FCC invokes 1960s-era policy to punish media after decades of minimal enforcement.
See full article...
See full article...
I just purchased a magnet that I think has a great response to that "Don't Tread on Me" bullshit:In Trump's GOP, you earn political capital by acting tyrannically. And of course his supporters are the same people who bought the "Don't tread on me" flags.![]()
I'd say a better place to go looking is r/LeopardsAteMyFace. It's a bit repetitive, but you see instances of people being affected by Trump's policies. Truly a cesspool of cognitive dissonance, as many of them still say they support Trump and "what he's doing," even as they complain about the effects of his policies that have affected them personally.If you want a laugh, go to r/conservative and take a read. They banned anyone without flair that indicates they were conservative from posting. And the few times conservatives made posts about tariffs being bad, their posts were removed by moderators. There are posts there that shows 30+ comments that were all deleted or hidden because they criticized Trump for something.
While I understand the point you’re trying to make here, I assure you that plenty of swing voters (which is the group I explicitly referenced in my comment) do, in fact, read.Ahem, they DON'T READ! So the book and library losses mean NOTHING to them!
My favorite one had to be the white woman complaining that she wasn't a DEI hire, its the black people.I'd say a better place to go looking is r/LeopardsAteMyFace. It's a bit repetitive, but you see instances of people being affected by Trump's policies. Truly a cesspool of cognitive dissonance, as many of them still say they support Trump and "what he's doing," even as they complain about the effects of his policies that have affected them personally.
Radical. The word you're looking for is radical.I think conservatism is more about conserving institutions and rejecting change. A lot of the times, those institutions align with preserving hierarchy (for example, slavery or Jim Crow). However, in this instance, the attacks are being made on institutions (courts, regulatory agencies, social programs, etc.). I would not categorize the current Republican party as small c conservative. I would categorize them as capital C Conservative.
A lot of people care about their libraries across the political spectrum. Far right groups have lost in part due to wanting to kill off public libraries at the local level.While I understand the point you’re trying to make here, I assure you that plenty of swing voters (which is the group I explicitly referenced in my comment) do, in fact, read.
I travel enough that I try not to generalize too quickly, but I can say that more than a few swing voters are already horrified and will show at the midterms.
In looking at their world today, I'd say the latter. They believe what they're saying. True believers are the kind of people who need to be kept down, because they will not listen to reason, and will not quit until they get their way.What if we're the bad guys? No, it's thechildrenDemocrats that are wrong!
I assume they don't actually believe what they're saying there, but if they do it's some impressive cognitive dissonance.
What THEY are advocating for is forcing other networks to run Fox News like lies. It isn't even a debate. THEY LIE. The facts are available to prove it.What you're advocating for here is censorship of opposing political views.
The first causes the second, it doesn't merely correlate.I feel like there's a distinction between conservative (with a lower case 'c') and Conservative (with a capital 'C').
The first is a political philosophy/viewpoint. The second is an increasingly authoritarian and reactionary brand or identity based on beating down everyone else.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.What you're advocating for here is censorship of opposing political views.
That's the neat part about Fascism, you don't let your opponents regain power.I wonder how much consideration the MAGA folks have given to what happens when their furious opponents regain power with all these expanded executive powers and a clear mandate to remove the existent threat of totalitarianism to ensure That Never Happens Again.
I imagine they don't really imagine losing that often, or that their opponents are competent. But man, what a Dunning-Kruger Clown Car they all are. Competent, highly motivated attorneys and administrators who understand how power and organizations actually work could do so much more.
I don't believe in vengeance, but would absolutely be down for making sure the door hits their asses hard and permanently on the way out.
Competent fascism.That's the neat part about Fascism, you don't let your opponents regain power.
Hey now they are fair and balanced, it is right in their tagline.So when does Fox News get investigated?
That's the goal, certainly. In practice, autocrats get murdered at a much higher rate than any other profession. It's very hard to retire peacefully as a dictator. It's hard to maintain power because they shut off real sources of unbiased information, nor do they have real input about the wants and needs of their subjects. Viciousness is horrible, and also makes for a poor economy, lots of dissidents, brain drains of people talent enough to escape, low rates of innovation in science, technology, or culture, etcetera.That's the neat part about Fascism, you don't let your opponents regain power.
This time it's different for so many reasons, here's some Tolkien for you. Besides, he has Constitutional powers as long as the courts say he does and congress agrees. He would still be the Commander in Chief.That's the goal, certainly. In practice, autocrats get murdered at a much higher rate than any other profession. It's very hard to retire peacefully as a dictator. It's hard to maintain power because they shut off real sources of unbiased information, nor do they have real input about the wants and needs of their subjects. Viciousness is horrible, and also makes for a poor economy, lots of dissidents, brain drains of people talent enough to escape, low rates of innovation in science, technology, or culture, etcetera.
They basically survive past the point of popularity by making sure a critical organized mass of people have enough terror of what happens to them and their family if the regime falls. We've seen over and over that the nominally "loyal" military of a dictator decides to just not shoot civilians. Sure, selected paramilitary death squads can cause terror, but that's not an army.
And fascist states don't really have that much world-historical staying power. The longest running political systems are mostly some flavor of constitutional democracy/republic. North Korea is really the only multi-generational hard autocracy around, and they've not even made it a century. And it is a truly, truly horrible place to live.
Bear in mind that if Trump cancels national elections or something, blue states, the US military, and lots of other stakeholders aren't under any legal or moral obligation to help him or follow his orders. If he's no longer the legally elected POTUS, then he doesn't have anyConstitutional powers. He'd just be some asshole influencer squatting on public property.
The older I get the more clear it has become to me that terrible people truly believe that everyone else is also a terrible person.What if we're the bad guys? No, it's thechildrenDemocrats that are wrong!
I assume they don't actually believe what they're saying there, but if they do it's some impressive cognitive dissonance.
They're not just holding the cards, they're the ones dealing the cards in the first place.Alito and Thomas will apply the principle of "I Have Power and You Do Not", a time-honored Conservative principle that also drives this policy.
In Trump's GOP, you earn political capital by acting tyrannically. And of course his supporters are the same people who bought the "Don't tread on me" flags.![]()
"It's much easier to bamboozle a man, than to convince him that they've been bamboozled."The ultimate hypocrisy, after showing such concern for the Biden Administration's non-repression of free speech being such a major concern for Trump's sycophants.
Now the shoe is on the other foot, they're ready to strip anyone who disagrees with them of the right to free speech.
How long until the MAGAs realize they've been played, and their speech as well will be silenced once they figure out they've been lied to?
Because they’re imagining themselves treading on the hated libs, poors, browns, blacks, and immigrants.In Trump's GOP, you earn political capital by acting tyrannically. And of course his supporters are the same people who bought the "Don't tread on me" flags.![]()
We've spoken out enough. We'll be rounded up well before we hit any retirement age.Retirement? What’s that? I’m 55 and figure I’ll have about 2 years of that when I retire at 75…
There is no GOP, no Republican party--only the Trump Party.They are NOT conservatives. Conservatives believe in the rule of law, in personal freedoms. The GOP has moved beyond that.
You'll get the same argument everytime the capitalists get bailed out by the government (socialism).no. it IS the ideologies. the first thing a communist is telling you is sth like...the ideology was right, but the implementation was bad. this IS a communist propaganda also. becomes...communists were savage terrorists from day 1 (one). there is no bs like become or sth similar.
Lies are not political views. They’re just lies.What you're advocating for here is censorship of opposing political views.
Even the accusations of stolen elections?Every accusation is an admission of guilt