Trump admin seeks medical records of federal workers—for vague reasons

LDA 6502

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,573
Subscriptor
Understandably so! I can hardly sleep at night, knowing such people are out there, and it’s starting to interfere with my work: threatening to kill 90 million civilians unless they end a war we started for reasons we can’t name.
It isn't that we cannot name the reason we started Operation Epstein Files Distraction, but that the media largely chooses not to.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

launcap

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,010
If America's past can tell us anything, perhaps the Union army Mk2?

"And in todays news, the Coastal Armies were closing in on Washinton DC where ex-president Trump is still refusing to leave the White House. The Rump US Army has declared itself neutral, having been defeated in a series of lightning battles where the high morale of the Coastal armies proved decisive."
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,491
Subscriptor++
Don't you have medical privacy laws? to give an example in France the police cannot access medical documents and must ask a doctor to filter what is useful or not to the investigation,
even criminal investigations
We do. We also have laws about insurrection, corruption, fraud, and sexual assault.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,941
Subscriptor++
We not only voted him back into office, we voted him back in by an actual majority of votes cast. Like it or not, we have to own this shit.
While accepting we have, indeed, allowed ourselves to be saddled with this shit, the election was determined by a plurality, not a majority.

/quibble
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

jhodge

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,746
Subscriptor++
While accepting we have, indeed, allowed ourselves to be saddled with this shit, the election was determined by a plurality, not a majority.

/quibble
As they always are and probably always will be unless we have a moment of sanity and adopt ranked choice voting (or equiv). If anything, I’m even more peeved at non-voters than I am at Trump voters. I think Harris was an awful candidate, but you only get to pick from what’s on the menu. Individuals may have had reasonable reasons for being unable to vote, but not 35% overall.
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,941
Subscriptor++
As they always are and probably always will be unless we have a moment of sanity and adopt ranked choice voting (or equiv). If anything, I’m even more peeved at non-voters than I am at Trump voters. I think Harris was an awful candidate, but you only get to pick from what’s on the menu. Individuals may have had reasonable reasons for being unable to vote, but not 35% overall.
I could give two shits for the fee-fees of anyone who let Biden's deterioration fool them into thinking the mountain of psychotic excrement now actively destroying society would be a fine choice and taking the simplest of actions to stop it.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Dude_Man

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
171
Subscriptor
When your superior was handed king-style immunity by a corrupt and unhinged court and has (and has abused already) the power of pardon and asserts control over the "justice" system, there is no point at which that happens. All things are in the service of the party leadership and the oligarchs.
And thanks to the precedent set by Biden, he'll unconditionally pardon his whole family and any other minions he sees fit for everything on his way out the door so they won't ever be prosecuted even under a new, sane administration.

Assuming we ever get a new administration.
 
Upvote
-2 (4 / -6)

Bernardo Verda

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,214
Subscriptor++
And thanks to the precedent set by Biden, he'll unconditionally pardon his whole family and any other minions he sees fit for everything on his way out the door so they won't ever be prosecuted even under a new, sane administration.

Assuming we ever get a new administration.

He'd do that anyways, regardless of anything Biden did or didn't do.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
He'd do that anyways, regardless of anything Biden did or didn't do.
He would and will, and he'll still blame others either way (especially people like Biden), but it still stands as hypocrisy that puts a sour taste in (serious) people's mouth. I don't even blame him in a personal sense - his statement essentially acknowledging the hypocrisy but saying his family had an unjust target painted on them by corrupt right wing leaders makes him as a father act is understandable. But as with so many things, he addressed a problem late and only for himself with no regard for principles as the person who is supposed to be seen upholding them against the depravity of the "other side".
 
Upvote
-5 (0 / -5)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,941
Subscriptor++
You (deliberately?) ignore the non-voters, whose apathy and/or self righteousness put him in power.
You deliberately ignore the Heritage Foundation and that ilk's long-standing effort to sow apathy via disinformation, destruction of educational systems, and gathering control over media, and your conclusion is victim blaming.

Yes: too many people have sheep-like behavior. Blaming them and not the wolf isn't productive.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Hadrian's Waller

Ars Praetorian
856
Subscriptor
You deliberately ignore the Heritage Foundation and that ilk's long-standing effort to sow apathy via disinformation, destruction of educational systems, and gathering control over media, and your conclusion is victim blaming.

Yes: too many people have sheep-like behavior. Blaming them and not the wolf isn't productive.
Those who allow themselves to be foxed by a wolf have only themselves to blame.
 
Upvote
-6 (0 / -6)

Faceless Man

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,694
Subscriptor++
Ceaușescu would have loved this back when Romanian women were treated like breeding stock, forced to undergo monthly on/gym visits, survived, and effectively forced to get pregnant and have as many children as possible.
And we all know how well he treated those children...
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Bondles_9

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,119
Subscriptor
As they always are and probably always will be unless we have a moment of sanity and adopt ranked choice voting (or equiv).
22 of the 32 elections since 1900 have been won with a majority of the popular vote.

You should definitely still get rid of the electoral college and adopt ranked choice voting, but it's not the case that elections are always won by a plurality and not a majority.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Faceless Man

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,694
Subscriptor++
22 of the 32 elections since 1900 have been won with a majority of the popular vote.

You should definitely still get rid of the electoral college and adopt ranked choice voting, but it's not the case that elections are always won by a plurality and not a majority.
But is it really a majority if the turn out is only 60%?
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Bernardo Verda

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,214
Subscriptor++
But is it really a majority if the turn out is only 60%?

Not if every potential voter has fair access and equal opportunity to vote. But that pre-condition is hardly the case in the current-day USA (and being steadily and deliberately rendered even less so).
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,941
Subscriptor++
Well, they also have the wolf to blame. Fox? The metaphor's a little jumbled.
By unintentionally making a play on Fox News, he proved my point for me regarding long-term manipulation. If he intended clever wordplay, the better pun in context would have suggested sheep being fleeced by the wolf.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)