They don't, but it doesn't matter. The amount of money Sony makes from the ads clearly exceeds the amount they might lose due to customer loss over the issue. If it didn't, they would roll this back right away.Ads everywhere is not what users want .
Lately? Sony has been making terrible decisions for decades at this point. From CD DRM rootkits, locked down MP3 players, PSN debacles, leap year bugs, the list goes on and onWhy is Sony so allergic to making good decisions lately?
The big one that comes to mind for me recently(-ish) is crippling the growth of Playstation Vue by insisting on retaining the Playstation branding for it, which made people think you needed a PS console to use it. Which caused the user base to stagnate while new options from Hulu and Google surged past it, eventually leading them to shutter the service.Lately? Sony has been making terrible decisions for decades at this point. From CD DRM rootkits, locked down MP3 players, PSN debacles, leap year bugs, the list goes on and on
Yes, because Microsoft is known to be way more gamer friendly. Oh wait, they totally botched the launch of the Xbox One with multiple unpopular decisions, created a confusing mess of SKUs for the next gen launch (I seriously don't even know what they are called at this point). The only thing they seem to have done well is take Sony's gaming subscription idea and do it better than Sony did, but even that hasn't been working out that well for them lately. So they're just going to buy up the entire industry now, apparently.When you make a deal with a devil (Sony, in this case), don't be surprised when you end up with a pitchfork in your ass.
I'm going to bet a large number of people here will not click on a link to X. I won't.Playstation product manager guy on Twitter says it's just a bug, but doesn't really provide specifics. Guess we wait and see what changes.
https://x.com/dshiatt/status/1840822267737162237
And it got lumped in with weird things like the Vita TV/PlayStation TV which had similar confusion and was a somewhat mediocre game console due to the Vita controls not all translating to a controller experienceThe big one that comes to mind for me recently(-ish) is crippling the growth of Playstation Vue by insisting on retaining the Playstation branding for it, which made people think you needed a PS console to use it. Which caused the user base to stagnate while new options from Hulu and Google surged past it, eventually leading them to shutter the service.
It's sad, but they were one of the first in the MVPD space, and their product was one of the best in that space. And they wrecked it with bad decisions, because they're Sony.
Microsoft has made mistakes but Sony reigns supreme for killing products and content in the console/gaming world with a very full graveyard. Microsoft at least saw their mistakes through and attempted to rectify them without killing things like purchased content storesYes, because Microsoft is known to be way more gamer friendly. Oh wait, they totally botched the launch of the Xbox One with multiple unpopular decisions, created a confusing mess of SKUs for the next gen launch (I seriously don't even know what they are called at this point). The only thing they seem to have done well is take Sony's gaming subscription idea and do it better than Sony did, but even that hasn't been working out that well for them lately. So they're just going to buy up the entire industry now, apparently.
The really hilarious thing is, IIRC, the Vita TV or whatever it was called somehow did not support Vue.And it got lumped in with weird things like the Vita TV/PlayStation TV which had similar confusion and was a somewhat mediocre game console due to the Vita controls not all translating to a controller experience
Yes, because Microsoft is known to be way more gamer friendly. Oh wait, they totally botched the launch of the Xbox One with multiple unpopular decisions, created a confusing mess of SKUs for the next gen launch (I seriously don't even know what they are called at this point). The only thing they seem to have done well is take Sony's gaming subscription idea and do it better than Sony did, but even that hasn't been working out that well for them lately. So they're just going to buy up the entire industry now, apparently.
They're clearly pivoting back to the ps3-era tagline, "It only does ___."Scharon Harding said:Ars Technica has reached out to Sony about why it decided to add non-removable ads to the PS5 home screen and about the outdated and otherwise perplexing content being displayed.
Very likely won't work.
Money. The answer is always "money".Why is Sony so allergic to making good decisions lately?
Saving face.Playstation product manager guy on Twitter says it's just a bug, but doesn't really provide specifics. Guess we wait and see what changes.
https://x.com/dshiatt/status/1840822267737162237
Why is Sony so allergic to making good decisions lately?
What?! You don't believe the code and infrastructure to connect ads to games just happen by accident?Saving face.
Some dipshit MBA type thought he was a fucking genius for this and now they're backpedaling.
A downside of the internet is that you never really know if your post might be read by somebody in the playground console wars mindset.I'm not advocating for Microsoft, either.
Nah, the unspecified bug is just that the ads aren't 'relevant' enough. They aren't going to back-peddle. They are going to "fix" it to work as intended.Saving face.
Some dipshit MBA type thought he was a fucking genius for this and now they're backpedaling.
When you make a deal with a devil (Sony, in this case), don't be surprised when you end up with a pitchfork in your ass.
Yes it is! Users are clamoring for more ads. There's extra fractional cents to be made in perpetuity!Ads everywhere is not what users want .