Peter Bright legal issues

Status
Not open for further replies.
They.......gave him a job despite obvious warning signs.
Hindsight is dead easy. This s BS.

I think there were obvious signs, like his repeated arguing about age of consent laws in particular, but his posting behavior alone should have precluded employment here. Technical prowess aside, he had a huge history of poor behavior and and earned all the ire directed at him, in spades. Things like shitting in a thread about bachelor recipes with 'cumming on a wheatabix' or something (I'm getting that one second hand from another former poster).

Simple enough to say there's no significant reason for Ars Staff to suspect Peter of being a child rapist. Not so easy to say they had no reason to question employing him.

++ This
 

Andara

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,123
Subscriptor++
A website known for banning Trump supporters shitposters...
T,FTFY. Though there is considerable overlap on that particular Venn diagram.
Yup... for some people, it's really hard for them to realize that they're not being persecuted; they're just acting like assholes and being punished just like any liberal would for the same behavior. They've moderated/banned more than one anti-vaxxer, and we know that one's found on both sides.
 
I caught the news on the second day, and have followed this thread and the one in the Lounge on and off for some time. I have not posted much in the forums for the longest time, and I just want to get this off my chest. I know this post will probably rub some people the wrong way. I don't care.

My thoughts are with Aurich, the Ars team, and Peter's family, and may everyone get through this ordeal and find peace soon.

Though my registration was in April 2001, I was a lurker long before I needed to make my first post; in other words, Ars has been part of my life for close to two decades. I had never subscribed to Ars all this time, but I shall pledge my support with a subscription after this post.

For the first ten years when I was active, or actively lurking, on the forum, I have always enjoyed Peter's posts, especially in the Symposium and Battlefront. IIRC, someone called him "purposefully obtuse" in battlefront or one of those "tab vs. space" arguments, and he can be down right asshole-ish at times (and honestly I think it was a bit of British humor kind of thing, and also just his peronsa), but his technical prowess is beyond doubt. Even now, the techie/code monkey in me still wishes I could have met him in person, for the techie that he is/was.

It sadden me to see such a talented person going down this path. Someone said that maybe he wanted to get caught. Maybe that's his "out" of the situation. A large part of me hope this is true. I hope that 11-yo is just his fantasy, but if it turns out to be a real person, then perhaps Peter still has the conscience to help her get the help she needs.

:(
 

JonTD

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,309
I've seen posts in this very thread disappear (including one of mine), so there is editing behind the scenes but why would they want to delete
this thread anyway?
I'd like to see some proof that posts were actually being deleted as if they never existed. Moderated out with appropriate moderation messages, sure, but I've been on Ars a long time and I've never seen posts deleted. Even really heinous content gets edited out, but not entirely removed.
 
I've seen posts in this very thread disappear (including one of mine), so there is editing behind the scenes but why would they want to delete
this thread anyway?
I'd like to see some proof that posts were actually being deleted as if they never existed. Moderated out with appropriate moderation messages, sure, but I've been on Ars a long time and I've never seen posts deleted. Even really heinous content gets edited out, but not entirely removed.


I don't have screenshots but this happened:

Some dude name generp (or something such) posted he wanted to get banned/removed as he didn't want to be associated with this site even though his account was years old and many posts (paraphrasing, the post was quite long and I _wont_ even try to go into details).
So I replied to him, I had sent him a pm.

Came back to see if he had replied to me a few times (his post was here for perhaps 15-20 mins) then his post was gone as well as my reply to him ( no edit, just gone) so I figured... shits gotten real. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


I'm skeptical that someone who needs to call out his race in his username is here to argue in good faith.
You're a twit. :/
 

RojBlake

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,129
Subscriptor
They.......gave him a job despite obvious warning signs.
Hindsight is dead easy. This s BS.
I think there were obvious signs, like his repeated arguing about age of consent laws in particular
I can think of a few notably misanthropic posters who regularly post about violent things they want to do to people, sometimes quite specific things to quite specific people. But we extend to them the benefit of the doubt that it's either dark humor or they're just blowing off steam - exactly the same benefit of the doubt we extended to Peter for the better part of twenty years.

