Given the propensity for Muckimucks xAI thingamabob to go wildly off-the-rails, you'd have to be a complete lunatic to want to buy robots that can cause actual physical damage all around them from Muckimuck. If I were running a factory, a warehouse or similar I wouldn't let Muckimuck's robots anywhere near even if I was paid for it.Musk has said the Tesla robots will find their way onto the company's production line to build cars, presumably to replace workers whom he would otherwise have to pay salaries and benefits. But the CEO has grander ambitions for his robots, claiming on an investor call last year that the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year.
The current global labour force is estimated to be ~3.7billion.the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year.
Right!?!? I wondered what purpose that could serve over a smaller (less prone to physically hurting people) drone with a tiny grabby arm... yeah...Yeah and I have a bridge to sell too. Humanoid robots are an unimaginative child's idea of the future.
Simple - Optimus will be both the buyer and the product. In the future, your robot slaves will themselves own slaves.The current global labour force is estimated to be ~3.7billion.
Even assuming that these humanoid robots only manage the same 1/3rd duty cycle as humans, that means replacing every single worker on the planet in 4 years.
If you assume each humanoid robot replaces 3 humans, then in less than 2 years every worker on the planet will have been replaced by a Tesla humanoid robot.
Who exactly are the investors expecting to pay for this vast workforce? The newly-redundant ex-workers?
That's a very charitable way of putting it. He's clearly injected too many marijuanas.Anybody else find Musk a bit ... odd?
IDK, maybe it's just me.
Musk says robots will save the company.
I run an automotive themed diner in California and my popcorn scooper has called in sick for the past two weeks causing my profits to plummet.But the CEO has grander ambitions for his robots, claiming on an investor call last year that the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year.
the last paragraph gave me unflattering visions of JohnnyCab
It's almost as if they haven't exactly thought this through. Everybody knows the old adage about the market remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent. But, I am really starting to wonder what precisely is going on such that these investments, that large numbers of people know are over-valued, are still appreciating (e.g., bitcoin, AI, tesla).Who exactly are the investors expecting to pay for this vast workforce? The newly-redundant ex-workers?
::shakesfist:: "Heathen… HERETIC!"... Who exactly are the investors expecting to pay for this vast workforce? The newly-redundant ex-workers?
Anybody else find Musk a bit ... odd?
IDK, maybe it's just me.
But then you'd have to do the calculus on the ultimate cost benefits of charging, maintaining, and any other tasks required to keep 10 robots running versus paying 1 human employee... No doubt you'd be paying humans to keep all those robots running.Robots are good at menial repetitive tasks. Presumably 1 person would not be replaced by 1 robot. But 1 human job might be replaced by something like 10 robots, each performing a more focused task.
the Chinese government telling automakers at the start of the summer that their price war was over

If a CEO is incorrect about a prediction, that's legal. It is illegal to mislead investors. This statement will tie the legal system up for years trying to figure out if Musk is simply hopeful or just bald face lying.claiming on an investor call last year that the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year.
kinda surprised robotics hasn't changed to a more therapod like design. Human legs are incredibly weird and unwieldy. Most other cases of bipedalism in the natural world are more like a trex - with bent legs and much more balance. Instead of humans with a straight knee column leg that you are precariously balanced on top of.Yeah and I have a bridge to sell too. Humanoid robots are an unimaginative child's idea of the future.
It is in no way a realistic number. He's said they'll cost around $30k. I've seen some notes about MAYBE $20k... He keeps saying he expects EVERYONE to buy these to work for them around the house or do dumb menial shit. But MANY (most?) people aren't even spending that much on their primary daily transportation, let alone a humanoid robot to do their laundry.Erm... "the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year."
Bullshit.
How on earth would that be possible, unless they're going to sell for something like $99. Mobile phone sales last year were less than 2 billion, globally, so even they don't amount to billions (plural) per year.
I disagree. I’m moderately in the humanoid robot camp because when co-working with humans, in choosing between adapting the human world for robots, or adapting robots for the current human world I prefer the latter.Right!?!? I wondered what purpose that could serve over a smaller (less prone to physically hurting people) drone with a tiny grabby arm... yeah...
Realspeak, I think wizards with guns did a skit on the inevitable future of having robot helpers in homes. It’s... horrifying.
Gotta admit, it's nice to be able to know what's NOT coming in the future when Musk makes an announcement.Despite the very non-humanoid shape of industrial robots in car factories, Musk has said the Tesla robots will find their way onto the company's production line to build cars, presumably to replace workers whom he would otherwise have to pay salaries and benefits. But the CEO has grander ambitions for his robots, claiming on an investor call last year that the company will sell billions of humanoid robots a year.