Here in SoCal, we used to call that place Bandini Mountain.He microdoses pillow down sourced from bullshit mountain.
Paint chips.Leaded Gasoline
On_Trumps_OrdersOr, better yet, Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_MAGA_Tunnel
Congratulations on trying to rationalize the irrational.So let's just make the assumption for a moment that this would even work (hard, I know).
What do the drones bring to this? Why not just install them in a static location in or near the voting area? Ideally with an AC power adapter so dead batteries aren't a concern.
My phone's Bluetooth is "nuclear device", which so far has served it's purpose as a unique identifier.You just know that whenever he sees a “Secret Government Surveillance Van” SSID, he starts looking for an unmarked black van.
Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
The overall goal isn't crazy. Now, how they plan to get there... I can't speak to (haven't RTFA).
But my guess is they want a way to do Cambridge Analytics (or whoever they were with Facebook) again... where they sneak or steal information somehow. Even manipulate it (lie about finding cheating) if expecting to fail.
Prove the information you're extracting can't be used to know how people voted, and we'll talk about it. Find another person or 3 to also view the information... and we'll talk about it. Try to help everyone instead of just yourself... and we'll talk about it.
Ohhh. That could be fun.You just know that whenever he sees a “Secret Government Surveillance Van” SSID, he starts looking for an unmarked black van.
...darn, you're on to my ssid trick...You just know that whenever he sees a “Secret Government Surveillance Van” SSID, he starts looking for an unmarked black van.
Eh. Lindell doesn’t seem to be useful to anyone. Every indication is that he’s mostly self-funding all this election fraud stuff, that his “seminars” are extremely poorly attended, and that even the True Believer attendees come away disappointed with how shitty his claims and “evidence“ is. This sniffing drone thing isn’t close to being his first doesn’t survive first contact with a brain cell idea. And when the people who believe the ghost of a dead Venezuelan ruler interfered with the election think your ideas are nuts, you know you’re on a different level.Bankrupted or not, he and Alex Jones will still end up sipping aged scotch together on the stern of a megayacht on their days off thanks to being maliciously useful idiots for moneyed interests.
Ill change my hotspot SSID to Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel while voting this year.
Or, to be sneaky, a common powerline network device.So, a switch and Cat6 Ethernet cabling, connected to the router, which is connected on coax or fiber makes his drones useless.
DOH!
Not at all. He'll find some AP in the building - hard to find a public building without a Wifi point these days, even if it belongs to somebody's printer or toaster oven. Once he's found said AP, he's 'proven' that the voting machines are connected to Illuminati servers. Because of course he has.So, a switch and Cat6 Ethernet cabling, connected to the router, which is connected on coax or fiber makes his drones useless.
DOH!
Here's the link to my county's page asking people to observe. It's different for each county/state across the country, as to whether any rando can request directly to be a monitor, or whether they have to be a representative of a political party, but pretty much every election in this country is run with 3rd party observers watching the counts.Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
Why is someone who named themselves "EternalStudent07" apparently so dedicated to NOT actually learning things before speaking? Yeah, RTFA! Also, RTFA about just how verifiable and monitorable elections actually are before assuming they're not.The overall goal isn't crazy. Now, how they plan to get there... I can't speak to (haven't RTFA).
Because drones are cool and hi tech and something something. And they're made in China and hook into the Chinese Iluminati servers (but he overlooked that little detail). You're just over thinking this. Certainly Lindell isn't.So let's just make the assumption for a moment that this would even work (hard, I know).
What do the drones bring to this? Why not just install them in a static location in or near the voting area? Ideally with an AC power adapter so dead batteries aren't a concern.
Wait, does the UN actually do that in other "developed" democracies? I thought it was the exception, not the rule. Damn, we think we're so much better than everyone else...Because if we allowed the UN to come in and monitor our elections like they do everywhere else what do you think would happen? Especially if they actually found irregularities? I suspect that the term "ZOG" would come back into fashion as people decided that the UN had taken over our government.
You could. In fact, since the task at hand is "searching for wi-fi addresses" you probably already have the necessary hardware in your hand or pocket at this very instant. You could run this as an app on a phone.Without going into the why a sniffer is useless in what he wants to prove.
