Crypto hoarders dump tokens as shares tumble

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,398
Subscriptor
1764196139764.png
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)
Crypto is a weird human absurdity. How did this tech make any headway? Everything about it is flawed by design and because of design. So strange

True story time: I was at one of my favourite bars in Melbourne, Australia, a while ago. An American guy came over and was really chatty. I'm a sociable guy we talked for a while. He was showing off a bit about how he had been travelling from city to city around South East Asia. Boasting about travelling is not new or bad IMO, but I asked him "wow man, how can you afford that?"

Dun, dun dah! CRYPTO!

End of story, he was on a pump and dump mission for drunken chumps. Luckily I am aware of this kind of thing, so I wished him the best and said see-ya.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

JoHBE

Ars Praefectus
4,134
Subscriptor++
I guess HODL is now FODL. . .

It'll be interesting to see if this causes a total deflation of the crypto bubble, or if it yet again finds a bottom and bounces back.

One of the arguments that crypto-boosters have long made is that crypto, supposedly like Gold, would hold its value in a time of economic recession or depression. A hedge against economic uncertainty, a safe haven for your dollars. . .and yet, it seems that as we are starting to enter an economic recession, that crypto is not so de-coupled from the larger economy and other assets like stocks, bonds, and the value of the dollar.
It's truly WILD how anyone could seriously believe that a puff of hot air would somehow represent a hedge against economic uncertainty.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
67,692
Subscriptor++
It wasn't a commentary on the USA. It was a comment on the theory of independent press keeping a government's tendency to lie to itself in check. The Soviet Union had no institutions to keep it from believing the lies it was telling the governed. Even the intelligence organs were telling the ideologues running the country exactly what they wanted to hear. Even with Trump's full frontal assault on people that disagree with him, the USA still has a press industry willing to tell the populace and the organs of government the emperor is buck ass nekkid. That never ever existed in Tsarist Russia nor The Soviet Union. Ever. Both governments shot messengers with bad news. There's a big difference in historical traditions of truth telling regardless of what the audience does with the information.
Which is why the savvy peeps knew what the relentless cries of "fake news!" said about the intentions of Trump and those supporting him a dozen years ago.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,977
Subscriptor
I guess HODL is now FODL. . .

It'll be interesting to see if this causes a total deflation of the crypto bubble, or if it yet again finds a bottom and bounces back.

One of the arguments that crypto-boosters have long made is that crypto, supposedly like Gold, would hold its value in a time of economic recession or depression. A hedge against economic uncertainty, a safe haven for your dollars. . .and yet, it seems that as we are starting to enter an economic recession, that crypto is not so de-coupled from the larger economy and other assets like stocks, bonds, and the value of the dollar.
The issue is how many companies tied their fortunes to Crypto's rise and relied on that rise to keep going up. Had it been a small investor market ONLY without the manipulation and the deep connections made to the financial health of the real world businesses, it MIGHT have been closer to the "gold standard" ideals they touted.

But given human nature, and the avarice of those who run scams... er... neural network nonsense like AI and other Techbro companies that have no viable business plan, and rely on vibe financing to stay afloat, with no hope whatsoever in the real world of paying back the vibers who threw their money at it, using bitcoins as a last, desperate attempt to ward off fiscal disaster was probably inevitable.

Wasn't on my bingo card, but in retrospect, it should have been.

To me, this signals just how bad shit's going to get for the tech sector, and anyone who has substantial amounts of capital tied up/invested in it. They may as well hold the wake for those funds. They've already been cremated, and their ashes scattered to the winds...
 
Upvote
11 (12 / -1)

dikbozo

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,022
I guess HODL is now FODL. . .

It'll be interesting to see if this causes a total deflation of the crypto bubble, or if it yet again finds a bottom and bounces back.

One of the arguments that crypto-boosters have long made is that crypto, supposedly like Gold, would hold its value in a time of economic recession or depression. A hedge against economic uncertainty, a safe haven for your dollars. . .and yet, it seems that as we are starting to enter an economic recession, that crypto is not so de-coupled from the larger economy and other assets like stocks, bonds, and the value of the dollar.

it ain't worth shit unless you can unload it. just like anything else. you can't eat it or wear it and it it won't keep the rain off your head.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Control Group

Ars Legatus Legionis
19,268
Subscriptor++
Arguably making work no longer be necessary—to the extent that LLMs are actually able to do this, which is... highly debatable—is a generally good thing. Put another way, it is hard to see how making people do work that does not need to be done by a human being for its own sake is inherently a good thing.

