Technology like four-wheel steering and variable valve timing debuted in the Prelude.
See full article...
See full article...
There's a university in Hiroshima that I tend to think of as the Japanese car college. Their automotive engine lab is famous within the industry. I associate that university with Honda, because they both have the same focus on internal combustion engines. Even when they go high tech, it's about automobiles. For example, back in the 1990s, they showed a demo video at SIGGRAPH rendering car headlights in varying weather and road conditions. They joke about pilots having avgas in their blood. Some people have regular gasoline.Honda seems caught in a strange place right now. They’re way behind on EVs, with Chinese manufacturers leaping forward in tech, infrastructure, and affordability, leaving Honda and Toyota both in a position closer to 70s/80s Detroit than the disruptors they once were (now occupied by BYD, Xiaomi, Hyundai/Kia). And meanwhile, at the premium end, the Acura lineup is a confused mess. This Prelude seems like an out of place entry to a market that doesn’t really exist anymore. Best case to me is that it establishes a good hybrid powertrain for use in the Integra, which is a far more practical vehicle with an air of premium marketability.
Around 2008 or so I had a '83 Camry that I pulled out of the junkyard at the auto shop I worked at. Had over 450,000km on it. Reason for junking? Needed a clutch. I threw a shop battery in it, checked fluids and it fired right up. Turns out the clutch was fine, the airflow sensor was reading false air due to a slit in the intake boot downstream of it.Yeah, no. What made Japanese cars appealing at the time was that they weren't complete piles of rolling, rusting junk like US cars were. And they managed to get some decent gas mileage too. I was there during the transition and US manufacturing quality is the main reason I started looking elsewhere for my cars.
And if you don't believe me, go read Lee Iaccoca's autobiography. He describes how when he took over Chrysler, nobody could tell him what was going wrong with their cars because Chrysler didn't do QA. THAT's the market the Japanese were moving into.
Yeah the piece is a bit fluffy, the title got me to expect a deep dive à la John Siracusa. Maybe for next time the author should focus on one generation and what made it really special.For an Ars article, there’s a lot of tell don’t show in here. Having read the piece, I’m still not sure what made the Prelude such a well engineered car. Pop out headlights? 4 wheel turning? VTEC? And what’s this about a engineering thesis?
/// OFFICIAL MODERATION NOTICE ///
We don't run AI generated editorial. We don't run ads disguised as editorial. Period.
If anyone wants to accuse us of either without any evidence I have a really simple response: feel free to go find another website to read.
I'm really not going to tolerate it. You want to be critical of an article that's fine. Nobody here is so precious that we try and shut down criticism. If you can't do it without making personal attacks on the authors and accusing us of being unethical with zero evidence then please just find somewhere else to be.
On a more directly related note to this article: it's normal to use the launch of a new car to look back at the history if it's a vehicle that has an interesting story. That doesn't mean anyone is being paid off by Honda, it's called being enthusiasts. Maybe try living in a world where people are still capable of being excited about things and not just using all their energy to be negative about everything.
Against this backdrop, reviving a legacy nameplate is no longer just a branding exercise. It’s a test of [...]
A friend had one of these in the mid 90s. He lived in New England and said that they called it “The Sled” because the 4-wheel turning when driving on ice turned the entire car into a giant sled that you couldn’t steer. So it’s always interesting to hear that it was a feature some people loved.
I drove one back in the early 90th. It was quite a special car, for me because of the high powered servos that allowed you to turn the wheel like no other car, brakes and gas where extremly light to the touch, the precision of the manual gearbox, the sound ... it's hard to discribe and obviously not as impactful to somebody who didn't grow up with the cars of the 70th and 80th.For an Ars article, there’s a lot of tell don’t show in here. Having read the piece, I’m still not sure what made the Prelude such a well engineered car. Pop out headlights? 4 wheel turning? VTEC? And what’s this about a engineering thesis?
Not chainsaw jack…?@AusPeter is absolutely right. Deming’s “Total Quality Management” (TQM) revolutionized Japanese manufacturing. Here in the US, Deming’s TQM runs into political roadblocks. Specifically, Deming’s “Drive Out Fear” principle contradicts corporate totalitarianism. This has resulted in a variety of TQM charlatans who tout revised (perverted) versions, designed to be acceptable to head-chopping CEOs like GE’s infamous “Neutron Jack” Welch.
Especially after ARS recently pulled an article because of AI generated quotes ...I've been reading arse for a very long time and I'm not quite sure how to feel about this statement.
Several long time readers are seeing patterns in the text that very closely resemble common chatgpt mannerisms. Here's another example:
I have to be honest, if I'd read this anywhere else, I would have no doubts this was written by AI. While I can agree with you about the unfounded accusations of undisclosed ads, I'm not sure I fully support silencing honest opinions about what long time readers feel when reading this article...
Nope. Neutron Jack. Named after the Neutron bomb that killed people, but left the buildings standing untouched.Not chainsaw jack…?
The history was welcome, but as mentioned before, it could have been a little more detailed. Maybe more pictures of the tech? Maybe I'm expecting to much?On a more directly related note to this article: it's normal to use the launch of a new car to look back at the history if it's a vehicle that has an interesting story. That doesn't mean anyone is being paid off by Honda, it's called being enthusiasts. Maybe try living in a world where people are still capable of being excited about things and not just using all their energy to be negative about everything.
I mean, come on man, this is all still fresh and you expect us not to be skeptical?We don't run AI generated editorial
That one had people asking if AI was involved as well. Maybe it's just his style though.Another Ars contribution by Larry Printz: https://meincmagazine.com/features/2026/02/the-first-cars-bold-enough-to-drive-themselves/
It's fucking exhausting though to click on an article and check for comments on the topic and it's just all miserable shit like this though.I'm not sure I fully support silencing honest opinions about what long time readers feel when reading this article...
