As far as I know the video of the robot picking up an egg didn't involve and particular trickery. They are all-in on machine learning for the robots.And just to be clear: Tesla has no robot market. Every presentation they've done has been faked, no?
Well, DUH. A serial liar is banging their drum, and there are still enough people out there too brain dead to realize it's more about P.T. Barnum's adage about suckers to stop buying the fucking pieces of shit.Tesla's stratospheric valuation—which remains far higher than any other automaker—has been built on promises of massive growth and tech-sector profit margins. With these results looking much more ordinary, analysts are starting to cool.
To nitpick I don't think peterford stated his reasons for being against Chinese manufacturers being in the lead on EVs. Therefore you can't really claim that such a statement is irrational. At most you can say that it needs to be supported with reasons.Good thing there are other OEMs out there that aren't Chinese that offer EVs right now... even though your sinophobia is irrational.
Self-respecting leftists wouldn't be caught dead in one since the get go given his well known anti-union stance.Its easy Musk bought twitter, showed himself for what he is, a far-right fascist. Now no self-respecting liberal will be caught dead in a tesla as long as he remains involved in the company
Genuine question: how much, if any, of BYD's success is ahem tied to Tesla starting to manufacture vehicles in China a couple years ago? Is it reasonable to assume Tesla bore some of the R&D costs that are now propelling BYD to prominence?
A big reason for BYD’s success, Munger believes, is the caliber of its founder and CEO Wang Chuanfu, whom he described as a “combination of Thomas Edison and Jack Welch” in 2009. Recently, he elaborated further on the qualities of the billionaire BYD founder, who grew up in extreme poverty, having been born to rice-farmer parents then orphaned as a child.
"He can do things you can't do," Munger said on a Sunday episode of the podcast Acquired. "He's a fanatic that knows how to actually make things with his hands. He's closer to ground zero in other words. The guy at BYD is better at actually making things than Elon is."
Describing the investment in the Chinese automaker as a “venture-capital-type play,” he added, “BYD was a miracle, but that guy worked 70 hours a week and has a very high IQ.” Wang is also known to be a relentless cost-cutter, and he still lives a relatively frugal lifestyle.
I thought Elon doesn't criticize China because of the whole capitalists line up with fascists to temporarily make more money line. Is that not true?The margins are the big thing for the institutional investors. They'll might forgive some of the other minor misses if the margins held up.
I assume a lot of the prestige about owning a Tesla has worn off in the Chinese market.
I can’t say with any certainty that the egg video was faked. But the more recent one, folding a t-shirt, appears to show the robot being controlled by someone: their movements correspond directly to what the robot does.As far as I know the video of the robot picking up an egg didn't involve and particular trickery. They are all-in on machine learning for the robots.
I personally think they'll get some pretty neat demos out of them, but at the end of the day the price point and practical considerations are going to make them a market failure. Not unless there is a breakthrough with machine learning. IMHO this has been a big problem with Elon for a long time. He sees OpenAI demos and is totally wowed but has not tried to actually do real work with those tools and discovered the limitations. I suspect he is actually worried about the AI singularity happening in the next few years, and weirdly enough he's working as hard as he can to make it happen.
follow up information after that video freely said it was being remote controlled - it was to test the motor responsiveness and sensitivity.I can’t say with any certainty that the egg video was faked. But the more recent one, folding a t-shirt, appears to show the robot being controlled by someone: their movements correspond directly to what the robot does.
That’s not just making grandiose claims, it’s actively pretending that your robot is capable of things, when the reality is that it has all the sophistication of a remote control car.
Let’s not call them (retail “investors”) investors. They are speculators.Well not all investors are sophisticated which is why we are supposed to have laws that prevent CEOs of companies from doing multi-year frauds to pump their stock; the problem is that it's never enforced until the stock goes down first. Tesla is consistently one of the most popular stocks with unsophisticated retail investors.
Sophisticated institutional investors either should know, or do and don't care because they know they can sell to idiot retail.
Myeah, the fact that old Elon tends to cheer loudly to rhetoric right out of Mein Kampf is pretty telling. That's not flirting, it's pillow talk.Flirts with racism, white supremacy, transphobia and other nonsense conspiracy theories? I'd hate to see what you'd call getting in bed with those things if Elon is only flirting with them.
