Why do I get the feeling that some shady entity with ties to various US adversaries will take the chance to start selling "election sniffers" for these idiots to attach to drones and fly around themselves? Except the sniffer will in reality be a black-hat device that spreads malware to any wifi networks it's able to connect to...
No, he's no more a "legitimate believer" than Alex Jones. He's a disgusting opportunist willing to jump on any bandwagon to further his own bank account. He's the very sort of pseudo-religious opportunist the biblical story of Jesus throwing the merchants out of the Jerusalem Temple was warning against. I hate resorting to biblical references, but the story applies in this case.He may be a legitimate believer, and trusts 'experts' who reinforce his world view. The guy is obviously not all there. (This is not in any way to excuse the damage he is causing)
Ill change my hotspot SSID to Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel while voting this year.
Given that political parties do exist, how can we reduce the harm they do to society?the easiest and best solution to remove election fraud, gerrymandering, and most things wrong with America is to do what George Washington once said (paraphrasing): get rid of political parties.
-charlesoberonnWhy do right-wingers crackpots believe the most boring conspiracy theories?
Oh they’re putting things in the water/food/vaccines? Elites are sexual predators? How unimaginative.
How about something more creative like the government feeding radioactive isotopes to the mentally disabled?
Or giving black men fake syphilis treatments to study the disease?
Or kidnapping people and subjecting them to LSD and sensual depravation to try and develop mind control?
Or secretly hiring Nazi scientists to work in NASA?
Lindell also suggested that his system would protect elections from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). "This is the uniparty, deep state, globalist CCP; that's the cabal that's trying to steal our country from us. Well, now we're policing them, and it's over for them," Lindell said yesterday in a Bannons War Room interview.
Speaking as an American-by-choice who was originally something else, primaries in themselves seem to be 90% of the problem — it's just a really weird way to do an election in two steps, especially once you get into the whole "oh, you cared which person represented party X this year? Then you are allowed NO SAY in party Y!" side of things.Given that political parties do exist, how can we reduce the harm they do to society?
Ranked choice voting is one attempt to alleviate the extremism caused by party-affiliated "first past the post" primaries.
There are also attempts in various states to constitutionally eliminate gerrymandering.
Between now and the 2024 election might be a good time to brush up on FAA drone regulations as well.I'll wait for him to deploy these. And then the operators of said units will be more likely be arrested for interfering with polling sites.
There's a lot of stupidity to parse here, but did anyone think to tell him that the acronym WMD has some ... shall we say, historical baggage to consider?
The largest proven election fraud to take place in recent decades was for North Carolina's 9th Congressional District in 2018. A firm hired by the Republican candidate Mark Harris harvested absentee ballots, trashed some of them, filled in others, and ensured that Harris won the primary by 905 votes, a reversal of the 134-vote loss by Harris in the 2016 primary. The firm did the same thing in the November election, where Harris won by 828 votes.People like this are provably vastly more likely to engage in actual election fraud. Be very aware of that.
"Look how stupid I am" is an effective tactic with a long, venerable history. In 2020, over 30 million Americans demonstrated that they are not only astoundingly ignorant, but incapable of critical thought and living in fear of knowledge and the knowledgeable. Southerners, in particular, don't vote for anyone who looks like they "think they're better than me."I always wonder whether it's kinda nice to be this dumb.
Eh, Lindell actually has a long history of issues. Alcoholism, gambling, and crack cocaine usage among them. And he claims that he became sober through "prayer".No, he's no more a "legitimate believer" than Alex Jones. He's a disgusting opportunist willing to jump on any bandwagon to further his own bank account. He's the very sort of pseudo-religious opportunist the biblical story of Jesus throwing the merchants out of the Jerusalem Temple was warning against. I hate resorting to biblical references, but the story applies in this case.
Are they intentionally trying to cause a chilling effect for polling places by hovering drones around them?
Will those drones be distributed equally across all polling places, or will they be strategic based on the outcome they're looking for?
Will some domestic terrorist ride the coat-tails of this and weaponize a drone to enhance the chill effect for those polling places? Is the acronym WMD a hint-hint-nudge-nudge?
This needs to get shut down hard.
Not to put too fine of a point on it, but critical thinking and logic are not in this guy's wheelhouse.How are they going to tell the difference between the wifi at polling places against all the other wifi traffic? Even most smartphones have an option to be used as wifi hotspot.
LindellElectionFraudGenerator_#42069Ill change my hotspot SSID to Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel while voting this year.
