the second part is true - that musk is amazing at convincing people to believe what he says.It seems like the more intelligent someone is, the more likely they are to see patterns where there are none. Musk appears to suffer from this as well. What makes Musk different is his ability to sway people to his way of thinking and his exceptionally large audience.
Can you maybe change theory to hypothesis? It’s not exactly supported by evidence.Great catch -- thanks for the correction.
ULA should have renamed that building "The Grassy Knoll".Ok call me old fashioned but these things happen with cutting edge rocket science its called learning from your mistakes
Or maybe as with JFK was there a grassy knoll involved.![]()
Dmitry Rogozin (when he was head of Roscosmos) ,made the accusation and it's subsequently become something of a meme
I don't think it's power that's driven him mad but a long history of working (by his own admission) 16 hour days. That might theoretically mean 8 hours of sleep, but we all know you don't go straight to sleep after stopping work. He's also spending time on "not work" things, which means that my guess is that he's been getting consistently less than 6 hours of sleep a night for decades now. That's near guaranteed to result in issues.
Since no one on Ars apparently has any experience with long distance shooting, giving incorrect information makes someone sound well-informed around here.I was thinking a Barret similar
[emphasis mine]Elon Musk also spent 50 grand on a private investigator to allegedly look into the professional rescue diver he'd called a "pedo-guy" for no reason, and see if there was any substance to his own baseless allegation. This all happened after the rescue diver had waved off Elon's stupid steel coffin to rescue the trapped Thai soccer team from an underwater cave.
Donald Trump famously said (read: lied) he'd paid a private investigator to investigate Barack Obama's birth certificate after baselessly spreading racist lies about the incumbent presidential candidate not being born in America, with zero evidence to prompt or sustain such an allegation.
It's no surprise that when something embarrassing happens, people like Musk and Trump will throw a ton of emotional investment into an absolute bullshit answer they think will either exonerate them, or flood the zone and keep at least some sort of alternative narrative to their own dishonesty or incompetence floating around for their supporters to latch onto against the overwhelming sea of facts.
It doesn't matter how ridiculous or implausible the idea is, as long as it sounds exciting and might throw some people off the trail.
This is just one of the reasons why no, I don't feel like the "smart money" is to bet on Elon Musk. That's been apparent even before he decided to put together acrackket team of racist 4chan script kiddies to dismantle the government from the inside out.
It's only 1.18 miles (1900 meters) from the VIF to pad 40.Since no one on Ars apparently has any experience with long distance shooting, giving incorrect information makes someone sound well-informed around here.
The. 408 CheyTac (Cheyenne Tactical) is an ELR cartridge that's been around for a little over twenty years. Barrett is a firearms company that produces bolt-action and semi-auto .50 BMG rifles (with a few other competing cartridges as well here and there).
It's worth pointing out that the DOD adopted the Barrett M82A1 back in 1990, and it was explicitly deployed in Desert Storm for the purpose of covert sniper deployments against Iraqi SCUD missile sites from extreme long range (1+ mi). There's a very obscure book from 2000 called Hard Target Interdiction that's essentially a 500-page textbook for how to shoot large vertical missiles from extreme long range.
Considering what local terrain looks like around the launch site at KSC (and safety considerations for the shooter), it would indeed be logical to engage from a rooftop. For the sort of large caliber platform needed to make that sort of shot, the only real options are a muzzle brake or a silencer. The former is going to generate a significant muzzle flash even in daylight, while the latter often eliminates a visible flash. However, availability of large caliber silencers circa 2009 was relatively low - they existed but were quite uncommon. Conventional flash hiders provide no recoil mitigation, which is mandatory with a cartridge the size of a .50 BMG.
It's worth noting that a F9 is essentially a 12-foot-diameter target. Even at a distance of two miles, that's still 4+ minutes of angle, a relatively healthy target size. Very few targets could reasonably be expected to be hit at that distance with effective (read: catastrophic) results, and an F9 is one of them.
