Vance would be better in that he's a follower, not a leader, and wouldn't be doing even half of the crazy shit that Trump's doing. I have a hard time believing that Vance would sue the government while sitting as president so that he can negotiate a settlement with himself. (That's failing hard for Trump, by the way, as the judge accurately identified it as blatant collusion.)Yes, but Trump is a symptom, not the disease. The disease is corruption, enabled by Epstein-class billionaires and corporations. The death of Trump, as the old joke goes, might be a good start, but it'd only be a start. Vance would not be better.
Vance wouldn't have torn down 1/3 of the White House for a vanity project (read: money extraction scheme) that will never end. Vance wouldn't have started a war because he wanted to take credit for the war that Netanyahu was about to start (although he probably would have supported Netanyahu just as much). He likely wouldn't have invaded Venezuela to kidnap their leader.
And Vance wouldn't be spending millions of dollars in taxpayer funds starting pointless lawsuits that he doesn't even intend to win, he's just throwing money at it to stall the lawsuits and hopefully get the other side to give up.
Of the things that Trump has done that Vance would do, Vance will attempt to do them more subtly, and therefore faceplant harder when it's exposed.
Last edited: