Ooh, agentic middle managers will be in humanoid shells. They'll even get the chance to wear suits instead of polos when they have special meetings. How droll, a room full of robot executives governed by LLMs deciding how much glue to put in their frozen pizzas, speaking their own secret language to each other and there are donuts even though none of them eat, just because 72% of business meetings involve donutsSimple - Optimus will be both the buyer and the product. In the future, your robot slaves will themselves own slaves.
As Tesla sales fall in China, Musk says robots will save the company.
Hyundai is probably more worried about their own aging population at home in South KoreaBD is 80% owned by Hyundai, who may be playing the long game to support Japan's aging population.
I'm sure there's a significant share of investors who have long been able to piece together the picture but suffer from FOMO and have convinced themselves that they'll be able to get out in time by selling to a Bigger Fool.It's almost as if they haven't exactly thought this through. Everybody knows the old adage about the market remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent. But, I am really starting to wonder what precisely is going on such that these investments, that large numbers of people know are over-valued, are still appreciating (e.g., bitcoin, AI, tesla).
Paul Krugman cites some evidence that it's because markets don't react until it's ridiculously obvious what's going on. Still, if you believe all this crap is over-valued and that a reckoning is coming, the longer this goes on, the bigger the crash will be when the market finally does react.
as of today, Tesla’s P/E stands at 197
which would be justified if.. well, there is no rationale justification apart from having just invented the anti-gravity engine, the cure for all cancers, or.. AGI i guess
the quintessential bubble, that will implode eventually. postponing the event is the reason why they awarded $ 29 billions of TSLA shares to Musk to keep him as CEO
as i often read on these pages, we live in a pretty weird timeline
What about leaving the doors open if you want the robot to go there?That’s why I split my comment between areas where a robot is interacting with humans and the human environment and areas where their not.
As an example if you want to introduce a robot to your house. How does it go through doors? Do you add actuators to the doors that the robot can control in order to open/close them? (And have to retrofit every door in your house). Or do you build a robot that can simply use the multitude of dooknobs/handles/latches that humans have developed over millennia? (Which means at the very least humanoid hand style manipulators. )
One of the other things he doesn't ever account for is that a LOT of people hate him and Tesla now. Not everyone, but a non-negligible number of people. And these people are not going to buy these robots even if they are in a position to buy one and can afford one and have a legitimate use case for one. They won't because of the name on them. Of course... by the time they are actually useful and/or affordable (or even FUNCTIONAL), who knows what the company will look likeThat humanoid robot thing is a fever dream. i truly wonder who's going to buy them apart from modern slaves for the global superrich elite (you know those with a net worth of a billion or more). I mean humans are SO much cheaper. And if AI really takes all those desk jobs, then humans will be even cheaper!
Musk bailed on hyperloop upon unveiling his white paper. He claimed he didn’t have time to pursue it… even as he was founding companies left and right.I thought Musk bailed on the hyperloop after it achieved it’s goal - shutting down high speed rail in CA.
Yes, but they aren't selling them at $30,000. Of course, Tesla won't be either but that is a different part of the story. If they could sell Spot or one of the humanoid versions for that they would walk off the shelves after a backflip or two. Yes, there are Chinese versions at that price point but they are much less performant.isn't Boston robotics, who make genuine cutting edge robots with a frankly astonishing capability, struggling to sell enough to stay solvent? Tesla doesn't even have a first mover advantage with optimus, there are already companies in the humanoid robotics space, there just isn't very much money there*
*relatively speaking I mean.
Falling sales for BYD and Tesla in China isn't too shocking. Tesla is just garbage, and BYD is facing a rising tide of domestic competition churning out fantastic cars for good prices.
Is it just me or is the line of causality perfectly backwards here? Q2 predates the summer. And profits usually fall because of a price war, not because of the end of a price war.
What about you're an elderly person and you've gone into the bathroom, shut the door and you've fallen down and can't get up. Meanwhile your home help robot is sitting there on the other side of door listening to your yelling, all the while wondering what is this doorknob thingy, and how do I use it?What about leaving the doors open if you want the robot to go there?
Let me rephrase that: given the option would anyone replace their robovac with a far bulkier, heavier, more expensive and potentially dangerous one for the added benefit of it autonomously opening doors?
Besides a door opening robot doesn’t need to be humanoid either. A blob with motorized wheels, a single arm with “eyes” on it, a three fingered hand, would suffice and be cheaper.
But if automated doors are so important to someone, why not just install them now rather than wait for a humanoid robot that will likely be far more expensive and won’t come in their lifetime?
What’s the advantage of the humanoid robot using human tools? Give it a broom, making it more cumbersome and ineffective than a robovac? Maybe it will use your shower to self clean? Do you want that? Does it need the ability to sit on the couch for some reason? Or to handle the TV remote rather than using a wireless connection?
Let’s be honest, the real reason people want an humanoid robot is they desire and imagine it being a companion at some level. Same as with LLMs talking friendly and as confidente rather than tools.
