An engineering thesis disguised as a coupe: A history of the Honda Prelude

Aurich

Director of Many Things
40,904
Ars Staff
/// OFFICIAL MODERATION NOTICE ///

We don't run AI generated editorial. We don't run ads disguised as editorial. Period.


If anyone wants to accuse us of either without any evidence I have a really simple response: feel free to go find another website to read.

I'm really not going to tolerate it. You want to be critical of an article that's fine. Nobody here is so precious that we try and shut down criticism. If you can't do it without making personal attacks on the authors and accusing us of being unethical with zero evidence then please just find somewhere else to be.

On a more directly related note to this article: it's normal to use the launch of a new car to look back at the history if it's a vehicle that has an interesting story. That doesn't mean anyone is being paid off by Honda, it's called being enthusiasts. Maybe try living in a world where people are still capable of being excited about things and not just using all their energy to be negative about everything.
 
Upvote
75 (110 / -35)

kaleberg

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,245
Subscriptor
Honda seems caught in a strange place right now. They’re way behind on EVs, with Chinese manufacturers leaping forward in tech, infrastructure, and affordability, leaving Honda and Toyota both in a position closer to 70s/80s Detroit than the disruptors they once were (now occupied by BYD, Xiaomi, Hyundai/Kia). And meanwhile, at the premium end, the Acura lineup is a confused mess. This Prelude seems like an out of place entry to a market that doesn’t really exist anymore. Best case to me is that it establishes a good hybrid powertrain for use in the Integra, which is a far more practical vehicle with an air of premium marketability.
There's a university in Hiroshima that I tend to think of as the Japanese car college. Their automotive engine lab is famous within the industry. I associate that university with Honda, because they both have the same focus on internal combustion engines. Even when they go high tech, it's about automobiles. For example, back in the 1990s, they showed a demo video at SIGGRAPH rendering car headlights in varying weather and road conditions. They joke about pilots having avgas in their blood. Some people have regular gasoline.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

msadesign

Ars Scholae Palatinae
603
Subscriptor
As a young man, I was a serious Honda motorcycle afficiendo. Starting with the Honda 90 (both styles), I owned the 160, the 250, the 350, 450, and finally the 750 (a brute!), whereupon I took leave of may senses and bought a Suzuki X6 250, which was blazingly fast and fun to ride with the then-unique 6 speed transmission. During a road trip with the X6 from Colorado to Baton Rouge, while zipping through Dallas at 2 AM, I blew a dime-sized hole in one of the pistons, but that's another story.

Moving to the Chicago area, I became a commuter. The answer? A bright yellow Honda N600. This car was a blast to drive, and amazingly big inside; the gear shift sticking out of the dashboard was odd, but quite comfortable. My brother and I are both 6'-1"; we put thousands of miles in that car, camping in Colorado and Wyoming, both feeling comfortable inside the surprisingly roomy cab.

In 1973, during the gas crisis, I sold the car for $2600!, which was more than twice what I paid for it. Good times.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

copiedright

Ars Centurion
268
Subscriptor++
I miss my 89 Prelude with 4 wheel steering. By far my favourite car. Had a friend who had 3 of them and was using two as sacrificial for spare parts, that could only last so long.

The four wheel steering was amazing. Handling and turning was amazing. But you had to be aware and be careful. It was a car you had to reverse parallel park. Trying to nose in would leave the back of the car hanging out.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)

CelicaGT

Ars Scholae Palatinae
730
Subscriptor
Yeah, no. What made Japanese cars appealing at the time was that they weren't complete piles of rolling, rusting junk like US cars were. And they managed to get some decent gas mileage too. I was there during the transition and US manufacturing quality is the main reason I started looking elsewhere for my cars.

And if you don't believe me, go read Lee Iaccoca's autobiography. He describes how when he took over Chrysler, nobody could tell him what was going wrong with their cars because Chrysler didn't do QA. THAT's the market the Japanese were moving into.
Around 2008 or so I had a '83 Camry that I pulled out of the junkyard at the auto shop I worked at. Had over 450,000km on it. Reason for junking? Needed a clutch. I threw a shop battery in it, checked fluids and it fired right up. Turns out the clutch was fine, the airflow sensor was reading false air due to a slit in the intake boot downstream of it.

