I don't think there was much of a conversion. I'm sure you know that he's from a very problematic South African family - pretty much MAGAs with a slight tan. He "worked" with Peter Thiel on PayPal.He DID say we needed to raise fossil fuel production. I took that as the first sign of his MAGA conversion.
Well, in Musk's world Atlas shrugged...You're wrong, it's Musk personally holding the Twitter infrastructure on his shoulders like Atlas.
Seriously though, it's impressive how it's holding up.
Yes it is a feature to some regimes in Arabic and china.Given the current ownership...uh...feature, not a bug?
It will have to do at least one bankruptcy rinse of the absurd debt the buyout saddled it with. Who will own the IP and any 'assets' after that is anyone's guess. I'm betting the banks wrote in some heavy penalties for Elon using Tesla/Space-X collateralI'm on the fence if Twitter will fail or not. On the one hand it's a complete train wreck. On the other hand millions of people are using it to get a front row seat to watch the train wreck. The demise will be when people stop paying attention and I'm not sure we're able to collectively look away.
Sackings will persist until morale and revenue improve!!Twitter wishes it to be known that the people responsible for sacking those responsible for [noun] have just been sacked.
If bots weren't a problem before, they certainly are now.
Also hate to play conspiracy theorist, but considering Twitler has shown he's willing to go down on CCP officials to protect his Tesla plants, we sure that this wasn't a case where the gates were opened by someone on the inside? No hard evidence to support this, and it could well be a happy coincidence for Chinese authorities, but one does have to wonder.
Apple isn't going around boasting about being the Great Protector of Freeze Peach.See a lot of replies as "is Musk beholden to China because of the factories" - not nearly as much as Apple is, and i dont see anybody fake casually implying "i dont know, i dont know, but maybe Tim Cook is beholden to China and that why he is doing everything CCP asks from him to squash info on protests"
hyprocritical much? If Tesla is beholden, Apple is bought and paid for milion time over.
Also, to be picky, no one talking about this has a physical laptop, as far as I’ve seen. They have a disk image with a bunch of Hunter’s files on it and no proof it hasn’t been tampered with. Some of the images touted as his laptop have been openly tempered with, in fact.It is Hunter's laptop, but there's nothing on there of any consequence. The DOJ and Congress gave it a look and still haven't found anything. The Republicans aren't interested in the laptop as evidence, they're interested in it as a way to get a sham trial started.
Oh, we already have bigger news.
View: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1597300125243944961
Gee, I wonder what could possibly be causing Apple to threaten that?
If bots weren't a problem before, they certainly are now.
Also hate to play conspiracy theorist, but considering Twitler has shown he's willing to go down on CCP officials to protect his Tesla plants, we sure that this wasn't a case where the gates were opened by someone on the inside? No hard evidence to support this, and it could well be a happy coincidence for Chinese authorities, but one does have to wonder.
Revenues are always positive or at the very least 0.Ah; now I understand Musk's strategy. What's 6% of a negative number?
Caffeine free diet coke gives you no energy.Because he's a man-child poser. He wants us to think he's burning energy working on all of his companies, when all I see is a person with poor eating and hygiene habits.
I disagree. If Musk was trying to deny Apple money that they are owed, that would already be in court.The funny part, is they it's more likely to be related to Apple not getting their 30%, than the lax moderation.
Drop the smugness, bozo. If it weren't for your nick, I'd smell the bullshit from your first sentence anyway, so I can still ignore the deluge of idocy. The ignore function works just finde, btw. C'est la vie, indeed.Oh wait, the new forums don't auto-hide posts with >20 downvotes and there is no "ignore" functionality anymore for people here to incorrectly refer to as a "block" functionality. Well, c'est la vie, I guess.
Probably never.I know I personally reserve the utmost respect for all works "Published On Twitter Itself." What an honor! He must know somebody.
How long can it go on like this, with him threatening to "expose" the 99% of people who are openly un-receptive to his awkward villainy? At what point does he realize that yes, we know exactly what has been going on this whole time, we apparently understand it better than he does, and it all makes him look like a piece of garbage?