To the extent that people losing jobs is problematic, it is because they need to have a "job" at all in order to survive in our society. However, this is an inherent problem of our current economic system, not something we are encountering for the first time due to AI. The solution is not preserving these jobs (except insofar that LLMs are an inferior substitute) but increasing social supports. Also, we really need to collectively rethink this notion that people even should need to work as much as they do for our society to successfully function. We could make an incremental step in this direction by reducing the standard 5 day work week to 4 days, which I have heard has been shown by various studies show is likely to make us collectively more productive despite the reduction in total hours worked.
This.

We’re in a weird time where people claiming they can reduce scarcity are reviled for costing jobs. And the revilers aren’t wrong. What’s wrong is that we live in a system that depends on there not being enough of anything for everyone to have it.

The fundamental moral bankruptcy at the heart of it is the very notion that somebody’s ability to survive should depend on their economic value to someone else. It’s a necessary evil when the only source of survival necessities is human labor, but that doesn’t make it good. It just means that we should celebrate anything that moves us further away from having to tie your life to how much money you can make for someone else.
 
Upvote
20 (20 / 0)
The Smarter Web Company "is valued at £132 million while the bitcoin it holds is worth about $232 million. "
But only if it doesn't sell the bitcoin! Because selling that much would drive the price down or even run out of buyers.
There's some subprime schadenfreude about to go down.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
67,692
Subscriptor++
This.

We’re in a weird time where people claiming they can reduce scarcity are reviled for costing jobs. And the revilers aren’t wrong. What’s wrong is that we live in a system that depends on there not being enough of anything for everyone to have it.

The fundamental moral bankruptcy at the heart of it is the very notion that somebody’s ability to survive should depend on their economic value to someone else. It’s a necessary evil when the only source of survival necessities is human labor, but that doesn’t make it good. It just means that we should celebrate anything that moves us further away from having to tie your life to how much money you can make for someone else.
Good thoughts, and I support the sentiment, but the money being poured into this is not being done to reduce scarcity for the masses. It is being done to make them irrelevant.

I could applaud an intent to reduce scarcity. The issue I have with this current effort is that they are lying about that as their intent.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)
As mentioned upthread, cryptocurrency was marketed as a hedge against the stock market. However, economist Paul Krugman observed that right now crypto is correlated to AI stocks. When Nvidia stumbled last week, crypto fell on its face.

Dare I hope for two birds with one stone, and get to see the collapse of both the LLM bubble and and crypto?
 
Upvote
20 (20 / 0)
Borrowing money to buy bitcoin, then borrowing more money against that bitcoin to buy back your own stock...

The world of finance made a crazy wrong turn a long time ago and is way, way off the reservation now.
Yeah. Bitcoin doesn't have to go to zero for these companies to get completely wiped out. It may only be another 20% down... or perhaps even the current price level is bad enough where the current debt can not be serviced and new equity can't be issued (or some other, more complicated and technical reason I have no understanding of)

And everything collapses for that particular speculator, even if bitcoin itself goes up in price later.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
Wait, I want to know what lenders are offering DEBT to make leveraged purchases of a highly speculative 'asset' with no inherent value? Also, I hope they lose a lot of money when Strategy and similar businesses go bankrupt.

We live in a world where black and brown people often can't get the money to buy a house, but somehow there are billions and billions of dollars available to buy crypto and. . . twitter.
Because just like the 2008 housing B.S. they've shown they are perfectly happy to gamble with "our" money, and then they will expect us to bail them out again with our tax dollars when the whole house of cards comes crumbling down.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

Nop666

Ars Praefectus
3,862
Subscriptor++
As much as I'd love that to be the case, (I've been shaking my head at bitcoin prices for almost a decade now), whilst down 20% this month its currently above were it was in July 2025 & still up 4x over the last 5 years.

Personally I'll never buy bitcoin, and I still think long term it goes to ~0 at some point, but I'm also honest enough to admit that sadly the "buy the dip" dipshits have actually been more right than me thus far.
The Greater Fool theory works because it relies on the truth that new suckers are born every minute.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Nop666

Ars Praefectus
3,862
Subscriptor++
Crypto was always a pump and dump scam with everyone thinking they would know when to dump before others. The orange criminal/traitors family lost a huge amount which is satisfying to see. Of course all of them are the dumbest of the dumb.
Umm. I don't think that is the case. TrumpCo minted their crypto & people paid USD to buy in, which TrumpCo kept. The coins turning to shit was expected; the whole crypto scheme was just a way to money-launder bribes to Trump.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

Nop666

Ars Praefectus
3,862
Subscriptor++
Crypto is a weird human absurdity. How did this tech make any headway? Everything about it is flawed by design and because of design. So strange

True story time: I was at one of my favourite bars in Melbourne, Australia, a while ago. An American guy came over and was really chatty. I'm a sociable guy we talked for a while. He was showing off a bit about how he had been travelling from city to city around South East Asia. Boasting about travelling is not new or bad IMO, but I asked him "wow man, how can you afford that?"

