Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
I couldn't agree more. I've had a '15 Mazda 6 for 2 months, and it has a HUD that does little more than speedometer and turn-by-turn sat nav directions. It's glorious and I almost never look at the dials any more.I don't follow auto development particularly closely, but I remain surprised there isn't more focus on head-up displays.
All cars should have them.
"The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Quote:
Not clear where you're going with "Volkswagen payroll", but don't keep posting it in unrelated article discussions."
Unrelated - a product from the Volkswagen company?
I can't even reply to this. It pops open a dialog letting me fill in everything and then simply doesn't do anything. So, replying to those warnings is unwanted. Why don't you simply state so, instead of letting users try in vain?
Why get this instead of a Model S ?
- Because you like contemporary design?
- Because you live in an area not smothered in readily available charging stations?
- Because you like the thought of having your car serviced by a much wider network of mechanics/dealers?
- Because you're thoroughly tired of Tesla zealots thread-crapping over any transport-related article that contains the word "hybrid"?
You're not wrong, but German manufacturers in general don't provide good value for money, so it should be no surprise that this extends to their halo products. Judging by their sales numbers and corporate profit margins, that approach seems to be working just fine for them.Overpriced by about 40k
Err, ... dude, I don't even know where to begin, so I'll just leave it alone. Get better, and I sincerely wish you all the best. No snark, no sarcasm.You don't know what's going on behind the scenes. I - unfortunately - do. For instance, did you know that is was a "North American three letter agency" that decided to punish VW (they all knew what they were doing for ages)?"Somebody's on Volkswagen's payroll" is not a statement of opinion, it is a statement deliberately made to sound like a fact. And since Jonathan is most likely not an employee of VW, full-time or otherwise, it should come as no suprise that the OP got shown a yellow card.I agree and you have a right to an opinion.Somebody's on Volkswagen's payroll. Oddly (and I won't explain it here), it's because of me - that is, against me...
Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
That is literally the plan. More or less the final option for those of us who want to drive a car rather than being a glorified passenger to the computer that's actually calling the shots.
Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
That is literally the plan. More or less the final option for those of us who want to drive a car rather than being a glorified passenger to the computer that's actually calling the shots.
So you're in the market for a $150,000 fastback with nearly 600hp and you're buying a Miata instead because it has a slower manual transmission?
Seems reasonable.
Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
That is literally the plan. More or less the final option for those of us who want to drive a car rather than being a glorified passenger to the computer that's actually calling the shots.
So you're in the market for a $150,000 fastback with nearly 600hp and you're buying a Miata instead because it has a slower manual transmission?
Seems reasonable.
$30,000 car that you actually get to drive vs an overpriced toy that let's you pretend you know how to . . . any day of the week.
Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
That is literally the plan. More or less the final option for those of us who want to drive a car rather than being a glorified passenger to the computer that's actually calling the shots.
So you're in the market for a $150,000 fastback with nearly 600hp and you're buying a Miata instead because it has a slower manual transmission?
Seems reasonable.
Despite being clearly the superior aesthetic design, the numbers show it'll trail its' competitors from BMW and Mercedes (M5 and E63 S) dynamically unless everything published is seriously conservative.
Have a look at the drubbing the S8 (the performance identical, but more conservatively styled than the RS7) put on the B7 Alpina....
2013 model dont forget.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhoMzFv_S-w
These cars run 10s quarter miles with a tune..
If those pictures are to be believed it also looks like they ditched the air/water setup that was prone to heatsoaking, and are using a proper air/air intercooler..
I have a good friend with an e63S AMG.. and as nice as it is. even on race gas its not beating a tuned rs7.. Heck my 20 year old v6 car is door to door with it.
Im really curious what these new cars will do, especially once the aftermarket cracks them.
