Wi-Fi sniffers strapped to drones—Mike Lindell’s odd plan to stop election fraud

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,540
Subscriptor++
Why do I get the feeling that some shady entity with ties to various US adversaries will take the chance to start selling "election sniffers" for these idiots to attach to drones and fly around themselves? Except the sniffer will in reality be a black-hat device that spreads malware to any wifi networks it's able to connect to...

The device really should be red-hat to be on brand.
 
Upvote
42 (42 / 0)
He may be a legitimate believer, and trusts 'experts' who reinforce his world view. The guy is obviously not all there. (This is not in any way to excuse the damage he is causing)
No, he's no more a "legitimate believer" than Alex Jones. He's a disgusting opportunist willing to jump on any bandwagon to further his own bank account. He's the very sort of pseudo-religious opportunist the biblical story of Jesus throwing the merchants out of the Jerusalem Temple was warning against. I hate resorting to biblical references, but the story applies in this case.
 
Upvote
80 (80 / 0)
the easiest and best solution to remove election fraud, gerrymandering, and most things wrong with America is to do what George Washington once said (paraphrasing): get rid of political parties.
Given that political parties do exist, how can we reduce the harm they do to society?
Ranked choice voting is one attempt to alleviate the extremism caused by party-affiliated "first past the post" primaries.
There are also attempts in various states to constitutionally eliminate gerrymandering.
 
Upvote
65 (66 / -1)

xoe

Ars Scholae Palatinae
7,496
Why do right-wingers crackpots believe the most boring conspiracy theories?
Oh they’re putting things in the water/food/vaccines? Elites are sexual predators? How unimaginative.
How about something more creative like the government feeding radioactive isotopes to the mentally disabled?
Or giving black men fake syphilis treatments to study the disease?
Or kidnapping people and subjecting them to LSD and sensual depravation to try and develop mind control?
Or secretly hiring Nazi scientists to work in NASA?
-charlesoberonn
 
Upvote
39 (39 / 0)

fenris_uy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,284
Without going into the why a sniffer is useless in what he wants to prove.

Why a drone? Polling places in the US don't have observers from the political parties already in site? Can't you just put the fucking sniffer in the backpack of that observer? Or is he so fringe that not even the GOP supports him?

Lindell also suggested that his system would protect elections from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). "This is the uniparty, deep state, globalist CCP; that's the cabal that's trying to steal our country from us. Well, now we're policing them, and it's over for them," Lindell said yesterday in a Bannons War Room interview.

Who wants to bet that the drone is probably Made in China, and that the device is filled with tech sourced from China, if not made directly in China.

EDIT:

According to the Carter Center almost anyone can be an US election observer as long as they don't disrupt the election. So they don't need a drone, they can send a guy with a backpack to be seated there in silence for the whole day.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
118 (118 / 0)
Given that political parties do exist, how can we reduce the harm they do to society?
Ranked choice voting is one attempt to alleviate the extremism caused by party-affiliated "first past the post" primaries.
There are also attempts in various states to constitutionally eliminate gerrymandering.
Speaking as an American-by-choice who was originally something else, primaries in themselves seem to be 90% of the problem — it's just a really weird way to do an election in two steps, especially once you get into the whole "oh, you cared which person represented party X this year? Then you are allowed NO SAY in party Y!" side of things.
 
Upvote
59 (60 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

jhollinger

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
144
Subscriptor
There's so much stupid here...where to start?
  • All these drones could freak people out ("It's the Terrorists, Evelyn!!") or crash, potentially opening him up to some sort of liability.
  • Someone could accuse him of trying to hack the voting machines via WiFi drone, further muddying the waters.
  • Oh, and has he heard of Ethernet? I guess it wouldn't be very secret. But if you're going for Illuminati-level conspiracy, WiFi isn't great either.
  • His pillows aren't very comfortable. I don't want politics to color something as banal as pillows, but the My Pillow my parents bought for me last Christmas wasn't very comfortable. Had to switch back to the old one. Maybe it's just my taste, idk.
    • And I'm a full-ass grown adult with a spouse, two kids, a pretty good paycheck - why in the hell did they think I needed a pillow?? Was it so they could pray over it for my lost, atheist soul?? Christ, it was - I'm just realizing this :(
Personally, next time I vote I plan to enable my phone's hotspot and change the WiFi name to "Illuminati Secret Ops" or similar.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
108 (110 / -2)

Martin Blank

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,637
Subscriptor++
People like this are provably vastly more likely to engage in actual election fraud. Be very aware of that.
The largest proven election fraud to take place in recent decades was for North Carolina's 9th Congressional District in 2018. A firm hired by the Republican candidate Mark Harris harvested absentee ballots, trashed some of them, filled in others, and ensured that Harris won the primary by 905 votes, a reversal of the 134-vote loss by Harris in the 2016 primary. The firm did the same thing in the November election, where Harris won by 828 votes.

