Ah yes, hospital food after you have had surgery - the best and most relevant source of information for everyone.Tell that to a hospital dietitian next time you're in post-operative care.
If you're going to whine about people not agreeing with your super-duper superior opinions, at least get the terminology right. "Sound-chamber"?I should have known better than to look at that original diagram objectively in this sound-chamber.
Less added sugar is good advice, there's a lot of food that gets lots of sugar added to it just as a matter of course. It can be a little hard to find 'no sugar added' alternatives to products, but worth it.
But that's also not really new information, and the rest of the advice is almost incomprehensible. What does highly processed even mean? What does their new food shape even represent? It doesn't seem to correlate to portion size or match the dietary guidelines of their own text, which makes it feel a little inscrutable
I mean maybe if the phrase has no consistent definition and only indirect connections to health outcomes we should stop using it as health guidance?
I don't know what the hell intent has to do with it either. Does high calorie, high sugar food become healthier if it has good intentions? Is a 200 calorie snack forged by soulless capitalism worse than a 400 calorie one made with love and good vibes?
What we actually want is people to have healthy macros, get good fiber, manage their caloric intake, and avoid excessive sugars, fats, and salts they don't need... so like, why not focus on that part instead of obscuring it behind weird and vague language.
From the linked article
Another difference is that the new recommendations specifically call out avoiding ultraprocessed foods. The previous guidelines did not explicitly name ultraprocessed foods but instead recommended consuming nutrient-dense foods, which means foods that have a lot of nutrients while also having relatively few calories. That is, in essence, less processed or whole foods.
Food scientists still lack a solid definition of ultraprocessed foods. Our committee actually spent a long time discussing this, and the Food and Drug Administration is currently working on creating a clear definition of the term that can guide research and policy.
be honest - you didn't even click on them, let alone read them.If you're going to whine about people not agreeing with your super-duper superior opinions, at least get the terminology right. "Sound-chamber"?
ETA: none of those studies say what you claim they say. You're fooling absolutely nobody.
They inherited from Biden the recommendations published by the Trump administration.
Nope.While the new guidelines say “no amount of added sugars or non-nutritive sweeteners is recommended,” it offers the suggestion that “one meal should contain no more than 10 grams of added sugars.” There are four calories in one gram of sugar, so the recommendation means no more than 40 calories from sugar per meal.
Whining about downvotes earns you downvotes, as is tradition.They could literally announce a cure for cancer, and it would be downvoted here on Ars.
And his spouse is a cow·girl ?He's a white heterosexual male idiot. All that matters in life and the universe is who's on top.
I find unsalted butter with a teaspoon of extra·virgin doesn't spatter as much (the water + hot oil thing) as pure olive oil.I'm a strong believer in cooking lean meat in Extra Virgin Olive oil , Italian food is where it's at.
and retarded."simple" means uncomplicated, easy, etc.
I think I have seen this recipe in a classic cookbook (probably not Elizabeth David) and have always regretted that I am unlikely to ever partake of the dish (in AU at least) and many other offal based dishes. Still love the lambs fry and grilled lambs' kidney from childhood.And there was me thinking peeps were talking about brawn - something my mum used to make regularly..
I believe that the rebellious colonists (I'm including Oz here too after the successful rebellion of the Ashes test series - mind you it was like adults playing a bunch of pre-teens..) call it "Head cheese".
Ingredients:
1 pigs head
1 large onion
1 large leek
1 large carrot
10 peppercorns
1 teaspoon of coriander seeds
6 bay leaves (retain 4 for decoration)
A bunch of fresh flat leaf parsley
½ bunch fresh thyme
4 pigs trotters
2 bulbs of garlic
1 lemon, juice only
2 pork bones
Obviously, my mum, being a traditional British sort, would never have used dodgy foreign stuff like coriander or garlic (not that coriander was available in the late 1970s in southern England - or at least, not in our local shops!) but the rest is similar to what I remember with little fondness. And the smell of the head boiling to remove all the meat is surpassed only by the smell of lungs ('lights') boiling up to be given to the dogs. She used to forage for berries to make jam with and then swap the resultant jam for offal from the village butcher. Truely a different time.
The pigs trotters are to provide extra mean and the jelly to hold the whole terrine together.
A lot of reduced fat or fat free versions of traditional products are bulked out with even more unhealthy ingredients. Reduced fat yoghurts typically very heavy on the sugar.I have this debate with my wife every time we buy cream cheese and she wants the 1/3 less fat version. It doesn't taste bad but I don't think it tastes as good.
Agree. It looks offal.Edit: Misunderstood diagram, assumed downward represented less desirable. This is not an infographic that communicates clearly.
RFK jr doesn’t wish harm to others
that’s just a inevitable side effect of his fanatical devotion to death rot and decay
Okay, let's get this out of the way first: RFKJr used some absolutely shit-tastic 1990s clipart to build that inverted pyramid.
How much does it cost to have your product show on the new pyramid, by position?Edit: Misunderstood diagram, assumed downward represented less desirable. This is not an infographic that communicates clearly.
