What would a cheap, Apple A18-powered MacBook actually be good at?

Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I picked up an M2 MacBook Air 16GB/256GB for $699 back in the spring right before the M4s were released, so I feel the budget niche is well served.

I’d rather be getting an M-series Air from a generation or two back instead of a model where they’ve cut corners on things like the screen, MagSafe or TouchID. For anything but the most demanding workflows you’d be hard pressed to tell a difference between mine and a brand new M4.
 
Upvote
117 (117 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

euskalzabe

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
112
My M1 MBA still works like a charm, so I don’t see the point of replacing it with an A18 powered version. Why spend money for equivalent performance? I reckon I still have at least 2 more years of MacOS updates… until that time comes, the M1 keeps performing splendidly for all my office work. I’ll check back in 2027…
 
Upvote
-3 (17 / -20)

wrylachlan

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,870
Subscriptor
I love the way the A18 Pro chip is being talked about as though it’s already out and we know its specs. It’s not out and we don’t know its specs. This will be Apple’s top line phone chip this year and what is being mentioned here may only be partly correct.

we don’t know if Apple upped the speed of the USB C port. We don’t know much else other than it will be faster.
Um…. It is out. It’s what’s in the iPhone 16 Pro right now.
 
Upvote
111 (111 / 0)
Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?

Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)

It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
 
Upvote
34 (45 / -11)

musicssound

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
167
Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?

Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)

It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
Apple sells a MacBook Air for $649 at Walmart right now. Seriously. it's the old 2020 model with the M1, but it's still being produced specifically so Apple can sell it at Walmart. They just don't sell it through their own channels anymore.

It's entirely possible they just want to end production on the M1, and perhaps start selling a model at that price point in Apple Stores, so they're going to make a bit of a fuss about adding colors while swapping out the processor and everyone will go "wow so cheap!" It might even be worth redesigning the case to make it just a bit smaller to save on aluminum costs, since the M1's case is comically oversized for the motherboard. But I wouldn't expect any different components otherwise.
 
Upvote
80 (83 / -3)

caramelpolice

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,669
Subscriptor
Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?
120Hz HDR OLED screens, four cameras, a cellular modem + GPS + satellite + antennas, NFC, and extremely tight construction tolerances to fit all that in a small frame.

Chip aside, it is much cheaper to make a mid-range laptop than a top-end phone.
 
Upvote
137 (138 / -1)
Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?

Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)

It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
To me, it seems that nowadays latptops are much less complicated than a phone. Especially considering the cheaper display tech, the drastic reduction in sensors, cheaper glass and larger build size that you are afforded on a laptop. A phone has to do all of that, plus cellular, crazy sensor etc.
 
Upvote
54 (54 / 0)
Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?

Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)

It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
The pro iPhones compared to this theoretical MacBook have three extra cameras, Face ID, 5G and an OLED ProMotion screen. Not to mention the position at the pinnacle of iPhone pricing.

It’s not exactly breaking news that the ‘best’ of ‘good, better, best’ product ranges have a price premium attached to them.

Edit: pipped to the post.
 
Upvote
21 (22 / -1)

Ceedave

Ars Scholae Palatinae
679
Subscriptor
Could be like a Chromebook, which is no longer cheap, but Apple doesn't have free web services (email, office apps). It sitll could fill that same niche, I think. And the brand recognition may give it a bump in adoption.
?
Storage is limited without additional subscriptions, but Apple does provide free email and cloud-capable office apps. For good reasons, they are not as widely used as Microsoft or Google offerings, but they do exist.
 
Upvote
45 (45 / 0)

TheMongoose

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
153
Subscriptor
Two problems— First, Apple is happy to sell refurbished Macs that are fine for most users— why complicate the lineup? Second, the real problem is that most new Macs are overspecced for most users. I don’t see how an underspecced MacBook fixes that.
Maybe they’re hitting a limit as to who’s buying new devices? I upgraded my 8GB M1 Air and Mini to the base) 16GB M4 versions and for my workload, I can’t see that I’ll need to upgrade these now until they go end of life.

So the way to go from there is to target people like my parents (who could afford brand new Apple devices, but won’t spend that much money, so they’re running on my second hand stuff).

When the M1 Air does stop being good enough, having a £500 option with an A-series chip would be fine for running a few Safari tabs and doing the occasional FaceTime call.

Plus with the way Windows 11 is at the moment, my parents won’t even touch it. So there’s another potential customer base there…
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

lp0_on_fire

Ars Scholae Palatinae
601
As someone who loved the 12-inch MacBook I would love to see something return to that form factor.

I don't do anything personal on my work MacBook Pro, simply because there have been a few episodes here where individuals personal data has been swept up in eDiscovery. Since my 12-inch MacBook died I have usually been using a Surface laptop in this role but I would love to get back into the 12-inch MacBook form factor without the guaranteed to fail CPUs, SSDs and Wi-Fi cards.
 