Oh how I wish I had footage of the post-conference dinner among the rest of the stakeholders. I bet there was champagne.Its true. He told them he wants more money or he's gonna stomp off somewhere
“I am uncomfortable growing Tesla to be a leader in AI & robotics without having ~25% voting control. Enough to be influential, but not so much that I can’t be overturned,” Musk wrote in a post on X. “Unless that is the case, I would prefer to build products outside of Tesla.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/16/tech/elon-musk-tesla-pay-package/index.html
I will consider buying a tesla car when Elon stops just talking about the Jews and their promotion of anti-white racism and starts actually doing something about them ...
/s
There will be around 125 electric car models on sale in Canada by next year, there are 50 right now, Tesla barely makes the top 10 for cheapest.
https://www.cargurus.ca/Cars/articles/cheapest-electric-cars-canada
The test was to evaluate the motor responsiveness and sensitivity. The video was to try and convince people that the robot could do that itself, without a remote control operator, without outright lying about it.follow up information after that video freely said it was being remote controlled - it was to test the motor responsiveness and sensitivity.
At the same time, it is hard to point to many companies poised for explosive volume growth in multiple enormous (or soon to be so) markets as is Tesla. To be sure $TSLA is priced for perfection, but the opportunities for them are absolutely grand. The potential value of the robot market is economy shattering.
It's just so weird Musk is taking such a public stance deeply in the conservative-right side of the political spectrum when so much of Tesla's market is the educated white collar city types who tend to lean more liberal. It's like Must is actively trying to hurt his company and his wallet.
Looking back it's comical how popular Musk was among the environmentally conscious liberal crowd. They sincerely believed Musk wanted to save the environment and thought he was a genius engineer like Tony Stark. The STEM fad was strong and cringey.
The minivan market seems like it could be a good fit for Tesla expanding the lineup. Not VW Buzz size but full Honda Odyssey/ Toyota sienna competitor.Delivery vehicles require specialized expertise. That's why many of them come from manufacturers you have never even heard of (they often buy the powertrains and frame from Ford or GM, and then build their own vehicles around that). For a niche manufacturer, it's probably wise to avoid branching out in that direction.
And normal looking trucks are not very promising for electrification. Ford seems to have problems finding buyers for their Lightnings, and Rivian is more of a pricey status symbol than a normal looking truck.
And battery cars are almost always premium vehicles, a large affordable battery SUV is an oxymoron. SUVs are rarely affordable to begin with, and neither are battery cars, especially when they are large. What is the average for the car market as a whole is pretty much the price floor for battery-powered cars.
What the market would need - but isn't feasible - is a sub-$20k vehicle with a 400 mile range.
I don’t recall them actually note that in any version I saw. Nor do I imagine that this was the first time trying this particular activity, which makes it less of a “test”. So I’m curious if this “follow-up information” explained why they chose to frame the shot (or edit the shot) to remove the puppeteer.follow up information after that video freely said it was being remote controlled - it was to test the motor responsiveness and sensitivity.
There’s a reason no one is making new minivan models and it isn’t because it’s a growth sector poised to take-off. It’s a niche dead end.The minivan market seems like it could be a good fit for Tesla expanding the lineup. Not VW Buzz size but full Honda Odyssey/ Toyota sienna competitor.
Charging is a rounding error for Tesla. The margins took a shit because they slashed prices to the bone. There's not much they can do to make the things cheaper to make. Hard to recover from that without jacking prices back up.Margin drops look terrible. I wonder what they will jack up to recoup margins? Definitely Autopilot, but perhaps waiting to jack up charging pricing once NACS becomes the defacto standard this year.
The Ridgeline touched a nerve when it was introduced because it was so obviously the pickup most buyers actually needed, and they hated it because they knew, on some level, that it was calling bullshit on their F-150s and Silveradissimos.There’s a reason no one is making new minivan models and it isn’t because it’s a growth sector poised to take-off. It’s a niche dead end.
Tesla needs to make more SUVs, CUVs and maybe a small pickup. Or a regular pickup if the Cybertruck goes nowhere (Honda tweaked the pickup and was savaged by the market for a very good vehicle).
I would argue that nobody actually believed Tesla was credibly valued like a tech company, and that it's basically an NFT, or a package of subprime home loans, with an attached car manufacturing arm - an over-valued speculative asset which investors are keeping their money in while its value remains high and are betting they can offload to some other chump when the music stops.Free cash flow increased by 33 percent for the quarter, but its operating margin is almost half that of Q4 2022 at 8.2 percent.
