I've seen ads for the Afeela absolutely EVERYWHERE for about 3 months now. They seem to think that users, not drivers, will be overjoyed to climb into a car and not drive. That is what every ad focuses on. Not driving. What the users are doing is nebulous, but the important thing is that driving is gross. Yuck. How much does it suck to have to control the vehicle you're in? That'd be lame and weird.
Ugh... I hate this future...
Now you are seeing the bigger picture.You sound like someone fortunate enough to not have to experience I-95 on a regular basis. I do actually like driving when I get to drive, and by that I mean getting to go faster than 0-10 MPH. I would love to hand that horrible traffic experience over to a computer that could (safely) handle it for me.
That said, nothing about this particular car (and all of its AI garbage) excites me.
One of the things people appreciate about rapid mass transit is not having to control the vehicle they are in. This is a much less capital, space and energy efficient version of that.How much does it suck to have to control the vehicle you're in? That'd be lame and weird.
It's on the level of the best 3d Mario games.
The AFEELA car sensor suite is
a comprehensive array of up to 40 sensors, including 18 cameras, a LiDAR unit, 9 radars, and 12 ultrasonic sensors, providing 360-degree environmental awareness for advanced driver assistance (ADAS) and future Level 3 autonomy. This setup creates real-time 3D graphics of surroundings, detects objects and pedestrians, monitors the driver for drowsiness, and supports sophisticated interactive technology and infotainment, blending Sony's digital expertise with Honda's automotive engineering.
Mini-Disc / ATRAC ?Every SONY product I've bought in the past 25 years had excellent quality hardware, excellent performance, excellent durability, and the worst software/firmware of any brand. I don't think adding AI would make things better.
Meanwhile in Japan....a few years agoMy two cents: the concept looks stupid and the name is doubly stupid.
Exactly. For something like a bus or train, great. You can talk to people. Get up and stretch sometimes. Get a snack. Cool. But for a car, which I would bet 90% of the time only has one occupant, you have to just sit there, with the wheel in front of you, probably seeing ads fed in by Sony. In standstill traffic I see the appeal, but Afeela show people enjoying not-driving on beautiful, curving mountain roads. It baffles me.One of the things people appreciate about rapid mass transit is not having to control the vehicle they are in. This is a much less capital, space and energy efficient version of that.
Speak for yourself. The drive, even when part of my 15 hours a week involved being stuck in Boston traffic, had always been my favorite part of my work day. I do realize I am part of a microscopic minority though.Car companies have been selling that lie forever. Sitting in traffic has never been entertainment.
Sony/BMG own the rights to Ozzy’s songExactly. For something like a bus or train, great. You can talk to people. Get up and stretch sometimes. Get a snack. Cool. But for a car, which I would bet 90% of the time only has one occupant, you have to just sit there, with the wheel in front of you, probably seeing ads fed in by Sony. In standstill traffic I see the appeal, but Afeela show people enjoying not-driving on beautiful, curving mountain roads. It baffles me.
I wouldn't even hope for an S2000 reboot anyway. No matter what, the company would be bogged down with nannies, connectivity, features, and numb driving experience. That goes for pretty much any manufacturer at this point, not just Honda.If this is Honda's new direction, an S2000 reboot slips further and further away.
I love my S2k and my EV, but this is nonsense.
And the advertised range is "Up to 300 miles." Ridiculous for a >$90K car. This thing seems DOA, IMHO.It gets worse, per Jalopnik, in a piece of actual journalism, the first year will only be the $102,900 Signature and the $89,000 trim that drops in 2027 is decontented ala Tesla with no rear entertainment system and only comes in black.
At any trim level I still think this is pointless because for that money there's a lot of better competition, unless you must have a built in Play Station , which I would find as welcome as the Microsoft Teams Mercedes builds into some cars. When I drive I listen to music and look at the scenery. Fortunately I spend only a tiny amount of time in traffic jams or on Interstates. I also have no desire to spend a mortgage payment equivalent on a car.
https://www.jalopnik.com/2068359/sony-honda-mobility-alfeela-1-first-production/
It's Sony, so it does, but you have to use a MemoryStick and i-Link cable.The only question that matters: does this car support CarPlay?
