As someone who just reupped everyone in my family I could convince to 16GB Lunar Lake HPs in either 14 or 16 inch sizes for $600/each with reasonable laptop build quality, you need to realize with this that the Windows MSRPs might not compete with this but the Windows deals easily beat this.I'm surprised to see the statement at the end about it aging poorly, when typically cheap Windows laptops tend to last maybe 2 years before they're useless. I don't like Macs (just personal preference) but I definitely think the lifespan of this is going to extend beyond the majority of it's Windows counterparts. I know people who've used a MacBook for 8-10 years before they've outlived their usefulness.
Well, see, I want to run Linux. . . and from what I've seen, Linux on Snapdragon X isn't very well supported - there have been reports of some Snapdragon X systems mostly working, but others, not so much. Hit and miss.So I regularly help people shop for laptops, one thing to note is that 13" laptops even 5 years ago (especially in the lower price tier) were about as big as a 15-16" laptop is now because the bezels have shrunk so much. Check whatever you are currently on's actual physical footprint and compare that rather than just looking at screen size.
The reason 13" tends to be a little pricier is I believe it's a little less popular so the components don't have the scale on parts orders. Also the screens even at the same resolution are harder/more expensive to make because they have higher DPI.
If you don't mind Windows on ARM (which seems to mostly be stable last I heard), this is probably the best 13-14" deal on the market right now. Also same price at Newegg, Walmart and ebay. Would probably buy Walmart for the better return policy.
https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/h...f1820f00150a1eba9b&subacctname=Slickdeals+LLC
People saying Windows is has to be rooted either in them having not used it since Windows XP or because they bought extremely cheap computers.I mean it's POSSIBLE to spend $1500 on a Windows PC. But, the one my mom just got was $218. I took Windows the heck off and put a better OS on (Ubuntu 24.04), but the fact of the matter is a Windows PC is only $1500 if you're going for some pretty beefy specs (or buying a prestige model like an XPS or an Alienware or something.)
The point about Windows being crap is true though. I strongly recommend Ubuntu with a KDE desktop, or Linux Mint, but if it's "Windows or Mac", the Mac is going to be a lot more trouble-free.
You can't displace Chromebooks with hardware. The Chromebook succeeds in the market because of software, not hardware. If MacOS comes up with software that can be provisioned and deployed as easily as ChromeOS is, where a student can grab literally any laptop and pick up exactly where they had been within seconds, then the people who actually buy Chromebooks might consider it.
Yep. It comes down to what compromises are made to hit that price point. It looks like for a lot of people the Neo will give them the functionality they need for their use cases. For browsing, media consumption, and basic productivity applications, this is more than enough without the compromises with the screen quality, build, and materials that typify most laptops in that price range.Sounds like this is the perfect machine for people who don’t know what a virtual machine is, or don’t edit RAW photos. Which is a LOT of people. Like people who buy $500 laptops from Walmart
It’s the entry level model like the $349 iPad or the iPhone SE, it can do the basics for most people but has compromises. Which is fine because it costs so much less than the next model.
Maybe a spec bump model in 12 months time with the A19 Pro with 12GB of RAM is the one to wait for.
That’s what I thought. What the reviewer called “normal use” is…. Not normal for people who buy these cheap laptops.The review is nicely written for the Ars audience, but the Ars audience has only the scantest overlap with the Neo’s intended market.
I predict that Apple will sell boatloads of the Neo, mostly to users who don’t need to know or care about external 4K monitors or editing RAW images.
Oh yeah, sorry can't say on running Linux on this one (or any Snapdragon). I thought Linux had okay ARM support for some reason. This is a little bit more expensive at $750, but seems solid for what you are looking for.Well, see, I want to run Linux. . . and from what I've seen, Linux on Snapdragon X isn't very well supported - there have been reports of some Snapdragon X systems mostly working, but others, not so much. Hit and miss.
But, that said, I'll have to research this later and see what I can find regarding Linux support for this particular model. I'm also concerned though as I seem to recall seeing an article, somewhere, possibly Phoronix, about some updates to the Linux kernel that actually made it run worse on Snapdragon systems (which may be resolved by now).
I just don't have a lot of confidence that Linux on Snapdragon X will be a good experience today and in the future.
Generally agreed, but I would counter with: Longer support period.It's becoming difficult to see how this is a better replacement for the Walmart M1 Air, other than being more widely available and in colors. It has the same price but worse performance, worse battery life, less resolution screen, worse ports, worse trackpad, etc.