The disappointment was due to Tesla failing to live up to the self-set expectation that they were a tech company.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/operatingmargin.asp
They have oft been compared to the Apple of the car industry, except Apple has a far, far, higher operating margin:
https://companiesmarketcap.com/apple/operating-margin/According to Apple's latest financial reports and stock price the company's current Operating Margin is 30.20%
Investors can't trust Tesla to keep it's word (that they will have tech-company style operating margin), especially since they can't even match existing auto manufacturer's operating margin:
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MBGAF/mercedes-benz-group-ag/operating-marginThe current operating profit margin for Mercedes-Benz Group AG as of September 30, 2023 is 9.82%
So if they aren't profitable like a tech company, they can't be valued like a tech company.
Official Chinese quality rankings say there are 21 brands above Tesla's quality in China. Their quality is poor everywhere.Yes, significantly higher build quality and consistency.
My conjecture is other manufacturers have more mature processes and better quality US workers. Chinese Tesla workers are extremely high quality and can compensate for poor processes.
While I doubt an IR rain sensor actually has a BOM cost of even $20 at scale, the real secret is that you don't need an automated rain sensor of any description in the first place. If you feel the rain drops are obscuring your vision, you can just...push a wiper stalk! (Though I guess if the purpose is to reduce costs not to improve the UX, it's understandable that Tesla deletes the physical interface, too...)Tesla needs to actually start listening to customers, instead of stroking Musk's ego.
Removal of stalks was stupid, and whatever money they saved on that, they immediately blew it on the useless screen in the back console. Ultrasonic sensor removal is equally stupid.
Then there's a lack of CarPlay, and the general outdatedness of their craptacular infotainment system. It was acceptable in 2019, it's not acceptable in 2024.
Even the freaking automatic wipers don't work at all, after nearly 8 years of trying. Admit the failure, and add a $20 infrared rain sensor.
I like the automatic wipers on my Avalon, especially since they'll start going faster if it starts raining harder. It tends to work pretty damn good, with a tendency to go a little faster that I would generally prefer. Toyota figured this out over 14 years ago. The fact that Tesla can't figure it out speaks volumes to their engineering. Obviously it's something I could easily do without, but it's nice to have, much like the RFID keys and push button startWhile I doubt an IR rain sensor actually has a BOM cost of even $20 at scale, the real secret is that you don't need an automated rain sensor of any description in the first place. If you feel the rain drops are obscuring your vision, you can just...push a wiper stalk! (Though I guess if the purpose is to reduce costs not to improve the UX, it's understandable that Tesla deletes the physical interface, too...)
Do people legitimately prefer this kind of automation, or is it simply a gee-whiz fancy gizmo that impresses people the first time they see it and then slowly frustrates them as they discover its shortcomings ever after?
Don't worry, by 2018-ish they'll have fully self driving better than humans and it will skyrocket!And even that is overvalued since Tesla is an automaker not a tech company. I have no illusions that will happen, but $40/share seems where it ought to be priced, not $210.
The wise investor would know about margins, capital costs, liabilities, and legal responsibilities, and realize there is no way Tesla can be worth that much.I would argue that nobody actually believed Tesla was credibly valued like a tech company, and that it's basically an NFT, or a package of subprime home loans, with an attached car manufacturing arm - an over-valued speculative asset which investors are keeping their money in while its value remains high and are betting they can offload to some other chump when the music stops.
Thank you! Was going to post this if no one else did. It’s one of those core financial acronyms that should be correct in articles discussing financial performance. It’d be like calling RAM Random Ass Memory in a technical article.Minor nit-pick: GAAP stands for "Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", not "Agreed".
When your wiper is 3x as long as a normal one and costs 5x as much to replace, maybe it becomes a good idea not to take personal responsibility for operating itDo people legitimately prefer this kind of automation, or is it simply a gee-whiz fancy gizmo that impresses people the first time they see it and then slowly frustrates them as they discover its shortcomings ever after?
Inflation is down, job market is great, wages are on the rise. Don’t spread this FUD that the economy isn’t doing well, because it is. The only “uncertainty” comes from the wealthy who are butthurt interest rates are up and they can’t get free money anymore.The competition is now outputting meaningful quantities of vehicles, and they are starting to compete on price as consumers are swimming in inflation, a contracting job market, and general uncertainty. Not a good situation for a car manufacturer valued like a tech company.
I heard he’s top possum around here!I love Jim Salter, another frequent commenter.