Trump admin seeks medical records of federal workers—for vague reasons

Bondles_9

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,119
Subscriptor
Oh, a lot more than just one. (Trump was just the cat's paw, don't settle for letting him be the fall guy.

Other cells on the same block should include Vought, Miller, Leavit, Bondi, Hegseth, Blanche, Noem, Bovino, Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Vance, Musk, Thiel, ...

I'd bet there's enough fully deserving conspirators to fill the place again. (No need to worry about the water supply problem - they'll receive the same standards concerning prisoner rights, health care and safety as they enforced so enthusiastically.)
It's going to be a complete shitshow once these goons are thrown out. As you say, a lot of them should be headed to jail. Not prosecuting them isn't an option - we're right now watching how that turns out - but when a future government starts prosecuting these people for their very real crimes, there will be a lot of people* saying it's just Democrats doing the same thing as Trump's political revenge prosecutions of the totally made-up crimes of Clinton, Comey and James.

*A lot of MAGA arseholes, sure, but I'll bet dollars to donuts that the NYT will also run some version of "Democrats rightly condemned Trump's politicisation of the DoJ and must not do it themselves"
 
Upvote
24 (24 / 0)

GreyAreaUK

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,566
Subscriptor
Haven't read the article yet so just reacting to the headline but...He can't have any medical records until we have his, unredacted and real, going back 25 years. Oh, and his f'ing taxes, too. And release the f'ing Epstein files, in total, and unredacted while we're at it...
Sadly, America allowed him to become an autocratic dictator with virtually no limits to his power, so yeah, he probably can and will do what he wants. Because nobody is stopping him.
 
Upvote
10 (12 / -2)

kvndoom

Ars Praefectus
3,782
Subscriptor
I would say "political retaliation or targeting of workers who sought certain medical care, such as abortion or transgender care" is far and away the most likely outcome of, and internal justification for, this move.
I've asked Dollar Shave Club to add Occam's Razor to my monthly subscription.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

Missing_Linc

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
199
Oh, a lot more than just one. (Trump was just the cat's paw, don't settle for letting him be the fall guy.

Other cells on the same block should include Vought, Miller, Leavit, Bondi, Hegseth, Blanche, Noem, Bovino, Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Vance, Musk, Thiel, ...

I'd bet there's enough fully deserving conspirators to fill the place again. (No need to worry about the water supply problem - they'll receive the same standards concerning prisoner rights, health care and safety as they enforced so enthusiastically.)
I'd even argue that Donald has absolutely no idea this is being demanded.
How often has a journalist asked him about a policy and he's looked visibly shocked at how shitty it is?

He's got the mind of a toddler. The ballroom, the Trump arch, the Trump Kennedy centre rebuild, Trump library etc... All of these are jangly keys to keep him happy while he gives free reign to people like Steven Miller to do this shit.

Collecting the health records of government employees comes after requesting voting records of the same people. This is how you cull a government. Possibly literally knowing who's in charge.

I'm not "good Tsar, bad Boyar'ing" him by any means, He's a straight up monster. But he's not got the brains or foresight to think of this or understand the ramifications.

Edit: Spelling
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)

yyz.Wino

Smack-Fu Master, in training
91
Subscriptor
When I encounter someone who seems to defend or at least somewhat support this regime’s actions, I always ask, “So you would be comfortable with Obama/Biden/Mamdani/etc exercising this precise power?”

Now, I don’t expect consistency from this crowd but what has genuinely surprised me is that they react as though this thought had never actually occurred to them. I’m not talking about the “Trump for eternity” crowd. They clearly hope he simply becomes a monarch and never leaves office. Therefore, why worry about the opposition ever again?

I’m talking about those people who could theoretically break with Trump but, for whatever reason, haven’t yet. These people don’t think a monarchy is a danger. They just “like Trump” or whatever. They seem genuinely stymied by my question. It had never dawned on them that an office of accumulated power could be wielded by people they disagree with.

It’s incredible.
As I responded in a different thread, "Independent thinking?", what are you a communist?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
I'd even argue that Donald has absolutely no idea this is being demanded.
How often has a journalist asked him about a policy and he's looked visibly shocked at how shitty it is?

He's got the mind of a toddler. The ballroom, the Trump arch, the Trump Kennedy centre rebuild, Trump library etc... All of these are jangly keys to keep him happy while he gives free reign to people like Steven Miller to do this shit.

Collecting the health records of government employees comes after requesting voting records of the same people. This is how you cull a government. Possibly literally knowing who's in charge.

I'm not "good Tsar, badBoyar'ing" him by any means, He's a straight up monster. But he's not got the brains or foresight to think of this or understand the ramifications.

Edit: Spelling
I respectfully disagree.

The real tragedy of this will be that in 3-5 years, hiring at the federal level will not have recovered because of this (and many other, but especially this) policy. For some people, even the fact that this was threatened will be enough to never consider a gov job again and quit now if they have one. Fear is the strongest motivator. Of course, many people who politically align with Trump will assume they won't be purged and stay on.