The results didn't hold up to scrutiny, though, and the Board of Electors refused to certify the election. Harris himself called for a new election, though he didn't run in it. Another Republican did, and won by more that 4000 votes (more than the number of absentee ballots cast).

The leader of the scam, Leslie McCrae Dowless, pled guilty to counts of government theft and defrauding the government. He was sentenced to six months in prison, and died from lung cancer a few months after he got out. At least a few others pleaded guilty in return for suspended sentences.
 
Upvote
127 (127 / 0)
I always wonder whether it's kinda nice to be this dumb.
"Look how stupid I am" is an effective tactic with a long, venerable history. In 2020, over 30 million Americans demonstrated that they are not only astoundingly ignorant, but incapable of critical thought and living in fear of knowledge and the knowledgeable. Southerners, in particular, don't vote for anyone who looks like they "think they're better than me."

To gain the support of such people, you confirm their prejudices, preferably with frequent grammatical errors. Some of us remember Jess Helms standing before Congress pretending to be unable to pronounce the word "anus." He was deadly in his effectiveness.

Politicians speak to manipulate their audience, not communicate information. Never assume they are revealing who they are.
 
Upvote
43 (43 / 0)
No, he's no more a "legitimate believer" than Alex Jones. He's a disgusting opportunist willing to jump on any bandwagon to further his own bank account. He's the very sort of pseudo-religious opportunist the biblical story of Jesus throwing the merchants out of the Jerusalem Temple was warning against. I hate resorting to biblical references, but the story applies in this case.
Eh, Lindell actually has a long history of issues. Alcoholism, gambling, and crack cocaine usage among them. And he claims that he became sober through "prayer".

As someone who has high functioning addicts in their family, Lindell has all the signs. Including the leaning heavily on religion and believing weird conspiracy theories. Watching him interact with people and speak he reminds me of a certain family member who isn't an opportunist, he's just fried his brain with too many chemicals over the years.
 
Upvote
90 (90 / 0)

TechCrazy

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,779
Are they intentionally trying to cause a chilling effect for polling places by hovering drones around them?

Will those drones be distributed equally across all polling places, or will they be strategic based on the outcome they're looking for?

Will some domestic terrorist ride the coat-tails of this and weaponize a drone to enhance the chill effect for those polling places? Is the acronym WMD a hint-hint-nudge-nudge?

This needs to get shut down hard.

We already know it will only be in Democratic areas.
They are going to say

"We didn't have enough drones so we choose the places with high likelihood of fraud"
 
Upvote
57 (57 / 0)

cogwheel

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,918
Subscriptor
Around here, most polling places are in public schools and libraries. Those have their own WiFi networks, and it's doubtful they'll be entirely shut off just for election day, so that's pretty much a guaranteed 100% false positive rate.

We also have early voting, so are these idiots going to fly drones every day for a couple weeks at early voting places?
 
Upvote
42 (42 / 0)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,485
Subscriptor
How are they going to tell the difference between the wifi at polling places against all the other wifi traffic? Even most smartphones have an option to be used as wifi hotspot.
Not to put too fine of a point on it, but critical thinking and logic are not in this guy's wheelhouse.

Frankly, I'm not sure anything is actually steering his ship.
 
Upvote
31 (31 / 0)
Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
Because if we allowed the UN to come in and monitor our elections like they do everywhere else what do you think would happen? Especially if they actually found irregularities? I suspect that the term "ZOG" would come back into fashion as people decided that the UN had taken over our government.

And if we try to create some kind of independent third party to monitor elections in this country it would either be government funded and distrusted by all Republicans and many Democrats or a public-private partnership that would be a font of corruption and a money pit to throw our taxes into.

We can't even get consensus on how to create districts in most states. How do you think you're going to get consensus on election monitoring?
 
Upvote
26 (28 / -2)

Martin Blank

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,637
Subscriptor++
Eh, Lindell actually has a long history of issues. Alcoholism, gambling, and crack cocaine usage among them. And he claims that he became sober through "prayer".

As someone who has high functioning addicts in their family, Lindell has all the signs. Including the leaning heavily on religion and believing weird conspiracy theories. Watching him interact with people and speak he reminds me of a certain family member who isn't an opportunist, he's just fried his brain with too many chemicals over the years.
If religion is what it took him to get sober, then good for him. I've known a few people who couldn't make it across that line until they found religion, and then they found the strength to get themselves cleaned up.

None of them went as far as Lindell into the nuttery, though. That part is entirely on him.
 
Upvote
31 (33 / -2)

Zeppos

Ars Praefectus
3,004
Subscriptor
I'm sure I don't need to tell anyone here, but a wireless connection isn't proof of connection to the internet.