Putting the elderly in robocare is insensitive at best, using robots designed to resemble humans is an abominable parody of human care.There is a market that, although not as broad as Musk's current hallucination, is large and robust and that is personal care robots for the elderly. Japan has been working on that for quite some time with what appears to be limited results. They have to be strong, very safe, gentle, able to adopt to various positions and body styles, very easy to use and cheaper than minimum wage humans. For some reason, I don't think Optimus is there nor will it get there.
Funny thing, I wrote my above reply to someone else before reading your reply to me right above it, but it actually fits as an answer there too.What about you're an elderly person and you've gone into the bathroom, shut the door and you've fallen down and can't get up. Meanwhile your home help robot is sitting there on the other side of door listening to your yelling, all the while wondering what is this doorknob thingy, and how do I use it?
Robovacs exist. I suggested leaving the doors open, but apparently that wasn’t good enough … if someone is so obsessive about closing doors maybe automating them would be useful?But why would I retrofit my house with automatic doors now, when the home help robots don't yet exist? That's a complete waste of money.
with tesla, I'd worry about the baby taking a trip through the garbage disposal more than the clothes. Or washing the baby's dirty clothes without taking them off the babySo you don't know that Tesla autonomous FSD vehicles with at least 8 color cameras will ignore red lights on occasion? I would not worry as much about mixing whites and color cloths, as much as worrying about them taking a trip through the garbage disposal because it looks and sounds a bit like a washing machine. Fortunately, neither of us have to worry about Optimus robots doing much of anything, besides breaking down a lot, and very likely even falling over.
Fully robotic warehouses (AS/RS - automated storage and retrieval systems in the jargon) have been available from material handling vendors since the 1970s. One company I worked with looked at taking it a step farther: no human touch from container ship arrival at port to resorted loads arriving at local distribution centers. There are a lot of such systems in use but what warehouse management eventually finds is that maintenance costs go up exponentially as you move from 50% automated toward 100% - and there aren't that many qualified maintenance techs in the world.I would find it amusing (in the abstract sense) if the chief job found for Tesla robots was to replace Amazon warehouse workers. I can pretty easily imagine Amazon warehouses full of robots, teleoperated by people in India or the Philippines, with AIs looking over the operations' shoulders, learning how to respond the same way to the same stimuli. Whether it's Tesla robots or not is a different question.
thats a missunderstanding. Hyperloop existed to derail a public transpiration project in cali. THAT was the purpose, after that nothing else mattered.Musk bailed on hyperloop upon unveiling his white paper. He claimed he didn’t have time to pursue it… even as he was founding companies left and right.
Wait, I thought the future of Tesla was in self-driving cars?
Or was that last month's future?
It just amazes me that there are still people who put credence in anything that Elon Musk says.
If hyperloop were doable, Musk would have been doing it. The fact that he shat out a white paper and then claimed he didn’t have time made clear he was just wanking in public.thats a missunderstanding. Hyperloop existed to derail a public transpiration project in cali. THAT was the purpose, after that nothing else mattered.
Tesla is just as anti-environmental as a coal mine
Restructuring the corporation doesn't make androids make sense.Well I mean, it is Tesla Inc., not Tesla Automotive. In theory he could spin-off Tesla Automotive Group and use Tesla as an umbrella. Musk often doesn't give the full picture of how something will work since he has an organic method to his madness. Tesla Automotive could become a loss leader and tax write-off while money gets poured into Tesla Robotics.
You'd think that he'd take that as a sign.I’m failing to find a quote of his that mentions it specifically (way too many hits) but he has often said he finds himself a bit odd.
Haven't read all the comments, but in case no one has replied to this, the EV market in China has not declined, it's expanded:This would have been a far better article if you had mention whether or not the overall car market declined in China (so not just Tesla and BYD), and how the other EV manufactures there are doing. The title actually implies that in my opinion.
"Selling billions of humanoid robots" is just a slang they used in South Africa's schools back in the day, meaning "hi" or "see you" or "the dog ate my homework". Everybody should know that not actual billions of actual robots or actual sales were implied. /sIf a CEO is incorrect about a prediction, that's legal. It is illegal to mislead investors. This statement will tie the legal system up for years trying to figure out if Musk is simply hopeful or just bald face lying.
Who needs self-driving cars when we can put a humanoid robot behind the wheel of a regular car? Maybe that's the Tesla plan.the last paragraph gave me unflattering visions of JohnnyCab
Quite honestly Medical and Government alone would easily hit this if they were a few thousand dollars each.Erm... "the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year."
Bullshit.
How on earth would that be possible, unless they're going to sell for something like $99. Mobile phone sales last year were less than 2 billion, globally, so even they don't amount to billions (plural) per year.
There's equal chance that they are able to do $20k worth of nursing work, and that they cost only $20k.Quite honestly Medical and Government alone would easily hit this if they were a few thousand dollars each.
They both have countless tasks that have a shortfall of workers or would be augmented. Search and rescue, orderlies, janitors, maintenance workers, someone to open the door for you.
And now of course Agriculture would greatly benefit.
Even if they cost $20,000 each, if they last longer than a year they are cheaper than a human.