Hey! Let's please keep this factual.It is Hunter's laptop, but there's nothing on there of any consequence. The DOJ and Congress gave it a look and still haven't found anything. The Republicans aren't interested in the laptop as evidence, they're interested in it as a way to get a sham trial started.
This is like paying your rent in exposure.
Nobody—before Elon completed his purchase—thought Twitter was unpopular, or in trouble because not enough people used it. Touting engagement numbers will not pay employees.
He probably can't keep it going indefinitely with his own money. He has a billion dollars a year to produce just in INTEREST on the debt he went into to buy it, and selling Tesla stock to generate cash has already had impacts on that company.Like he cares about stiffing employees he already intended to fire. Musk can keep Twitter going indefinitely with his own money. He bought it because it's a popular, global propaganda engine. If it stays popular enough to deliver victory to right-wing extremists, he wins.
OF course he's out of the computer repair business. If we take him at his word, he's admitting to poking around inside a customers laptop. Why would anyone trust him with their computers after that ?And the only person who has claimed he got it from Hunter Biden is a) legally blind, b) never met Mr. Biden before that day or after, c) no longer is in the computer repair business, and d) wants nothing to do with the laptop anymore.
if you had an upside/down hat, I'd throw a couple $$s in it. Thank you!<snip>
If his hubris wasn't fucking up so many people, I'd feel bad for him. I value my partnership with my wife and my good relationship with my children very, very highly, and he'll never have that.
I wouldn't trade either for a hundred billion dollars.
I think I'm too gobsmacked and/or worn out by this to add to the conversation anymore, so I'll just say:It's not a communication unless it comes from the Cómmunicatíon region of France. Otherwise it's just a sparkling message.
The difference is that Apple has spent the last few years actively moving out of China and has diversified its production capacity into e.g. Vietnam. As do a lot of companies who can see the writing on the wall and arent't run by Giant attention-seeking man-babiesSee a lot of replies as "is Musk beholden to China because of the factories" - not nearly as much as Apple is, and i dont see anybody fake casually implying "i dont know, i dont know, but maybe Tim Cook is beholden to China and that why he is doing everything CCP asks from him to squash info on protests"
hyprocritical much? If Tesla is beholden, Apple is bought and paid for milion time over.
Tesla is also building new plants not in China, so the main difference is your last point.The difference is that Apple has spent the last few years actively moving out of China and has diversified its production capacity into e.g. Vietnam. As do a lot of companies who can see the writing on the wall and arent't run by Giant attention-seeking man-babies
And don't forget to bring along screen shots of your code. 'Cause if you aren't hard core developer, El Twitto won't want to see you.Come to the 10th floor if you know how to login to our apple developer account.
And here comes the nagging question: Does Twitter Inc owe the world intense moderation on the Twitter platform? Twitter the company was bleeding money before the Elon Musk finally bought it (and the online ad market has only slowed since then), so the profit-driven thing to do is to cull the human moderators that receive a paycheck from the company but don't contribute to the bottom line. Yes, theoretically this could lead to the exit of some users and advertisers, but reality has shown that most users and advertisers are still there because 1) the experience hasn't changed for the worse for most users and 2) there is nowhere else to go. I mean, where are those users and advertisers going to go? Mastodon? Even the ones that left will slowly come back.
Which brings the other question: What is the minimum amount of moderation that a platform like Twitter is legally obligated to have? And how do we legally define moderation?
Not to mention that Twitter's moderation squad has historically being used to silence news deemed unfavorable to certain people in power, despite those news being true. The censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop story (despite the story being true) comes to mind. Instead, with post-Musk Twitter we got to watch the ransack of FTX near-real time despite SBF being a major political donor to some very powerful people, blue and red. Even if pre-Musk Twitter had no intention to censor that story, the fact that people knew post-Musk Twitter wouldn't censor the story made them flock to the platform and share their info, which gave Twitter a nice boost in activity.
So, long story short, sorry folks, I just don't see the "Twitter is dying" everyone here is talking about.