The E63S 4-Matic is superior to the RS7 at literally everything, in a drag race to any speed, around a track, no matter what the competition is; if driver ability is equal a stock RS7 will simply not beat a stock E63S. There is not one aspect of performance that the Audi can lay claim to being on par with that of the E63S. If you don't believe me, just use your search bar. The E63S falls behind only the M5 in straight-line performance and it leaves every other high-performance sedan on earth in the dust around corners. The RS7 will not be faster than the E63 in any situation unless the former is tuned heavily. That kind of defeats the point of these comparisons doesn't it? AMG delivers a stock package that neither M nor Audi Sport can compete with. The M5 has astonishing acceleration, it can certainly outrun the E63, but it's lateral grip in the corners is vastly inferior to the E63. Just ask Chris Harris what he thinks about the M5 vs E63S; the RS7 will never catch them in a straight line and it won't catch an E63S in a corner either.
I don't follow auto development particularly closely, but I remain surprised there isn't more focus on head-up displays. I realise there will be regulatory issues, questions of safety and standards and conformity, but I'd have expected those well on the way to being solved by now.
This was particularly brought to mind by the photo of the Audi's very pretty map display: yes, the dash-screen stuff looks nice and is undoubtedly useful but why, in 2019, are we taking our eyes off the road for stuff like 'Turn left in 200 yards' or even registering a speed limit or fuel level warning?
Perhaps there are more barriers than I realise, to widespread adoption of HUD?
You're not the target demographic for this car then, because virtually all the people who buy these expensive super sedans buy automatics. The reasons being that you just don't feel like shifting all the time anymore, and that paddles are actually quite fun for some people.What is the point of a high HP car if it's automatic? I don't care how good the computer doing the transmission is, if I am getting a sports car for performance, I am getting manual transmission or not at all...
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.Stick shift?
Nope.
Moving on.
guess you are not buying any new cars. Well you can still get a Miata.
That is literally the plan. More or less the final option for those of us who want to drive a car rather than being a glorified passenger to the computer that's actually calling the shots.
So you're in the market for a $150,000 fastback with nearly 600hp and you're buying a Miata instead because it has a slower manual transmission?
Seems reasonable.
$30,000 car that you actually get to drive vs an overpriced toy that let's you pretend you know how to . . . any day of the week.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't afford it. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
![]()
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
![]()
My desire for manual has nothing to do with being in tune with my machine. I highly prefer manual transmission the way someone would prefer vanilla to chocolate, it's something that appeals to me. I have also never hit the brake with my left foot accidentally in an automatic.... Anyone who has driven a stick for a period of time then went automatic knows this feeling of trying to hit the non-existing clutch in an automatic only to hit the brake with the left foot and have your body lurch forward...
Also, there can be performance benefits for those that know how to properly drive it. I'm not sure to what extent these still exist at this point with how good the computers doing the shifting are now BUT there is still something to be said for having the power when I need it and KNOWING it will be there. If I have to accelerate quickly to merge, I KNOW that I can let it run high and shift late KNOWING I will get the power out of it and not just assuming that the automatic trans understands and won't shift on me.
Despite being clearly the superior aesthetic design, the numbers show it'll trail its' competitors from BMW and Mercedes (M5 and E63 S) dynamically unless everything published is seriously conservative.
Have a look at the drubbing the S8 (the performance identical, but more conservatively styled than the RS7) put on the B7 Alpina....
2013 model dont forget.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhoMzFv_S-w
These cars run 10s quarter miles with a tune..
If those pictures are to be believed it also looks like they ditched the air/water setup that was prone to heatsoaking, and are using a proper air/air intercooler..
I have a good friend with an e63S AMG.. and as nice as it is. even on race gas its not beating a tuned rs7.. Heck my 20 year old v6 car is door to door with it.
Im really curious what these new cars will do, especially once the aftermarket cracks them.
The E63S 4-Matic is superior to the RS7 at literally everything, in a drag race to any speed, around a track, no matter what the competition is; if driver ability is equal a stock RS7 will simply not beat a stock E63S. There is not one aspect of performance that the Audi can lay claim to being on par with that of the E63S. If you don't believe me, just use your search bar. The E63S falls behind only the M5 in straight-line performance and it leaves every other high-performance sedan on earth in the dust around corners. The RS7 will not be faster than the E63 in any situation unless the former is tuned heavily. That kind of defeats the point of these comparisons doesn't it? AMG delivers a stock package that neither M nor Audi Sport can compete with. The M5 has astonishing acceleration, it can certainly outrun the E63, but it's lateral grip in the corners is vastly inferior to the E63. Just ask Chris Harris what he thinks about the M5 vs E63S; the RS7 will never catch them in a straight line and it won't catch an E63S in a corner either.