That car was a four door 5 speed manual with power door locks and windows, moonroof, cruise control and the top shelf stereo. Everything worked, paint shined up with a polish. NO rust, factory brake pads (highway km, manual. The one owner did sales for Monsanto so it was all over NA) all original everything minus tires. Drove like new. I put another 80 or 100k on it before it died (at my hands unfortunately, I still cringe).

Younger people really don't understand how fucking TERRIBLE American cars were back then. I've spent lots of time under the hoods of '80's domestic vehicles. With a few outliers, they are all very bad. Now? With a few outliers they're all pretty good.
 
Upvote
48 (48 / 0)

Puzuzulemon

Smack-Fu Master, in training
60
Subscriptor++
For an Ars article, there’s a lot of tell don’t show in here. Having read the piece, I’m still not sure what made the Prelude such a well engineered car. Pop out headlights? 4 wheel turning? VTEC? And what’s this about a engineering thesis?
Yeah the piece is a bit fluffy, the title got me to expect a deep dive à la John Siracusa. Maybe for next time the author should focus on one generation and what made it really special.
 
Upvote
17 (21 / -4)

RajivSK

Smack-Fu Master, in training
54
/// OFFICIAL MODERATION NOTICE ///

We don't run AI generated editorial. We don't run ads disguised as editorial. Period.


If anyone wants to accuse us of either without any evidence I have a really simple response: feel free to go find another website to read.

I'm really not going to tolerate it. You want to be critical of an article that's fine. Nobody here is so precious that we try and shut down criticism. If you can't do it without making personal attacks on the authors and accusing us of being unethical with zero evidence then please just find somewhere else to be.

On a more directly related note to this article: it's normal to use the launch of a new car to look back at the history if it's a vehicle that has an interesting story. That doesn't mean anyone is being paid off by Honda, it's called being enthusiasts. Maybe try living in a world where people are still capable of being excited about things and not just using all their energy to be negative about everything.
I've been reading arse for a very long time and I'm not quite sure how to feel about this statement.

Several long time readers are seeing patterns in the text that very closely resemble common chatgpt mannerisms. Here's another example:

Against this backdrop, reviving a legacy nameplate is no longer just a branding exercise. It’s a test of [...]

I have to be honest, if I'd read this anywhere else, I would have no doubts this was written by AI. While I can agree with you about the unfounded accusations of undisclosed ads, I'm not sure I fully support silencing honest opinions about what long time readers feel when reading this article...
 
Upvote
42 (67 / -25)

dwolvin

Smack-Fu Master, in training
67
Subscriptor
A friend had one of these in the mid 90s. He lived in New England and said that they called it “The Sled” because the 4-wheel turning when driving on ice turned the entire car into a giant sled that you couldn’t steer. So it’s always interesting to hear that it was a feature some people loved.

Yeah, I grew up in central Wisconsin and don't want to admit how many decades I felt that way. They I learned about winter tires and took real (EVOC/defensive) driving classes and wish I could transmit that info back to the younger knucklehead me.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

redbird71

Seniorius Lurkius
40
For an Ars article, there’s a lot of tell don’t show in here. Having read the piece, I’m still not sure what made the Prelude such a well engineered car. Pop out headlights? 4 wheel turning? VTEC? And what’s this about a engineering thesis?
I drove one back in the early 90th. It was quite a special car, for me because of the high powered servos that allowed you to turn the wheel like no other car, brakes and gas where extremly light to the touch, the precision of the manual gearbox, the sound ... it's hard to discribe and obviously not as impactful to somebody who didn't grow up with the cars of the 70th and 80th.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

rayoleary

Seniorius Lurkius
36
@AusPeter is absolutely right. Deming’s “Total Quality Management” (TQM) revolutionized Japanese manufacturing. Here in the US, Deming’s TQM runs into political roadblocks. Specifically, Deming’s “Drive Out Fear” principle contradicts corporate totalitarianism. This has resulted in a variety of TQM charlatans who tout revised (perverted) versions, designed to be acceptable to head-chopping CEOs like GE’s infamous “Neutron Jack” Welch.
Not chainsaw jack…?
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

redbird71

Seniorius Lurkius
40
I've been reading arse for a very long time and I'm not quite sure how to feel about this statement.

