Once I read (on Ars) that Sony was collaborating with TCL, that was the end. Sony XBR was king as was its broadcast gear. But over time, the Bravia line was priced high and while great picture, LG and Samsung upped the game.My days of buying Sony TVs may be over.
So sad to watch what they’re turning into.
Sony’s support page says: “We appreciate your understanding ..."
... Sony didn’t explain why it’s removing these features.
Built-in TV guides require an Internet connection so people who keep their TVs offline are getting their OTA scheduling information from somewhere else.Bravia TV owners who keep their TVs offline (and thus reduce the amount of tracking and ads experienced) and rely on an antenna connection can still access a TV guide through the TV’s OS.
That $4500 smart TV you bought for Christmas? It's going to turn into a dumb TV five months later.
I really can't recommend Tablo. What used to be a great company got bought out by some clown car tech company, and they are pretty much trash now. They stripped really useful features out, and their free programming is absolute junk. Their developers are not very skilled either, which I suspect is why so many features were removed in current models.
Yeah but Samsung and LG are even more enshitified than Sony. There are NO decent smart TVs any more. Either save up (a lot) for a professional monitor or buy a “smart” TV and never connect it to the internet and use it with an Apple TV (or similar). But be alert, as some TVs have to be connected to the internet as part of their set up process otherwise they won’t even work as a dumb TV.Once I read (on Ars) that Sony was collaborating with TCL, that was the end. Sony XBR was king as was its broadcast gear. But over time, the Bravia line was priced high and while great picture, LG and Samsung upped the game.
But it will still spy on you.That $4500 smart TV you bought for Christmas? It's going to turn into a dumb TV five months later.
Some of these models are still within their warranty period, or available new.Is it really too much to ask that companies provide free services forever with no real payoff for themselves?
Except that almost every competitor is going thru some form of enshittification, too. It is so sad to watch the entire industry turn into garbage.My days of buying Sony TVs may be over.
So sad to watch what they’re turning into.
I find it interesting that the UK needed a significant amount of on-demand power generation (often using pumped hydro storage) because so many people would run to the kitchen and turn on the electric kettle during breaks in major games.I grew up in an age when the municipal water districts and power companies had to watch certain TV shows to ensure that the water pressure was available and energy kept flowing during their commercial breaks, because so tens of millions of the viewing public were watching the exact same show at the exact same time. And they had to pee, turn on more lights, or do other things during the commercial.
Don't like it but I can guess why. OTA TV in the US does not provide guide data so the OEMs have to source it themselves - which is an ongoing cost. If few people are using it, why continue to provide it? Yes I'm sure a few lawsuits will be inevitable but the cost of settling is probably cheaper than continuing to provide the service. Unless someone can force Sony to continue providing the service I get the business logic for this change, even if it's horrible for the consumer.
Yeah but Samsung and LG are even more enshitified than Sony. There are NO decent smart TVs any more. Either save up (a lot) for a professional monitor or buy a “smart” TV and never connect it to the internet and use it with an Apple TV (or similar). But be alert, as some TVs have to be connected to the internet as part of their set up process otherwise they won’t even work as a dumb TV.
I wish that "dumb TV" were easily and commercially available ... you know just stupid panels to hook up and HDMI or even better a Display Port. (Don't tell me it's called a monitor, I want a 55-60inch pannel, period)![]()
That already happened when the Find my remote stopped working through Google Home. Literally the only smart feature I used.That $4500 smart TV you bought for Christmas? It's going to turn into a dumb TV five months later.
Modern OTA digital TV systems all over the world include electronic program guide information in the broadcast signal, no internet required.Built-in TV guides require an Internet connection so people who keep their TVs offline are getting their OTA scheduling information from somewhere else.
Removing the OTA guide feature means you have one less reason to connect your "smart" TV to the Internet.I wish that "dumb TV" were easily and commercially available ... you know just stupid panels to hook up and HDMI or even better a Display Port. (Don't tell me it's called a monitor, I want a 55-60inch pannel, period)![]()
There was literally a guy paid to keep an eye on Eastenders, and get the power stations primed for the kettle surge at the end of the episode.I find it interesting that the UK needed a significant amount of on-demand power generation (often using pumped hydro storage) because so many people would run to the kitchen and turn on the electric kettle during breaks in major games.
Buy tv, plug in AppleTV, turn off TV WiFi. HD Homerun or Tablo for OTA.
It sounds absolutely insane but you're right, Google TV is the best OS for a dumb TV. I think step one is select your language but step two is picking it it's a smart TV or a dumb TV. If you pick dumb TV it just sends you on your way.This is the only sensible take in this thread that I've seen. Companies rarely do things out of pure spite.
What I'm really curious about is the limitations on set-top-boxes, how would a TV's built-in feature affect the ability to use a set-top box? Was this some kind of enhanced mode/feature where you could use the TV's guide to switch cable channels? The article doesn't make this very clear.
All Google TV devices that I've seen let you set it up as a dumb TV out of the box with no internet connectivity, the Android-specific features are just disabled. The UX for this is actually pretty nice.
As for Sony and TCL, it's sad, but TCL was probably building the majority of Sony's late-model TVs anyway, it was Sony's processing and the high-quality build that made them special. I am (somewhat) optimistic that these newer TVs will retain the quality. TCL's mid-to-high range is quite good these days.
More likely it'll be a deeply-discounted version of a current model, with the caveat that the TV will refuse to function without a reliable, working internet connection, and you must accept all of the data-gathering and advertising features.I foresee a future where TVs will no longer allow you to deny them access to the Internet. Instead they'll monitor the Wi-Fi bands looking for an open router or one still running a breachable security protocol and just attach themselves. The only way to prevent this will be to physically disable the Wi-Fi hardware.
Have you looked at a Pi with TVHeadend and then some UI like Kodi? I gave it a go with a janky USB DVB stick and it was alright. I expect it would be better with the official Pi TV HAT. There may be TVHeadend player apps for streaming OSes too, in which case the Pi is just for capture and serving over the network.There's really no decent antenna DVR when it comes down to it. Every single one has major failures in usefulness. Currently I'm using Hulu with Live TV, but the price is nuts. So I'm looking for alternatives. But until someone actually builds a decent Antenna DVR, my antenna is going to serve as a place for hummingbird nests and not much else.