Everything would be a separate subscription. Accelerator, brakes, screens . . ."To start the car please watch this 30 second ad"
Not having to drive will free you up to interact with the onboard personal AI, which uses Microsoft’s OpenAI tech. The AI agent “enhances mobility interactions through personalized natural dialogue. This elevates the relationship between people and mobility into something more personal and long-lasting,” Kawanishi said, adding that Sony Honda Mobility wants to use AI “sensitively while carefully considering personal information and privacy.”
The name is just absolutely fucking terrible, isn't it?My two cents: the concept looks stupid and the name is doubly stupid.
I just hope that, when the experiment with an AI-driven multimedia phantasmagoria on wheels inevitably ends, Honda and/or Sony is able to salvage a modern, high-tech BEV platform that it can use to make regular cars.It's a Honda with a Sony made infotainment system and people buy Honda's[sic].
https://www.namesfolder.com/islamic-girl-name/afeelaAfeela is Arabic/Muslim Girl name and meaning of this name is " TBD ".
A series of games capped by a huge hit in 2024's Astro Bot. It's the highest rated game on Metacritic for its release year, and tons of the "best game" awards. Calling it a "casual game" is a bit underselling it. It's on the level of the best 3d Mario games.
It's just one of many themes which Ars choice to call out as an example. God of War is another. I don't think it's the thing they're somehow tying the sale of a car to in a huge way, any more than the choice of paint colors. In fact, much less than that, given how many options are likely to be available (or just using a non-game theme).Fair point, but still, its a generationally limiting reference, and I would venture the generation that is most interested in EV's is still generally not (financially) interested in $100k ones just because it has a theme they might know about...
I remember Astro Bot from the first 3D headset Sony put out (on PS4), it was cute/short, but didn't know of its history before (or since), so also was curious as to why it was anything of note.
Sounds like I should revisit the '24 release (on my PS5 presumably) and see if it convinces me to save $100k for a car.... then again, Sony probably still expects everyone to get a second job to buy anything they squirt out, like back in the days when they were still a top-brand name.
See also: Cars are freedom.Car companies have been selling that lie forever. Sitting in traffic has never been entertainment.
Good researchPeople here are pooh-poohing the name Afeela, but if you stopped a moment to research, you'd find:
https://www.namesfolder.com/islamic-girl-name/afeela
Edit:
Another site says:
"Afeela is of Arabic origin and means 'beautiful, attractive'. It is a name often given to baby girls in Islamic cultures, symbolizing their glowing and charming personalities."
https://www.nameslook.com/afeela
I've seen ads for the Afeela absolutely EVERYWHERE for about 3 months now. They seem to think that users, not drivers, will be overjoyed to climb into a car and not drive. That is what every ad focuses on. Not driving. What the users are doing is nebulous, but the important thing is that driving is gross. Yuck. How much does it suck to have to control the vehicle you're in? That'd be lame and weird.
Ugh... I hate this future...
I'm not going to say I like traffic jams, but with a manual transmission you at least have the optimal speed puttering in first mini game where you try to stay moving at a speed where you don't stall, don't have to stop and start over and over and don't have anyone squeeze in front of you. It's somewhat entertaining.Speak for yourself. The drive, even when part of my 15 hours a week involved being stuck in Boston traffic, had always been my favorite part of my work day. I do realize I am part of a microscopic minority though.
People who work on user interfaces can be either the smartest or dumbest people, depending on how much they let themselves emphasize form over function. Or to put it another way, make a choice because it looks "cool" instead of because it works well.Yoke looks fucking ridiculous, it's not a plane. Stop.
Why not just buy an old used vehicle without all the modern stuff that you don't want ?
![]()
That level of electronics and touchscreens, and then AI on top of it all.. its everything I NEVER want in my car. And my last 5 vehicles have been made by Honda (under one label or another)! I'm already irritated enough that when I buy a car these days, I have to spend the first day figuring out privacy settings, submitting do-not-share-my-data requests, CA data deletion requests, etc. etc., without having to deal with this effing nonsense.