I'm not sure space efficiency is a brand any more than "LOOK HOW CUTE I AM I'M SO CUTE TELL ME I'M CUTE" is, but I definitely think the design language has become a trap.In retrospect maybe the retro 'Mini' design language is a trap - if instead they made insanely efficient space utilisation their thing - like the original - then maybe they could go up to minivans while staying on brand. Wouldn't look like a Mini though.
Tbh Fiat missed the same opportunity with newer retro-chubster 600 vs the old school Multipla (or the brilliantly weird double-bubble 2000s one)
To be fair, real estate agents generally have it in their contract somewhere that they're not allowed to drive a car older than X number of years. It's an image thing for clients.I have a friend who is a real estate agent: they roll a new Mini every couple of years on short term leases, and the rationale is hilarious. "generally the thing is mostly reliable for the first two years: then it gets annoying... So, two year leases and let someone else have the problems"
Yup. And it has to be a premium brand, but not so premium the clients think they're getting taken advantage of. Basically, the reason the Lexus RX350 exists.To be fair, real estate agents generally have it in their contract somewhere that they're not allowed to drive a car older than X number of years. It's an image thing for clients.
One day at work there was an Alec Issigonis' Mini parked between two "compact crossover" SUV, did it look tiny - the new Mini Countryman the other side, less soI wish they would stop calling it a "Mini". These things are massive now. What does this monstrosity weigh?
You bring up an interesting point: how do suspensions of (generally heavier) EVs hold up on our potholed roads? I see your Indiana pothole and raise you a Michigan one - a state where even our Jeep (!) injured its suspension...Let me preface this by saying, I recently sold a 2019 Clubman and my wife drives a 2024 convertible so we generally like the brand and subsequent quirks. Interestingly, we have a 2025 Countryman (gas) loaner in our garage right now (Indiana pothole did in the passenger front on the convertible).
I'm surprised Mini even bothered with this car. I'm sure they didn't expect it to be a volume seller, the whole exercise just seems wasteful.
I'm probably in the minority here, but 220 mile range isn't a problem for my family. We're trying to figure out what our first EV will be this summer, and the Mini isn't even in the top 5.
However, I don't think the pricing is grossly off target. A similarly optioned ID.4 is pretty close to this. It is worth noting that Mini depreciation is no joke (as another commenter said), I assume you multiply it x2 for a Mini EV!
This is a long way of saying, if you can't convert existing owners to your EV products, good luck attracting others when competitive products are more affordable with better range.
Haven't had a problem here, knock on wood. Though I've never fucked a tire in any pothole. I don't know if I'm lucky or just careful.You bring up an interesting point: how do suspensions of (generally heavier) EVs hold up on our potholed roads? I see your Indiana pothole and raise you a Michigan one - a state where even our Jeep (!) injured its suspension...
From Eastern ontario Canada, lots of potholes: to quote my local mechanic who i've known for, 30ish? years...You bring up an interesting point: how do suspensions of (generally heavier) EVs hold up on our potholed roads? I see your Indiana pothole and raise you a Michigan one - a state where even our Jeep (!) injured its suspension...
Do they still use large amounts of wood in British cars?Haven't had a problem here, knock on wood.
Very few EVs compare nicely in the weight department. Its length and width however are indeed mini in the US market, and compare to some of the smallest cars we have on the market. We don't really have things like the Toyota Yaris anymore, for example.At 2.1 m wide and 1.7 m high, and weighing 1.7 tonnes, it's not exactly "mini". Maybe in the US market it is.
I wouldn’t rely too much on those surveys that you (helpfully, thank you) linked to.The R56 generation (circa 2007-15) had reliability issues, most notably with carbon buildup that plagued a number of direct-injection engines of that era. But the F56 generation of this past decade has been damn near bulletproof.
![]()
https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2019-us-vehicle-dependability-study-vds
https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2024-us-vehicle-dependability-study-vds
To me it looks like a low-end Six Flags ride. I mean, I get the concept (profits, so fuck practicality), but god, why the fuck in the middle of the dash when everyone and God is used to glancing a little lower to see their driving data?Holy shit that gauge cluster is busy. The circle screen looks like it's making designing a screen that has all the info you need extra difficult. I think the lack of a corner to "anchor" things to makes it seem like everything is just splattered on the screen anywhere there was room.
You'd probably be able to get used to it, but should you have to?
Being in the middle isn't an issue. Mini has been doing that forever. I had a Scion that did it. No big deal.To me it looks like a low-end Six Flags ride. I mean, I get the concept (profits, so fuck practicality), but god, why the fuck in the middle of the dash when everyone and God is used to glancing a little lower to see their driving data?
Yeah, OMYAC here, but I instantly loathed it.
I don't see it being a popular vehicle for that, and many other reasons that have also been mentioned.
it looks cheap. That's not a good look for the Mini.
And of course all the Chinese cars you are locked out of access to by your government.Love the idea, but the execution just isn't there. I don't get how the Ioniq 5 / EV6 still don't have any real competition. The only other cars with sub 20 minute 10-80 charging times are Porsches and Lucids.
