Well, some people.People will do anything to give alcohol a pass.
Well, Amy had a better name for this line of work but kept it as a hobby. /sAndrew Waterhouse, and Enologist, that's an amusing name ^^' (Not really apt, kind of the opposite)
Really?However, grapes exposed to the Sun do produce more quercetin, and many inexpensive red wines are made from grapes that see less sunlight. If you’re willing to take a chance, look for an inexpensive, lighter red wine.
TANNINS?!?!Freaking cool article I always thought it was the tannins.
Mid 20s actually. It keeps pretty strong growth until mid twenties and slower but non-zero growth after.I was always taught that cells of the central nervous system stopped growing about age 18.
I stopped about a year ago, maybe closing in on 2. Just too much of a hit for not a lot of benefit. Wasn’t an alcoholic. Didn’t drink to excess. Just didn’t serve me. Congrats on clean living.I stopped drinking 8 years ago because alcohol seems to increase depression and anxiety
AnecdotalAll antidotal of course.
I stopped drinking 8 years ago because alcohol seems to increase depression and anxiety, and it also seems to inhibit judgement and logical reasoning, and not just in the short term. I believe it takes about 2 months after quitting alcohol to notice a change, because I believe this is about how long it takes for new neurons to grow and mature in the hippocampus, although I can't find a citation for that.
Moderate drinking? Alcohol consumption significantly decreases neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus
I was taught that in high school in the '80s, but when I was in college in the '90s there were plenty of articles suggesting it was untrue.I was always taught that cells of the central nervous system stopped growing about age 18.
There was a widely used medical/science book, from many years ago, that made the unfounded claim that the neurons you had at a certain (young) age were the only ones you'd ever have, and so that claim was assumed to be fact because some combination of appeal to authority/old wives tale.I was taught that in high school in the '80s, but when I was in college in the '90s there were plenty of articles suggesting it was untrue.
When I think about it, the only place I heard it in the '80s was in the anti-drug propaganda we heard fromlaw enforcement or posted on the walls in school. (And some of those posters were laughably bad--I remember a "How to spot an amphetamine addict" poster that had a long list of symptoms you could easily spot in anyone who had one too many cups of coffee.)
Ah...soo...Rudy was Rosetta stoned...and he missed it!?Has anyone tested the fluid that leaked out of Rudy Giuliani's head that time? It could be the rosetta stone to this little mystery.
I'd rather take the chance of the headache, thank you.If you’re willing to take a chance, look for an inexpensive, lighter red wine.
All antidotal of course. My wife always had issues with red. She drank red wine up and down Italy with zero issues. Commercially and family produced.
I'm not an expert, but I think the issue is direct sunlight exposure on the grapes themselves versus sun exposure on the grapevines. In cooler regions it is common to prune back the leaf cover to increase sun exposure on the grapes to help prevent mold before harvest (also affects flavor profile I'm sure), so you get more sunlight impinging on the grape clusters. Those hot high-yield Central Valley vineyards have the opposite issue - no real chance of mold since it doesn't usually start to get wet/foggy until after harvest, and exposing the grapes to direct sunlight would burn and/or desiccate them (turn them into raisins), so more leaves are left in place to shade the grapes. Pruning is also labor intensive and therefore expensive, so lower margin/higher volume operations are less likely to invest in additional pruning if they can avoid it.Really?
Part of my limited understanding of the wine industry is that wine grapes from cooler, less sunny terroir (Bordeaux, Napa, etc.) are prized for their flavor achieved through slower growth but have lower yields, with both factors conspiring to make those wines more expensive. While your Two Buck Chuck is made with wine grapes from the California Central Valley, where it's warm and sunny and they get a higher yield of less-celebrated grapes.
This article suggests the opposite.
The human body is an amazing device, indeed. I noticed the first chart on the chemistry of alcohol in the body appears not to be referenced in any way in the text of the article, and waaaay down in the lower corner it suggests a tie to the immune system. Having spent many years in close personal study of this phenomenon, I formed a less-then-scientific conclusion that a hangover is simply the body's blunt way of saying "Do less of that, please."I suspect that, like most biological processes, the ADLH inhibition is only a single part of the question; I'd be interested in seeing if there's a way to run an experiment with a few large populations: one with reduced ALDH efficiency (seen in some ethnic groups), one with a middle ground effectiveness (unaffected ethnic groups), a control, and a cohort of heavy drinkers or straight up alcoholics.
The most aggravating part about studying processes like this, is the hideous complexity and interconnectivity of every single system in our body. I don't know how biologists have the patience!