If sticks were some flawless cure-all for skill and performance, the Demon and the RS7 and the ZR1 and many other supercars would have them as an option, but they don't. Because stick shifts absolutely suck to drive with that much power, and not a single one of them will last past 20,000 miles of spirited driving behind 600+hp engines. Well, some will, but they're found in tractor trailers.
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
![]()
My desire for manual has nothing to do with being in tune with my machine. I highly prefer manual transmission the way someone would prefer vanilla to chocolate, it's something that appeals to me. I have also never hit the brake with my left foot accidentally in an automatic.... Anyone who has driven a stick for a period of time then went automatic knows this feeling of trying to hit the non-existing clutch in an automatic only to hit the brake with the left foot and have your body lurch forward...
Also, there can be performance benefits for those that know how to properly drive it. I'm not sure to what extent these still exist at this point with how good the computers doing the shifting are now BUT there is still something to be said for having the power when I need it and KNOWING it will be there. If I have to accelerate quickly to merge, I KNOW that I can let it run high and shift late KNOWING I will get the power out of it and not just assuming that the automatic trans understands and won't shift on me.
You know what's a way bigger performance benefit than a stick shift? 591hp and race-grade disc brakes backed by advanced electronic torque vectoring. Everything you just listed about controlling the vehicle is something you can do in sport mode with flappy paddle shifters. More importantly, it doesn't matter if you want to snap up the speed on a highway merge. It has almost 600 horsepower. I've driven a stick Mustang GT with 430hp, and you could dog that thing at 2000rpm for a fast highway merge. Even with 30% less power than this Audi, it could be a frighteningly fast car with seemingly no effort at all. More power is simply more power, skill just doesn't play into it beyond a certain point. Moreoever, the ZF 8 speed is widely recognized as maybe the best automatic ever made for sports cars, with incredibly sharp, authoritative shifting and tons of flexibility in operator control schemes.
I won't ever deny that sticks and Miatas are fun to drive for their own unique reasons, but I am utterly out of patience for this idiotic macho bullshit about how only REAL DRIVERS who want the REAL EXPERIENCE drive the REAL MAN'S CHOICE of THIRD PEDAL. Your dinky little 155hp Miata could be rolled up and smoked like a blunt by this fastback, and the guy driving it wouldn't even notice you tried to race him.
If sticks were some flawless cure-all for skill and performance, the Demon and the RS7 and the ZR1 and many other supercars would have them as an option, but they don't. Because stick shifts absolutely suck to drive with that much power, and not a single one of them will last past 20,000 miles of spirited driving behind 600+hp engines. Well, some will, but they're found in tractor trailers.
If you tick the HUD option, then you get the navigation prompts there.I don't follow auto development particularly closely, but I remain surprised there isn't more focus on head-up displays. I realise there will be regulatory issues, questions of safety and standards and conformity, but I'd have expected those well on the way to being solved by now.
This was particularly brought to mind by the photo of the Audi's very pretty map display: yes, the dash-screen stuff looks nice and is undoubtedly useful but why, in 2019, are we taking our eyes off the road for stuff like 'Turn left in 200 yards' or even registering a speed limit or fuel level warning?
Perhaps there are more barriers than I realise, to widespread adoption of HUD?
I absolutely cannot and am not embarrassed by it. Merely point out what vehicles are lust worthy and which are a waste of perfectly good tires. You want to be a passenger to a computer and be 150,000 poorer, fill your boots. I'd rather drive thanks.
It's OK, you can just admit you want but can't drive a real car. This whole sour grapes routine is a bit embarrassing.
![]()
My desire for manual has nothing to do with being in tune with my machine. I highly prefer manual transmission the way someone would prefer vanilla to chocolate, it's something that appeals to me. I have also never hit the brake with my left foot accidentally in an automatic.... Anyone who has driven a stick for a period of time then went automatic knows this feeling of trying to hit the non-existing clutch in an automatic only to hit the brake with the left foot and have your body lurch forward...