The Ioniq 6 is a 4-seater, but still reasonably small and affordable, starting at less than $40k. Or at least it wasIf I were in the market for an electric car and assuming no tariffs, I’d probably go for an Ioniq. But I prefer 2-seaters and there are few affordable options in that category. I’ve no interest in large cars or SUVs/crossovers.
Mini was taken over by BMW to give them a lower end sub-brand without eating into the brand imageIt's still a relatively small vehicle and I think this is the least interesting thing to criticize the brand for. But this really underlines how a car brand has to have a strong image, but not so strong that it's limiting.
Remember when Minis were actually "mini?" This thing looks to be big enough that it is the same volume as 2 original Minis. If we were allowed to import the available tiny EVs from elsewhere, Minis would have no market, except for nostalgic hippies.
Really good point. Maybe BMW should get around that by reintroducing the Austin Maxi? (please don't, it was horrible first time round):It's still a relatively small vehicle and I think this is the least interesting thing to criticize the brand for. But this really underlines how a car brand has to have a strong image, but not so strong that it's limiting. Mini can't build anything larger than subcompact without catching flak for not being miniature enough.
Only if you buy a Morgan, in which case a mere “yes” doesn’t quite cover it.Do they still use large amounts of wood in British cars?
Doesn't handle like a Mini, true. But it's a very nice step up from the Toyota suspension in the nearly-identically-priced BZ4X. It's also way less of a boat than the Prologue/BlazEr, though those are preferable for a number of reasons in my opinion.I went shopping for a mini last July, and sat one of these or equivalent at the dealership. They are awful. Much too big and heavy to be minis and whoever thinks we should get rid of physical toggles for touch screens needs to be shot. The dealer was despairing because he said no one likes them and they don’t handle like minis. Stupid decision by bmw but what do you expect these days. So I bought a used 2021 countryman S hybrid instead and love it. Dozens of toggles and switches! Manual controls for everything. And cheaper since it’s used. Win win.
I test drove a MY 2025 Countryman (ICE) last year (haven't driven the EV variant), but as I'm used to driving aLet me preface this by saying, I recently sold a 2019 Clubman and my wife drives a 2024 convertible so we generally like the brand and subsequent quirks. Interestingly, we have a 2025 Countryman (gas) loaner in our garage right now (Indiana pothole did in the passenger front on the convertible).
I'm surprised Mini even bothered with this car. I'm sure they didn't expect it to be a volume seller, the whole exercise just seems wasteful.
I'm probably in the minority here, but 220 mile range isn't a problem for my family. We're trying to figure out what our first EV will be this summer, and the Mini isn't even in the top 5.
However, I don't think the pricing is grossly off target. A similarly optioned ID.4 is pretty close to this. It is worth noting that Mini depreciation is no joke (as another commenter said), I assume you multiply it x2 for a Mini EV!
This is a long way of saying, if you can't convert existing owners to your EV products, good luck attracting others when competitive products are more affordable with better range.
We have special hire ones for the kind of American who is amazed that we have electricity and don't live in mud huts.Do they still use large amounts of wood in British cars?
It is our fault for judging you by your teeth.We have special hire ones for the kind of American who is amazed that we have electricity and don't live in mud huts.
The main thing I learned in Michigan was get steel wheels instead of alloys if possible. They don't bend as easy and are cheaper to replace if they do.You bring up an interesting point: how do suspensions of (generally heavier) EVs hold up on our potholed roads? I see your Indiana pothole and raise you a Michigan one - a state where even our Jeep (!) injured its suspension...
It's a cultural thing. We have conservative dentists, the US has interventionist ones.It is our fault for judging you by your teeth.
I will say the Subaru system has gotten better, so maybe an iteration or two will fix this one. For Subaru, the version present in my 24MY Legacy is leaps and bounds better than the videos I saw complaining about it a few years back demoed.From experience, if the system is laggy by the time it's seen by third parties, there's some really core problem that can't be easily fixed.
I always assumed it was because the NHS didn't cover dental work.It's a cultural thing. We have conservative dentists, the US has interventionist ones.
No, actually. There has been fairly extensive research - British people are less image conscious and less interested in purely cosmetic procedures, but our overall dental health is equal to or better than the US.I always assumed it was because the NHS didn't cover dental work.
I've heard arguments that it's due to malpractice lawsuits and the resulting high insurance costs. I don't know if that's true or not. I'm always skeptical of answers that boil down to "people have too many rights."No, actually. There has been fairly extensive research - British people are less image conscious and less interested in purely cosmetic procedures, but our overall dental health is equal to or better than the US.
I have a private dentist here and I recently had quite a lot of work - a root canal, 5 crowns - and it cost less than a single root canal and crown for my brother in the USA. I don't know why US overheads are so high.
A friend with an excess of patriotism bought an Austin Maxi around the time I bought a Citroen GSA. Both theoretically had hydraulic suspension.Really good point. Maybe BMW should get around that by reintroducing the Austin Maxi? (please don't, it was horrible first time round):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Maxi
In terms of achieving its goal of providing the primary dashboard display for the driver (or, more to the point, failing to in any coherent fashion), I'mma christen it an "instrument clusterf*ck".not to get all Edwin Tufte on this, but I think we need a term like chartjunk - "displayjunk" maybe - for all the nonfunctional cruft that builds up in infotainment displays.