That’s not what the article says at all. It says he wanted to eliminate table salt from his diet, which led him down the path of eliminating sodium chloride, which led him to sodium bromide.Very hard to blame ChatGPT for this. He wanted to eliminate Chlorine, asked stupid questions about halogens, got the answer that he wanted, and as an ur-stupid person, acted strongly on his take on that information. [People who are merely stupid will talk nonsense but keep on doing what they have always done and what society prescribes - so maybe they are not really so stupid at all!]
It was suggested where the article detailed that he distilled his water at home before drinking it and rejected the water the hospital offered; tap water often contains chlorine, and he didn't trust that bottled water does not.That’s not what the article says at all. It says he wanted to eliminate table salt from his diet, which led him down the path of eliminating sodium chloride, which led him to sodium bromide.
There is nothing in the story about the man wanting to eliminate chlorine from his diet.
I’m going to nitpick - Chloride is the ion form of chlorine, so yes, you absolutely do need chlorine in your diet. Chloride is just a special name for Cl-. It’s still the same element and not incorrect to say that chlorine is an essential element. We don’t have a special name for the sodium cation - you need sodium in your diet too.No! ChlorINE is very dangerous war gas; it’s chlorIDE you need, the latter is a benign ion of significant biological use. Granted, it’s only one tiny electron difference, but that makes all the difference… a very renowned biophysicist corrected me quite emphatically on this point once. If you attempt to let that electron be added inside or for that matter anywhere near your body, you will regret it.
That’s not what the article says at all. It says he wanted to eliminate table salt from his diet, which led him down the path of eliminating sodium chloride, which led him to sodium bromide.
There is nothing in the story about the man wanting to eliminate chlorine from his diet.
Except elemental chlorine is poisonous, while the chloride ion is essential for life. There is a distinction between the two.I’m going to nitpick - Chloride is the ion form of chlorine, so yes, you absolutely do need chlorine in your diet. Chloride is just a special name for Cl-. It’s still the same element and not incorrect to say that chlorine is an essential element. We don’t have a special name for the sodium cation - you need sodium in your diet too.
The screen says what they already believe. They crave confirmation, not information.What baffles me is how these same folks can place total confidence in something a screen says, but actively reject science/scientists. I've seen it in my own life where a relative will 100% believe whatever the magic AI screen spits out, but flies into a rage when a scientist tries to explain the same thing using facts, logic, and linear thought.
That’s not what the article says at all. It says he wanted to eliminate table salt from his diet, which led him down the path of eliminating sodium chloride, which led him to sodium bromide.
There is nothing in the story about the man wanting to eliminate chlorine from his diet.
...decided to try a health experiment: He would eliminate all chlorine from his diet, which for him meant eliminating even table salt
I ended up looking at the Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases case study itself and it doesn’t say that the man wanted to eliminate “chlorine” from his diet. I think that stating he “wanted to eliminate all chlorine from his diet” is an Ars editorial flourish that is wrong and misrepresents what the man intended to do.It's right at the beginning of the article:
After treatment with intravenous fluids and electrolyte repletion, he became medically stable for admission to the inpatient psychiatry unit. His metabolic alkalosis resolved and was thought to be due to chloride depletion and compensatory for his respiratory acidosis of unclear cause. His hypophosphatemia was thought to be from refeeding syndrome as the patient described an extremely restrictive vegetarian diet and was found to have multiple micronutrient deficiencies, including vitamin C, B12, and folate deficiencies. Vitamin D levels were not tested. With improvement, he was able to report that he had recently noticed new-onset facial acne and cherry angiomas, fatigue, insomnia, subtle ataxia, and polydipsia, further suggesting bromism. He also shared that, after reading about the negative effects that sodium chloride, or table salt, has on one's health, he was surprised that he could only find literature related to reducing sodium from one's diet. Inspired by his history of studying nutrition in college, he decided to conduct a personal experiment to eliminate chloride from his diet. [emphasis added] For 3 months, he had replaced sodium chloride with sodium bromide obtained from the internet after consultation with ChatGPT, in which he had read that chloride can be swapped with bromide, though likely for other purposes, such as cleaning.
With the method you're describing, you could just skip the step where you fact check the output on Kagi and Google and just search for the topic yourself.I do feel LLMs can help start your research. It tends to generate terms and concepts that you can put into Kagi or Google for fact checking and getting these crucial details such as context straight.
But blindly trusting an LLM like ChatGPT, or Facebook, or that guy in the pub is not a success strategy.
Do we need any additional proof that AI will try to kill us, then replace us?