Why a drone? Polling places in the US don't have observers from the political parties already in site? Can't you just put the fucking sniffer in the backpack of that observer? ...
Here's the link to my county's page asking people to observe. It's different for each county/state across the country, as to whether any rando can request directly to be a monitor, or whether they have to be a representative of a political party, but pretty much every election in this country is run with 3rd party observers watching the counts.
This is why 99.9% of all the election fraud claims from 2020 are complete bullshit. They rely on the assumption that members of their own political party failed to notice what would have been obvious manipulation. And when those observers speak out about how there wasn't any manipulation, they're attacked.
Why is someone who named themselves "EternalStudent07" apparently so dedicated to NOT actually learning things before speaking? Yeah, RTFA! Also, RTFA about just how verifiable and monitorable elections actually are before assuming they're not.
In most countries for most jobs it's active local party members only — people who dedicate time routinely to actively supporting their party, whether by attending meetings or through stronger contributions.I think the whole registered D or registered R thing is weird. In other countries, your party membership is a private matter, and is certainly not public information.
But on your main point, in (most?) countries only party members get a say / vote on who their party's candidate for election is going to be. I think I'm misunderstanding your point - you seem to be saying you should have a say in the candidate selection process of multiple parties?
They are. People can sign up to be poll watchers.Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable?
It absolutely the fuck is, considering the enormous conspiracy that would have to be in place in order to swing an election that way.The overall goal isn't crazy.
Your graph fails to back up your point. It only tries to link IQ to political ideology, not party affiliation.It is not unrelated to this discussion that people who say they are independent of a political party, and who also say they do not lean toward either party, who claim the pure "moderate" category, are actually the least-intelligent adults in America, by a large margin.
There is really nothing wrong with political parties. They are a convenient mechanism through which to exercise your individual beliefs. Every advanced nation has political parties, and George Washington has been dead for centuries and there is no particular reason to revere him. View attachment 61283
Well, what if I told you there was a device that's been made for the first time in history that can tell you that that machine was online?"
One of the stronger WiFi networks in my immediate neighbourhood is 'Nostromo'. Not sure if that's the Alien movie series or Conrad novel one, though.My phone's Bluetooth is "nuclear device", which so far has served it's purpose as a unique identifier.
Interesting. I fail to see how a person could get multiple ballots that way. Doesn't checking in on the one tablet eliminate the possibility of checking in again, on any device?Poll worker here (Ohio). The tablets where voters check in are connected to each other through an access point. No internet or cell connectivity, just a local wireless LAN. This is because Ohio mandates that, when a polling location contains multiple precincts, people must be allowed to check in at any given tablet, regardless of which precinct that that voter belongs to. So the LAN is needed in order for the tablets to talk to each other, otherwise it's theoretically possible that one person could check in at each tablet separately and get a ballot from each. So, ironically, the WiFi is preventing fraud, not supporting it.
Guarantee these goons would flag such a network, because nuance does not exist in their world, they'll just see a WiFi network and freak. Also, the building I worked in last time was city hall for a small suburb, and it has public WiFi, as does much of the surrounding area.
Political parties don't provide any kind of checks and balances. If they did, then Trump would have been impeached.I agree that there needs to be a solution for many things wrong with US politics. But the one thing the country was born on was checks and balances. If we remove political parties, how do we honestly evolve to a better future without weighing both sides of anything?
Only an idiot would boil it down to just "both sides".There's greasy stuff going on for both sides.
HOWSo getting rid of parties would let the greasy get away with more without any opposition or oversight.
Fuck that noise. There does not need to be any balance with the Republican party. They are straight up fucking fascists.If anything, there needs to be better balance within parties.
Again, fucking how?Establishing balanced parties by establishing better checks in the system might be our answer.
And how do you do that when the right to lobby elected officials is literally right there in the first amendment?For example lobbyists, they have caused huge momentum swings for both parties and have turned them into wrecking balls. We need to ban lobbyists.
That's the dumbest fucking thing you've said on the topic, and that's saying something.Second, who is electing our candidates? Maybe it's time for democrats to pick the republican candidates and republicans to elect the democratic candidates.