The connections in autistic brains are idiosyncratic and individualized

Each autistics' brain is distinct; non-autistics' brains are remarkably uniform.

Read the whole story

 

[Veritas super omens]

beebee[/url]":258n0wtd]

sprockkets[/url]":258n0wtd]

SharZee[/url]":258n0wtd]Why the differences in autistic brains?
If autistic brains have been developmentally damaged/impaired, the amount and impact of damage would vary and cause unique results. I propose that radiofrequency radiation is one immensely important factor in the biological impacts/damage of the brain, from autism to Alzheimer's and other brain-damaged conditions.

Evidence is in the science, but the popularity of wireless means you will not hear about it, since no precautions are being recommended by regulators. This is nothing new, think asbestos, lead paint and tobacco... To sample the science showing this kind of damage from radiofrequency/microwaves FAR BELOW what is allowed, please view Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe's 2014 talk on children and emr at youtube. See also Dr. Leif Salford's presentation there on his long-term work on blood brain barrier and radiofrequency damage, which causes leaking. For consumer friendly site, see BabySafe Project. And for cutting edge science showing results in mice of very brief wifi exposure see at Medical Symposium at C4ST the informal study by Dr. Hugh Taylor of Yale.

Those charged with protecting lives are more interested in innovations, fun and profit. The brain damage has only just begun. FCC is allowing DAS antennas (small cellular antennas) to build out wireless infrastructure quicker EVERYWHERE. This means more damage to the public, esp. children and all future generations. Once DNA is damaged it impacts all generations.

Some believe that infertility and genetic damage is intended to cut back human populations. Who knows? It certainly appears that the utter lies of regulatory officials and industry will result plenty of harm to individuals and the human species, in general.

Wired, cable and fiber allow access that is 100% SAFE. Why aren't officials building these out? Whatever the reason, the results spell disaster.

I can assure you that 30 something years ago, when there were no cell signals, wifi signals, and about less than 10 channels of tv, didn't stop me from having a form of AS.

To play devil's advocate, autism has been on the rise, and so has RF smog. However correlation is not causation. Since there is no definitive test for autism, the definition for the diagnosis has broadened.

Without drifting off topic too far, you will not eliminate RF smog. You can limit your dose. For the average person, their RF exposure is due to cell phones. A wired or bluetooth headset reduced your exposure by a few orders or magnitude. This boils down to the risk management notion of the precautionary principle.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle

Nobody has proven cell phones are dangerous. But the nature of the experiment is you can't prove they are safe.

I average about two hours a day with a bluetooth headset in my ear and I'm not concerned.

The NHTSA would clearly argue that cell phones ARE dangerous. Just coming back to work from lunch I was nearly in an automotive accident caused by an idiot using a cell phone while driving. Radio frequency dangers? The carrier wave does not have enough energy to cause any significant interaction with tissue.

 

[Veritas super omens]

I am totally intrigued by autism and brain function studies in general. Savants, whether congenital or acquired, certainly merit more study.