FCC invokes 1960s-era policy to punish media after decades of minimal enforcement.
See full article...
See full article...
If you want a laugh, go to r/conservative and take a read. They banned anyone without flair that indicates they were conservative from posting. And the few times conservatives made posts about tariffs being bad, their posts were removed by moderators. There are posts there that shows 30+ comments that were all deleted or hidden because they criticized Trump for something.Just yesterday overheard two people talking at the park about how the markets were all down after the announcement of the tarrifs. Then one of them said "well he [Trump] is just doing what's best for America". His supporters have total blind faith in everything he says and does.
“Here” does not include Scotland.In the UK, the BBC is required to be impartial, as such it's really one of the few trusted news sources here.
According to Mango Mussolini, Faux Noise is extremely far left liberal. So they will eventually suffer the same fate after all the others are shut down. Faux Noise escaped losing a lawsuit by claiming to be an entertainment channel instead of a news channel. The moron judge not only bought their argument, he also allowed them to keep their fake “news” name. And now the SC shows that they are essentially demented the same way.So when does Fox News get investigated?
Trust me, living in a pretty red area I don't need to go to reddit to see that kind of stupidity. The plethora of pick up trucks encrusted with "Make America Great Again" and "F*** Biden" bumper stickers speak for themselves.If you want a laugh, go to r/conservative and take a read. They banned anyone without flair that indicates they were conservative from posting. And the few times conservatives made posts about tariffs being bad, their posts were removed by moderators. There are posts there that shows 30+ comments that were all deleted or hidden because they criticized Trump for something.
DARVO mentality.Every accusation is an admission of guilt
Truly. They are masters of contortion when it comes to inventing narratives from whole cloth and selectively applying the law when it suits their cause, and ignoring it when it does not.Alito and Thomas will apply the principle of "I Have Power and You Do Not", a time-honored Conservative principle that also drives this policy.
Ahem, they DON'T READ! So the book and library losses mean NOTHING to them!Look at the book bans and the threats directed at law firms.
Only because he considered what would happen if the Democrats got control. Felon45 is making sure that cannot ever happen, so his insane policy is totally safe from any retaliatory reversal.I disagreed with several of Chairman Pai's decisions, but at least he stayed away from this.
You know it’s bad when Ars wants Ajit Pai back.I disagreed with several of Chairman Pai's decisions, but at least he stayed away from this.
The tinfoil hat-wearer in me wonders if this is all intentional, and will not be the last time they act on a "complaint". Perhaps the ulterior motive is for the FCC to be the target of so much litigation that the current administration decides that it serves no regulatory purpose and dissolves it via EO because everyone is suing it.likely to lead to extensive legal actions challenging FCC authority.
Treading for thee, but not for me.In Trump's GOP, you earn political capital by acting tyrannically. And of course his supporters are the same people who bought the "Don't tread on me" flags.![]()
Non sequitur aside, the difference between the Nazis and the Soviets is most easily demonstrated by the fact that there are still Eastern Europeans left to fucking hate the Soviets.the first thing communists did in my country was to kill 30 000 people in 3 months to bypass the resistance. so i dont think nazis are remotely close to what animals were communists.
Your problem, and mine, is authoritarianism, not socialism or capitalism.the first thing communists did in my country was to kill 30 000 people in 3 months to bypass the resistance. so i dont think nazis are remotely close to what animals were communists.
Carr doesn't have to worry about that, at least not yet. He's a True Believer, he's doing these things because he very much wants to. It does no good to tell him, please don't do this because it will break the First Amendment, since that is his actual goal.He can't drop the case. He's been directed from the Oval Office, and as recent dismissals have shown, the Admin is willing to fire people who are not loyal to DJT first and foremost. Loyalty to the US Constitution is not what it takes to keep your job.,
One thing I have noticed in Arkansas is that I have seen fewer Trump flags lately. I don't know if that's just because the election was over or what. During his first term, we had people who kept permanent Trump flags or signs on their property.Trust me, living in a pretty red area I don't need to go to reddit to see that kind of stupidity. The plethora of pick up trucks encrusted with "Make America Great Again" and "F*** Biden" bumper stickers speak for themselves.
You should visit a Glasgow Pub and ask what the locals think about the BBC. The answers will be... colourful.In the UK, the BBC is required to be impartial, as such it's really one of the few trusted news sources here. Enforcing impartiality isn't necessarily bad.
Indeed.Sorry bud, but conervatives in this country are fascists. You can't rebrand this just because you don't like it.
True, but it also reflects the Public’s disdain for the Trump message, which irritates them (Conservatives) to no end.If only he was being honest. The goal is solely to intimidate news organizations who say things conservatives don’t like.
We keep comparing Nazi's and Communists when speaking of atrocities, but it isn't the ideologies that should be compared, it's the leadership. When any form of government becomes an autorcrocy and the head of that government is evil, people die. That is the common thread.the first thing communists did in my country was to kill 30 000 people in 3 months to bypass the resistance. so i dont think nazis are remotely close to what animals were communists.
We seem to be in agreement.Sorry bud, but conervatives in this country are fascists. You can't rebrand this just because you don't like it.
I understood the sarcasm in your comment and the viewpoint of your paraphrased quote.I think that was my favourite quote of the article.
The Democrats have always tried to do what we're currently doing! So we shouldn't so they don't in the future!
Networks like MSNBC run mostly news and some commentary in the evening. But even their
TLDRI must confess a certain weary amusement observing the fervent defenders of censorship here at Ars suddenly recoiling at the sting of their own venom. I've watched you applaud every creeping advance of "content moderation," every cheering embrace of state-sanctioned "fact-checking," and every bureaucratic incursion designed to suppress inconvenient voices under the sanctimonious banner of combating "misinformation." How earnestly you championed the arbiters of "truth," confident that power would always rest in benevolent hands—yours, naturally.
Now Chairman Carr’s heavy-handed revival of FCC censorship has, unsurprisingly, invoked your righteous horror. Suddenly, the First Amendment, that ancient parchment so long neglected, is brandished once more as sacred scripture. Where was this principled outrage when you eagerly clamored for speech codes, when you cheered social platforms for their censorship, or dismissed warnings about "slippery slopes" as hysterical hyperbole?
Your newfound devotion to free speech is heartening, if disingenuous. Indeed, "weaponizing government" was once a gleeful pastime when you felt secure in the belief that your opponents alone would be silenced. But history, as ever, holds a lesson: powers granted to suppress the speech of your adversaries inevitably turn against you.
May this sobering spectacle remind you, belatedly, that the pendulum you set in motion has no mercy and favors no faction. Perhaps now, chastened by your own hypocrisy, you'll recognize the wisdom of defending liberty universally, lest it vanish altogether.