Several long time readers are seeing patterns in the text that very closely resemble common chatgpt mannerisms. Here's another example:



I have to be honest, if I'd read this anywhere else, I would have no doubts this was written by AI. While I can agree with you about the unfounded accusations of undisclosed ads, I'm not sure I fully support silencing honest opinions about what long time readers feel when reading this article...
Especially after ARS recently pulled an article because of AI generated quotes ...
 
Upvote
42 (48 / -6)

J4yDubs

Ars Scholae Palatinae
627
Subscriptor
On a more directly related note to this article: it's normal to use the launch of a new car to look back at the history if it's a vehicle that has an interesting story. That doesn't mean anyone is being paid off by Honda, it's called being enthusiasts. Maybe try living in a world where people are still capable of being excited about things and not just using all their energy to be negative about everything.
The history was welcome, but as mentioned before, it could have been a little more detailed. Maybe more pictures of the tech? Maybe I'm expecting to much?

I don't agree with your last sentence though, at least in regards to the latest Prelude. I really don't see anything to be excited about. It doesn't seem to capture anything that made the previous versions a Prelude. Sometimes things deserve some negativity...
 
Upvote
19 (21 / -2)

momurda

Ars Scholae Palatinae
854
My grandma had an 1988 2.0Si with 5 speed. When i was a little kid i thought it was the coolest thing ever, i never got to drive it although i did get to shift gears from the passenger seat when i was in the car with her. After 10 years in upstate NY and well over 100k miles, she gave it to my uncle, who drove it another 120k, then he sold it to some kid.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

mjoc04

Smack-Fu Master, in training
18
Subscriptor
I still drive a 1998 Prelude with manual transmission. Tires, batteries and oil keep it running. I live in VA so we have annual albeit minimal inspections which it has always passed. People occasionally stop me and ask if I'd consider selling it. My previous car was a 1988 Prelude and the only reason I replaced it was because my wife wanted me to have airbags since I was on I-95 every day :).
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

InsaneScientist

Smack-Fu Master, in training
62
Subscriptor++
I normally try to stay out of all this discussion because I don't really want to argue with everyone on the internet, but...

So many sentences/paragraphs in this article follow the "three examples/descriptors" pattern commonly found in LLM generated text.

Come on. Are we seriously using this as an argument for things being LLM generated? Have we somehow forgotten that we all learned three point (usually paragraph) papers back in grade school?

Sometimes LLMs have their own quirks of sentence structure... And sometimes the things they do are common because they're the fundamentals of actual writing.
 
Upvote
74 (79 / -5)

Bernardo Verda

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,005
Subscriptor++
I normally try to stay out of all this discussion because I don't really want to argue with everyone on the internet, but...



Come on. Are we seriously using this as an argument for things being LLM generated? Have we somehow forgotten that we all learned three point (usually paragraph) papers back in grade school?

Sometimes LLMs have their own quirks of sentence structure... And sometimes the things they do are common because they're the fundamentals of actual writing.

That one had people asking if AI was involved as well. Maybe it's just his style though.

On the other hand, it's pretty much the style I'd expect from this kind of automotive article, if it was written by a human or by an AI/LLM.

I can see how people end up suspecting it was LLM generated, but if I had to bet the next round of beers, I'd bet human (and probably a human with an ad-copy background).

It seems to be an unfortunate side effect of the push to use AI in everything -- it makes us more suspicious of the kinds and styles of writing that AI is almost good at.
 
Upvote
23 (25 / -2)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,806
Ars Staff
Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean a computer wrote it. And pointing to grammar like emdashes or sentence construction as some clever gotcha is ridiculous.
It's fucking exhausting though to click on an article and check for comments on the topic and it's just all miserable shit like this though.
yes it is and it’s a big reason I engage much, much less around here now.
 