Dun, dun dah! CRYPTO!

End of story, he was on a pump and dump mission for drunken chumps. Luckily I am aware of this kind of thing, so I wished him the best and said see-ya.
Hah. Which bar? (I am also from Melbourne, but haven't been to a bar in years.)
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

JoHBE

Ars Praefectus
4,134
Subscriptor++
Arguably making work no longer be necessary—to the extent that LLMs are actually able to do this, which is... highly debatable—is a generally good thing. Put another way, it is hard to see how making people do work that does not need to be done by a human being for its own sake is inherently a good thing.

To the extent that people losing jobs is problematic, it is because they need to have a "job" at all in order to survive in our society. However, this is an inherent problem of our current economic system, not something we are encountering for the first time due to AI. The solution is not preserving these jobs (except insofar that LLMs are an inferior substitute) but increasing social supports. Also, we really need to collectively rethink this notion that people even should need to work as much as they do for our society to successfully function. We could make an incremental step in this direction by reducing the standard 5 day work week to 4 days, which I have heard has been shown by various studies show is likely to make us collectively more productive despite the reduction in total hours worked.

OK...But this is all just rational claptrap that doesn't apply to the current world.
 
Upvote
1 (3 / -2)
An interesting thing about this is that in the USA we have a government of We The People. . . and a majority of the people decided to believe the lies they wanted to believe, and here we are. We have/had an independent press, but too many voters decided to IGNORE them to believe the lies they were telling themselves.
Do we really have an independent press? I mean sure, it exists in a tiny amount, but with the number of press outlets bought out or ran by right-wing billionaires (Sinclair propaganda in OTA, Fox and other right-wing owned cable TV, CBS now run by Trumpists, etc.) over the last 2 decades, I'm not sure that's the case anymore unless you count independent journalists on YouTube and Substack (which of course have their own problems, mostly the lack of editors and such to check things in detail before publishing).

In many parts of the country, it's not so much choosing to believe the lies, but the lies being so prevalent in every form of media that it's much like the proverbial fish in water asking the other fish "what is water?" They're so surrounded by right-wing media, that they don't understand they are in fact in a bubble of nothing but right-wing slant. Even on Youtube I have to search out left wing content (the algorithm never feeds them to me), and have to be careful on what I click on to avoid the algorithm spiraling into right-wing nonsense for weeks until I fix it with nonstop "Not Interested" clicking.
 
Upvote
8 (9 / -1)
Wait, I want to know what lenders are offering DEBT to make leveraged purchases of a highly speculative 'asset' with no inherent value? Also, I hope they lose a lot of money when Strategy and similar businesses go bankrupt.

We live in a world where black and brown people often can't get the money to buy a house, but somehow there are billions and billions of dollars available to buy crypto and. . . twitter.
Plenty of white people also can't get the money for a house.
 
Upvote
-7 (1 / -8)

StikyPad

Ars Scholae Palatinae
702
I guess HODL is now FODL. . .

It'll be interesting to see if this causes a total deflation of the crypto bubble, or if it yet again finds a bottom and bounces back.

One of the arguments that crypto-boosters have long made is that crypto, supposedly like Gold, would hold its value in a time of economic recession or depression. A hedge against economic uncertainty, a safe haven for your dollars. . .and yet, it seems that as we are starting to enter an economic recession, that crypto is not so de-coupled from the larger economy and other assets like stocks, bonds, and the value of the dollar.
I mean, almost everyone who has avoided crypto has done so because they believe it's going to zero at some unpredictable point in the near to mid future. How could it not? It has no intrinsic value, little to no legitimate functional use case, and "holding" is just typing up capital that could be put to better use elsewhere.

I'm happy to be shown why I'm wrong, but "it's always rebounded" is not a valid argument. The question isn't whether, but why. If it's just a case of people getting greedy again, without any fundamental reason for a price increase, then at some point people are going to get gun shy. Or not. But I don't want to essentially gamble on the timeframe for people to wise up. Anyone who thinks this can carry on forever should buy some tulip stocks.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)