information public, they can't even figure out something like bit torrent
Play dumb and incompetent to keep themselves in power over the people.
Our government has the largest budget of anything, anywhere, ever.
Yet somehow they manage to charge 10¢ a page for information out of every agency. The most technologically advanced nation on the planet can put people on the moon, but when it comes to making basic public information public, they can't even figure out something like bit torrent
Play dumb and incompetent to keep themselves in power over the people.
Emphasis mine. While I'm highly confident in our technical ability to put people on the moon, our dysfunctional government gives me great pause. Could we really send people to the moon again without the planning and final decision being stuck in perpetual bureaucratic deadlock?
So let's see if I understand this.....
It's perfectly OK for the Trump Administration to publish the contact info of people commenting about elections, but when it comes to Net Neutrality, it is perfectly OK to keep the actual comments under wraps.
It seems two different things are being discussed here: comments and complaints. The former are opinions on the proposed rolling back of net neutrality regulations, which Pai is happy to dump online with full contact details. The latter are actual examples of alleged infractions of existing net neutrality rules, which Pai et al are withholding presumably because they prove the problems they contend doesn't exist actually do exist. But the conclusion is the same though: the swamp is being filled to overflowing with industrial effluent.So let's see if I understand this.....
It's perfectly OK for the Trump Administration to publish the contact info of people commenting about elections, but when it comes to Net Neutrality, it is perfectly OK to keep the actual comments under wraps.
So if I go complain to the White House voter commission that they're a pack of idiots, I'm sure they'll keep all my contact info and complaints under wraps.
How many times has Pai gone to Russia for guidance on handling the public's input to open democratic (well perhaps republican) processes such as rule making by one blind idiot?
So if I go complain to the White House voter commission that they're a pack of idiots, I'm sure they'll keep all my contact info and complaints under wraps.
Ha, that's brilliant. So all we have to do to bring attention to this is create a complaints on Twitter and use @realDonaldTrump and his ego will make sure it goes viral!
However, following novel administrative procedures established by the White House, Pai would probably be happy to release the names and addresses of the complainants, so that interested parties can directly ask each of them for the exact text of their complaint.the FCC is refusing to release the text of more than 40,000 net neutrality complaints
Well, Comcast’s CFO said: “In terms of what actually happens (…) it's the fear of what Title II could have meant, more than what it actually did mean. (…) Hopefully that chilling effect is gone; both from how investors look at the space and businesses look at the space.” So, actually, it’s exactly the opposite of what Pai said: it is the strident opposition to Title II classification that was a response to “hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom”.Pai has also claimed that net neutrality rules were a response to "hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom"
Three of those are mine
Ask the Advisory Commission on Election Integrity to help. They'll get that info out the door so fast you won't know who hit you.Pretty sure with the bribes from the industry he could hire a competent programmer to make that a non-issue.it will only provide the text for a fraction of the complaints, because providing them all would be too burdensome.
We note that Commission staff could have denied NHMC's FOIA request on its face as unreasonably burdensome under the FOIA. In order to release all 47,000 complaints to NHMC, Commission staff would have had to review and redact personally identifiable information from each one of those complaints, which would have been unreasonably burdensome. Rather than simply denying the FOIA request, however, the staff has worked diligently with NHMC to provide it with responsive information in a reasonable time frame, while still protecting the personally identifiable information of thousands of consumers. On June 20, 2017, Commission FOIA staff provided NHMC with approximately 1,000 responsive complaints. Consistent with an oral offer on July 5, 2017, staff made a written offer on July 14, 2017 to provide NHMC by September 1, 2017 an additional 2,000 complaints, the accompanying carrier responses, 1,500 related emails, and an Excel spreadsheet of all 47,000 complaint numbers and additional requested data fields.
This is what's referred to as becoming 'untouchable'. Once you obtain a sufficient amount of money/power, you no longer have to play by the rules established for everyone else (the little people), and you can retire into a guarded community where every problem you've caused can't come back to effect you.Pai, like Powell, has nothing to lose here, he is not accountable for his actions. he faces no penalties for lying, no sanctions for failure, absolutely nothing to hold him to facts, and the consequences of his actions. He will go from this job to a very high paying job in the industry and that's that.
Pretty sure with the bribes from the industry he could hire a competent programmer to make that a non-issue.it will only provide the text for a fraction of the complaints, because providing them all would be too burdensome.
Does that include drawn, quartered, put in the public square in stocks, then pied?I want to see someone pie Pai in the face. I would donate to any legal defense for that person.
To be fair, one has to agree that if nothing else is transparent (and there is nothing else in this agency since Pai was put in charge), his personal motives for doing what he's doing certainly are.Pai has previously claimed that his proposed repeal of net neutrality rules is using a "far more transparent" process than the one used to implement net neutrality rules in 2015.