The fiscal "responsibility" republicans and the mega rich agree on one thing—the government is a beast that should be starved. This will help.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
Member when OPM was hacked and they stole everyones information? Pepperidge Farms I remember.

I still have the letter that says something along the lines of:

"We are sending this to you because we were hacked and all your information was stolen. We aren't going to do fuck all about it but we needed to make it look like we at least gave some sort of a shit. Have a nice day and fuck off."

Sincerely,

OPM
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

MilanKraft

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,036
It'll be for either hate or a grift. Or both.
Because the data is medical (personal) in nature, "root out the woke / hate" is most likely for this bingo card... that and/or using one's private information against them to force cooperation when illegal requests are made. They know they can't run the machine by themselves; they need worker bees, preferably experienced ones. Mass exoduses don't necessarily help their cause, despite the early penchant for mass-layoffs in some departments.
National Security!
...also this. As someone said, fascists gonna fascist. Just waiting out the non-prediction-markets bet (because fuck those guys with a rusty chainsaw) on "how long will it take the average, clueless, distracted American to figure out that being a fascist administration does not require death camps to be present (i.e. nazi is merely one brand of fascism). Although with these "immigrant warehousing" projects, there's still plenty of time for that to morph into something much uglier.

Misanthropic is the way.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,491
Subscriptor++
I would say "political retaliation or targeting of workers who sought certain medical care, such as abortion or transgender care" is far and away the most likely outcome of, and internal justification for, this move.
The absolute "best" case scenario for this admin is just flagging any procedures they don't like as waste and fraud and saying the VA or federal insurance won't cover them anymore.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
At what point do the people who assent to these demands start to face legal trouble?

Do you get a "Get Out of Jail Free" card if you knowingly do something illegal just because you were told to by a superior?
Hopefully in January of next year, after the midterms. If not, February of 2029.. maybe.
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)

trashcanman

Ars Praetorian
479
Subscriptor++
This will open a floodgate of retaliation, blackmail, and claims by the government of insurance fraud that can secretly be used to demand compliance from federal workers, or to publicly shame them via disclosures or leaks that will force many to resign, and/or to strip them of their security clearances.

I have a feeling it will also be used to destroy health plans offered to current and retired government employees, to dissuade anyone from making a career of government service.

Given the amount of data that has already been stolen by these assholes, I expect that they’ll also be stealing this information to use as leverage to retain power by threatening to leak embarrassing details, or to silence critics.

Whatever it is, you can bet that fuckwad Russ Vought will be using it to further the trauma being inflicted on federal employees, and just in time to make use of it to inflict maximum damage in the lead up to the midterms.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
“Current and former federal employees whose medical records were unlawfully shared to the federal govt by insurance companies” sure sounds like a big ass class of litigants to me. Let’s fucking go lawyers
The problem is, how would these people know that their medical records had been unlawfully shared? Do they get notified?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
If/when the shit really hits the fan, Russ Vought will not come out unscathed. There are around three million federal employees, and though I’m not sure how many he considers bureaucrats, there are a lot of them. And some of them will have an axe to grind with him after being “traumatically affected”. Same goes for many others in this regime.

ETA: Also, that’s rich coming from the director of the OMB and CFPB. What does that make him? Oh, yeah, a fucking bureaucrat. Though he probably is thinking, “Not me! Don’t traumatically affect me! Do it to all those other, less deserving, less human bureaucrats!” 🤬
Would being "traumatically affected" be grounds for an insanity defense?
 
Upvote
-1 (0 / -1)

mmiller7

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,405
Legal trouble with whom? Do you really think the DoJ is going to prosecute people for doing what the admin demands?
Better question, do you think they will hesitate to throw all the underlings who were told to make it happen under the bus if someone successfully challenges it?
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

jhodge

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,748
Subscriptor++
IANAL, but I wouldn't be at all shocked if HIPPA could be interpreted to have room for government collection of this data for loosely-specified oversight purposes. The government is always loathe to constrain itself in any meaningful fashion. Historically, government is constrained more by norms and calculations of what voters will tolerate than by law.

Unfortunately, it's become apparent that voters will tolerate pretty much anything as long as it's bad for the other team.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
You see them demonstrating the same blind team-following bullshit coming from them as well. You'll hear shit like "well what if Biden did it?" or "you would support it if Hillary did it" and so on.

The fuck I would. You saw it a lot with the Epstein files. The difference between them and "us" is they think this is a team sport and everyone is on one side or the other and will do anything to defend their team whereas "we" say put them all against the wall. We don't want our team to win, we want good, decent people to do the right thing. If that means throwing all of the established leaders into a proverbial trash compactor, go for it, regardless of the letter that comes after their name.
This here need a million, billion, trillion more upvotes.....
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)