Also, Musk will contribute money to bridge Twitter over and pay off debt because, let's face it, celebrity is a hell of a drug.
PS: I understand it's a difficult pill to swallow, but hey, you've always got Ars Technica. Oh wait, the new forums don't auto-hide posts with >20 downvotes and there is no "ignore" functionality anymore for people here to incorrectly refer to as a "block" functionality. Well, c'est la vie, I guess.
$5 billion? Who is going to pay $5B for Twitter?Musk could surely sell Twitter for $5 billion, walk away and go back to SpaceX and Tesla. Sure losing $39 billion would be a painful lesson. Instead he's risking losing much much more , if Tesla's stock dropped to a P/E ratio similar to Ford or Volkswagen he'd potentially end up with negative net worth. He's taken out loans against the current value of Tesla stock, I don't think we know exactly how much but its enough to put in the hole if Tesla stock crashes.
The word is “insolvent” — bankruptcy is inevitable when you’re insolvent (unless you pull a miracle) but may not happen for a while yet.$5 billion? Who is going to pay $5B for Twitter?
To buy Twitter, Musk saddled a $5 billion revenue company with $1 billion in interest payments. Since then, things have gotten worse. Musk himself has said that Twitter has had a massive revenue drop as advertisers walk away. While he didn't release any numbers, rumors are that it's in the neighborhood of $4 million/day. Or $1.4 billion/year.
So now a company with $3 billion in revenues (and likely still falling) needs to come up with $2.4 billion just to keep afloat. And given that the company has gutted its management, back office, and technical staff, there is literally nobody to reverse the course.
I guess I don't see someone paying $5 billion, or even $5 million, to buy a company that saddles them with a couple of billion in debt payments every year and the need for a top to bottom rebuild. Sinking that money into a brand new Twitter clone would be a whole lot easier.
The reality is, Twitter's bankrupt, it's just that the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.
It's still twitching because it has Musk's axe buried in its central nervous system.$5 billion? Who is going to pay $5B for Twitter?
To buy Twitter, Musk saddled a $5 billion revenue company with $1 billion in interest payments. Since then, things have gotten worse. Musk himself has said that Twitter has had a massive revenue drop as advertisers walk away. While he didn't release any numbers, rumors are that it's in the neighborhood of $4 million/day. Or $1.4 billion/year.
So now a company with $3 billion in revenues (and likely still falling) needs to come up with $2.4 billion just to keep afloat. And given that the company has gutted its management, back office, and technical staff, there is literally nobody to reverse the course.
I guess I don't see someone paying $5 billion, or even $5 million, to buy a company that saddles them with a couple of billion in debt payments every year and the need for a top to bottom rebuild. Sinking that money into a brand new Twitter clone would be a whole lot easier.
The reality is, Twitter's bankrupt, it's just that the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.
How long before he crashes a Cybertruck into a random pizza place?
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1597405399040217088
There's a difference between building a single plant in Brandenburg, Germany and relying on China for most of your output and components vs. moving most of your production out of China in the medium term.Tesla is also building new plants not in China, so the main difference is your last point.
How many social media platforms have quickly run into trouble because they refused to moderate ?
To your leading question (remainder of your post spoilered to focus on this), this article makes the case that moderation was Twitter's primary product and, as such, it was an essential part of their business. It wasn't that Twitter owed moderation to everybody else so much as they owed it to themselves.
We've already seen what happens when you gut the moderation team and relax rules about what can be posted: it's an unmitigated mess that a lot of people and companies want absolutely nothing to do with. (Note how this also verifies the thesis of the article).
Elon Musk's current hell is very much of his own making, and he has no one to blame but himself for the loss of advertising customers and high profile account holders. And without those, he has no route to financial viability without taking away from his other business ventures.
To worry about angering China would require Musk to have a greater understanding of human behaviour than he has demonstrated since he took over Twitter.No mention of Musk's Tesla venture in China? Even if there is no direct correlation, You have to think that his main concern is not offending the Chinese government and so would feel almost no urgency to deal with this.