Is anyone doing anything about those posters? Of course not, because it's not reasonable to jump to the conclusion that they really mean what they say unless and until they tangibly demonstrate that they really mean what they say. Those posts don't become "obvious signs" until we look at them in hindsight.
 

Hangfire

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,648
Subscriptor++
A few posts mentioning Peter's significant other with identifiable information were deleted because assholes need to post information that leads to doxxing.

Slightly tangential to doxxing I'm just wondering if anyone can offer me any help or advice in how to send a muffin basket to the correct office of the AUSA Prosecuting this case for the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. I believe it's an Alexander (Zander) Li?
 

Demento

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,482
Subscriptor
I too am intrigued as to "the management" deleting posts.

Any comment from the powers that be?
It's already been said that personal data that could be used to tar and feather another innocent Arsian has been removed. That's all you're going to get. Mrs. Bright isn't (much) crazier than the rest of us and deserves some peace.
 
To our low post-count trolls: Yep, it sucks here. If I were you, I'd probably close the tab and never come back. Please.

To all of the "shoulda seen it coming" Monday morning quarterbacks: if it was so obvious to you, why didn't you do something about it?

Because it’s hard to do something about it if you don’t work there and therefore have no power over something like that?

What a thought.
 

anuj

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,141
Subscriptor++
To our low post-count trolls: Yep, it sucks here. If I were you, I'd probably close the tab and never come back. Please.

To all of the "shoulda seen it coming" Monday morning quarterbacks: if it was so obvious to you, why didn't you do something about it?

Because it’s hard to do something about it if you don’t work there and therefore have no power over something like that?

What a thought.
If you had something "obvious" (aka actionable) as it relates to his charges and arrest that folks "shoulda [seen] coming", you sure as fuck don't have to be a co-worker or employer to do something about (aka report) it. Stop conflating all the goal posts.
 
I too am intrigued as to "the management" deleting posts.

Any comment from the powers that be?
It's already been said that personal data that could be used to tar and feather another innocent Arsian has been removed.

I remember the post that was deleted (in ribs and rabs), that I replied to, there was no feathering any another account or family/friends - it was largely polite but made some 'accusations' which is why I got curious and wrote to the guy.

Things have changed, deal_with_it.meme.gif
 
They.......gave him a job despite obvious warning signs.
Hindsight is dead easy. This s BS.

I think there were obvious signs, like his repeated arguing about age of consent laws in particular, but his posting behavior alone should have precluded employment here. Technical prowess aside, he had a huge history of poor behavior and and earned all the ire directed at him, in spades. Things like shitting in a thread about bachelor recipes with 'cumming on a wheatabix' or something (I'm getting that one second hand from another former poster).

Simple enough to say there's no significant reason for Ars Staff to suspect Peter of being a child rapist. Not so easy to say they had no reason to question employing him.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

I have refused for years to give Ars my hard-earned money precisely because of their coddling of Peter Bright and de facto approving of his pedophile jokes (Have you SEEN his Twitter account?), graphic torture fantasies, trolling, name-calling and generally anti-social and uncivil behavior in these boxes, which Ars leadership defended, decided to reward with mod authority and much later, upgraded him to a paid position. It remains a mystery to me why Caesar and company did so, but we can all see how well it worked out for them. Just a colossal blunder all around and a huge stain on an otherwise useful forum.
 

Topinio

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,965
Subscriptor
If you had something "obvious" (aka actionable) as it relates to his charges and arrest that folks "shoulda [seen] coming", you sure as fuck don't have to be a co-worker or employer to do something about (aka report) it. Stop conflating all the goal posts.
This.

Peter Bright is, and ever has been, a total arsehole. As in, an "I worked around the corner from him for a few years, hundreds/thousands of miles away from most Arsians, but wouldn't have said 'hi' in a pub like I would've to most people on here" level of arsehole.