Basically, it's an entirely plausible shot for a decent skilled individual to make, with a rifle system that had been deployed by the military for twenty years with the explicit purpose of blowing up large missiles at long distances, and a how-to guide commercially available for the prior decade.
Makes me curious how Boeing deals with the bullet holes. Do they just replace the whole panel? Depending on the panel size, it could be either "a minor job" to replace it, but a patch could/should cause a whole bunch of stress analysis needed to determine if it's safe. I wonder if they have a standard bullet hole patch? Aircraft have a surprisingly small "safety factor", or "factor of ignorance" as one of my professors called it. Or just put a piece of duct tape inside to seal the air leak and Bondo over the holeIt would not surprise me in the least if some of the rocket hardware at either Starbase or McGregor has been shot.
Boeing occasionally finds bullet holes in new 737s after the train ride from Kansas to Seattle.
Quite often, I've noticed people project their own intentions onto others...so am not surprised that a certain somebody thought malfeasance was afoot...
If they'd gone to the effort of getting a sniper, surely they'd have made sure the muzzle flash was suppressed - with a suppressor or just inside a hide?
Edit: grammar
Damn. I was hoping for some actual technical details of the investigation, rather than just a gov't report saying "we checked, move along now, nothing to see here". Maybe it is as simple as 'security cams show nobody on top of the building'. But it could have been something interesting about getting image analysis of the flash of light, or subtle system clock differences making the flash of light seem timed right, etc. It's all a big COPVout...
It seems like the more intelligent someone is, the more likely they are to see patterns where there are none. Musk appears to suffer from this as well. What makes Musk different is his ability to sway people to his way of thinking and his exceptionally large audience.
They used to mock us all the time, bht better believe they stopped their cars in the street and lined the fence the first time we raised the rocket on the pad.Glad to see ULA is staffed by upstanding professionals, no doubt pillars of their communities.![]()
Or a LEO pedo-sat.The shot that killed JFK didn’t come from the Dallas sixth floor but came from a NASA launch tower in Cape Canaveral. See NSAM 271 and also the Torbitt document.
Did we read the same article? He didn't blame some "vague outside evil influence" - he blamed his biggest competitor, which would be super convenient for him. When he likes an idea, he falls hard to confirmation bias - wouldn't it be WONDERFUL for him if he could have his biggest competitor embroiled in a criminal investigation, with bad headlines in the news, while at the same time being able to deflect blame away from his or his subordinates' bad decisions, and maybe even be able to sue his competitors for billions of dollars of damages?So in summary, on the direction of Musk safety was intentionally ignored in the name of speed, then when a predictable accident happened he blamed some vague outside evil influence out to get him, not the clear and obvious mistakes.
/another person dies from "Full Self Driving"
Have you seen the kind of shenanigans SpaceX's CEO gets up to?Glad to see ULA is staffed by upstanding professionals, no doubt pillars of their communities.![]()
Nope. The contract was awarded to ULA in the early 2010s, and the contract period extended into the early 2020s.Time-travel typo?
The origins of COVID aren't even terribly important. The right is just using it as a way to cover for Trump completely and unequivocally fucking up the USs response to it.My sentiments exactly.
I feel the same way about theories surrounding the origins of COVID.
It almost seems like it is human nature to look for scapegoats.
For example, the 'Spanish Flu' was known by different names...depending on the nationality of the publication.
And by now the ketamine probably doesn't help.I don't think it's power that's driven him mad but a long history of working (by his own admission) 16 hour days. That might theoretically mean 8 hours of sleep, but we all know you don't go straight to sleep after stopping work. He's also spending time on "not work" things, which means that my guess is that he's been getting consistently less than 6 hours of sleep a night for decades now. That's near guaranteed to result in issues.
