At least I can take a breath now. Still 5 counts fewer than I feel he should have been found guilty on (I am not the jury though).
Now let's hope the judge throws the book at him. Has the bailiff return the book and then throws it at him again. THEN sentences him to the maximum.
While that would be vindictively refreshing, retribution isn't USUALLY part of fraud case sentences.
I'd prefer to see him pay a fine that will bankrupt his great, great, great grandkids just so that there's no chance of him ever doing this again, but chances are he'll have benefited more from doing it, than not doing it, since that's typically how fines go.
And that's all I expect to see - fines.
Prison is usually based on the magnitude of the scheme with respect to fraud, and this one was small potatoes. Legally, he's done nothing else wrong, and I've never heard that he's had other run-ins with the law that might factor into a more harsh sentence.
If he gets prison, it'll probably be for under two years. And it will be at a plush federal institution for white-collar criminals.
A "just" sentence would be to bar him for life from being involved in, hired to do or consulted about any kind of securities or stock trading (meaning he'd lose his other businesses/jobs, too). Sort of like sentencing a cheater at poker from ever gambling in any way ever again.
That won't happen, of course, but one can dream. The "player" would see justice if he was legally barred from being involved in anything that could lead to a repeat of what he did.