Upvote
31 (42 / -11)

darkowl

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,995
Subscriptor++
I learned to drive in a 1980s Prelude, the last one in Australia sold with … my memory is a bit hazy, either four wheel steering or something? I think the former? Regardless, it was a fantastic car. It drove so well. It was comfortable, and the sunroof was great for summer days.

Though it wasn’t my car I do kind of miss it. It had done enough kms to go to the moon and back by the time it read finally retired, I heard.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,806
Ars Staff
I normally try to stay out of all this discussion because I don't really want to argue with everyone on the internet, but...



Come on. Are we seriously using this as an argument for things being LLM generated? Have we somehow forgotten that we all learned three point (usually paragraph) papers back in grade school?

Sometimes LLMs have their own quirks of sentence structure... And sometimes the things they do are common because they're the fundamentals of actual writing.
Every example these stupid AI detectors give are just examples of good writing. None of the authors here are ever going to apologize for knowing how to write.

How do people think they trained those LLMs in the first place, ffs?
 
Upvote
48 (55 / -7)

Mechjaz

Ars Praefectus
3,262
Subscriptor++
Also, Honda recently announced that it is getting out of making EVs and focusing on hybrids. Now with the war in the gulf, I was wondering about gas mileage, and I'm probably not alone.
The war in the Gulf
Yer gonna hafta be more specific (...sigh)

There have been two US-initiated wars in the Gulf in my memory and three in my life.

On a slightly happier note, the second most attractive girl I knew in high school drove a late 90's Prelude. So that's something.
 
Upvote
9 (11 / -2)

Horza

Seniorius Lurkius
4
Subscriptor++
Bought a red '91 Prelude in 00 as my first Car, it has survived and supports my family, still rolling.
Only invested in some paintwork and a new Cat since the old one was stolen.
Managed to scrounge a new windshield after 2 unlucky stone chips.
Wonderful engineering feat. the handling and torque is such a joy to drive.

And I can say it's a headturner, lots of younger people stop to comment, older geezers like myself start reminiscing. The looks are so different from modern cars.

Can't get myself to buy a modern car, though a coupe isn't ideal as a family vehicle. :)
Guess we'll see what to do when Petrol is phased out, 'cause I honestly think it'll be rolling still.

clean_prelude.jpg
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)

real mikeb_60

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
13,001
Subscriptor
I’m a 1990 Si fan in terms of favorite year and styling. The last iteration with the double decker headlights was also notable though I know it wasn’t a fan favorite.

Excited about the return; styling and tech look great!

Thanks for the wonderful Sunday AM car article. Reminded me of watching Motor Week Sunday mornings as a kid.
Yeah, but longer and more informative.

Motorweek is still on (Saturdays 0800 on my local stations, except during pledge months when just about everything is preempted by stuff that supports the begging breaks). They still have their standard programming style, with short individual pieces crammed into 20-25 minutes (must allow time for enhanced sponsorship announcements aka ads). Most of their car reviews are essentially driving impressions similar to here, though they do seem to find time to visit a dragstrip for verifying 0-60 etc., and occasionally (for serious models) a Real Racetrack for a few circuits. Mostly, the visits are for B-roll with voiceover and a little on-screen data.

Unfortunately, modern car magazine "test" articles (other than Consumer Reports) seem to be similar to Motorweek's coverage. They just fill a few more (virtual) pages with stuff (not always related to the actual car under test).

The car show I really miss is Car Talk with Click n Clack...
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

real mikeb_60

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
13,001
Subscriptor
AccAround 2008 or so I had a '83 Camry that I pulled out of the junkyard at the auto shop worked at. Had over 450,000km on it. Reason for junking? Needed a clutch. I threw a shop battery in it, checked fluids and it fired right up. Turns out the clutch was fine, the airflow sensor was reading false air due to a slit in the intake boot downstream of it.