So many sentences/paragraphs in this article follow the "three examples/descriptors" pattern commonly found in LLM generated text.
I normally try to stay out of all this discussion because I don't really want to argue with everyone on the internet, but...
Come on. Are we seriously using this as an argument for things being LLM generated? Have we somehow forgotten that we all learned three point (usually paragraph) papers back in grade school?
Sometimes LLMs have their own quirks of sentence structure... And sometimes the things they do are common because they're the fundamentals of actual writing.
That one had people asking if AI was involved as well. Maybe it's just his style though.
yes it is and it’s a big reason I engage much, much less around here now.It's fucking exhausting though to click on an article and check for comments on the topic and it's just all miserable shit like this though.
Every example these stupid AI detectors give are just examples of good writing. None of the authors here are ever going to apologize for knowing how to write.I normally try to stay out of all this discussion because I don't really want to argue with everyone on the internet, but...
Come on. Are we seriously using this as an argument for things being LLM generated? Have we somehow forgotten that we all learned three point (usually paragraph) papers back in grade school?
Sometimes LLMs have their own quirks of sentence structure... And sometimes the things they do are common because they're the fundamentals of actual writing.
Also, Honda recently announced that it is getting out of making EVs and focusing on hybrids. Now with the war in the gulf, I was wondering about gas mileage, and I'm probably not alone.
Yer gonna hafta be more specific (...sigh)The war in the Gulf
Yeah, but longer and more informative.I’m a 1990 Si fan in terms of favorite year and styling. The last iteration with the double decker headlights was also notable though I know it wasn’t a fan favorite.
Excited about the return; styling and tech look great!
Thanks for the wonderful Sunday AM car article. Reminded me of watching Motor Week Sunday mornings as a kid.
Best "Chevy" I ever drove (counting cars in the family - several - and fleet and rentals) was our 86 JapaNova - a Corolla sedan assembled from Japanese kit at NUMMI with Chevy emblems and a few GM interior/trim parts. Only downside with it was the brakes, which faded seriously on long grades and really hard stops. The only Honda we had (a 94 Accord LX - no VTEC or ABS) also had abysmally weak brakes though otherwise was unremarkable. Not that Big Three cars were any better, really - mostly, they were worse.AccAround 2008 or so I had a '83 Camry that I pulled out of the junkyard at the auto shop worked at. Had over 450,000km on it. Reason for junking? Needed a clutch. I threw a shop battery in it, checked fluids and it fired right up. Turns out the clutch was fine, the airflow sensor was reading false air due to a slit in the intake boot downstream of it.
That car was a four door 5 speed manual with power door locks and windows, moonroof, cruise control and the top shelf stereo. Everything worked, paint shined up with a polish. NO rust, factory brake pads (highway km, manual. The one owner did sales for Monsanto so it was all over NA) all original everything minus tires. Drove like new. I put another 80 or 100k on it before it died (at my hands unfortunately, I still cringe).
Younger people really don't understand how fucking TERRIBLE American cars were back then. I've spent lots of time under the hoods of '80's domestic vehicles. With a few outliers, they are all very bad. Now? With a few outliers they're all pretty good.
To be fair, the article just seemed a bit sloppy to me. It's pretty clear to me it's been written by a human, just that the writing isn't the usual style here on Ars.Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean a computer wrote it. And pointing to grammar like emdashes or sentence construction as some clever gotcha is ridiculous.
yes it is and it’s a big reason I engage much, much less around here now.
Are you saying parallel parking with the rear end coming in first is an exception? Because that's how it's always done in my country, even the driver license exam is test that way.The four wheel steering was amazing. Handling and turning was amazing. But you had to be aware and be careful. It was a car you had to reverse parallel park. Trying to nose in would leave the back of the car hanging out.
Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean
As a mechanic, peak GM was reached just before the '08 crash. Some of their best engineered highest quality stuff. They also weren't afraid to step out and try some weird shit. Sure, not all of it landed (many were simply before their time) but holy heck the Po tic Solstice and Saturn Sky. Those thing are gilded unicorns these days! Even the Aztec aged well.Best "Chevy" I ever drove (counting cars in the family - several - and fleet and rentals) was our 86 JapaNova - a Corolla sedan assembled from Japanese kit at NUMMI with Chevy emblems and a few GM interior/trim parts. Only downside with it was the brakes, which faded seriously on long grades and really hard stops. The only Honda we had (a 94 Accord LX - no VTEC or ABS) also had abysmally weak brakes though otherwise was unremarkable. Not that Big Three cars were any better, really - mostly, they were worse.
Second-best "Chevy" I drove was the 17 Bolt - had its faults, but overall a very competent small car that happened to also be a EV (mostly designed and most components coming from S. Korea, assembled in Michigan). Sister in law had a "Chevy Sprint" which was really a Suzuki (tiny car, 3-cyl, etc.) that she drove the s*** out of with few if any repairs. Understand the new Bolt is mostly (more than 50%) Chinese, and based on a short test drive seems to be much nicer than the Equinox EV for my purposes. None of the genuine US Chevys have been attractive or reliable, wherever they were assembled. Perhaps there's a pattern here?
Japanese makes have used US assembly for a long time, with generally good results (witness our NUMMIs, both Chevy and Toyota-branded). Even the diesel Rabbit (assembled in PA at a former Chrysler plant) was pretty good - except for the German parts (engine, transaxle, many electrics) which were maintenance and repair nightmares.