Upvote
11 (15 / -4)

lp0_on_fire

Ars Scholae Palatinae
601
I wonder if this would also be the first MacBook with a cellular chip in it. Might as well!
I would love that.

There were some MacBook Pro prototypes with 3G that escaped into the wild, I think the story was AT&T failed to return them to Apple and they wound up at a recycler instead and from there eBay and Craigslist.
 
Upvote
17 (17 / 0)

Andrewcw

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,978
Subscriptor
In this modern age it will be pretty good. Providing if they make it an App store only walled garden model. Kind of like Windows RT Surfaces. But Apple has way better means of pulling it off.

If they're looking to dive into non-US markets and need a really cheap device with a keyboard. This would be a route to take.
 
Upvote
-16 (1 / -17)
For normal use, what wouldn't it be good at? It's roughly equivalent to a 12th-gen Core i7, which is still a perfectly fine laptop chip. On Geekbench 6, an A18 is 50% faster than an Apple M1 on single core, and equal on multicore.

Given that a M1 Air is still a perfectly capable machine, providing a still-excellent user experience (even with only 8 GB RAM), why would you expect it to be any less so?
 
Upvote
53 (53 / 0)
My M1 MBA still works like a charm, so I don’t see the point of replacing it with an A18 powered version. Why spend money for equivalent performance? I reckon I still have at least 2 more years of MacOS updates… until that time comes, the M1 keeps performing splendidly for all my office work. I’ll check back in 2027…
I don't get the A18 Pro for this either, seems like an M2 would be about the same cost and far more capable for laptop use. But the potential huge gain is for an ultra portable similar to the 12" MacBook. In fact, I would pay a premium for such a laptop. I'm still running my 12" happily and would love a optional replacement. I briefly tried the MBA M1 and returned it. The extra 7/10 of a pound completely changed my use habits and I hated it. Besides the ease of use of my 12" at home, the small and light form factor also allowed me to carry it on a very lightly loaded bicycle for 6 months and 5,000 miles in New Zealand a year ago.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

adespoton

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,690
Seems to me this chip could be used for Apple to start a new line, called the Apple CloudBook, that competes directly with ChromeBooks and integrates directly with iCloud services, providing a minimal locked down MDM environment that pushes people to mostly use their webapps. Could be used for fleet devices and the educational sector, with cheaper plastic housings and low-end LCDs. It would still be based on macOS, and would run some basic apps (and could have other task-based apps pushed via MDM), but would have minimal local storage, mostly earmarked for the OS and cache.

If they could get the price down low enough (not sure if they could), that could be a really good entry level Mac to not only get people into the ecosystem, but also in the habit of using Apple's hardware in a SaaS/cloud-first way (which I'll never do, having had Macs before SaaS and "The Cloud" had been invented as different than mainframe computing).

This would also play well with tariffs.
 
Upvote
-3 (6 / -9)

Brendan McKinley

Ars Praetorian
457
Subscriptor++
I'm surprised it wasn't mentioned in the article, and I could be biased based on my background, but the elephant in the room is Chromebooks in Education. Specifically K12, which use to be a crucial market for Apple, but is now absolutely dominated by ChromeOS. Due to cost per device as well as ease of management. Although I am aware macOS does support MDM fine, I use it every day.

The actual technology involved in building this hypothetical Mac Chromebook equivalent would be incredibly easy for Apple. The million dollar question is whether Apple wants to try and re-enter that space with the Mac, or keep things as they are; Push MacBook Airs to college students and K12 teachers, try to win as many 1:1 iPad schools as possible, but leave the remainder of K12 students to Google and ChromeOS.

With this strategy Apple is obviously hoping kids see Chromebooks as something little kids use, and you "graduate" to a "real computer" when you go to college, but there is a big risk that if kids get use to ChromeOS in K12, they will continue to be fine with it and the wider Google ecosystem in college/work/home.

On the other hand if Apple does release a low cost MacBook they risk cannibalizing iPad and/or MacBook Air sales, and dragging their overall margins down.

It's definitely a delicate tight-rope to walk.

Edit: Partially ninjaed by GaitherBill and adespoton.
 
Upvote
40 (41 / -1)

jsully2549

Ars Scholae Palatinae
717
I could see this, with 8gb ram, and no Apple AI, being an EDU only SKU.

Apple used to have those a million years ago.
I bought an edu Macbook Air 13 when my Pro 17 died (gpu) on a trip. Used it for a long time as a browser device. 13" screen with 11" guts.

And only last fall switched from an i5 MBA 13 to the M3 MBA 15.

But it will need 16GB to have a long life. And since memory is so absitiveky cheap, ...
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)