That car was a four door 5 speed manual with power door locks and windows, moonroof, cruise control and the top shelf stereo. Everything worked, paint shined up with a polish. NO rust, factory brake pads (highway km, manual. The one owner did sales for Monsanto so it was all over NA) all original everything minus tires. Drove like new. I put another 80 or 100k on it before it died (at my hands unfortunately, I still cringe).

Younger people really don't understand how fucking TERRIBLE American cars were back then. I've spent lots of time under the hoods of '80's domestic vehicles. With a few outliers, they are all very bad. Now? With a few outliers they're all pretty good.
Best "Chevy" I ever drove (counting cars in the family - several - and fleet and rentals) was our 86 JapaNova - a Corolla sedan assembled from Japanese kit at NUMMI with Chevy emblems and a few GM interior/trim parts. Only downside with it was the brakes, which faded seriously on long grades and really hard stops. The only Honda we had (a 94 Accord LX - no VTEC or ABS) also had abysmally weak brakes though otherwise was unremarkable. Not that Big Three cars were any better, really - mostly, they were worse.

Second-best "Chevy" I drove was the 17 Bolt - had its faults, but overall a very competent small car that happened to also be a EV (mostly designed and most components coming from S. Korea, assembled in Michigan). Sister in law had a "Chevy Sprint" which was really a Suzuki (tiny car, 3-cyl, etc.) that she drove the s*** out of with few if any repairs. Understand the new Bolt is mostly (more than 50%) Chinese, and based on a short test drive seems to be much nicer than the Equinox EV for my purposes. None of the genuine US Chevys have been attractive or reliable, wherever they were assembled. Perhaps there's a pattern here?

Japanese makes have used US assembly for a long time, with generally good results (witness our NUMMIs, both Chevy and Toyota-branded). Even the diesel Rabbit (assembled in PA at a former Chrysler plant) was pretty good - except for the German parts (engine, transaxle, many electrics) which were maintenance and repair nightmares.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

void&

Ars Centurion
214
Subscriptor
The Prelude was a great car and it's nice to have an overview of its history. I think the article is reasonably balanced. It explains how the first Preludes were just Accord coupes, not the engineering showcase that they came to be later. Also that many of the innovations were premature or not worth the cost and did not continue into later models. It still was a great car. Somehow I doubt the new Prelude will be as great, but I am looking forward to the review.
 
Upvote
10 (11 / -1)

FranzJoseph

Ars Centurion
2,141
Subscriptor
Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean a computer wrote it. And pointing to grammar like emdashes or sentence construction as some clever gotcha is ridiculous.

yes it is and it’s a big reason I engage much, much less around here now.
To be fair, the article just seemed a bit sloppy to me. It's pretty clear to me it's been written by a human, just that the writing isn't the usual style here on Ars.

So I'll hope you will take my take on it as constructive criticism the author might actually learn from, and not a personal attack on their integrity. As I do actually enjoy reading such historical articles here.

For one thing, it feels embellished a bit beyond understanding at times. Plenty of the adjectives could have been deleted without harming the gist of it.

For another thing, it overuses certain terms, phrases and phrasing quite a bit too much for my taste. All in good faith, but it gets pretty tiring after the first one. Plus some of the hyperboles.

Third, the LLMs have been all trained on actual articles like these, so I do find it somewhat understandable people had debated its provenance. Because the one very thing LLM stochastic parrots are actually good at is mimesis and memetics. Like all parrots do.

Continuing on, when most of the internet is flooded with LLMs parroting the writing style the stochastic parrot had been trained upon, it's inevitable that people yell "LLM!" whenever they encounter the same style of writing. Remember the dashes debate?

And yes, I can't even use em‑dashes correctly since my native tongue yells at me with "you idiot!" whenever I try to implement them the usual "correct" way – hence the lonely en‑dash here, because that's how they are actually used in my native language, all the English heathens be damned ;-)

Fourth, it's a bit thin on the actual meat of the article, i.e. the technical side. We were promised "An engineering thesis disguised as a coupe", while it in my opinion (YMMV!) fell a bit short on the "engineered thesis" hyperbole.