Linux has excellent ARM support. Apple silicon uses the ARM instruction set for the CPU, but ARM support doesn’t mean Linux will automatically support the custom GPU, custom NPU, all of the hardware such as the trackpad, Wifi, etc etc.Oh yeah, sorry can't say on running Linux on this one (or any Snapdragon). I thought Linux had okay ARM support for some reason. This is a little bit more expensive at $750, but seems solid for what you are looking for.
https://www.bestbuy.com/product/hp-...ry1-tb-ssd-glacier-silver-aluminum/JJGH2LFK84
There’s some very good information in this post, thank you!!The Neo supports one screen at up to 3840×2160 at 60 Hz output, so that should work.
MacBooks with M-series Apple silicon support multiple screens and higher resolutions.
Be aware that a typical widescreen 3440×1440 screen has about half the pixel density of a "Retina" display.
While Windows and Linux typically use subpixel text rendering to make text sharper, MacOS does not.
Apple instead opted to double the total pixel density on all their screens.
Therefore text in MacOS on that screen will look a little less sharp than text in Windows.
That’s what I thought. What the reviewer called “normal use” is…. Not normal for people who buy these cheap laptops.
As soon as he mentioned editing RAW photos or using Audacity, he moved outside the target market.
I suspect the use cases listed are beyond what most MacBook Air users do, let alone the target market for the Neo.
IIUC, Linux does have decent ARM CPU support, the problem is drivers - things like GPU, Sound, Network, Cameras, Power Management, USB, Wifi, Bluetooth, etc.Oh yeah, sorry can't say on running Linux on this one (or any Snapdragon). I thought Linux had okay ARM support for some reason. This is a little bit more expensive at $750, but seems solid for what you are looking for.
https://www.bestbuy.com/product/hp-...ry1-tb-ssd-glacier-silver-aluminum/JJGH2LFK84
The version with 512GB of storage and Touch ID is $699.<snipped>
Re: $600 Windows laptops comparisons.
When I'm using a laptop, I'm carrying it places (so weight matters), opening and closing it and using it across my legs (so fit & finish and build quality matter), I'm interacting with the OS using the keyboard and trackpad (so fit & finish and build quality matter again) and looking at the screen (so screen quality matters). I'm also using it in various places, so battery life matters. Only after all of these are satisfied do I start to care about performance, assuming it crosses a baseline threshold (which this machine absolutely does, as it is comparable to the M1 8GB that I have two copies of, one in a MBA and one in a Mac Mini that serves as my 24/7 uptime ~server). I will 100 times out of 100 trade a performance ceiling for the physical artifact that I will carry and hold and touch and look at to be nicer and more pleasant to use.
Yeah, I've been looking at the Omnibooks, in particular the Aero. They are about what I want, and apparently they used to be cheaper, but their price went up about $200 the last few months. Although it's hard to say, because I don't know that the model that I saw a price for in a video from December, is exactly the same as the model I was comparing too.Oh yeah, sorry can't say on running Linux on this one (or any Snapdragon). I thought Linux had okay ARM support for some reason. This is a little bit more expensive at $750, but seems solid for what you are looking for.
https://www.bestbuy.com/product/hp-...ry1-tb-ssd-glacier-silver-aluminum/JJGH2LFK84
The same issues that Cunningham noted with reviewing $500 notebooks would also apply with refurbs -- namely the inconsistent availability (by the time any guide gets posted, the models included in the guide might already be unavailable) and proliferating configuration combos (when the models are new, they are often have config options that are no longer available by the time they hit the refurb stock).You know what I've tried to find in tech journalism, and had a hard time finding, but would be amazingly useful, is a guide to the best refurbished laptops. Laptops from say the last 3 years, which might have been quite expensive at release, but now could be had for like 1/2 as much money.
Yes, I can try to find old reviews of some of the better mid-range and high-range laptops from say 2 years ago, and then go look for those refurb. . . but that's a lot of work, and the kind of thing such a guide from a site like Ars, could really help a lot of people from doing the exact same homework.
And such a guide could also warn users away from deals that LOOK like good deals, but maybe some particular make/model isn't as good of a deal as it appears, because of high failure rates of the internal ssd or gpu or whatever.
My first Mac was the SE (the only classic Mac with built-in dual floppies). List price at that time was $3,100 after Apple bumped up the price by over $100 during a RAM shortage (keep in mind this was for a 1 MB model). Student pricing fortunately kept my price at $1,750.I groan at the notion of 8GB in a computer running Tahoe. Then I remember I paid $500 for an external floppy drive in 1984.
