Skip to content
Critical

Meeting the Inflation Reduction Act’s EV battery requirements will be hard

Some EV battery thresholds achievable—if US allies are way, way too generous

Doug Johnson | 81
Image of a large pile of greyish stone.
Lithium ore sits waiting for processing. Credit: Bloomberg Creative Photos
Lithium ore sits waiting for processing. Credit: Bloomberg Creative Photos
Story text

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has some car troubles. One of President Joe Biden’s major initiatives, the law was intended to foster activities that are both good for the economy and green. As such, it contains stipulations about the manufacturing of EVs—particularly that their batteries come from local sources or free-trade partners. But there are some issues with the availability of critical minerals that meet the “local” criteria and some vagueness on important terminology, according to a recent paper.

Higher standards

The IRA was signed into law in August of last year. It includes a provision that gives tax credits to producers that use critical minerals that come from the US or some of its close trade partners. In particular, to get the credits, an electric vehicle—which needs to be fully electric—would need to have a battery in which 80 percent of the market value of its critical minerals is sourced from within the US. This requirement starts out lower (at 40 percent) and then ramps up over time.Alternatively, this benchmark could be reached using minerals sourced from free-trade partners, or the minerals could hail from elsewhere but be processed in the US.

In theory, purchasing one of the vehicles eligible for a tax credit would be more affordable for many consumers.

“I see the motivations there are well-founded. We want to have a secure, environmentally and socially responsible supply of critical minerals as we move to decarbonize,” Jennifer Dunn, one of the paper’s authors and an associate professor of chemical and biological engineering at Northwestern University, told Ars.

However, “it would be hard” to source the aluminum, cobalt, graphite, lithium, manganese, and nickel—the critical elements the paper focuses on—in a way that would meet the IRA’s criteria in the next four years, she said. Dunn and her colleagues wanted to dig into whether meeting the IRA’s stipulations would be within reach of manufacturers by 2027 and whether there are consequences of these standards being set based on the market value of the minerals as opposed to something like weight.

Thanks, France?

To examine these questions, the team reviewed the IRA’s vehicle requirements to get these tax credits. They then took data from the International Energy Agency and various other sources on how many consumers will want to buy vehicles in 2027. This number landed between 1 and 2 million.

From there, the researchers looked at where the materials needed for those million-plus vehicles would come from in the US using United States Geographical Survey data. From this source, they also looked at the market price for the critical elements over five years (from 2022 backward) and got a sense of how much each element is produced domestically and how much is imported from free-trade partners. They then used the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies Model—a lifecycle assessment tool that includes data on vehicle component fabrication—to calculate which types of minerals, and in what amounts, are needed for nickel cobalt aluminum cathode batteries, lithium iron phosphate batteries, and nickel cobalt manganese batteries.

The team used this information to determine whether it would be possible to hit the 80 percent mark for each of the three battery types. In particular, they calculated this twice: once under a business-as-usual assumption and once where all of the free-trade countries made all of their critical elements available to US producers. They also ran the calculations based on the weight of materials and market price. From their calculations, the team found that if the US’s friends provided all of their minerals, the 80 percent target would be achievable for nickel cobalt aluminum cathode batteries.

Of course, that means those countries couldn’t use the materials for their own purposes. “Don’t worry, France, you’ll find yours somewhere else,” Dunn joked.

Even under these favorable conditions—an unreasonable amount of material support from free-trade partners—it would be a pretty big stretch to hit this target for lithium iron phosphate and nickel cobalt manganese batteries.

Dunn said she “struggles” with the idea of using market value for the elements. The research notes that using weight as opposed to market price didn’t really impact the results much at present. But market prices can change wildly. She noted that there could be a situation in the future where it’s incredibly easy for a producer to hit the 80 percent mark thanks to price spikes in some of the minerals, and if some of them ended up being particularly pricey on the market, they would eat up the percentage points very quickly.

Broadly speaking, though, it seems the US would be unable to meet its critical mineral demand for tax-credit-eligible batteries by 2027.

Define “processed”

Another big omission from the IRA is a definition of the term “processed” as it applies to critical minerals, Dunn said. It could mean a producer takes a lump of the element, puts it on a conveyor belt in the US, and calls it a day—or it could mean a more substantive transformation. But it’s currently unclear, she said. This ambiguity could result in the US getting minerals from a country with poor labor or environmental standards, which “doesn’t really help us with our secure and socially and environmentally responsible supply of minerals,” she said.

Dunn added that the IRA also has some additional gaps. It ignores the environmental impact of mining minerals and the importance of non-critical mineral supplies. Further, it doesn’t offer much support for using recycled minerals as a source (though critical elements recycled in North America can count toward the 80 percent).

There are some limitations to Dunn and her colleagues’ paper, however. For one, the USGS data set, while freely available, comes out only yearly. And big developments can happen quickly in the world of critical minerals—like India finding a big deposit of lithium, for instance. However, “the overall conclusions that we drew in the paper still hold,” she said.

Nature, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01079-8 (About DOIs)

Photo of Doug Johnson
Doug Johnson Science Correspondent
Doug Johnson is a Canadian writer, editor, and journalist, who focuses on science, tech and the environment.
81 Comments