Because if we allowed the UN to come in and monitor our elections like they do everywhere else what do you think would happen? Especially if they actually found irregularities? I suspect that the term "ZOG" would come back into fashion as people decided that the UN had taken over our government.Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
WiFi and the Internet are synonyms to people like this. Your laptop is WiFi. Your TV is WiFi. Your phone is WiFi. Hackers use WiFi. It's WiFi all the way down.Wait untill this guy hears about hard wired connections...... POOOF!
If religion is what it took him to get sober, then good for him. I've known a few people who couldn't make it across that line until they found religion, and then they found the strength to get themselves cleaned up.Eh, Lindell actually has a long history of issues. Alcoholism, gambling, and crack cocaine usage among them. And he claims that he became sober through "prayer".
As someone who has high functioning addicts in their family, Lindell has all the signs. Including the leaning heavily on religion and believing weird conspiracy theories. Watching him interact with people and speak he reminds me of a certain family member who isn't an opportunist, he's just fried his brain with too many chemicals over the years.
Personally, I would add big tinfoil hats to the voting machines to put his mind at ease. You know, first subtly suggest the idea to the guy. In such a way that he thinks he came up with it. Else it will not work. Then resist the implementation of it by all means. Keep the guy busy. In the end, yield.I'm sure I don't need to tell anyone here, but a wireless connection isn't proof of connection to the internet.
This drone idea has all kinds of problems aside from that, though:
Lindell is once again getting himself involved in technical things about which he has no concept. Someone is grifting him even as he grifts others.
- Battery life: Most polling locations are open for 8-12 hours. I'm not aware of any drones that can fly that long one a single charge. They're going to need a lot of drones and a lot of batteries.
- Data storage: For it to be useful evidence, proper collection, tracking, and chain-of-custody will be required. I have doubts they can handle that at a small scale.
- Commercial flight restrictions: If they're flying these near airports for commercial purposes (and non-profits count), they're going to need all the pilots to have an FAA drone pilot's license. Even if they don't, I believe they still have to notify the local tower if they're going to fly them within airport airspace, which can extend several miles out from the airport itself.
Or, better yet, Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_MAGA_TunnelIll change my hotspot SSID to Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel while voting this year.
Of course the pillow guy has never heard of ethernet.
His current religion is MAGAIf religion is what it took him to get sober, then good for him.
Without going into the why a sniffer is useless in what he wants to prove.
Why a drone? Polling places in the US don't have observers from the political parties already in site? Can't you just put the fucking sniffer in the backpack of that observer? Or is he so fringe that not even the GOP supports him?
They absolutely are. Anyone can be an election monitor as long as they don't disrupt operations.Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
No, they'll claim rural voters were scared away from polling places by them so the election must be overturned. Like the people who led a boycott of Target suing them over lost sales.We already know it will only be in Democratic areas.
They are going to say
"We didn't have enough drones so we choose the places with high likelihood of fraud"
Hoards of stupid people.I seriously don't understand how this guy got rich.
I also seriously don't understand how he hasn't already burned through all his money via all this conspiracy BS. As a courtesy to the entire planet, they seriously need to fast-track the various slander cases against him, so that he can be bankrupted into oblivion.
Speaking as an American-by-choice who was originally something else, primaries in themselves seem to be 90% of the problem — it's just a really weird way to do an election in two steps, especially once you get into the whole "oh, you cared which person represented party X this year? Then you are allowed NO SAY in party Y!" side of things.
Oh, that's easy. Those voting machines SSID self-identifies, e.g., "Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel"How are they going to tell the difference between the wifi at polling places against all the other wifi traffic? Even most smartphones have an option to be used as wifi hotspot.
Since when are facts going to stop them?I'm sure I don't need to tell anyone here, but a wireless connection isn't proof of connection to the internet.
This drone idea has all kinds of problems aside from that, though:
Lindell is once again getting himself involved in technical things about which he has no concept. Someone is grifting him even as he grifts others.
- Battery life: Most polling locations are open for 8-12 hours. I'm not aware of any drones that can fly that long one a single charge. They're going to need a lot of drones and a lot of batteries.
- Data storage: For it to be useful evidence, proper collection, tracking, and chain-of-custody will be required. I have doubts they can handle that at a small scale.
- Commercial flight restrictions: If they're flying these near airports for commercial purposes (and non-profits count), they're going to need all the pilots to have an FAA drone pilot's license. Even if they don't, I believe they still have to notify the local tower if they're going to fly them within airport airspace, which can extend several miles out from the airport itself.