All I know is that I found it a bit tiring, that's all. Too many allusions, embellishments and fluff without the meat, if you get my meaning. Was it that bad? Not really. I did actually like the author's previous article even if it had some of the same issues and wandered around a lot (their historical article about some of the earliest "self‑driving" cars was pretty interesting, even though it seldom delved into the very specifics).

TL;DR: I just felt it was a bit of a sloppy writing, quite orbiting around its headlined premise of exploring how the actual car differed from the others on the market. Perhaps that's just me looking at it from my Euro perspective, or me not really being a car enthusiast. I don't really know. I did enjoy it actually, even if I think it could have been better.
 
Upvote
31 (40 / -9)
Well, the 2026 Prelude is technically a crazy hybrid Civic Coupe Type R without the +100hp since the money went into the suspension performance over the engine. Money went towards the suspension costs and video reviews showed that it can handle very well. Still, the Miata and 86 twins will outclass it the more fun categories other than sipping mileage points. The new Z will also take a swing at the price point.

I'm not a Honda car person as a 6ft behemoth, their cars annoyed me with the roof lines. Any decent road bumps and speed bumps, I'd hit my head up into the ceiling; most circa 1980-2003 based Accord/Civic/Integra + coupes. Majority of the car reviewers tend to enjoy Honda's roots with their suspension designs at most and how the driver can "feel" the car handling.

Lexus SC300 '98/Toyota Solara '00.
 
Upvote
-1 (4 / -5)
The four wheel steering was amazing. Handling and turning was amazing. But you had to be aware and be careful. It was a car you had to reverse parallel park. Trying to nose in would leave the back of the car hanging out.
Are you saying parallel parking with the rear end coming in first is an exception? Because that's how it's always done in my country, even the driver license exam is test that way.
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)

CelicaGT

Ars Scholae Palatinae
730
Subscriptor
Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean

Best "Chevy" I ever drove (counting cars in the family - several - and fleet and rentals) was our 86 JapaNova - a Corolla sedan assembled from Japanese kit at NUMMI with Chevy emblems and a few GM interior/trim parts. Only downside with it was the brakes, which faded seriously on long grades and really hard stops. The only Honda we had (a 94 Accord LX - no VTEC or ABS) also had abysmally weak brakes though otherwise was unremarkable. Not that Big Three cars were any better, really - mostly, they were worse.

Second-best "Chevy" I drove was the 17 Bolt - had its faults, but overall a very competent small car that happened to also be a EV (mostly designed and most components coming from S. Korea, assembled in Michigan). Sister in law had a "Chevy Sprint" which was really a Suzuki (tiny car, 3-cyl, etc.) that she drove the s*** out of with few if any repairs. Understand the new Bolt is mostly (more than 50%) Chinese, and based on a short test drive seems to be much nicer than the Equinox EV for my purposes. None of the genuine US Chevys have been attractive or reliable, wherever they were assembled. Perhaps there's a pattern here?

Japanese makes have used US assembly for a long time, with generally good results (witness our NUMMIs, both Chevy and Toyota-branded). Even the diesel Rabbit (assembled in PA at a former Chrysler plant) was pretty good - except for the German parts (engine, transaxle, many electrics) which were maintenance and repair nightmares.
As a mechanic, peak GM was reached just before the '08 crash. Some of their best engineered highest quality stuff. They also weren't afraid to step out and try some weird shit. Sure, not all of it landed (many were simply before their time) but holy heck the Po tic Solstice and Saturn Sky. Those thing are gilded unicorns these days! Even the Aztec aged well.

Also, have you heard of the Toyota Cavalier? Yes, that was a thing. And for the record, base Cavaliers are like cockroaches, mostly reviled but also nigh unkillable. The later Ecotec equipped ones destroyed many egos on the strip as well. Those things begged for boost.

(Good entity above iOS autocorrect has gotten truly atrocious now. It just turns properly spelled words used in correct context into gibberish more often than it fixes mistakes.)
 
Upvote
6 (8 / -2)