But they'll be all over it if it has an attractive promoter with a well-crafted campaign on Instagram and Tiktok.Ah yes, hospital food after you have had surgery - the best and most relevant source of information for everyone.
I should have known better than to look at that original diagram objectively in this sound-chamber.
"Overwhelming evidence accrued in recent decades shows that the types of fat and carbohydrate have major implications for chronic disease prevention, and that healthy dietary patterns may vary greatly in macronutrient proportion with attention to food quality. This principle is undermined to a significant degree by a renewed focus on restricting total dietary fat, especially for a worldwide population with highly prevalent insulin resistance and related cardiometabolic disorders."
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916523661520
More articles say similar things. There is just no evidence that supports most of the claims people have. The internet has just made it worse, even though there is good information available, people won't read it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299123154369
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1144200/full
"The results of an online survey showed that followers’ perceived attractiveness of influencers, similarity to influencers, procedural fairness, and interpersonal fairness of their interactions with influencers are positively related to the strength of their parasocial relationship with influencers, which further mediates the effect of the aforementioned factors on followers’ interests in influencer-promoted products"
No statistical significance was associated between the level of accuracy or evidence and engagement metrics (p > 0.05).
His position is a reward for spoiling things for Harris.Heart disease and liver cancer for all! Coupled with the ongoing war against health care this is going to drive early deaths while simultaneously undermining real expertise (probably the driving reason RFK Jr has any power at all).
Just more of the eugenics adjacent bullshit these people keep advocating for.
I'm feeling an urge for some Starbucks right about nowBrought to you by Carl's Jr.
Next to the whale blubberWhere in the pyramid does road kill sit?
The entire program can be summarized Trump-style in a series of three images: left to right, the “Before” photo featuring a closeup of a young Brad Pitt; the graphic of the new inverted food pyramid; and finally, the “After” photo featuring a closeup of RFK Jr.this is the area I expected RFK Jr. to do the least amount of damage
There are some traditional or derived yogurts that don't have it. Like Icelandic Skyr and other strained types.A lot of reduced fat or fat free versions of traditional products are bulked out with even more unhealthy ingredients. Reduced fat yoghurts typically very heavy on the sugar.
...
Not sure about Japan...East Asia doesn't have much dairy, so Chinese, Japanese, and other east and southeast Asian Buddhists don't really consume dairy.
Now the easy part: dietary behavior change, affordable food, addressing food desserts /s
Actually, yes. On account of different forms and extents of physical activity (the average American is not very physically active, and what activity they do have is low impact at that), but also the vastly more complicated gut microbiome (much of which is inherited from mothers). We're still trying to piece together all the ways the microbial life inside our digestive system works with (and often against) our overall physical, mental (yes, seriously), and digestive health.Do human health and nutrition standards differ greatly from country to country? Why?
and it’s quite likely that people in America ate less food, in the past, just less (unless they worked hard physically), and that the northern Mediterranean portions are way smaller than in the US even now. I remember being astounded at US portion size when I moved here in the 70s from England - the land of suet. I thought people were playing a joke on me when they subbed me lunches at UCLA!If you want to be fair, mention too that those people also had a pretty different lifestyle than current ones; food being just one component of longer healthier life.
…. Well with that amount of red meat it won’t be coming out easyUpside down pyramid goes in one end. Poop emoji comes out the other.
I very much disagree. That some eats a vegan diet tells you nothing apart from their diet. Any beliefs you have about why you or others should be vegan should not be presumed to be held by everyone who is vegan, no matter who tells you that this is true.Veganism isn't lifestyle or a diet. It's not even about us at all. Veganism is an ethical stance that acknowledges that animals are sentient and value their own lives and that we have no right to exploit them for our own selfish pleasures and/or convenience. Animals need a voice and vegans are that voice. If you don't like what we're saying that's on you not us.
Your own link states in the introduction that there are many large proven health benefits to the population of restricting sodium intake significantly, but that restricting it "aggressively" gives no additional benefits.Lot to unpack here but interesting that AHA still insists on this low sodium thing which is being proven more and more wrong:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9504547/
Less added sugar is good advice, there's a lot of food that gets lots of sugar added to it just as a matter of course. It can be a little hard to find 'no sugar added' alternatives to products, but worth it.
But that's also not really new information, and the rest of the advice is almost incomprehensible. What does highly processed even mean? What does their new food shape even represent? It doesn't seem to correlate to portion size or match the dietary guidelines of their own text, which makes it feel a little inscrutable
I mean maybe if the phrase has no consistent definition and only indirect connections to health outcomes we should stop using it as health guidance?
I don't know what the hell intent has to do with it either. Does high calorie, high sugar food become healthier if it has good intentions? Is a 200 calorie snack forged by soulless capitalism worse than a 400 calorie one made with love and good vibes?
What we actually want is people to have healthy macros, get good fiber, manage their caloric intake, and avoid excessive sugars, fats, and salts they don't need... so like, why not focus on that part instead of obscuring it behind weird and vague language.