But. This was not extrapolatable from the (copious) data of his online life to within anything like reasonable confidence. No-one in his family, or friends group, or working at Ars HQ, or on this forum, (unless they had more info than what's in his postings) should AFAICT have "seen it coming". Arsehole /= paedophile, the world would be hell if so.

(FWIW, I v. much hope he's merely burning his life down in the most grotesque and permanent way he could think of, suicide by legal system, and has not gone so far off the deep end that anyone real got hurt -- but either way, to the armchair commentators with 20-20 hindsight all demanding their pound of flesh: the man is fucked up, let people grieve for who they thought they had and stop twisting the knife; it's not their fault he crashed and burned like this.)

E: typos
 

-Locke-

Ars Scholae Palatinae
659
Subscriptor
I too am intrigued as to "the management" deleting posts.

Any comment from the powers that be?
It's already been said that personal data that could be used to tar and feather another innocent Arsian has been removed.

I remember the post that was deleted (in ribs and rabs), that I replied to, there was no feathering any another account or family/friends - it was largely polite but made some 'accusations' which is why I got curious and wrote to the guy.

Things have changed, deal_with_it.meme.gif
Like fuck that post was anything resembling polite..... claiming so is disingenuous bullshit and some variety of nuking it was completely reasonable.
 

Nekojin

Ars Legatus Legionis
31,783
Subscriptor++
If you had something "obvious" (aka actionable) as it relates to his charges and arrest that folks "shoulda [seen] coming", you sure as fuck don't have to be a co-worker or employer to do something about (aka report) it. Stop conflating all the goal posts.
This.

Peter Bright is, and ever has been, a total arsehole. As in, an "I worked around the corner from him for a few years, hundreds/thousands of miles away from most Arsians, but wouldn't have said 'hi' in a pub like I would've to most people on here" level of arsehole.
I have a bit of a story on that.

Quite some time ago (well over a decade ago, since I was using ICQ at the time), there was some discussion about UK and US politics in the Soap Box. I was surprised to get a ping from Peter on ICQ, so I accepted the chat. The conversation started out civilly enough, but it got shitty and abusive pretty quickly, with him declaring that as a US citizen, I didn't know shit about the UK governmental structure*, but he understood US politics better than I did. After a little abuse, I said that I was done with the conversation, and asked him to stop. He continued harassing me until I went and blocked him.

It came up some time (a few years) after that, and I finally told the story, adding in that I thought Peter was drunk at the time (otherwise, why would he open a private chat just for that?). Several Soap Boxers refused to believe that the conversation had happened - that either I was making it up, or I had to be mistaken, it must have been someone else.

* Mostly because I stated that I believed that the Royal Family does still have some power in the system, and he insisted that they were a meaningless figurehead with no power or authority at all.
 
I too am intrigued as to "the management" deleting posts.

Any comment from the powers that be?
It's already been said that personal data that could be used to tar and feather another innocent Arsian has been removed.

I remember the post that was deleted (in ribs and rabs), that I replied to, there was no feathering any another account or family/friends - it was largely polite but made some 'accusations' which is why I got curious and wrote to the guy.

Things have changed, deal_with_it.meme.gif
Like fuck that post was anything resembling polite..... claiming so is disingenuous bullshit and some variety of nuking it was completely reasonable.


I am NOT arguing if that was right or wrong to nuke it - that's Ars call, not mine.
I was asked for proof and I presented it on posts vanishing.

And yes, that post was (IMO) polite - but it's useless to argue about it as neither you nor I have a copy of the text.
We can agree to disagree or if you have the text post it and we can argue about it - other than that we are just pissing upstream.
 

Xavin

Ars Legatus Legionis
30,671
Subscriptor++
A few posts mentioning Peter's significant other with identifiable information were deleted because assholes need to post information that leads to doxxing.

Slightly tangential to doxxing I'm just wondering if anyone can offer me any help or advice in how to send a muffin basket to the correct office of the AUSA Prosecuting this case for the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. I believe it's an Alexander (Zander) Li?
Law enforcement/judiciary/etc can't legally accept gifts related to their job. On top of that, they never accept any kind of free food because it could be poisoned or even just laced with LSD or weed. If you managed to send them anything, it would be routed directly to the trash can.
 
