Why does "The Cloud" need involved in this at all? You download a driver it breaks things (crashes/instability/error logs etc)--Windows already keeps an entire OS upgrade directory rollback already for OS upgrades--why doesn't it just store the old driver that worked? I'm not forgetting, of course, that Windows loves to automatically update drivers without your knowledge/consent Mr. Microsoft.Now Microsoft is offering another path: automated rollback to a previous working driver, even after a buggy one is downloaded and installed. Cloud-Initiated Driver Recovery, as the company calls it, allows Microsoft to “initiate a recovery action from the cloud, replacing the problematic driver on affected devices without requiring manual intervention from the user or the hardware partner.”
I mean classic Microsoft:What happens when it's the network driver that gets borked?
Windows handling of audio is atrocious. Don't even get me started. It cant even efficiently handle switching to headphones for video meetings and back to speakers again without #$%(ing everything up.This is overdue. Half the reason why I'd push off letting Windows updates run is because maybe needing to reconfigure audio could be a pain.
That's a good reason to make weekly drive images. Reinstall the most recent good image and pause updates. Hopefully, also make daily backups of new and changed files. You're set.What happens when it's the network driver that gets borked?
I think this would boot from an UEFI menu option and I think that is using a default set of drivers, just like when you choose to restore Windows. I think...What happens when it's the network driver that gets borked?
Do what you would with a bad graphics driver: uninstall it and use the generic one until you can get the proper driver from the manufacturer.What happens when it's the network driver that gets borked?
I know, I was speaking specifically to the "cloud" part. I keep flash drives around for a reason!Do what you would with a bad graphics driver: uninstall it and use the generic one until you can get the proper driver from the manufacturer.
W11 must really be a shitshow, because I never seem to have any of the problems I read about with W10.
This is an extension of doing things without your consent. The operating word in "Cloud-Initiated Driver Recovery" is 'initiated.' This is just Microsoft reaching out and changing your drivers again when they find out they've already pushed something buggy.Why does "The Cloud" need involved in this at all? You download a driver it breaks things (crashes/instability/error logs etc)--Windows already keeps an entire OS upgrade directory rollback already for OS upgrades--why doesn't it just store the old driver that worked? I'm not forgetting, of course, that Windows loves to automatically update drivers without your knowledge/consent Mr. Microsoft.
How about saving us from buggy windows updates?Windows Update is getting better at saving your PC from buggy drivers
Oh, that ship sailed a while back. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us...-notepad-4088b954-c97b-46dc-813f-959be01746d5I wouldn't be surprised if they start including integrating CoPilot into Notepad at some point.
So, “Safe Mode with Networking Support”?I think this would boot from an UEFI menu option and I think that is using a default set of drivers, just like when you choose to restore Windows. I think...
That sounds like a PITA way to make an immutable OS.That's a good reason to make weekly drive images. Reinstall the most recent good image and pause updates. Hopefully, also make daily backups of new and changed files. You're set.
Do what you would with a bad graphics driver: uninstall it and use the generic one until you can get the proper driver from the manufacturer.
W11 must really be a shitshow, because I never seem to have any of the problems I read about with W10.
There are pros and cons to this. Be careful what you wish for.I guess my previous comment sparked a train of thought, but...why not start working on making Windows immutable? It's already partway there, between automatic rollback points and MSI.
It wouldn't be a "this year" objective, but seems like MS could save everyone--including themselves--a lot of headaches in the long run.
With a pretty blue overlay with an option to select wifi network and a button with label "magically fix compooter"So, “Safe Mode with Networking Support”?
When discussing pros/cons of an operating system, you would expect some comparisons to other operating systems to provide some context and benchmarking. Bringing up Linux is perfectly valid, although I would argue that the actual Linux distro and how it's managed matters more than just the fact that it's "Linux".And now a million comments talking about how awesome uglyass Linux is. Like clock work.
I solved this problem by installing Linux.Why does "The Cloud" need involved in this at all? You download a driver it breaks things (crashes/instability/error logs etc)--Windows already keeps an entire OS upgrade directory rollback already for OS upgrades--why doesn't it just store the old driver that worked? I'm not forgetting, of course, that Windows loves to automatically update drivers without your knowledge/consent Mr. Microsoft.
I change my monitor display settings--Windows doesn't need to consult the cloud, it just says "you changed things, if this is fine click OK or it'll revert in 15 seconds"
I solved these broken Windows drivers and broken Windows driver management things...by not installing Windows on my strix halo minipic
Eh, I'd say it is much more institutional inertia. But that is my reading. People who manage Windows deployments get grumpy at all the oddball inexplicable things that happen at scale. Users hate Teams and often Sharepoint gets negative vibes. and so on. But--devil you know and are invested in, both monetarily and in knowledge base. Given all the antagonism from enthusiasts and users--if people organized they could FOSS collaboration tools like Office or Creative Cloud has for LibreOffice on Linux...but, it is like getting Americans to not rely on carrier-messaging and adopt platform-agnostic things like WhatsApp or Signal or what have you; it is the default everyone uses which results in chicken-and-egg of inertia and adoption.Windows is successful because of it's deep integration with Microsoft's enterprise management tools, Microsoft's cloud offerings, etc.
With a more automated system for rolling back bad drivers, Microsoft has another way to fix things when they do break.
...You can ship a bare-bones PC from an OEM straight to any user anywhere in the world, and easily provision it and then monitor/lock it down with Windows. That user can be up and running in 1 hour with their Office Documents, Teams Meetings, Sharepoint access, Microsoft Authenticator MFA, etc. This is a very large moat that no other OS can touch...
Such comments are usually unhelpful and made purely for performative reasons.When discussing pros/cons of an operating system, you would expect some comparisons to other operating systems to provide some context and benchmarking. Bringing up Linux is perfectly valid, although I would argue that the actual Linux distro and how it's managed matters more than just the fact that it's "Linux".
I don't disagree that Microsoft has become synonymous with US hegemony. But managing security access levels, user accounts, and device control using a loose collection of independent software and cloud services is much harder than having a 100% pure Microsoft shop. This isn't a big deal in a home or small/medium business environment, but it becomes very challenging as you scale up higher than that, especially once you cross borders and become international. From a cost perspective, going 100% Microsoft can also be much more cost effective and it makes things significantly easier for billing and accounting, and managing the regulatory and compliance paperwork for 1 large entity is MUCH easier than managing the T&Cs, compliance, InfoSec reviews, etc for a large list of smaller shops. Microsoft's Office also has collaboration features that LibreOffice, for example, can't even come close to.Eh, I'd say it is much more institutional inertia. But that is my reading. People who manage Windows deployments get grumpy at all the oddball inexplicable things that happen at scale. Users hate Teams and often Sharepoint gets negative vibes. and so on. But--devil you know and are invested in, both monetarily and in knowledge base. Given all the antagonism from enthusiasts and users--if people organized they could FOSS collaboration tools like Office or Creative Cloud has for LibreOffice on Linux...but, it is like getting Americans to not rely on carrier-messaging and adopt platform-agnostic things like WhatsApp or Signal or what have you; it is the default everyone uses which results in chicken-and-egg of inertia and adoption.
Well...right up until there are larger macro-level reasons to dump Microsoft. See France and other countries wanting to free themselves of US tech monopoly dependence. Which, yea I totally support. Or, all the enshittification of its products and services. Or the spyware. Etc.