Also, there can be performance benefits for those that know how to properly drive it. I'm not sure to what extent these still exist at this point with how good the computers doing the shifting are now BUT there is still something to be said for having the power when I need it and KNOWING it will be there. If I have to accelerate quickly to merge, I KNOW that I can let it run high and shift late KNOWING I will get the power out of it and not just assuming that the automatic trans understands and won't shift on me.
You know what's a way bigger performance benefit than a stick shift? 591hp and race-grade disc brakes backed by advanced electronic torque vectoring. Everything you just listed about controlling the vehicle is something you can do in sport mode with flappy paddle shifters. More importantly, it doesn't matter if you want to snap up the speed on a highway merge. It has almost 600 horsepower. I've driven a stick Mustang GT with 430hp, and you could dog that thing at 2000rpm for a fast highway merge. Even with 30% less power than this Audi, it could be a frighteningly fast car with seemingly no effort at all. More power is simply more power, skill just doesn't play into it beyond a certain point. Moreoever, the ZF 8 speed is widely recognized as maybe the best automatic ever made for sports cars, with incredibly sharp, authoritative shifting and tons of flexibility in operator control schemes.
I won't ever deny that sticks and Miatas are fun to drive for their own unique reasons, but I am utterly out of patience for this idiotic macho bullshit about how only REAL DRIVERS who want the REAL EXPERIENCE drive the REAL MAN'S CHOICE of THIRD PEDAL. Your dinky little 155hp Miata could be rolled up and smoked like a blunt by this fastback, and the guy driving it wouldn't even notice you tried to race him.
If sticks were some flawless cure-all for skill and performance, the Demon and the RS7 and the ZR1 and many other supercars would have them as an option, but they don't. Because stick shifts absolutely suck to drive with that much power, and not a single one of them will last past 20,000 miles of spirited driving behind 600+hp engines. Well, some will, but they're found in tractor trailers.
Never once did I say I was a REAL MAN for driving stick nor that I drive a Miata (never would....) or that a manual transmission had anything to do with macho. Learn to read, I mentioned NONE of the things you said, dumbass. Your preconceived stereotypes are ridiculous and insulting. How about go fuck yourself, go play your stereotypes elsewhere.
Sure, ...What is the point of a high HP car if it's automatic? I don't care how good the computer doing the transmission is, if I am getting a sports car for performance, I am getting manual transmission or not at all...
What is the point of a high HP car if it's automatic? I don't care how good the computer doing the transmission is, if I am getting a sports car for performance, I am getting manual transmission or not at all...
What is the point of a high HP car if it's automatic? I don't care how good the computer doing the transmission is, if I am getting a sports car for performance, I am getting manual transmission or not at all...
In 30 years virtually all cars will be BEV and they absolutely won't have a manual transmissions. Hell most wont have a multi-gear transmission at all. So in a couple decades I guess you will be walking everywhere or buying increasingly ancient and (hopefully prohibitively expensive to operate) vehicles to prove a point.
You want to be a passenger to a computer
Let's take a moment to appreciate how *amazing* the last generation of ICE cars are.
I feel like this and the Porsche article are excellent counterparts, for the beginning of the brief few years in which both technologies overlap at the high end.
You meant to say "the latest generation"?
Will there be ICE cars in 3, 5, or 10 years time? Certainly.
However, car manufacturers have already started diverting their resources away from their development. Mercedes Benz's development chief Markus Schaefer stated a week ago that their current four cylinder engine is likely to be the last that they will develop, ever.
For those of us who appreciate oil-burning cars, it's a time to celebrate the fun we've had and the fumes we breathed. It's the end of a glorious era.
What is the point of a high HP car if it's automatic? I don't care how good the computer doing the transmission is, if I am getting a sports car for performance, I am getting manual transmission or not at all...
In 30 years virtually all cars will be BEV and they absolutely won't have a manual transmissions. Hell most wont have a multi-gear transmission at all. So in a couple decades I guess you will be walking everywhere or buying increasingly ancient and (hopefully prohibitively expensive to operate) vehicles to prove a point.
No he won't, there's a reason most buyers of a certain age don't buy manuals anymore.