Seriously! I'd be ok with MacBook SE, but in my head canon I'd call it a Mac SE, in the old way.Just call it the "Macintosh SE."
Um…. It is out. It’s what’s in the iPhone 16 Pro right now.I love the way the A18 Pro chip is being talked about as though it’s already out and we know its specs. It’s not out and we don’t know its specs. This will be Apple’s top line phone chip this year and what is being mentioned here may only be partly correct.
we don’t know if Apple upped the speed of the USB C port. We don’t know much else other than it will be faster.
Apple sells a MacBook Air for $649 at Walmart right now. Seriously. it's the old 2020 model with the M1, but it's still being produced specifically so Apple can sell it at Walmart. They just don't sell it through their own channels anymore.Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?
Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)
It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
120Hz HDR OLED screens, four cameras, a cellular modem + GPS + satellite + antennas, NFC, and extremely tight construction tolerances to fit all that in a small frame.Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?
To me, it seems that nowadays latptops are much less complicated than a phone. Especially considering the cheaper display tech, the drastic reduction in sensors, cheaper glass and larger build size that you are afforded on a laptop. A phone has to do all of that, plus cellular, crazy sensor etc.Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?
Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)
It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
The pro iPhones compared to this theoretical MacBook have three extra cameras, Face ID, 5G and an OLED ProMotion screen. Not to mention the position at the pinnacle of iPhone pricing.Okay, can someone explain the math to me? It honestly isn't making any sense at the moment, but there must be something I'm missing- so, the latest low end MacBook with the latest M chip is $1000; and the latest iphone with the latest A chip is $1000... So how does putting that A chip into a MacBook somehow make it cheaper..? MacBooks have far larger screens, unibody construction, and keyboards, yet it would be less than an iPhone..? What does the iphone have that the MacBook is missing?
Or, are they going to just release this mac at the $1000 price point and raise the price on everything else? (In which case, people are actually excited about that?)
It really feels like no matter what, in order for Apple to slide this into a cheaper MacBook slot of less than $1000, they have to not only take a cut in their notoriously high margins on this macbook, but also admit how obscene the margins on the iphone are. None of that makes any sense to me.
?Could be like a Chromebook, which is no longer cheap, but Apple doesn't have free web services (email, office apps). It sitll could fill that same niche, I think. And the brand recognition may give it a bump in adoption.
Maybe they’re hitting a limit as to who’s buying new devices? I upgraded my 8GB M1 Air and Mini to the base) 16GB M4 versions and for my workload, I can’t see that I’ll need to upgrade these now until they go end of life.Two problems— First, Apple is happy to sell refurbished Macs that are fine for most users— why complicate the lineup? Second, the real problem is that most new Macs are overspecced for most users. I don’t see how an underspecced MacBook fixes that.
I would love that.I wonder if this would also be the first MacBook with a cellular chip in it. Might as well!
I don't get the A18 Pro for this either, seems like an M2 would be about the same cost and far more capable for laptop use. But the potential huge gain is for an ultra portable similar to the 12" MacBook. In fact, I would pay a premium for such a laptop. I'm still running my 12" happily and would love a optional replacement. I briefly tried the MBA M1 and returned it. The extra 7/10 of a pound completely changed my use habits and I hated it. Besides the ease of use of my 12" at home, the small and light form factor also allowed me to carry it on a very lightly loaded bicycle for 6 months and 5,000 miles in New Zealand a year ago.My M1 MBA still works like a charm, so I don’t see the point of replacing it with an A18 powered version. Why spend money for equivalent performance? I reckon I still have at least 2 more years of MacOS updates… until that time comes, the M1 keeps performing splendidly for all my office work. I’ll check back in 2027…
I bought an edu Macbook Air 13 when my Pro 17 died (gpu) on a trip. Used it for a long time as a browser device. 13" screen with 11" guts.I could see this, with 8gb ram, and no Apple AI, being an EDU only SKU.
Apple used to have those a million years ago.