I ended up looking at the Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases case study itself and it doesn’t say that the man wanted to eliminate “chlorine” from his diet. I think that stating he “wanted to eliminate all chlorine from his diet” is an Ars editorial flourish that is wrong and misrepresents what the man intended to do.
You can't really generalize like that. People like Snelling are deliberate bad-faith assholes who are perfectly capable of going through the motions and even formulating defensible PhD theses, then turning around and intentionally turning off that part of their brain or just plain lying.Some collages and universities only test rote memorization, and not comprehension. That is one reason why there are so many incompetents with actual degrees, in some cases even PhDs, who are young earth creationists. They can parrot back correct information when among scientific peers, but then spout absolute counterfactual nonsense when among the very poorly informed.
https://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/realsnelling.htm
I ended up looking at the Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases case study itself and it doesn’t say that the man wanted to eliminate “chlorine” from his diet. I think that stating he “wanted to eliminate all chlorine from his diet” is an Ars editorial flourish that is wrong and misrepresents what the man intended to do.
Yeah. That's the sort of prize you have to earn by sending in 5 box tops plus 2.99 S&H.Chlorine/Chloride is a nit pick. You aren't going to find free chlorine in food.
Just like everyone here confirming that the AI told him to do this when there's zero evidence of that. More than likely it was his own idea and the AI just gave him some basic info on how the chemicals interact.The screen says what they already believe. They crave confirmation, not information.
I'd refrain from making eugenic comments, I realize it's just dark humor, but... Assuming natural selection will play any role in bad decision making, is as useful as replacing sodium chloride with... well, hopefully you get it!There's clearly a bell-curve of "the right amount of information" for society to function well. Too little, you end up with quacks selling cure-alls and snake oil because nobody can effectively do any research. Too much, and you end up with quacks selling cure-alls and snake oil because everybody can effectively do terrible research.
Sooner or later this will work it way out of the gene pool.... one way or another.![]()
Well, I wish that were true, but, as the guy in this case attested, people will just assume the doctor/nurse is going to give an answer that supports "Big Pharma" rather than give the truth. You have to either up your "bedside manner" game, At least give an example or two where general doctor's advice contradicts maximizing pharma profits. I mean, "why do you ask?" sounds like the medical practitioner is playing "Gotcha". You should probably start with "I hear there's a lot of misinformation about that on the internet". Don't personalize it as an opportunity for "I'm right, you're wrong" -the American public has heard so much of that over the years, they collectively view medical advice with suspicion, and of course they do, ever since the advertising campaign, "More doctors smoke Camels!"Also:
If any interns/residents are reading this, yes, part of being a medical professional is recognizing that there are many different ways that people will do foolish things and we call this "preventive medicine". Never, ever be afraid to inquire "why do you ask?"
Are you kidding? All you need to do to get that much sodium is eat a couple of cans of soup.For what it's worth, I've had similar difficulties increasing my sodium intake. Binge-eating salty pretzels and bar-style peanuts as snacks and chugging gatorade seems to work. It's true that a lot of cheap foods substitute salt for flavor/quality, but I also think there's been a lot of pressure to reduce sodium content in foods.
It's harder than you might think to deliberately get 3-4g of sodium/day.
THIS!kinda suprised he skipped right over potassium chloride which is sold as a salt alternative
The human flaw that causes this predates computers. People tend to trust anyone that can speak confidently and with the aura of authority. Politicians base their careers on this. Chatbots are perfecting the method.We have failed as a species. I don't understand how people are so trusting of chatbots. How are people so bad at vetting information?
kinda suprised he skipped right over potassium chloride which is sold as a salt alternative
You are correct. But chloride is still chlorine. It doesn’t become a different element by having a charge.Except elemental chlorine is poisonous, while the chloride ion is essential for life. There is a distinction between the two.
If he's getting nutritional advice from ChatGPT, arguably the psychosis predates that interaction.After using ChatGPT, man swaps his salt for sodium bromide—and suffers psychosis
(emphasis mine)I do feel LLMs can help start your research. It tends to generate terms and concepts that you can put into Kagi or Google for fact checking and getting these crucial details such as context straight.
But blindly trusting an LLM like ChatGPT, or Facebook, or that guy in the pub is not a success strategy.
Some of the chilling answers might well challenge the use of "never" and definitely "never, ever."If any interns/residents are reading this, yes, part of being a medical professional is recognizing that there are many different ways that people will do foolish things and we call this "preventive medicine". Never, ever be afraid to inquire "why do you ask?"
Enough KCl and I suspect he would never have darkened the doors of Emergency Admissions.kinda suprised he skipped right over potassium chloride which is sold as a salt alternative
Sorry but I looked at that wiener pointing and thinking he is saying "unlike grandpa's mine easily fits into this hole."