This drone idea has all kinds of problems aside from that, though:
  • Battery life: Most polling locations are open for 8-12 hours. I'm not aware of any drones that can fly that long one a single charge. They're going to need a lot of drones and a lot of batteries.
  • Data storage: For it to be useful evidence, proper collection, tracking, and chain-of-custody will be required. I have doubts they can handle that at a small scale.
  • Commercial flight restrictions: If they're flying these near airports for commercial purposes (and non-profits count), they're going to need all the pilots to have an FAA drone pilot's license. Even if they don't, I believe they still have to notify the local tower if they're going to fly them within airport airspace, which can extend several miles out from the airport itself.
Lindell is once again getting himself involved in technical things about which he has no concept. Someone is grifting him even as he grifts others.
Personally, I would add big tinfoil hats to the voting machines to put his mind at ease. You know, first subtly suggest the idea to the guy. In such a way that he thinks he came up with it. Else it will not work. Then resist the implementation of it by all means. Keep the guy busy. In the end, yield.

But... why wifi? What about 4G, 5G. Wifi is so unimaginative, so limited. If I'd want to rig those machines, I would definitely not use a commercially widely available technology. Think the military has better hard to detect wireless tech.

Oh well... time for coffee.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Ubersoldat19

Ars Scholae Palatinae
612
Without going into the why a sniffer is useless in what he wants to prove.

Why a drone? Polling places in the US don't have observers from the political parties already in site? Can't you just put the fucking sniffer in the backpack of that observer? Or is he so fringe that not even the GOP supports him?

I know, right? This is all part of the salesman angle. A passive election observer isn't titilating and doesn't sell your audiance like "WMD". Mike needs these donations to keep rolling in for his legal defense fund. This always has been, and always will be a grift.
 
Upvote
31 (31 / 0)
Always accuse your enemy of the wrongs you plan to commit, preferably before you commit them. Put them on the defensive before you give them anything they can attack. It traps them in the position of "I'm not a poo poo head! You're the poo poo head!" It's a devastating public relations tactic.

It's one of Trump's favorite tricks – unsurprising, given that it's enabled a successful criminal career for more than half a century. It's so effective that dozens of other Republicans are swimming in his bow wave far better than they could on their own.
 
Upvote
40 (40 / 0)

Martin Blank

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,637
Subscriptor++
Why aren't elections 3rd party verifiable and monitorable? Obscurity is not real security.
They absolutely are. Anyone can be an election monitor as long as they don't disrupt operations.

We even get international election monitors. OSCE sends a couple of hundred for each November federal election, and other organizations also send monitors.
 
Upvote
51 (51 / 0)

ShortOrder

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,211
We already know it will only be in Democratic areas.
They are going to say

"We didn't have enough drones so we choose the places with high likelihood of fraud"
No, they'll claim rural voters were scared away from polling places by them so the election must be overturned. Like the people who led a boycott of Target suing them over lost sales.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)
I seriously don't understand how this guy got rich.

I also seriously don't understand how he hasn't already burned through all his money via all this conspiracy BS. As a courtesy to the entire planet, they seriously need to fast-track the various slander cases against him, so that he can be bankrupted into oblivion.
Hoards of stupid people.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

redtomato

Ars Praefectus
4,963
Subscriptor++
Speaking as an American-by-choice who was originally something else, primaries in themselves seem to be 90% of the problem — it's just a really weird way to do an election in two steps, especially once you get into the whole "oh, you cared which person represented party X this year? Then you are allowed NO SAY in party Y!" side of things.

I think the whole registered D or registered R thing is weird. In other countries, your party membership is a private matter, and is certainly not public information.

But on your main point, in (most?) countries only party members get a say / vote on who their party's candidate for election is going to be. I think I'm misunderstanding your point - you seem to be saying you should have a say in the candidate selection process of multiple parties?
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)
How are they going to tell the difference between the wifi at polling places against all the other wifi traffic? Even most smartphones have an option to be used as wifi hotspot.
Oh, that's easy. Those voting machines SSID self-identifies, e.g., "Dominion_Voting_Machine_#1922935_CHINA_Tunnel"
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

fenncruz

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,794
I'm sure I don't need to tell anyone here, but a wireless connection isn't proof of connection to the internet.

This drone idea has all kinds of problems aside from that, though:
  • Battery life: Most polling locations are open for 8-12 hours. I'm not aware of any drones that can fly that long one a single charge. They're going to need a lot of drones and a lot of batteries.
  • Data storage: For it to be useful evidence, proper collection, tracking, and chain-of-custody will be required. I have doubts they can handle that at a small scale.
  • Commercial flight restrictions: If they're flying these near airports for commercial purposes (and non-profits count), they're going to need all the pilots to have an FAA drone pilot's license. Even if they don't, I believe they still have to notify the local tower if they're going to fly them within airport airspace, which can extend several miles out from the airport itself.
Lindell is once again getting himself involved in technical things about which he has no concept. Someone is grifting him even as he grifts others.
Since when are facts going to stop them?
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)