A lot of my family members would find the Neo a completely capable machine. The nephew who's producing albums in Ableton? Not so much.
Good points.The same issues that Cunningham noted with reviewing $500 notebooks would also apply with refurbs -- namely the inconsistent availability (by the time any guide gets posted, the models included in the guide might already be unavailable) and proliferating configuration combos (when the models are new, they are often have config options that are no longer available by the time they hit the refurb stock).
I will often just search the older reviews if I see a refurb or clearance deal. Those deals typically don't last long.
I still use a 13-year-old MacBook Air 11" for running Zoom meetings.I'm surprised to see the statement at the end about it aging poorly, when typically cheap Windows laptops tend to last maybe 2 years before they're useless. I don't like Macs (just personal preference) but I definitely think the lifespan of this is going to extend beyond the majority of it's Windows counterparts. I know people who've used a MacBook for 8-10 years before they've outlived their usefulness.
As with any larger RAM complement you can tell when your usage exceeds the resources.The warning about 8GB of memory seems a little vague. If Activity Monitor is closed, can you tell? Or is it "subtle" i.e. you can't tell? People said this about M1 MacBook and the M1 mini, both of which worked perfectly fine.
And my point is, regardless of whether there are consistently good (for some functions of that word) ones on sale for $600, it's not actually competing with those $800 machines, because those don't come with the things these buyers actually tend to want.That was literally a fast example to point out that "this isn't competing with $600 MSRP Windows machines, it's competing with 800-1k machines because there are constantly good ones on sale to the 600 mark". That was my point. Obviously the 2 in 1 dell for $50 less wasn't meant to be "this is strictly better for every use case".
Most buyers like you, you mean. Because what I am attempting to tell you is that the buyers this is aimed at are shopping for completely different things than you are, according to criteria you don't value. They are not shopping for "the best specs available for $600." They are shopping for integration with a service ecosystem, familiarity, simplicity, and "it just works," and now they can get that for $600 instead of $1100.I was simply pointing out, correctly that comparing a $600 macbook Neo to $600 MSRP windows machines is not relevant to most buyers.
If one never touches an application or workflow that uses more than that, why would it not? The hardware will last. The OS will get updates for 5-7 years. It looks sharp and doesn't creak. And sorry man, but Word, Safari, Photos, Music, and Pages do not use 8GB of RAM, maybe even simultaneously."My mom cares if her iphone" okay so your mom needs Mac OS. That is literally the exact use case I said this is for lol. But I think people saying this thing is going to last a long time when it only has 8 GBs of ram are wrong.
That's my point. So why did you spend the previous couple sentences arguing it?And yes I do know what 5-600 dollar laptop users care about, the #1 thing is OS familiarity frankly. It's why I always find the cross shopping idea ridiculous on it's face. Most people don't want to learn a new OS, so it doesn't matter that the M1 is infinitely faster and more efficient than a comparable windows PC at release. You can't run windows, and people are locked into software ecosystems as much by familiarity as they are by walls.
That was a misunderstanding due to a now long-fixed bug in the reporting API as far as I remember. Apple Silicon Macs actually do not stress their Flash storage any more than Intel Macs do, due to them swapping a lot less they can actually stress their Flash less than the older Macs!On the 8GB thing... When it came out, a lot of people found the 8GB Air to be perfectly usable for heavier tasks because an SSD-backed swap was reasonably peppy. And then a few months later there was some news about 8GB Macbooks absolutely chomping through the write life of their SSDs, much faster than usual. Did that get a resolution? Or are there a lot of older 8GB Macbooks out there with trashed SSDs that are otherwise fine?
In my industry experience, yes. Jamf does not come anywhere near the ease and convenience of how Chromebooks are provisioned.I don't think you'll see Apple getting into that space ever.
Folks are still stuck with crappy Jamf right?
The Neo replaces that. Otherwise totally agree with your post.Mildly disappointed that the comparison wasn't done against the WalMart Special base model M1 MBA with 8GB. I feel like the Neo is aimed squarely at that audience.
With Apple's budget models for any product, you always have to look at something like the Neo as a supply chain and production play. With the iPhone SE, for example, they just updated the SoC and cellular modem, and kept the rest of the design intact. They were able to keep the phone current while maintaining high margins at a $400-450 price point (helps that the production lines were already amortized and the cost of the older spec parts were lower).It's becoming difficult to see how this is a better replacement for the Walmart M1 Air, other than being more widely available and in colors. It has the same price but worse performance, worse battery life, less resolution screen, worse ports, worse trackpad, etc.