A few posts mentioning Peter's significant other with identifiable information were deleted because assholes need to post information that leads to doxxing.

Slightly tangential to doxxing I'm just wondering if anyone can offer me any help or advice in how to send a muffin basket to the correct office of the AUSA Prosecuting this case for the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. I believe it's an Alexander (Zander) Li?
Law enforcement/judiciary/etc can't legally accept gifts related to their job. On top of that, they never accept any kind of free food because it could be poisoned or even just laced with LSD or weed. If you managed to send them anything, it would be routed directly to the trash can.


I doubt anyone is actually serious to send food (or as pointed out above) bombs to the prosecutor :rolleyes:
 

Jim Z

Ars Legatus Legionis
46,752
Subscriptor
I too am intrigued as to "the management" deleting posts.

Any comment from the powers that be?
It's already been said that personal data that could be used to tar and feather another innocent Arsian has been removed.

I remember the post that was deleted (in ribs and rabs), that I replied to, there was no feathering any another account or family/friends - it was largely polite but made some 'accusations' which is why I got curious and wrote to the guy.

Things have changed, deal_with_it.meme.gif
Like fuck that post was anything resembling polite..... claiming so is disingenuous bullshit and some variety of nuking it was completely reasonable.


I am NOT arguing if that was right or wrong to nuke it - that's Ars call, not mine.
I was asked for proof and I presented it on posts vanishing.

And yes, that post was (IMO) polite - but it's useless to argue about it as neither you nor I have a copy of the text.
We can agree to disagree or if you have the text post it and we can argue about it - other than that we are just pissing upstream.

go away you fucking sea lion.

OjwE1qG.jpg
 
Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark Bark
 

Ecmaster76

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,070
Subscriptor
It came up some time (a few years) after that, and I finally told the story, adding in that I thought Peter was drunk at the time (otherwise, why would he open a private chat just for that?). Several Soap Boxers refused to believe that the conversation had happened - that either I was making it up, or I had to be mistaken, it must have been someone else.

Seems easy to believe. A lot of his Soap Box posts seemed drunk and especially belligerent to me (even taking into account the general belligerency of the SB)
 

Kiloran

Smack-Fu Master, in training
68
A website known for banning Trump supporters shitposters...

T,FTFY. Though there is considerable overlap on that particular Venn diagram.

Speaking of Venn diagrams and overlap, has anyone noticed there are more than a few similarities between Peter Bright and Ben Kuchera? Both are avowed male feminists, express some rather "interesting" views here regarding pedophilia and rape, massive personality issues. Might be worth looking into.
 

ChrisSD

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,178
This thread may be outliving its usefulness. Not gonna lock it yet, but if this is what's left to say it might be time. It's just concern trolling and back and forth and getting nasty.
To be honest, if we're at the point where people are throwing random accusations around then this thread is less than useful.
 

Belisarius

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,220
Subscriptor++
A website known for banning Trump supporters shitposters...

T,FTFY. Though there is considerable overlap on that particular Venn diagram.

Speaking of Venn diagrams and overlap, has anyone noticed there are more than a few similarities between Peter Bright and Ben Kuchera? Both are avowed male feminists, express some rather "interesting" views here regarding pedophilia and rape, massive personality issues. Might be worth looking into.

Yeah, I think it's probably time to lock this, given the above bullshit. And hand out some bans, frankly.
 

Iron Clad Burrito

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,240
Subscriptor
A website known for banning Trump supporters shitposters...

T,FTFY. Though there is considerable overlap on that particular Venn diagram.

Speaking of Venn diagrams and overlap, has anyone noticed there are more than a few similarities between Peter Bright and Ben Kuchera? Both are avowed male feminists, express some rather "interesting" views here regarding pedophilia and rape, massive personality issues. Might be worth looking into.

Since Kuchera doesn't work here and hasn't posted here in 6 years, maybe you can bring it up with his current employer and forum where he regularly posts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.