Without seeing it or knowing what the camera was that recorded it, it's also possible it was just a simple video glitch. The flash might have only been a single pixel being excited by something for some small percentage of 1/30th of a second, which could have been actual light reflected off something entering the optics, an internal voltage fluctuation, or even a solar particle strike.They likely never identified it, but keep in mind that this was a flash seen in the distance from a single camera. My uninformed guess would be the sun glinting off some random crap on the building. Either because of its movement through the sky off a fixed object like a window or a piece of metal, or because something up there could move enough in the wind to reflect the sun. A sign on a pole that can move slightly or an unsecured latch on an AC unit or whatever would do the trick.
Thanks to one typo I will now spend the rest of the day with "Mmm Bop" in my head.My god Musk musk think Hanson’s razor is a dull as his personality.
Given that Musk's number one agency target was USAID, I would argue that he is responsible for many deaths already, and who knows how many more to come.[emphasis mine]
As was obvious to anyone who saw Terry Moran of ABC’s Trump interview last week, when Trump insisted for seemingly 10 minutes that the “MS13” that was clearly photoshopped onto Abrego Garcia’s knuckles was real. Or that the Sharpie marked up hurricane map was real. Or Musk’s insistence that his Nazi salute was really a “from the heart” gesture. Or Musk’s statement that he couldn’t be a Nazi because the only issue with Nazis was that they killed people and he never had. The list goes on.
Yeah, but this is more like what I'd expect from that headline:"Florida man shoots at rocket" is a pretty believable headline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razorMy god Musk musk think Hanson’s razor is a dull as his personality.
Not to give credence to the sniper theory but I once got a tour of a Goodyear blimp (while it was moored to the ground, alas) and they have a plexiglass dome that they use for visual inspection of the inside of the envelope, mostly to spot light coming in through holes. And most of those holes are caused by people shooting at it. And many, maybe even a majority, of the 737 fuselages that arrive in Washington state by train from Boeing's Kansas facility have bullet holes in them that need to be patched."Florida man shoots at rocket" is a pretty believable headline.
The cinematic allusion is appropriate, because one gets the impression that some of the folks involved in this story have lost the ability to distinguish between fiction and nonfiction.In this direction, about one mile away, lay a building leased by SpaceX's main competitor in launch, United Launch Alliance. A separate video indicated a flash on the roof of this building, now known as the Spaceflight Processing Operations Center. The timing of this flash matched the interval it would take a projectile to travel from the building to the rocket.
A sniper on the roof of a competitor's building—forget the Right Stuff, this was the stuff of a Mission: Impossible or James Bond movie.
Power and wealth have been empirically shown to affect your ability to feel empathy and restrain impulses. It's not an either/or. All of the above can be true and probably are, along with several more, such as substance abuse, online and self-radicalization, and a psyche that probably wasn't that stable right out of the box.I don't think it's power that's driven him mad but a long history of working (by his own admission) 16 hour days. That might theoretically mean 8 hours of sleep, but we all know you don't go straight to sleep after stopping work. He's also spending time on "not work" things, which means that my guess is that he's been getting consistently less than 6 hours of sleep a night for decades now. That's near guaranteed to result in issues.
Precisely how much time does the FAA need to spend justifying and explaining a negative conclusion, particularly to put to bed a wild conspiracy theory pushed by someone with a deep interest in any conclusion that doesn't cast doubt on his company's quality and safety culture, and who is known to display paranoid tendencies?Damn. I was hoping for some actual technical details of the investigation, rather than just a gov't report saying "we checked, move along now, nothing to see here". Maybe it is as simple as 'security cams show nobody on top of the building'. But it could have been something interesting about getting image analysis of the flash of light, or subtle system clock differences making the flash of light seem timed right, etc. It's all a big COPVout...
So what was this flash? If the FBI believed there was no evidence -- sure, they would know -- but what was this identified as?
I doubt he will. Moonshark just had a tasty snack.Read the article. Berger's FOIA request just came through.